Showing posts with label segregation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label segregation. Show all posts

Monday, April 14, 2025

The Big Ripoff!

The have found a way to get around school integration! And they gave an innocuous, vouchers. Vouchers are bring back the era of Jim Crow...
AP News
By  KIM CHANDLER
April 8, 2025


More than half of families who applied for Alabama’s new school voucher program have children attending a private school or are home schooling, numbers that buoy school choice advocates who say the flood of applications proves the approach is what parents want

Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey’s office released application figures Tuesday for the CHOOSE Act, the new program which will help eligible families tap state dollars to help pay for private school or home-schooling costs. Families submitted 22,167 applications for a total of 36,873 students.

Ivey said the robust number of applications are a sign that, “clearly, taxpaying Alabama families want school choice.”
However,
The numbers showed that more than half of the applications come for students who are already attending a private school or being home-schooled. Of those 36,873 students, 10,287 students are from public schools, 15,436 students are from private schools and 9,070 are homeschooled.

[...]

Supporters say the programs let parents choose how best to educate their children. Critics say it drains money from public schools to help families who may have already decided to enroll their children in a private school.

“I’m concerned about the fact that we have about 150 failing schools and those schools need additional revenue,” Sen. Rodger Smitherman, D-Birmingham, said referencing the designation for schools with low test scores.
That is my concern also... the school voucher programs help up and middle income families. For some it is enough to kick them up enough so that they can afford a private school and the voucher funds take away from the public schools.

The Republicans are jumping up and down about Social Security fraud but are tight-lipped fraud in their pet project... school vouchers!


The majority of voucher money the state gave homeschool families this school year went toward non-educational expenses, and a bill to change that is getting a dicey reception at the Arkansas Capitol.

State senators were divided this week on Senate Bill 625, a clean-up bill for the 2023 LEARNS Act, which created Arkansas’s school voucher program. SB625 would require homeschool families to put most of their state funding toward academics instead of extracurriculars. The bill failed in a sparsely attended committee meeting Wednesday, but the full Senate pulled the bill out of committee and passed it on Thursday. It next goes to the House side, where it will likely see further debate.

SB625, sponsored by Sen. Breanne Davis (R-Russellville), puts parameters on how the roughly $7,000 in taxpayer dollars each homeschool student in the state can now claim in voucher form can be spent.
Hmm... how about a new swimming pool? My homeschooled children needs to learn water safety!
The new rules are needed, she said, because data from the current school year, the first in which vouchers were available to certain categories of homeschoolers, revealed that most of that money went toward non-academic expenses.

[...]

Those non-educational expenses include extracurriculars and transportation, and the fact that most of the homeschool voucher money went for those costs shouldn’t come as a big surprise. In November, the Arkansas Times reported on the phenomenon of homeschool families putting voucher money toward horseback riding lessons, baseball coaches and other decidedly non-scholastic endeavors.
So my example of vouchers paying for a swimming pool, I can see how some parents my lie and say it is for swimming lessons! Public Funds Public Schools writes,


The fanciest voucher out there these days is the “education savings account” (or “education freedom account” in places like Arkansas or New Hampshire). There’s an almost frantic effort by the voucher lobby to avoid the “V” word, and some of that includes genuine self-delusion that these ESAs/EFAs are actually something other than vouchers with extra allowable expenses beyond private school tuition. But that’s all an ESA is: tuition plus.

Some states like Iowa and Arkansas still have fairly limited packages in that “plus” bucket: mostly add-on costs associated with attending private school itself, such as textbooks, uniforms, school fees and so on, with limited homeschool expenses thrown in as well. In other states like Arizona and Florida, these add-ons are far more permissive, from educational materials on Amazon to Disney World field trip passes.

One side argument that research-aware voucher lobby folks make is that the horrific academic outcomes suffered by lower- and middle-income voucher users will go away because these new laws aren’t creating vouchers, just “ESAs.” But there’s no educational theory of action—and no brand of common sense—that says students will make up academic losses just because their parents can now use vouchers on backyard trampolines and SeaWorld tickets on top of tuition at private schools that don’t deliver academically.

[...]

One problem with this new array of school voucher designs is that some programs do make it even easier for fraud, misuse, or simple errors to occur involving large sums of public dollars. When a state education or revenue agency is administering the voucher system and directly reimbursing private schools or parents for demonstrable tuition expenses, it’s a bit easier to keep track of spending, especially when routine audits accompany that activity. But in the ESA/tax credit voucher versions, new opportunities for waste and even fraud can and do occur.

