Tuesday, September 22, 2026

Oh, What A Tangled Web We Weave, When First We Practice To Deceive!

This administration has tried every which way to deny media access. Only media that toes the party line is allowed access to the administration. Let us list the times they went after the press:

Here’s a list of the major media-access restrictions and clashes in this administration (from Duck.ai):
  •     AP barred from Oval Office, Air Force One, and some events over the “Gulf of America” naming dispute.
  •    CNN, MS NOW, and Politico banned from White House coverage/grounds, with badges disabled or confiscated.
  •    Pentagon access rules that led to reporters being denied badges or pushed out unless they accepted new restrictions.
  •   Twice they threated or attempted bans aimed at individual reporters/outlets earlier in the term that were later reversed or ended up in court. 
Then we had the Defense Department starting a witch hunt for whoever leaked the story on the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln, along with Secretary Hegseth firing editors and some staff at Stars and Stripes, which he had no authority to do since Congress passed a law against it. But alas, the Trump administration decided not to investigate itself, and Congress just shakes in fear of Trump, bowing to every wish.

This morning I wrote that the administration is fudging the war casualties. Couple that with the attacks on the First Amendment, and you have to wonder what they want to keep from voters.

Where do you see government attacking the press? Russia, China, North Korea, Turkmenistan, Belarus, and Myanmar. What do they have in common? They are all authoritarian governments.

There was a reason the First Amendment was made first. The founders felt it was the most important.

24/7 Political Ad For Trump... TRUMP - TV

Breaking News!!!!!!

Trump starts White House TV news show... Trump-TV
The Hill
by Ryan Mancini - 09/21/26


The White House on Monday launched Trump TV, a 24/7 stream on YouTube, days after President Trump banned reporters from CNN, Politico and MS NOW over their coverage of him and his administration.

The inaugural video was a stream of Trump speaking at Mount Rushmore on July 3 as part of a livestream titled “Trump TV: The Essentials Station.” The stream started at 7 p.m.

“Watch the Trump Administration’s biggest moments all in one place,” read the stream’s description on YouTube. “Top videos, major remarks, and must-see highlights streaming 24/7 and updated in real time. Stay informed and stay up to date!”
What a narcissist dream!
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) slammed Trump TV’s rollout in the wake of his ban on White House reporters from CNN, Politico and MS NOW.

“First, Trump banned independent news from the White House,” Newsom wrote on X. “Now, he’s launching what is quite literally state-run TV to try drowning out the fact that he and his corrupt administration are failing the American people. This is truly autocratic behavior from a failed President.”

Trump banned reporters from the three outlets on Friday as a result of what he claimed was “their constant ‘reporting’ FAKE NEWS!” He told reporters in the Oval Office that there was no particular reason for the timing of the ban, rather that it was “really just cumulative stories over the last two years.”

“You get sick of it,” he added.
24/7 propaganda!

How many of you read "1984"?
Do you remember the constant presence and voice of Big Brother—while simultaneously watching and listening to everything the citizens do? This is also where the famous two-minute hate sessions take place. Everywhere you looked there was the image of Trump... oops, I meant "Big Brother."

The Hill article ends with...
“An America cannot have state TV,” Jiang said. “That’s what makes America America … because you need independent actors to be able to be the observers. And if the government is only showing you what it wants, then you have to question: What are we missing?”




Monday, September 21, 2026

This Man Has His Finger On The Nuke Button

For a person who control the nuclear arsenal is very, very scary!
by Ryan Mancini 
09/20/26
 
 
 President Trump on Sunday speculated on the future of the Iran war, asking “if and when do I blow the entire nation up?”

Fox News’s Trey Yingst reported that Trump is in a “deciding mode” and “that very big things are going to be happening in the not-so-distant future.”
 
 “The president described the current choices on the table as ‘wiping Iran out, letting them rot economically or making a deal,'” Yingst said. “He added, ‘My question is if and when do I blow the entire nation up? They better behave.'”

Trump said Thursday that he’s weighing the decision to “go in and annihilate them [the Iranian regime] or do I not,” he told Axios, adding that anything “could happen with me.”
For that talk to be coming out of the President of the United States is wrong! It so very wrong!
 
What do you think? 

I Was Never In The Military.

But one thing I believe that who are or did serve deserve full benefits! They were will to put their lives on the line and we should take care of them!
By Reuters
September 18, 2026


More ​US troops have died during ‌the US-Israeli war with Iran than the Pentagon has publicly disclosed, the Washington Post reported ​on Friday.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ​denied the report.

[…]

The Post, citing five unidentified ⁠officials, reported that there had been ​at least 22 military fatalities, four ​more than were listed in the data available on the Pentagon's public database.
The newspaper also reported, ​citing another unidentified official, that not ​all of the undisclosed deaths were directly tied ‌to ⁠the months-long conflict but involved US personnel who were in the Middle East amid ongoing hostilities.
Yeah, but it is only four not counted… big deal! Yeah it is a big deal! You see the families don’t get the same benefits as those who were killed in a combat zone.
CNN
By Davis Winkie & Aleena Fayaz
Aleena Fayaz
Jul 24, 2026


Democratic members of the Senate sent a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth late Thursday demanding answers as to why the website was having issues and asked for a full accounting of war casualties.

Four deaths and dozens of injuries disappeared from the totals on Thursday after the Defense Casualty Analysis System website had correctly listed the total number of US troops killed in the war at 18 earlier in the week. Four soldiers died – three in Jordan and one in Iraq – as part of operations over the weekend.

[…]

The Defense Department has been slow to disclose injuries during the war, with officials pointing to security needs. On Monday, Parnell had acknowledged that “nearly 100 service members” had been injured in the war since July 7, at a time when dozens of those injuries did not appear in the DCAS totals.
This is from a government whose leader call those who died on D-Day losers and suckers!

I hope that they are not denying benefit because of cost nor because of the politic because they fear making the public even more against the war.

They Forget It Is A Spectrum.

Age is a spectrum... it is not just the young who need help but also at the other end of the age spectrum that also need help, but a different type of help.
BBC News
Josh Parry
Sept. 19, 2026


As a 75-year-old lesbian, Mindy Meleyal has lived through every major milestone in the modern LGBT rights movement, from the start of decriminalisation in 1967 to the first same-sex marriages in 2014.

But now she says this important part of her identity is frequently overlooked due to her age.

She's part of England's older LGBTQ+ community, which a new report suggests often experiences poorer health, more limited finances and greater social isolation than the wider older population.

The report, from the Centre for Ageing Better, says without specialist support, this growing demographic could be forced "back into the closet" when accessing care, warning they may even delay getting the care they need because of concerns about homophobia.
What I have found is that my circle of friends is getting smaller and smaller. A friend passed away last week. She was a friend who I used to go out to lunch once a month with our senior trans group.
"It's very common for people to hide things if they have a carer visiting their home, for example hiding their wedding photos or taking down a trans flag," he says.
I used to call it "Sanitizing" when my parents came over, but in a Long Term Care facility we have to hide.
The Kindred House scheme is what's known as extra-care housing, which means residents live independently, but there is a 24/7 care team available for those who need extra help, and all staff will receive specialist training around LGBTQ+ inclusion.

