The Constitution? WTF Is That!

He just makes thing up that have no basis in reality!

His latest wacko claim is that President's Biden are void! Do you believe this cr*p?

Fact-checking Trump’s claim that Biden pardons are ‘void’ because he used an autopen

NPR  News

U.S. President Donald Trump at the Oval Office in Washington

By Louis Jacobson & Amy Sherman

Mar 18, 2025

President Donald Trump claimed some of former President Joe Biden’s pardons are invalid because Biden used an autopen.

“The ‘Pardons’ that Sleepy Joe Biden gave to the Unselect Committee of Political Thugs, and many others, are hereby declared VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT, because of the fact that they were done by Autopen,” Trump wrote March 17 on Truth Social. He referred to Biden’s pardons of congressional members who served on the committee that investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol attack.

It’s uncertain to us whether Biden used an “autopen” — a mechanical device that uses a robotic arm with a pen attached — to sign the pardons. Yet, Trump also claimed that Biden “did not sign” the pardons and “did not know anything about them!”

[...]

“Everything was signed by autopen — almost everything,” Trump said March 13. “Nobody has ever heard of such a thing.”

Biden is not the first U.S. president to use an autopen. Presidents Barack Obama, John F. Kennedy and Thomas Jefferson used autopens or mechanized signing devices.

So! I see Hunter Biden getting arrested again... the legislators on the Jan 6 panel... Dr. Anthony Fauci... General Mark Milley... the members of the House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack and anyone Trump thinks "dissed him" being carted off in handcuffs for a perp walk.

The pardon portion of the Constitution’s Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 says the president has the power to grant pardons, but makes no mention of “sign” or “signature.” More than a half-dozen constitutional law experts told PolitiFact they see no restriction in the Constitution on the use of an autopen.

[...]

Frank O. Bowman III, a University of Missouri law professor, pointed to images of pardons from Abraham Lincoln’s presidency, which sometimes do not match each other, nor Lincoln’s documented signature elsewhere.

That’s because “in the 1800s, the secretary of state, or one of his functionaries, often prepared and signed pardon warrants in the name of the president,” Bowman said.

[...]

In 2005, during George W. Bush’s presidency, the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel wrote a memo to the president’s counsel about the legality of using an autopen to sign bills. The department concluded:

“The President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law. Rather, the President may sign a bill within the meaning of Article I, Section 7 by directing a subordinate to affix the President’s signature to such a bill, for example by autopen.”

But the man in the White House doesn't believe in the Constitution or the law... he just lies his way through.