In Arizona, Attorney General Kris Mayes has filed charges against people who created what Mayes called “ghost children” to claim voucher dollars, while spending on non-permitted items also has been and continues to be a problem there. In Utah, the state’s voucher middle-man vendor spent more than state law allowed on administrative fees and expenses, while the vendor in Idaho and Missouri has struggled to make payments on time. In Florida, investigative reporting has found voucher payments to schools that faked fire safety and facilities inspections, while in North Carolina, watchdog organizations found the state was sending voucher dollars to private schools for more students than were enrolled in those schools—and even to a school that didn’t exist!
When you stop and think for a moment the Republicans have been pushing the "fraud" in Social Security which is about 0.00625% of the annual budget! But not a peep is said about the fraud in voucher programs!
North Carolina offers an especially telling window into what is happening across this once legally segregated region where legislatures are now rapidly expanding and adopting controversial voucher-style programs.
ProPublica
By Jennifer Berry Hawes and Mollie Simon
Nov. 18, 2024,


Private schools across the South that were established for white children during desegregation are now benefiting from tens of millions in taxpayer dollars flowing from rapidly expanding voucher-style programs, a ProPublica analysis found.

In North Carolina alone, we identified 39 of these likely “segregation academies” that are still operating and that have received voucher money. Of these, 20 schools reported student bodies that were at least 85% white in a 2021-22 federal survey of private schools, the most recent data available.

Those 20 academies, all founded in the 1960s and 1970s, brought in more than $20 million from the state in the past three years alone. None reflected the demographics of their communities. Few even came close.

Northeast Academy, a small Christian school in rural Northampton County on the Virginia border, is among them. As of the 2021-22 survey, the school’s enrollment was 99% white in a county that runs about 40% white.
Remember... school voucher programs were designed for one thing! To continue with the segregation in a way that is legally "non-discriminatory" while discriminating and to gut public education so only the white upper class gets a full education. Private school can discriminate against us, blacks, immigrants, religion, in other words anyone not like them.



Wednesday, June 05, 2024

On This Day.

In 1950 segregation was banned in railroad dinning cars.
With One Wish, Banishing Memories Of Jim Crow
NPR MORNING EDITION
By Wade Goodwyn
MAY 30, 2012


As the sun beams down, Dorothy Flood, 75, stands on the steps of the Royal Gorge Route Railroad train, smiling like a 1940s movie star.

"Right there! Then turn around, right there!" photographers call out, jockeying to snap her picture. "Here we go, count of three — one, two and three!"

And with a tip of his cap, a porter offers Flood his hand, and her "Wish Of A Lifetime" begins.

Many are familiar with the Make-A-Wish Foundation, an organization that grants wishes to terminally ill children. Less familiar is the nonprofit group Jeremy Bloom's Wish Of A Lifetime. The organization grants wishes to adults age 65 and older — and recipients need not be ill or dying to qualify.

Dorothy Flood's wish — to ride in a train dining car — is an easy one to make come true.
Why was the ride so important to her? Because when she was little Blacks could not ride there in the dinning car… the Supreme Court struck down the ban on Blacks being forced out of the dinning cars.
Crossing The Mason-Dixon Line

Flood grew up in ethnically diverse Jersey City, N.J. But traveling by train to North Carolina each summer with her grandmother was like traveling to another country.

"When we'd get to Baltimore, that was the Mason-Dixon Line," Flood says. "The African-Americans would go in the back ... and white people would go into separate cars."

Flood and her grandmother — and many of the other black passengers — carried their food in shoe boxes.

"I guess that was the easiest thing to carry them in. And every shoe box would have fried chicken, pound cake ... a hard-boiled egg and fruit," Flood says. "And to this day it's the best fried chicken I ever had."

But while the food was good, the child, whose parents had been killed in a car accident, couldn't grasp why she and her grandmother couldn't eat in the dining car.
Now down in Florida school children cannot read about this because it will make some children uncomfortable to hear. Woke is banned… teaching Black history is banned, talking about LGBTQ+ topics is banned.

Are we going forward or backwards?

Tuesday, October 24, 2023

Some Can Flee


But most can’t flee and have to hope that they make it through safe in body and mind.
More Than 100K Transgender Youth Live in States Impacted by Restrictive Laws: Study
The study also found that almost 150,000 trans youth live in states that protect transgender rights.
The Advocate
By Jacob Ogles
October 23 2023


About 100,000 trans youth in America live in a state that took a basic quality of life element away this year. Some lost the ability to stay on a youth sports team while others lost access to essential health care, or countless teens lost the ability simply to use the restroom of their choice.