Porter says he hopes the scheme will "trigger some conversations" about how to best support older LGBTQ+ people in the challenges they face.
It is not the staff! They were beautiful in helping us, but... It is the residents that is the problem. Shunning. I have heard from trans people that no one sits at their table or get up and leave when they sit down at a table,

I believe we need to start off simply... just a drop in centers at Pride centers during the daylight hours. Board games, movies, book groups, just stuff to get us out of our residencies and in and around others LGBTQ+ people. Even intergenerational drop-in centers should be tried. The goal is to get the Stonewall Generation out of their homes and with others.

Sunday, September 20, 2026

What Is It With Him?

He has a loose screw... he is so fixed on seeing his name plastered everywhere!
Ousted board members say a contractor has already been selected for the project.
Politico
By Ashley Ahn
09/17/2026


Ousted board members of the U.S. Institute of Peace are asking a federal court to block the imminent carving of President Donald Trump’s name on the headquarters of the nonpartisan institution he sought to dismantle shortly after taking office.

Members of the board who were removed by the administration filed an emergency motion Thursday in Washington in a dispute that has echoes of Trump’s effort to place his name on the Kennedy Center.
What is it with him... does he have Walter Mitty fantasies?

The Hill writes,
“The United States Institute of Peace was once a bloated, useless entity that blew $50 million per year while delivering no peace,” spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement.

“Now, the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace, which is both beautifully and aptly named after a President who ended eight wars in less than a year, will stand as a powerful reminder of what strong leadership can accomplish for global stability,” she continued. “Frivolous litigation to stymie these efforts should be rejected.”
So by gutting the agency Trump thinks he deservers his name on the building?

What has Trump stuck his brand on? Here is a partial list:
  • Trump Tower — New York
  • Trump National Golf Club — multiple locations
  • Trump International Golf Club — multiple locations
  • Trump National Doral — Miami
  • Trump Turnberry — Scotland
  • Trump International Golf Links — Ireland and Scotland
  • Trump International Hotel & Tower — Chicago
  • Trump International Hotel — Washington, D.C.
  • Trump International Hotel — Las Vegas
  • Trump Winery — Virginia
  • Trump International Oman
  • Trump International Vietnam
  • Trump International Golf Club Dubai
  • Trump International Hotel & Tower Dubai
  • Trump Tower at Century City in Manila
  • Trump Towers Istanbul
  • Trump Tower Bucharest
And now:
  • Trump Ballroom
  • Trump Arch
  • Trump Kennedy Center
  • Trump U.S. Institute of Peace
Tell me with a straight face that Trump doesn't have a Caesar complex.

You're Over Reacting!

How many times have I heard that when I write about Trump and the Republican Party, and how it is mirroring Nazi Germany in the 1930s? “Oh, you are overreacting! It can never happen here!”

In July on "X
Rep. Nancy Mace
House Republicans
@RepNancyMace
Just because you're mentally ill doesn't mean the rest of America has to play along. 

A man is a man. A woman is a woman.
6:30 PM · Jul 29, 2026
But that is not the first time she has made comments about us. Last September, she said...


The killing of right wing activist and influencer Charlie Kirk has prompted disturbing and questionably legal calls for a crackdown on the left from President Trump and his allies. In an appearance on the cable network Newsmax on Tuesday evening, Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX) took things further — way further. 

After latching on to the fact the man being charged with the shooting allegedly had a transgender romantic partner, Jackson called gender non-conforming people a “virus” as he argued they need to be placed in institutions and barred from the internet. 

“We have to do something about this,” Jackson said after railing against doctors who aid with “gender transition. “We have to treat these people. We have to get them off the streets and we have to get them off the internet. We can’t let them communicate with each other. I’m all about free speech, but this is a virus, this is a cancer that’s spreading across this country that’s going to do great damage to normal, hard working, law abiding people.”
What are we going to do—laugh it off? “Oh, she didn't mean it that way!” Our “community trauma” with the Holocaust, with the attacks in Turkey and Senegal... it raises our hackles when we see that happening here.

And then there is the language coming from the Trump administration itself with him labeling us terrorists

With Trump’s administration incorporating “gender” into its domestic-terrorism framework, it becomes even harder for many of us to simply laugh it off.
by Matthew S. Bajko, Assistant Editor  Wednesday, October 8, 2025


From the start of the Nazi persecution of homosexuals in 1933, the atrocities Adolph Hitler and his regime waged against LGBTQ Germans and others has impacted the LGBTQ community in America. Long before the Stonewall riots in New York City of 1969, the horrors unleashed by the Nazis were central to the fight for LGBTQ rights in the U.S.

So argues Thomas R. Dunn, founder and director of the Queer Memory Project of Northern Colorado, in his new book “The Pink Scar: How Nazi Persecution Shaped the Struggle for LGBTQ+ Rights.” It will be released October 21 by Penn State University Press as the first book in its Troubling Democracy series.

[...]

Practically from the start of the war, LGBTQ Americans had access to news reports about how German homosexuals were being rounded up. The coverage spoke about the pink triangles they were made to wear in the concentration camps to denote their being gay.
Our collective memories remember the Lavender Scare. We survived Anita Bryant and “Save Our Children,” and now we hear it all again!
GOP U.S. Reps. Nancy Mace and Ronny Jackson both called for the institutionalization of transgender people on Tuesday.
The Advocate
Erin Reed
Sep 17, 2025


In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s killing—committed by a suspect who notably was not transgender—conservative leaders have seized the moment to escalate their war on LGBTQ+ people. Vice President JD Vance and Stephen Miller used the death to demand the dismantling of NGOs critical of Kirk. Far-right influencer Matt Walsh openly called for executions of those he branded “LGBTQ+ terrorists.” And now, two sitting members of Congress have crossed a new threshold, explicitly calling for the institutionalization of transgender people—an escalation even by today’s standards.

First, South Carolina representative Nancy Mace, who has a history of vehement opposition to transgender people in Congress, called for the institutionalization of transgender people in a street interview where she hurled slurs at the community. She first stated of the shooter’s partner, “It was a transgender… It was a [tr*nny].” When she was asked how she would feel if she were called names the way she calls transgender people, she said “these people are violently ill and should be in a straitjacket with a hard steel lock on it.”
I am sure that back in the ’30s their neighbors said, “You worry too much.” I worry about a coup and a crackdown on dissidents. And when the government begins using the language of domestic terrorism and dissidents in connection with “gender” and “gender extremism,” it is understandable that we and LGBTQ+ communities pay close attention.

Legacy

[Editorial]

Merriam-Webster Dictionary:
Legacy
1.
something (such as personal property or money) that is willed to someone by a person who has died: bequest
2.
something transmitted by or received from an ancestor or predecessor or from the past
3.
a candidate for membership in an organization (such as a school or fraternal order) who is given special status because of a familial relationship to a member
What I want to write about is number 2.

