Showing posts with label budget. Show all posts
Showing posts with label budget. Show all posts

Friday, September 11, 2026

Ask Them How?

Just a simple question: How?

"I'm going to cut your utility bills."... How?
"I'm going to cut the price of drugs."... How?
"I'm going to lower grocery prices."... How?
"I'm going to make housing more affordable."... How?

The devil is in the details!

That’s something no politician tells you. Why? Because they can’t! They don’t know either. But they’ll tell you what you want to hear.
CT News Junkie
by Donald Eng
September 9, 2026


Legislative Republicans made their plea for voters to elect more members of their party in November, offering reductions or outright elimination of about a half-dozen taxes or fees in return.

“Affordability has become a buzzword for the Democrats we serve alongside, and they’ve spent the summer pointing fingers at Washington instead of looking in the mirror,” said House Minority Leader Vincent Candelora of North Branford. “Connecticut didn’t become one of the most expensive states in the country the day President Trump took office. It got that way over years of decisions made in this building, by the people and party that have controlled it,”

[...]

Among the measures were an elimination on sales tax on meals sold in grocery stores, elimination of the public benefits charge on utility bills, a one-year gas tax holiday and an elimination of the highway use tax – a mileage-based tax on heavy commercial vehicles that helps fund road and bridge maintenance.

The centerpiece, though, is a scaled reduction in the state income tax for those earning $200,000 or less. That one proposal represents about half of what the group said was the $2 billion total.
So the question asks to be asked... HOW?

They are cutting taxes by 2 billion dollars... but where are they going to cut? All I hear is crickets.

What they did say is that they will take it from the budget surplus. However—and you know darn well that there is always a "however" or a "but" in politics—the budget surplus varies from year to year depending on the economy! The surplus is also used to pay down our long-term debt and the two major state pension obligations: the State Employees Retirement System (SERS) and the Teachers' Retirement System (STRS).

The Republicans haven't said anything about that! And if that isn't enough... what in the budget are they planning to cut? They Republicans want to treat the volatile surpluses as a bottomless piggy bank for sweeping tax cuts without explaining how they'll balance the math,

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

He's Happy, He Is Like A Kid In A Candy Store

Trump is actually gleeful over the shutdown... he doesn't see the hardship it will cause millions of people. He doesn't care about the millions who will be laid off. He doesn't care what it will do to the economy. He is only after getting more political power... this is nothing more than a power grab at the people's expense!
BBC News
By Anthony Zurcher and James FitzGerald
September 30, 2025


Funding for the US government will be cut off at the end of Tuesday unless President Donald Trump's Republican Party can agree with opposition Democrats on a way forward on a spending bill.

That could bring some - but not all - US government services to a temporary halt.

Although budget confrontations are common in US politics, this particular spending fight is especially tense, given that Trump has spent the last nine months drastically cutting down the size of the federal (meaning national) government.
What will it mean to we the people?
What's different about the White House response this time?
What stands out about this current standoff is the position of Trump's team.

In the past, long shutdowns were usually seen as politically dangerous, hampering both voters' everyday lives and the images of lawmakers and the president.

But this time around, the Trump administration appears more than happy to shutter large parts of the US government for an extended period. In fact, officials have threatened to use a shutdown to identify "non-essential" workers who could then be permanently let go.

Also, after previous shutdowns, government operations mostly returned to normal, with staff and spending levels largely going back to prior levels once the standoff is resolved.

Over the past nine months, however, the Trump administration has slashed spending and pushed workers out of their jobs, testing the boundaries of presidential power. A shutdown could allow the administration to accelerate its massive reductions.
Don't expect this shutdown to be over fast... we are in it for the long haul.
AP News
By  SEUNG MIN KIM
September 28, 2025


President Donald Trump has had one refrain in recent days when asked about the looming government shutdown.

Will there be a shutdown? Yes, Trump says, “because the Democrats are crazed.” Why is the White House pursuing mass firings, not just furloughs, of federal workers? Trump responds, “Well, this is all caused by the Democrats.”

Is he concerned about the impact of a shutdown? “The radical left Democrats want to shut it down,” he retorts.

“If it has to shut down, it’ll have to shut down,” Trump said Friday. “But they’re the ones that are shutting down government.”

In his public rhetoric, the Republican president has been singularly focused on laying pressure on Democrats in hopes they will yield before Wednesday, when the shutdown could begin, or shoulder the political blame if they don’t. That has aligned Trump with House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., who have refused to accede to Democrats’ calls to include health care provisions on a bill that will keep the government operating for seven more weeks.
Trump does what Trump does best... lie and blame others!
Still, Republicans say they are confident Democrats would be faulted if the closure comes. For Trump, the impact would go far beyond politics. His administration is sketching plans to implement mass layoffs of federal workers rather than simply furloughing them, furthering their goal of building a far smaller government that lines up with Trump’s vision and policy priorities.
Trump is trying to blame us for the shutdown over our healthcare, I wrote about that here.

What do the Democrats want? Usually it is the Republicans making demands...
The GOP’s stance — a short-term extension of funding, with no strings attached — is unusual for a political party that has often tried to extract policy demands using the threat of a government shutdown as leverage.

[...]

This time, it’s the Democrats making the policy demands.

They want an extension of subsidies that help low- and middle-income earners who buy insurance coverage through the Obama-era health care law. They also want to reverse cuts to Medicaid enacted in the GOP’s tax and border spending bill this year. Republican leaders say what Democrats are pushing for is too costly and too complicated to negotiate with the threat of a government shutdown hanging over lawmakers.
Trump is itching to use his hatch to cut jobs and lay people off.