A new study by UCLA’s Williams Institute found roughly a third of transgender teenagers in the U.S. between ages 13 to 17 had access to one or more of these rights compromised as a wave of anti-LGBTQ+ laws kicked into effect across numerous states.
However, that means 66,000 do not have access to healthcare!!!!
“A record number of laws impacting transgender youth were introduced in state legislatures in 2023,” said lead author Christy Mallory, legal director at the Williams Institute. “While most of them did not pass, the ones that did significantly shifted the legal landscape for transgender youth.”
The only reason why the laws are being passed is for political gain. The fact that these youth will be scarred for life doesn’t matter to the Republicans.
Segregation of school bathrooms under the guise of protecting students grew especially, with six states enacting new laws. An estimated 32,700 trans teens now live with restroom and changing room restrictions at schools, and of those, 23,600 live in states with newly implemented restrictions, including those in Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Idaho, Kentucky and North Dakota.
Do you know when else “protecting our children” was used to prevent some from going to the bathroom? One of the justifications for racial segregation was to protect children.

I asked ChatGPT:
Was one of the justification for segregation protecting the children?

Yes, one of the justifications put forth for segregation in the United States during the era of Jim Crow laws, which enforced racial segregation, was the notion of "protecting the children." This argument was used to defend the practice of segregating schools and other public facilities.

Proponents of segregation argued that it was necessary to protect white children from what they perceived as negative influences or harm that might come from attending integrated schools. They claimed that racial integration would lead to interracial socialization and potentially disrupt the social order and values of the white community.

However, it's important to emphasize that this argument was fundamentally based on racist beliefs and stereotypes about Black people. It falsely portrayed African American children as threats to the well-being and morality of white children, when in reality, segregation perpetuated discrimination and inequality.

The "separate but equal" doctrine, established by the 1896 Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson, allowed for segregated facilities as long as they were purportedly equal in quality. In practice, these facilities were rarely equal, with Black schools and other institutions often receiving significantly fewer resources and inferior treatment compared to their white counterparts.

The Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s challenged these justifications for segregation, leading to landmark Supreme Court decisions like Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, which declared state laws establishing separate public schools for Black and white students to be unconstitutional. This decision marked a significant step in the desegregation of American society.

Then I asked the AI...
Compare and contrast banning blacks from white bathrooms to banning transgender students from using the bathroom of their gender identity?

ChatGPT
The comparison between historical racial segregation, such as banning Black individuals from using white bathrooms, and the contemporary issue of banning transgender students from using the bathroom of their gender identity revolves around issues of discrimination, civil rights, and equality. Here's a comparison and contrast of these two situations:

Comparison:

Discrimination: In both cases, individuals are being singled out and denied access to public facilities based on their identity. Racial segregation and bans on transgender students using the bathroom of their gender identity are both forms of discrimination.

Civil Rights: Both cases involve civil rights issues. Racial segregation during the Jim Crow era violated the civil rights of Black individuals, while banning transgender students from using the bathroom that corresponds with their gender identity can be seen as a violation of their rights to equal treatment and freedom from discrimination.

Social Stigma: In both situations, there is a social stigma associated with being part of a marginalized group. Racial segregation perpetuated negative stereotypes and reinforced racial hierarchies, while bans on transgender students using the bathroom that aligns with their gender identity contribute to the stigmatization of transgender individuals.

Contrast:

Basis of Discrimination: The basis of discrimination differs. Racial segregation was based on skin color and the historic oppression of Black people, while the discrimination against transgender students is based on their gender identity.

Historical Context: Racial segregation has a deep historical context in the United States, particularly during the Jim Crow era. While transgender rights have a historical context, the contemporary debate over bathroom access is part of a more recent discussion.

Legal Framework: Racial segregation was prevalent and legally sanctioned, leading to a series of Supreme Court decisions overturning these laws, most notably in Brown v. Board of Education. In contrast, the legal landscape for transgender rights is still evolving, and protections for transgender individuals vary by jurisdiction.

Visibility and Awareness: The issue of transgender bathroom access has gained attention in a more public and widespread manner due to increased awareness and advocacy in recent years. Racial segregation, although it had a significant impact, was addressed during a different era with different media and communication dynamics.

Intersectionality: It's important to recognize that there can be overlap between these two issues, as transgender individuals can be of any race. Transgender people of color, particularly Black transgender individuals, face intersectional discrimination based on both their race and gender identity.

In conclusion, while there are similarities in terms of discrimination and civil rights violations, there are also key differences in the basis, historical context, legal framework, and awareness surrounding these two issues. The struggle for transgender rights is part of the broader civil rights and equality movement and represents a contemporary challenge to societal norms and prejudices.
For trans people we see this as a battle for our Human Rights, whether we get to live our true lives in peace or forever looking over our shoulder wondering if we will be arrested.