Upstairs, I have old photos of my mother and her sisters. The black-and-white photos of family from the 1920s are still... well, not quite like new, but only slightly faded. But the color photos and slides? Their colors have faded and taken on a red shift.

And yet, what do the new generations leave behind? Vaporware.

You know all those huge data centers you are fighting against? Well, my photos are in there, and your photos are in there, along with all of that stuff you have in the cloud. Your wedding photos, the pictures of your first baby, that first vacation that the two of you took, that photo of the "double dare" to go on the roller coaster at the amusement park—they are all in the cloud! No, wait, they are not in your attic. They can go "POOF" at the press of a key, or the moment you stop paying. They are in your social media posts, but what happens after you are no longer here? Yes, they are up on Facebook and all of your friends can see them, but what about your future generations?

What happens to our future generations?

I burned discs of the old family photos, but they can’t just be picked up and looked through—you now need a "device."

What will our legacy be?

{/Editorial] 

Saturday, September 19, 2026

Saturday 9: Everybody Loves a Clown (1965)

On Saturdays I take a break from the heavy stuff and have some fun… 
 
Unfamiliar with this week's tune? Hear it here.

1) Not everyone loves clowns. "Coulrophobia" is the irrational fear of clowns. Do you have any fears or phobias?
I never did but it seems like the older I get the more acrophobia until I walked out on the French King Bridge to take some fall foliage photos. I froze.

2) This week's featured artist, Gary Lewis, sings that he jokes a lot at parties. In social settings, are you more a talker or a listener?
Listener.

3) He's dreaming of a special girl. Do you often daydream?
All the time… I’m the modern day Walter Mitty dreaming of heroine winning space battles.
 
4) Gary named his band The Playboys because they were always late to rehearsals and Gary joked that they would rather play than work. Do you tend to be early, late, or exactly on time?
Late… in rebellion! My father was a colonel and if we had to be somewhere @ 5PM we would get there around 4:30 and wait so we could be there at 5!

5) Gary Lewis had first-hand knowledge of clowns. His father was famous funny man Jerry Lewis. Who always makes you laugh?
There hasn’t been a lot of laughter later since Jan 20th

6) In 2017, Gary was in the news when it became known that Jerry disinherited all six of his sons from his will. Have you ever attended the reading of a will?
Nope.

7) This past summer found Gary Lewis on The My Generation Tour, performing with other acts from the mid-1960s, like The Lovin' Spoonful, The Hollies, and Mitch Ryder and the Detroit Wheels. Do you enjoy listening to "the oldies?"
Well I have a theory… you mainly like the music you grew up with.
The Eagles, Linda Ronstadt. The Beatles, The Stones… etc.
 
8) In 1965, when this song was popular, Muhammad Ali defeated Sonny Liston to become the heavyweight champion of the world. Have you ever attended a boxing match?
Yes… boring! When I was a Cub Scout we went to a PAL boxing match that was televised. That was what save the day for me the TV cameras!

9) Random question: What color is your toothbrush?
It’s the one that the dentist gave me… for a child… all multi-colored.

Friday, September 18, 2026

The Witch Hunt!

Here we go again! Outrageous accusations to grab headlines and rally their base... see we are doing something but it is the "liberal" courts that strike us down!
MassLive
By Susannah Sudborough
 Sep. 17, 2026


The Trump administration announced Thursday that it is investigating allegations that Northborough-Southborough school officials facilitated a student’s “social” gender transition without the consent or knowledge of the teen’s parents.

The student’s parents, Joseph and Arlene Kutzko, claim their child, a former Algonquin Regional High School student, attended after-school counseling sessions supporting a gender transition, according to the Department of Education (DOE). The Kutzkos were not informed of the sessions and were under the impression the student, who is a minor, was receiving extra schooling for a math class.

The Kutzkos also claim that school staff began using a male name and pronouns to refer to the student without the parents’ knowledge, federal officials said.

The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education advises schools to refer to students by their chosen gender identity, and to make a plan with the student regarding when and how to inform their parents of the student’s gender identity. This policy has also been supported by federal courts.
But not by Trump & Company.

One question is when is a child old enough to make decisions on their own? Another is when is a child old enough to reject their parent's religion?
Catholic Herald
Christine Rousselle
Sept. 17, 2026


The US Department of Education is investigating a school district in Massachusetts after the district allegedly enabled a child’s gender transition without notifying her parents.

“Today, the US Department of Education’s (the Department’s) Student Privacy Policy Office (SPPO) launched an investigation into The Public Schools of Northborough and Southborough in Massachusetts to determine whether the school district violated the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA) and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) after reports that school officials allegedly facilitated the ‘gender transition’ of a minor student without parents’ knowledge or consent,” said a September 17 press release from the Department of Education.

“Parents have a right to know what is happening with their children at school, particularly when it concerns deeply personal matters involving their health and wellbeing,” said Frank Miller, Director of the Student Privacy Policy Office, in the press release.
Open and shut case according to them... right? Well lets jump back to the MassLive article.
At the beginning of last year, DCF removed the student from their parents’ home, WBUR reported. On Tuesday, Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey told reporters at an unrelated event that DCF removed the child from their parents’ home after criminal charges were filed against the Kutzkos. Healey declined to comment on whether DCF was helping the child transition genders.

Federal officials said the school district’s actions may violate FERPA, a federal law that requires parent access and limited control over their children’s school records. Federal investigators are also investigating whether the district violated a federal law known as PPRA, which requires schools to obtain written consent from parents before looking into the student or their family regarding sensitive subjects, including mental health and sex behaviors and attitudes.
So to throw a monkey wrench into the mix... the parents are not the guardians of the child.
In January 2025, Joseph Kutzko was charged after prosecutors say he punched his then-15-year-old child in the shoulder, pulled his child’s hair and threatened to kill his child “for not singing in tune during a birthday celebration,” according to court records. He was arrested and pleaded not guilty in Westborough District Court.

Arlene Kutzko was charged with witness intimidation after prosecutors say she pressured her child to “tell the school that she was exaggerating and being stupid” the same month, according to court records.

In December 2025, a judge dismissed the charges against Joseph Kutzko under conditions, including that he attend an anger management class, stay away from his child and abide by a restraining order, court records indicate. Arlene Kutzko’s case was also dismissed after she agreed to stay away from her child and abide by a restraining order. The conditions for both parents expire in December.
We don't know if it was "Beat the gay" out of the child or not, but whatever the reason the fed seem to have a very weak case.

Just Like The 1930s

Did you know that in Germany in the 1930s they had a box to check off that said "Jew"? Now the Trump administration will have a box to check off... "Trans!"

A double-edged sword!