We are in this shutdown for the long haul, Republicans in Congress have no backbone to stand up to Trump. My prediction is that this shutdown will be the longest in history, in another PBS News article they write...
Trump has shown little interest in entertaining Democrats’ demands on health care, even as he agreed to hold a sit-down meeting Monday with Schumer, along with Senate Majority Leader John Thune, House Speaker Mike Johnson and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries. The Republican president has said repeatedly he fully expects the government to enter a shutdown this week.
I will tell you this... Congress will not be singing "I'll be home for Christmas" because they will still be battling CR in Congress.

Friday, June 27, 2025

If You Don't Like The Message. Shoot The Messenger!

She has been on the job for over 30 years, she held her current position since 2012, she worked for both the Republicans and the Democrats leaderships. But now she has ruled against the Republican pet bill and the Republicans are ready to can her.
Kansas senator cites 2001 precedent when Trent Lott fired parliamentarian during reconciliation process
Fox News
By Alex Miller
June 26, 2025


A Senate Republican wants to see the Senate parliamentarian fired and plans to introduce a resolution that would require the position to be term-limited.

Fury erupted among conservatives Thursday morning following the news that Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled several key reforms and tweaks to Medicaid in the Senate GOP’s version of President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" did not pass muster with Senate rules.
Bear with me for a minute, this gets a little bit technical. You see when one chamber passes a bill and the other chamber amends the bill, they can only amend what in the bill and not add other things. For example if the bill is on the budget the other chamber can only add financial amendments... they add an amendment to strip us from healthcare. That would not be allowed. Yahoo News put it this way...
Over the course of the past week, the parliamentarian has decided that a long list of key provisions that have been part of the "big, beautiful bill" cannot be included in their current forms.
Danger Will Roberson, Danger! You are going against the Lord Master!
Here’s a list of just some of the items that have been vetoed:
  • A plan to sell off millions of acres of public lands.
  • Defunding the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
  • Blocking federal grants for “sanctuary cities.”
  • Cuts to federal food assistance.
  • Barring undocumented immigrants from receiving Medicaid.
  • Rollbacks of green energy funding and emissions standards.
  • New Medicaid tax rules that would have brought in hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue.
Republicans will now have to either rewrite each of these sections of the bill in a way that satisfies the parliamentarian or be forced to abandon them completely so they don’t prevent the entire package from becoming law.
You are going against the Master's plan! So heads will roll!

Fox News goes to report,
However, Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., wants immediate action taken against the parliamentarian.
Off with her head!
He argued that, based upon early reports, the parliamentarian's rulings against myriad provisions in the bill may erase up to $500 billion in spending cuts, which could hamper the bill's survival among fiscal hawks and miss the goal of hitting up to $2 trillion in spending cuts over the next decade. 

Marshall, like other congressional Republicans, was particularly incensed over the parliamentarian’s rulings that gutted numerous changes Senate Republicans made to the widely-used Medicaid program that triggered conservatives.

Among the axed provisions was the Senate GOP’s harsher crackdown on the Medicaid provider rate, or the amount that state Medicaid programs pay to providers on behalf of Medicaid beneficiaries, which proved a divisive policy among some in the conference.
Yahoo New writes this about the parliamentarian...
The current parliamentarian is named Elizabeth MacDonough. She’s a 59-year-old Washington, D.C., native who has worked for the federal government in some capacity for most of the past 35 years. She was appointed as parliamentarian in 2012, becoming the first woman — and just the sixth person in history — to hold the position. At the time, she was described as “down-to-earth,” “diligent” and “a pistol” by figures in Congress who knew her well.

Since assuming the role, she has largely stayed out of the public eye. She purportedly only makes one public speech a year and does not speak directly to the media. During her tenure, control of the Senate has flipped three separate times — first to Republicans in 2015, then to Democrats in 2021 and back to the GOP this year. In addition to advising leaders from both parties through several reconciliation bills over the years, she also guided the Senate through two separate impeachment trials and was responsible for protecting Electoral College certificates from the mob attacking the Capitol during the Jan. 6 attack.
Now now she is a piranha, she had the audacity to go against the king's wishes... so it is "Off with her head the traitor!"

She has found that the changes proposed to Medicaid are not budgetary but rather regulatory. The Hill writes,
Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough has rejected key Medicaid provisions in the Senate GOP megabill, a ruling that appears to strike a major blow to Republicans’ strategy for cutting federal spending.

The Senate’s referee rejected a plan to cap states’ use of health care provider taxes to collect more federal Medicaid funding, a proposal that would have generated hundreds of billions of dollars in savings to offset the cost of making President Trump’s corporate tax cuts permanent, according to a Democratic summary of the parliamentarian’s ruling.
I am just an interested bystander, but even I can tell that they way the Republicans want to cuts is by changing the rules... it is right in there in black and white. What they want is to change the rules for the state portion of Medicaid funding... That is a regulatory change.

So it all boils down to will they fire her and appoint a crony to the position who will always answer kneeling "Yes Master, as you wish!"

Tuesday, December 31, 2024

The Numbers Don't Line Up.

[Editorial]
 
You know how Trump appointed Musk and Ramaswamy to balance the budget? Well it is impossible! They will need to cut either: Defense, Social Security, or Medicare! There is no ifs, ands, or buts about it!

Cutting all these programs...
 
Food Assistance:
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps
Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)
National School Lunch Program (NSLP)
School Breakfast Program (SBP)
Summer Food Service Program (SFSP)
Housing:
Housing Assistance programs
Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
Education:
Pell Grants
Head Start
Tax Credits:
Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)
Child Tax Credit
Cutting all programs will not balance you will either:
  1. Cut the military budget.
  2. Cut Social Security and Medicare.
  3. Massive layoff.
  4. All of the above.
  5. Raise taxes.
Which do you think Trump will chose?
 
[/Editorial]