For Blacks during the era of Jim Crow they had the Green Book that had safe places you could go safely when you traveled, for us we have “Peeing in Peace.”

Monday, June 28, 2021

1984 Double Speak

Legal action against Tennessee hateful laws.
ACLU sues Tennessee over new restroom 'warning sign' law targeting transgender-friendly businesses' policies
Chattanooga Times Free Press
By Andy Sher
June 25, 2021


The American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee and the national ACLU sued in federal court Friday to block a first-of-its-kind state law requiring warning signs at businesses that allow transgender people to use the restroom of their choice.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of two business owners, one in Chattanooga and one in Nashville, who say they object to being forced by the government to post "stigmatizing signs."

The plaintiffs say the new "bathroom bill" law, signed by Gov. Bill Lee on May 17 and slated to take effect July 1, violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by compelling speech. They ask the court for a preliminary injunction to halt enforcement while the lawsuit proceeds.
[...]
"Forcing businesses to display a stigmatizing message for political expedience is unconstitutional," said Hedy Weinberg, ACLU of Tennessee executive director, in a statement. "Furthermore, by targeting the transgender community, these government-mandated signs marginalize and endanger transgender individuals. Tennessee should be embracing and protecting all Tennesseans, not passing unconstitutional discriminatory laws."
I would have expected that the Fourteenth Amendment would play in to the legal case because they single out us and the 14th Amendment is about equal treatment.

Of course the Republicans hates the ACLU…
In a statement to the Times Free Press on Friday, Sen. Paul Rose, R-Covington, the legislation's Senate sponsor, wrote "these days it seems the ACLU is more concerned about advancing the left's woke agenda than defending anyone's civil liberties. This law protects the rights of all people using restrooms in Tennessee.

"There was nothing discriminatory about this bill, either in intent or in execution. Period," Rose added.
Typical Republican double speak, “defending anyone's civil liberties” so they think that forcing us into segregated bathrooms is okay. These people are living in George Orwell 1984!

Sunday, May 02, 2021

Your Papers Please.

This image is in the public domain
It is becoming the old south again (if it really changed), following its long tradition of segregation. This time it is a new segregation, not Black and white, but trans and cis-gender but it is still insidious.
Tennessee passes bill requiring anti-trans signs on businesses with trans-inclusive restrooms
A bill passed the Tennessee legislature that would require bathroom facilities that trans people are allowed to use be designated as allowing use by "either biological sex." It now goes to the governor's desk.
LGBTQ Nation
By Juwan J. Holmes
May 1, 2021


Both chambers of the Tennessee Legislature have passed a bill that would require businesses to post notices that say they allow transgender people to use the building’s restrooms.

If signed, it would make the Volunteer State the first state in the country to adopt legislation seeking to single out trans-affirming businesses for allowing trans people to use bathrooms that align with their gender identity.

Tennessee’s House Bill 1182 would require signs at the entrances to the building and the door of every restroom that isn’t single stalled.

The signs would be required to state “this facility maintains a policy of allowing the use of restrooms by either biological sex, regardless of the designation on the restroom.”

“A public or private entity or business that operates a building or facility open to the general public and that, as a matter of formal or informal policy, allows a member of either biological sex to use any public restroom within the building or facility shall post notice of the policy at the entrance of each public restroom and at each entrance of the building accessible by the general public,” H.B. 1182 reads.
Yeah right. This is just more Republican newspeak right out of George Orwell's novel Nineteen Eighty-Four.
The bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Tim Rudd (R), said that it isn’t aimed at transgender people since it doesn’t ban them from using the restroom altogether.
Bullsh*t! First of all, there needs to be a sign on the bathroom that allows trans people to use the bathroom, how many places would take the time to put up a sign.

Segregation is segregation, when you divide people in to groups based on some inborn characteristics it is wrong!

So what tools do we have in our toolbox to fight this pogrom?

I am not a lawyer but the way I see it, the Fourteenth Amendment says… “nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” It seems to me that banning us from bathrooms is not “equal protection of the laws.” Second, they will only be attacking trans people who are easily identified as trans so unless they are checking each and every person entering the bathroom then that seems to me to be another violation of the 14th Amendment.

Next what about states rights?

The Article IV, Section 1: Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution says…
Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.
So the way I see it, my Connecticut birth certificate says I am female and that means every other state in the Union must recognize it.

I think that there will be a court case coming shortly and it will go all the way to the Supreme Court and I actually think that we would win. Why? Because even this court would have a hard time going against the Article IV, Section 1 of the Constitution and the 14th Amendment.

What now has to happen is the man in the White House who "has our back" needs to act.