Back around 2010, when we were trying to pass the gender-inclusive non-discrimination bill and we replied that we had no idea of the number of trans people in Connecticut, we thought that lack of data was a bad thing. But now, that may seem like a good thing. Why? Because someone like Trump could misuse the data.
The Trump administration is proposing sweeping changes to the rules governing the 2030 US Census, including a requirement that could make questions about biological sex mandatory for respondents, a change critics say could effectively force transgender people to disclose their trans status to the federal government.
The Pink News
by Sian Thompson
Sept 17, 2026


The proposal, published by the Census Bureau on September 10, would prohibit questions about race, ethnicity and sexual orientation from appearing on the short-form decennial census. At the same time, it would allow questions about biological sex, date of birth and household relationships to be included for the purpose of verifying the population count. The proposed rule is part of a much broader overhaul of the decennial census.

News outlet The Needle argued the practical impact would leave trans people with limited options: disclose sex assigned at birth, lie, or refuse to take part. It wrote: “By requiring trans people to identify themselves by their sex assigned at birth, and with a looming threat of prosecution for noncompliance, the Trump Administration is compelling every trans person to out themselves to the Federal Government.”

The Needle also claimed: “This is an attempt to weaponise the Census to make a list of every trans person in the United States.”
Leave it to Trump to make the census racist! I don't know about you, but I will go with what is on my birth certificate. But we are not the only ones Trump is attacking!
AP News
By  MIKE SCHNEIDER
February 19, 2026


U.S. Census Bureau plans to use a questionnaire with a citizenship question as part of its practice test for the 2030 census could jeopardize the once-a-decade head count and scare away immigrants from participating, congressional Democrats warned Thursday.

Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform urged the Census Bureau to drop plans to use the American Community Survey form, which includes the citizenship question, and instead use a traditional census questionnaire that omits it. The on-the-ground tests in Huntsville, Alabama, and Spartanburg, S.C., start next month.

“The Trump Administration is risking millions of taxpayer dollars to pursue policies which could fatally compromise the 2030 count before it even begins,” they wrote in a letter to acting Census Bureau Director George Cook and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, whose department oversees the statistical agency.
Okay, the Constitution says a census shall "be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons..." and "...within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct." Nowhere does it say only "citizens" shall be counted. But the Republicans are trying to weave their transphobia and xenophobia into the count. NPR from last year wrote;
A Trump administration official on Friday signaled a potential rollback of the racial and ethnic categories approved for the 2030 census and other future federal government forms.

Supporters of those categories fear that any last-minute modifications to the U.S. government's standards for data about race and ethnicity could hurt the accuracy of census data and other future statistics used for redrawing voting districts, enforcing civil rights protections and guiding policymaking.
Legislators run on data. How many (they want to know the voting block this will affect... vote both for and against), how much, etc.
The "Project 2025" policy agenda released by The Heritage Foundation, the conservative, D.C.-based think tank, called for a Republican administration to "thoroughly review any changes" to census race and ethnicity questions because of "concerns among conservatives that the data under Biden Administration proposals could be skewed to bolster progressive political agendas."
"...could be skewed to bolster progressive political agendas." Um... like, yeah, we will actually see the size of the minority populations. But if the questions are asked, will it raise the fear in minority populations of being tracked, like in Germany in the 1930s?

You see... "How many?" Without being counted, we will never know. But if it is asked, minorities might not be counted. Either way, the Republicans win.

Of All Things To Pick On!

At a campaign rally in Olathe, Kansas, on Monday, what did the Vice President speak about?
The war? No...
The soaring price of home heating oil? No...
The skyrocketing national debt? No...
The cost of food? No...

So what did he speak about? Well, Roll Call said he said at the campaign rally;
Adam Hamilton sent his church's donations to sessions with titles, and I'm quoting here, "kink, consent and communication," whatever the hell that means. To sessions whose titles, those are some of the good ones. There are, there are titles that I could not even repeat on this stage or my lovely wife back home would kill me. [Laughter]But maybe worst of all, by sponsoring this festival, Adam Hamilton proudly supported a drag group called Our Ladies of Perpetual Indulgence, which you may remember was the devil worshiping group that was saying special blessings before LA Dodgers games and insulting Christian and every Christian in this room in the process.
JD Vance 00:28:00-00:28:33 (33 sec)
No Signal (0.988)
We gotta be clear about what this group is. This is an anti-Christian hate group. Its whole purpose is to mock the Christian religion. It mocks nuns. It insults the crops. It desecrates the Eucharist and thinks every person of faith in the United States of America is a joke. So let's review. Democrat Pastor Adam Hamilton thinks it's a sin to be white and a sin to raise cattle and eat meat, but he's okay with supporting groups that spit on God-fearing Americans and mock everything that we hold dear.
JD Vance 00:28:33-00:29:11 (38 sec)
Medium (1.641)
Ladies and gentlemen, that is not Christianity. That is left-wing radicalism dressed in the skin suit of our religion. Let's send it packing in November. But more than that, it is the kind of hatred that we rejected in 2024, hatred that asks to split our country up by race, by gender, that tries to separate neighbor against neighbor based on their skin color, based on their background, based on their ethnicity.
The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. (That is their real name.) Who?

How many of you have heard of them? They are part of our history! During the time when Reagan was demonizing us over HIV/AIDS as a "gay disease." And, as usual, the Republicans lie! They lie to stir up anger! The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence is a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) registered organization that raises funds and provides support for people and communities affected by HIV/AIDS, among other causes.

But the VP doesn't say that. Instead, he calls them a "drag" group.

According to their website...
Since our first appearance in San Francisco on Easter Sunday, 1979, the Sisters have devoted ourselves to community service, ministry and outreach to those on the edges, and to promoting human rights, respect for diversity and spiritual enlightenment. We use humor and irreverent wit to expose the forces of bigotry, complacency, and guilt that chain the human spirit.
Instead of talking about the topics the voters want to hear about, he talks about something no one knows about so he can lie, stir up anger against the LGBTQ+ community, and avoid talking about how he is going to end the war.

The Advocate magazine reported,
The vice president misnamed the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, distorted the group’s work, and twisted Democratic Senate candidate Adam Hamilton’s sermons at a campaign rally.
Christopher Wiggins
Sep 16, 2026


Vice President JD Vance reached for satanic panic Monday while campaigning in Kansas, falsely describing the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence as devil worshipers and mangling the group’s name in the process.

Vance appeared at a MAGA Inc.-organized rally at Webco Manufacturing in Olathe to support Republican U.S. Sen. Roger Marshall, who faces the Rev. Adam Hamilton, a prominent United Methodist pastor and Democrat, in November. State Senate President Ty Masterson, the Republican nominee for governor, also attended, according to the Kansas Reflector.

Vance attacked Hamilton because Resurrection, the church Hamilton founded, was among dozens of sponsors of Kansas City PrideFest.
These people know what the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence really are; a fundraiser for those living with AIDS. But instead, they lie.
"If he was talking about the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, our name isn’t the only thing the vice president got wrong," Roma said. "I do not recognize or accept his inflammatory misrepresentation of who we are and what we do. The Sisters are a global human rights fundraising organization. We do not mock nuns, we are nuns. You will find Sisters around the world serving meals to the hungry, providing warmth and comfort to the unhoused, or counseling the most marginalized and often ostracized members of society. From our early work as pioneers in HIV/AIDS education and prevention, to our continued ministry of service and compassion, the Sisters are committed to upholding our vows to expiate stigmatic guilt and promulgate universal joy."
They lie for votes. They lie to rally anger in their base to vote. They don't care about anyone who gets hurt in the process. It is all about power.

Thursday, September 17, 2026

Sorry Charlie!

Well, a school district in Virginia has seen the light! That is, after a lawsuit.
Fredericksburg Free Press
By Adele Uphaus | Sep 11, 2026


The King George County School Board approved updates to its policy governing student organizations and a regulation governing non-curriculum-related student organizations following a closed session that began at 8 a.m. Friday.

The updated policy allows secondary school students to organize and conduct meetings of non-curriculum-related groups — a change to language the board adopted last November that restricted such groups to high school students only.

The updated regulation lays out the procedure for establishing a non-curriculum-related student organization. It requires “proof of written parental permission to form and/or join” the organization. If the organization wants to renew for a subsequent year, the renewal request form must include “a list of students who are currently members” and “proof of written parental permission from each member to renew such membership.”
So lets step back in time to...
Susan Park says she filed a federal lawsuit after the King George County School Board repeatedly rewrote its rules to keep a gay-straight alliance from forming.
The Advocate
Christopher Wiggins
Aug 06, 2026


Susan Park’s child has already advanced from King George Middle School, about an hour and 20 minutes southeast of Washington, D.C. The eighth-grade year in which he hoped to join a gay-straight alliance, make friends and find some relief from bullying is over. That time cannot be returned to him. When school starts, he will enter King George High School.

Park could have allowed the dispute over the club to become another family’s problem. Instead, on Tuesday, she, along with the family of another student, filed a federal lawsuit so that the next LGBTQ+ student in this rural Virginia county might receive what her child was denied.
The school was happy with providing the club... but then parents and outsider got involved!
Some parents circulated the materials in a community Facebook group, generating hundreds of comments. The proposed faculty sponsor was allegedly doxxed, accused of “grooming” children and targeted with demands that she be fired.
The Fredericksburg Free Press went on to write;
“I’d [Board member Ed Frank] also like to state that every student in King George County Schools deserves to be safe, treated with dignity, and protected from bullying,” he said. “My concern is not about denying protection to any child. My concern is age appropriateness, parental transparency, and rules governing extracurricular discussions.”

[...]

Board member Colleen Hoover said “a lot of blood, sweat, and tears” went into conversations about the policy and regulation.

“The community as a whole needs to come out and be more supportive,” she said. “We were voted into this position to be here and do what you want us to do, and sometimes when things get difficult, it would be nice to have more community support.”
Gee how the Board changed its tune once the lawsuit was filed!

In another Advocate article they report;
“Having been advised that the parties have reached a settlement,” Senior U.S. District Judge Robert E. Payne wrote in a September 4 order obtained by The Advocate, “any further discovery deadlines are stayed until further order of this Court.”

[...]

The lawsuit accused the school board, Superintendent Jesse Boyd, and King George Middle School Principal Casey Nice of violating the First Amendment and the federal Equal Access Act by blocking the GSA while finding ways for other student organizations to continue operating.

The legal principle is well established. In Board of Education v. Mergens, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Equal Access Act, which requires federally funded public secondary schools that permit noncurricular clubs to provide other student groups equal access regardless of their message. Federal courts have repeatedly applied that protection to GSAs, including rulings for students in California and Kentucky. In 2016, a federal appeals court also ruled that the act covered a Florida middle school. Schools can close their forums to all noncurricular clubs, but once they allow even one, courts have said they cannot exclude an LGBTQ+ student group because officials or community members object to what it represents.
They added more hoops for the after school organizations to jump through...
Under a regulation adopted Friday, students must provide proof of written parental permission to form or join such an organization. Groups seeking to return in subsequent years must submit a membership list and proof that every student has parental permission to renew their participation.
So, because of their hatred of all things LGBTQ+, they added extra burdens for all the other clubs... which I imagine will not make them popular with the other clubs and students, and the LGBTQ+ students will be blamed for it.


Off The Deep End

Well the Republicans finally went off the deep end of there hate for us... DNA testing! This is sick!
To prove someone’s biological sex, law enforcement official sees DNA tests as unpractical, and inspecting people’s naked bodies as unlikely
Idaho Capital Sun
By Kyle Pfannenstiel
July 13, 2026


As parts of Idaho’s criminal transgender bathroom ban are now in effect, how far will law enforcement officers have to go to enforce the new law?

What if officers don’t believe a person’s gender markers on IDs?

Will they inspect people’s naked bodies to prove their biological sex? Do they need a warrant for that? 

Will they use DNA testing to prove someone’s sex? At what point in an investigation under the law will that testing take place? 

These questions echo concerns that high-ranking law enforcement officials shared with state lawmakers on the bill, which some said would be difficult to enforce and might require invasive methods. Now, more than a week into the law taking effect, some are confronting the realities of how they’d handle reports of the law being broken.
So this Pink News popped up on Facebook yesterday...


Idaho officials have told a federal judge that they can use DNA testing to enforce strict trans bathroom laws in the state.

In Idaho, transgender people are required by law to use public bathrooms and changing facilities of the sex they were assigned at birth.

[...]

According to the Idaho Capital Sun, US District Judge Amanda Brailsford asked officials how they could expect to enforce the bathroom law when many trans people now carry ID that corresponds with their correct gender.

Idaho Solicitor General Michael Zarian then told the judge that it shouldn’t be too difficult “because there is DNA testing.”
Okay, let that sink in... do they mean that each and every person going to the bathroom will be tested? Or just the women who do not look feminine enough for the gender police?
Olson [Lambda Legal attorney] expanded on the pitfalls of the new law while speaking to reporters after the hearing. “If I just go to a restaurant with my family and want to wash my hands before dinner, this law comes into play. Now I have to stop and decide, do I – if this law is in effect – do I go into the restroom that is illegal now, the men’s room?” he asked.

“Or do I walk into the women’s room and take all of the risk that that now comes with, whether that’s assault or harassment, or someone calling the police, because now it looks like I’m violating the law?”
These Republicans have their anger focus so tightly on trans that they don't even think of trans men! Back in August in Kansas a bunch of trans men show how absurd these laws are.
The group of trans men use women’s bathrooms in publicly owned facilities, which is required by Kansas law, to highlight what they say are flaws in the bathroom bill.
Kansas Public Radio
By Zach Boblitt
August 20, 2026


A group of transgender men are highlighting the confusion caused by a new Kansas law that requires them to use the women’s restroom in publicly owned facilities.

The transgender men have gathered at locations across Kansas to do a sort of protest by complying with the law. They use the women's bathroom — the restroom of their assigned biological sex at birth.

The SB244 Compliance Crew — named after the bathroom ban bill that became law earlier this year — went to a library in Emporia, a swimming pool in Garden City and water parks in Dodge City and Great Bend.
The gender police is out there enforcing the "Gender Norms" beware!

Wednesday, September 16, 2026

The November Election – The Governor’s Race.

We know the position of the governor but the Republican candidate is an unknown… so lets look at his voting record and statement.

He has a problem with using your electric bill to fund assistance for low-income households and wants to remove that charge, but he hasn’t said what he would replace that funding with.

Abortions… mainly, he follows the national Republican position. According to CT Mirror, in 2022 Fazio voted no on Connecticut’s Reproductive Freedom Defense Act. That law expanded protections for abortion access and protected patients and providers from certain legal actions originating in states with restrictive abortion laws. Fazio has said he supports keeping abortion legal under Connecticut law, while also supporting the ability of states to set their own abortion laws, but he voted against expanding. CT protections.

Immigration… mainly, he follows the national Republican position. Fazio supports greater cooperation between Connecticut law enforcement and ICE and has opposed Connecticut laws that limit that cooperation. However, in this year’s session he voted against legislation that established schools, hospitals, courthouses, and places of worship as protected areas where ICE generally could not make an arrest without a judicial warrant.

Now for us… trans rights and healthcare.

First the good news he has publicly opposed homophobic/transphobic harassment and he vote for the bill consolidated the discrimination statutes. But that is where the “good news” ends. He mainly followed National on our rights. He opposes trans athletes. He playing our healthcare for young adults close to his vest, but why? Why does he not want to go on record, what is he afraid of?

And it is funny he is all for parent’s rights until it comes to our healthcare and then he thinks it is okay for government to step between us and our doctors.

So for Connecticut if you like Trump… you will probably like Fazio.

It's Spreading!

There are so many evil things have been spreading... in Turkey we are being violently rounded up!
Sept. 13, 2026


Police in Turkey have detained 47 people in a series of raids on gay bars and the homes of LGBTQ+ activists, officials say.

Raids took place in 12 provinces over the weekend as part of a campaign dubbed "My Family is Safe" that the Turkish government says has been designed to protect family values.

One of the targets of the operation was LGBTQ+ association Kaos GL.

[...]

Officers detained 26 people and seized drugs, digital equipment, smuggled alcohol and a firearm during the raids, according to the Istanbul chief prosecutor's office.

In a separate statement, the Ankara chief prosecutor's office said another 21 people had been detained as part of an investigation into Kaos GL.

The organisation said 50 activists had been detained, more than 10 taken after police raids on their homes.

It said that authorities had blocked several websites and social media accounts linked to LGBTQ+ organisations.
This is scary! Al Jazeera reports;
Justice Minister Akin Gurlek said in a social media post on Sunday that prosecutors had launched an investigation into 162 suspects, nine associations and 13 businesses to “protect children, the institution of the family, and public order”.

Turkish authorities targeted current and former members of multiple LGBTQ rights and HIV awareness groups. The organisations’ websites were blocked days before the police raids.

Gurlek said the “My Family is Safe” operations on Sunday aligned with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s 10-year “Decade of Family and Population” executive order, which aims to combat Turkiye’s falling birthrate.
The scary part is I can foresee Trump doing something like because of Executive Orders.
“The real name of this operation is not ‘My Family is Safe’; it is state-led discrimination, politics of fear and the dismantling of civil society,” the Turkish Human Rights Association said on X.

The European Parliament’s rapporteur on Turkiye, Nacho Sanchez Amor, condemned the detentions as “a shocking escalation in the repression” in the country.
Last September in a National Security Memorandums and Executive Orders it directed federal law enforcement to target political violence, explicitly framing "extremism on gender" and support for progressive social causes alongside phrases branding opponents as "domestic terrorists" So it makes you wonder if Trump would do something like this?

Tuesday, September 15, 2026

Snopes

I think one of the standards on the internet is "Snopes," I trust them. So when I saw that they looked at the report from the White House, my ears perked up.
Research from Harvard found that gender-affirming surgeries for minors are rare — and usually involve chest reduction for cisgender boys.
Rae Deng
Sept. 4, 2026


As cited by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, a database from anti-trans group Do No Harm proves that from 2019 to 2023, more than 5,500 minors in the United States had sex change surgeries.

An August 2026 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services report claimed that "watchdog analyses tracking" had determined more than 5,500 minors had undergone "sex change surgeries" from 2019 to 2023. 

The "watchdog analyses tracking" references an anti-LGBTQ+ group that inflated the data by counting a vast number of procedures entirely unrelated to "sex change surgeries," including hair removal, surgical removal of excess eyelid skin and bladder drainage. These procedures were counted in the "sex change surgery" statistic as long as the patient had a gender dysphoria diagnosis or a psychiatric condition related to crossdressing (which is different from being trans). As with any other person's healthcare, there are many reasons why a trans person may need these procedures that have nothing to do with being trans. 
Credible data indicates that gender-affirming surgeries are rarely performed on minors, and most minors who receive them are not actually trans, but cisgender boys getting chest reductions. A peer-reviewed study from Harvard University researchers in 2024 determined that in 2019, only 85 trans minors received gender-affirming surgery and most of them were age 15 to 17. The Harvard study found no gender-affirming surgeries conducted on children under 12. 
Surprise, surprise... they lied!  

And this is what they say about the doctors...
A child who undergoes a sex rejecting procedure can become a patient for life.

A disturbing new Trump administration report details the financial incentives that HHS says pushed clinics to take advantage of some of the country’s most vulnerable children.

“There was a tremendous financial incentive for these clinics and these practitioners to produce what we call captive patients.”
And their conclusion:
The bottom line 
The data HHS cited in its report comes from an anti-LGBTQ+ group that used faulty analysis to inflate data on gender-affirming surgeries among trans minors. 

It's more accurate to say that from 2019 to 2023, more than 5,500 minors, many of whom had a gender dysphoria diagnosis at one point in time, received various procedures for any number of medical reasons, the vast majority of which were unrelated to being trans. 

Peer-reviewed research suggests that gender-affirming surgeries among minors are incredibly rare and usually involve cisgender boys undergoing chest reductions.
The report is a good example of the saying "If you can t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bull."

KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation) reports on the harm Trump vendetta on the trans community...
HHS Report: “Wolves in White Coats: How Doctors and Hospitals Pushed and Profited from the Fraud of “Gender Medicine,” August 12, 2026.

Purpose: Much of the report focuses on what HHS calls “fraudulent billing practices” relating to gender-affirming care.. Through various tables HHS identifies over 100 providers it believes have questionable billing claims related to gender-affirming care. Beyond the concerns it raises about billing the report content is wide ranging. It states gender-affirming care providers may offer this care as a way to generate revenue, that they do so to create a “captive patient” audience, describes Biden administration civil rights actions as efforts “to impose, unilaterally, gender ideology,” criticizes medical associations supportive of and/or providing guidance around gender affirming care, and promotes the stories of people who have detransitioned and parents who opposed access to gender-affirming care.

Implications: The billing and coding data provided in the report has already been used to support other administration actions. It is the basis of a letter HHS Sec. Kennedy sent to the OIG seeking investigations of providers (see separate entry).

The report fosters misinformation in several domains. It is unlikely that providers are offering gender affirming care for the purposes of generating revenue given the small share of transgender people in the U.S. and relatively low cost of interventions (as described in the report). The report also appears to conflate the cost of medications with revenue generated by prescribers. It suggests the Biden administration’s efforts to improve civil rights protections for LGBTQ people promoted gender affirming care. It uses select sketches of individuals who have detransitioned to promote the notion that “activists and providers have tried to force children to undergo potentially life-altering interventions” when in fact detransitioning is quite rare.

The report could be used to build a basis for further administration actions aimed at limiting gender affirming care and may also serve to intimidate named providers.

HHS Report: “Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology?”, August 2026.

Purpose: HHS issued this commissioned report with the stated aim of “examining the psychology behind strong support for radical gender ideology and left-wing authoritarianism.” It finds “gender ideology may function as an ideological accelerant” and leads to legitimizing violence.

Implications: This HHS commissioned report seeks to align support for transgender people generally, that is beyond support for access to medical care, with “left-wing authoritarianism” and potentially violence. Despite this aim, the report states that “violence connected to gender ideology remains largely undocumented in the academic literature.”

The survey includes use of a new tool to measure support for transgender people asking questions drawn from guidance from major medical associations. There is no mention in the report of this scale being validated. The questions sought to measure the endorsement of consensus positions not related to gender-affirming medical care. Questions generally focused on beliefs around support for transgender people’s gender identities and gender exploration. The study found that people who scored higher on this measure (i.e., those who are more likely to agree with the guidance) were also more likely to hold “racialized” “authoritarian” left-wing views, and more likely to say political violence could be justified in certain cases.

Efforts to challenge major medical association guidance may represent an aim to erode public support for these organizations and align with other actions (see above) seeking to harm the credibility of these organizations. Further, the report could be used as a basis for the administration’s continued efforts to target these organizations and/or erode support for transgender people and their access to care. The report may also align with other efforts by the administration to suggesting there is a relationship between supporting transgender people and violence.

The instrument developed does not appear to be a probability survey raising questions about representativeness of the report’s findings. The report suggests that correlated findings are casual, which is not supported by the analysis, and it does not appear to have been peer reviewed.
This is all part of an effort by the Trump administration to deny proper medical treatment to a minority for political gain.
Federal officials referred around 150 healthcare organizations for investigation into allegations of fraud.
Mother Jones
Madison Pauly
August 18, 2026


Just two days after finalizing a regulation to make sure trans kids from low-income families can’t afford puberty blockers or hormone therapy, the Trump administration has loosed another salvo in its bitter war against transgender people’s healthcare. On Thursday, the Department of Health and Human Services published a report—authored largely by employees of right-wing advocacy groups—alleging that some hospitals are using incorrect codes to bill insurance for pediatric gender-affirming care. The report paints transgender healthcare as motivated by profit rather than medical necessity, calling the billing codes “potentially fraudulent.”

In a social media video, Vice President JD Vance announced he was referring roughly 150 healthcare organizations listed in the report to the Department of Justice for criminal investigation. The list includes over a dozen major children’s hospitals, pharmacies including Walgreens, and small doctors offices and clinics. Standing at Vance’s side, HHS Secretary RFK Jr. added that he, too, was referring the providers for investigation by his department’s inspector general.
They also call the report a hatch job!
Yet advocates of transgender healthcare describe the HHS report released Thursday as part of a larger effort to shut down care. “This report is part of a broader pattern from this administration: Using the power of government to attack science and target health care providers instead of helping families get the care they need,” says Kellan Baker, senior advisor for health policy at the Movement Advancement Project. “It’s an intimidation campaign,” adds Jennifer Levi, the director of transgender and queer rights at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, pointing to ways the report might show up in future legal cases.
This all is to justify Trump's pogrom on the trans community!

Allegiance

That is Trump's mind set... I appointed you so you owe your allegiance to me and not the Constitution!


President Donald Trump on Tuesday went after the Supreme Court after it rejected his push to restrict mail-in voting in this year’s midterms, saying justices who opposed him were “not the people I interviewed.”

[...]

“The Court’s inability and unwillingness to do the right thing for our Country will go down, in a very negative way, in the annals of History,” Trump wrote in a lengthy social media post Tuesday. “This Supreme Court is bullied and cajoled by the Radical Left into making decisions that have set America back at least a hundred years.”

[...]

“These are not the people I interviewed to serve on the United States Supreme Court, they are merely a shell of their original selves,” Trump said. He asserted that the court “is costing the United States Trillions of Dollars with shockingly bad rulings that are of such magnitude that it won’t be easily possible for our Country to recover or heal.”
Trump went on to say...
“It is not easy for me to write this criticism of the United States Supreme Court - it will likely cost me dearly for years to come - but I feel it my obligation and duty, as President, to do so for the America we love!” Trump said.
Trump doesn't even calculate the Constitution and the laws... it is all about loyalty to him.  

This Is Just The Type Of Person The Republicans Are Looking For!

Accused of domestic violence. ✓
Questions about whether he lied on his jury questionnaire. ✓
Ignores facts. ✓
 
CBS News reported that...
 CBS News legal analyst Caroline Polisi said the real issue here is whether the juror lied when filling out the juror questionnaire.
 
 "The test is whether he made purposeful misrepresentations during the jury selection process. If he did, that's a crime," she said, adding that "an arrest is not an automatic disqualification for serving on a jury." 

The juror court questionnaires are sealed as part of the official court record.

"It's unlikely we will find out whether the juror made misrepresentations unless there is an official court-sanctioned inquiry," Polisi said. 
If the juror did lie on the form, they could be charged with perjury or making false statements to the court.

But that is the backstory... what I want to write about is the offer Florida made to the juror.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Offers ‘Asylum’ to Holdout Juror in Lindsay Clancy Case
“If the juror is being harassed, Florida will provide asylum,” DeSantis wrote on social media
People
By Charlotte Phillipp
September 13, 2026
 
 
 NEED TO KNOW
  •     Governor Ron DeSantis criticized media coverage of the holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial and offered him “asylum” in Florida
  •     The juror reportedly has a history of domestic violence allegations and an active restraining order against him, according to a Sept. 11 report from NBC10 Boston
  •     Clancy’s trial ended in a mistrial after jurors tasked with determining criminal responsibility in the deaths of her three young children couldn’t reach a unanimous verdict
 Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is offering “asylum” to the holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial after accusing media outlets of launching a smear campaign against him.

On Friday, Sept. 11, DeSantis, 47, shared a post on X in response to a recent report from NBC10 Boston that the juror has a history of alleged domestic violence and an active restraining order against him.

“A man objected to allowing a woman to kill her three young kids and get away with it, so NBC is trying to smear that juror, whose identity should be protected. Another low for legacy media,” the governor wrote. “If the juror is being harassed, Florida will provide asylum — I’m sure he’d be welcomed and appreciated.”
That is total BS! That is a total lie! The jury was hung. It was split 11 to 1 in favor of finding Clancy not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility (insanity) due to postpartum psychosis. She would have a hearing for involuntary commitment, and then, depending upon the outcome, she could have an initial hospital commitment that can last up to six months. After that, the facility can request successive one-year extensions.

To me, this isn't really about Lindsay Clancy. It's about the governor of Florida using a Massachusetts criminal case as a political weapon against a Democratic state. The New York Post reported that,
NBC10 Boston reported that the juror was accused of attacking his wife in September 2021 and that last year his nephew had taken out a restraining order against him. The man also faces a pending eviction case by his landlord for $12,000 of unpaid rent, the outlet reported.

Court records show that the juror divorced his wife after the alleged incident in 2021 and that the criminal charge against him was dismissed — although his ex-wife said she backed away from pursuing the case because she was worried that testifying could cause her to lose custody of her daughter, the outlet reported.
 
 Juror questionnaires in Massachusetts ask prospective jurors whether they have been arrested, charged with a crime, or been served with a court order — all which should have been answered affirmatively by the holdout juror, NBC10 reported.
That is the person he wants to give asylum to: a nice, fine, upstanding individual. But the real reason he wants to offer it is to take a political dig at a Democratic state. He doesn't care one iota about the case, just that he thinks he can get votes over this! He is playing to the MAGA crowd.

However, what is even more outrageous is what the Hindustan Times is reporting...
Lindsay Clancy holdout juror GiveSendGo raises whopping $110,700 as Ron DeSantis offers him ‘asylum’
A GiveSendGo launched for a male holdout juror who reportedly led to a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case has already raised $110,700.
Sep 14, 2026
By Sumanti Sen
 
 
 A GiveSendGo launched for a male holdout juror who reportedly led to a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case had raised $110,700 at the time of writing this article. The GiveSendGo, which aims to raise $150,000, describes how “one juror held his seat” when support poured in for Lindsay.
 
[...]
 
 “The country got the full TikTok-diagnostics package. Postpartum. Psychosis. Voices. Trauma. A stack of pill bottles and a sad playlist. The SSRI-medicated mob ran cover like this was a self-care story instead of a triple child killing. They wanted a diagnosis, not a verdict. They wanted her sick, not guilty. They wanted three dead kids memory-holed so nobody had to say the words mother and murderer in the same sentence,” the fundraiser says.
 The legal question was whether she was criminally responsible because of her mental state, and one juror disagreed with the other eleven. DeSantis chose to portray that juror as a heroic man standing up against people supposedly trying to excuse the killing of three children.
 
While the conservatives are making him out as some kind of male hero! They have turned the focus from perjury to sexism. OK Magazine wrote:
Lesley Abravanel
Sept. 3 2026
 
 
 Podcaster Joe Rogan slammed public advocates and social media users supporting Lindsay Clancy, pointing to a double standard between men and women.

Rogan argued that the public sympathy surrounding the case highlights a societal bias. He claimed, "This lady killed her kids, and everyone's like, 'Oh my God, she needed help.' Imagine if a single father killed his kids.”

He asserted that a father facing identical charges would never receive a "Free Lindsay"-style campaign or solidarity rallies.
Totally illogical!
He slammed the wave of people creating dedicated support groups and spreading online conspiracy theories to defend her actions. He described the phenomenon as proof that "people are out of their f------ minds right now.”

"If those ladies could see the crime scene and see those dead kids with their f------ vacant eyes staring up because their mother took their life, the last f------ thing that they saw was their mother standing over them, choking them to death, I don't think they would feel so bad,” he said.
This is what MAGA thinks now... toxic masculinity! And it is so easy to get them riled up. So the guy who lied on a jury form is now a hero!

Monday, September 14, 2026

A Little Trans History

Us old-timers groan when we hear that because it was a gatekeeper.

You had to fit into their standards... it wasn’t so much for the medical requirements, but rather your sexual orientation and how well you could assimilate into society. Trans women had to be sexually attracted to men, and, well, trans men didn’t exist. The guys were written off as just lesbians. 

If you talk to someone from that time or read something from it, you will find out that we had a reputation for being liars according to the doctors. We would say we were attracted to men, but we dated women.

Eventually, they changed the rules to drop the sexual orientation and assimilation requirements (though many other roadblocks to transition still remain). Around that time, conservatives started using us as scapegoats... as a diversion from the real issues.

The golden years were from around the turn of the century until Trump got elected to his first term; then, the pendulum didn't just swing to the right, it was slammed over to the right.

I remember the Lavender Scare. 

I remember "Save our Children." 

But this is different. This is an organized, government-led attack on a minority. We haven't seen this since the 1930s. We have seen this throughout history: when one group begins gaining social acceptance, conservatives get energized and try to put them "in their place!" But they don't stop us... they only slow us down. And we shall prevail!

What A Can Of Worms!

So, in my news feed this morning was a story about a California trans court case... it is both good news and a great big unknown. In case you haven't heard, we had a victory... of sorts.

Lawyers and Settlements reports:
A federal judge has ruled that California can continue allowing transgender girls to compete in girls’ school sports, despite a recent Supreme Court decision allowing other states to ban them.
September 8, 2026,
By Jane Mundy


The legal battle over transgender athletes has produced an unusual result: states may ban transgender girls from girls’ sports, but they don’t have to.

Federal Judge Cynthia Valenzuela August 31st dismissed a U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit challenging California policies that allow transgender students to compete on school sports teams consistent with their gender identity.

[...]

In its June 30 decision, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that West Virginia and Idaho could restrict participation on girls’ teams based on biological sex. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote that states “may maintain women’s and girls’ sports for biological females” and may determine eligibility based on biological sex.

But “may” turned out to be an important word. The Supreme Court did not rule that every state must adopt those restrictions. Nor did it decide the separate question of whether Title IX permits transgender girls to participate on girls’ and women’s teams.

Valenzuela concluded that nothing in Title IX clearly required California to exclude transgender girls. She found California had not received clear notice that billions of dollars in federal education funding were contingent on banning transgender girls from girls’ sports. The federal government’s guidance on the issue has also shifted repeatedly over the past decade.
What happens when a trans-friendly state plays a non-trans-friendly state?

Education Week reported that;
Therefore, Valenzuela wrote that California “lacked clear notice” of such categorical exclusion of transgender athletes as a condition of the federal funding California received, and other court decisions—including the Supreme Court’s in June—did not “supply the missing clarity.”
It seems like each state is on its own. If "states' rights" hold up in court, it will be very interesting to see what happens. What will happen, say, in the Rose Bowl if one team bans trans athletes, or if a team with trans athletes plays in a state that bans them? Will they have to forfeit?