Showing posts with label Presidential Campaign. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Presidential Campaign. Show all posts

Monday, September 29, 2025

Mini-Post: This Is Bull...

I bet you that you didn't know we had so much power! 0.5% of the people is causing so much harm to the other 99.5%! Imagine!
Proposed legislation behind the impending US government shutdown contains provisions that would ban federal funding for transgender adults, as well as youngsters.
Pink News 
By Amelia Hansford
September 29, 2025


The bill has kept congress at a stand-still over the past few days after Democrats refused to provide the necessary votes for it to go through. Unless agreement is reached by 12.01am (Eastern) on Wednesday (1 October), sections of the government will be unable to function.

Donald Trump initially refused to meet with Democrats to avoid the shutdown, accusing minority leaders Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer of making “unserious and ridiculous demands”. The Republicans control both the senate and house of representatives.
However there is one big flaw in Trump's statement, the Democrats are not asking for that! Just a minor detail... but Trump lied to mobilize his base. He is counting on his cult followers not to know the truth.

What they are asking for is: an extension of Affordable Care Act (ACA) Subsidies, rollback of Medicaid Cuts, restoration of Public Media Funding, and prohibition on "Pocket Rescissions."

Do you see us in any of reasons why the Democrats are willing to shut down the government? But Trump will be crowing from the rooftops that he stopped the Democrats from added us?



I know that there are many, many trans people think we should shut down the government over our healthcare. I do not.

I think we have to pick our battles, and the spending bill should not be one of our skirmishes. There is too much at stake here, and the Republicans are ready to drive a spike in us over this. Our goal must be to win back Congress in 2026 and the presidency in 2028. All others should take a backseat to those goals.

We will need all the votes we can get to overcome the gerrymandering of the electoral map the Republicans have created."


Tuesday, December 26, 2023

Vengeance Is Mine Saith The Republicans.

Have you noticed that the Republicans are always talking about vengeance and getting even. Even with no evidence that are trying to impeach president Biden… why? Could it possible be because the Democrats twice impeached Trump?

It has been reported that Trump said…

The Hill:
Steve Bannon and Kash Patel claimed that former President Trump is “dead serious” about exacting revenge on his political enemies if he wins a second term as president, and they warned members of the media to take the threats seriously, saying Tuesday, “We’re going to come after you.”

In an episode of Bannon’s “War Room” podcast, Bannon and Patel, two of Trump’s close allies, pledged to prosecute members of the media who “lied’ about the 2020 presidential election results — falsely suggesting Trump truly won.
The Washington Post...
Especially because of the second story. “Trump and allies plot revenge, Justice Department control in a second term,” report The Post’s Isaac Arnsdorf, Josh Dawsey and Devlin Barrett.

As they detail, Trump and allies “have begun mapping out specific plans for using the federal government to punish critics and opponents should he win a second term, with the former president naming individuals he wants to investigate or prosecute and his associates drafting plans to potentially invoke the Insurrection Act on his first day in office to allow him to deploy the military against civil demonstrations.”
The Huffpost
Top Republican lawmakers brushed aside questions about former President Donald Trump’s alarming vow to purge his political opponents, which he referred to as “vermin” in a Veterans’ Day message over the weekend.
But he is not the only one Republican seeking revenge.

New York Magazine
Yet the fact that Republicans have been threatening a revenge impeachment against the next Democratic president literally since Trump’s first impeachment has been oddly absent from news coverage. The Associated Press, in an appropriately skeptical explainer, answers the question of why Republicans are doing this: “Since gaining the House majority in January, House Republicans have aggressively investigated Biden and his son, claiming without evidence that they engaged in an influence-peddling scheme.”

Well, that’s true, but it’s not why Republicans are impeaching Biden. They are impeaching him specifically to even the score with Trump.
Vengeance is mine saith the Republicans and it is not just on the federal level but states also want to get in on the revenge.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and AG Ken Paxton promised retribution for votes they didn’t like. Here’s who they are targeting.
Paxton has been seeking revenge on fellow Republicans who voted to impeach him earlier this year. Similarly, Abbott is looking to unseat GOP House members who voted against school vouchers.
Texas Tribune
By Carla Astudillo and Patrick Svitek
December 21, 2023


The Texas primary season promises more drama than usual as Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton seek revenge against dozens of fellow Republicans in the state House.

Paxton is working to defeat the House Republicans who voted to impeach him in May on abuse-of-office charges. The Senate acquitted him after a trial in September.

Abbott, meanwhile, wants to unseat the House Republicans who thwarted his yearlong crusade for school vouchers, which would allow parents to use taxpayer dollars to help pay for private school costs.

Both of them have their work cut out for them. Sixty House Republicans voted to impeach Paxton, while Abbott is focused on a narrower group of 21 who voted last month to strip a voucher proposal out of a broad education bill.
The elephant is a good symbol for the Republican party, they say an elephant never forgets and neither do the Republicans.

Meanwhile that want tit for tat... Colorado banned Trump from the ballot so we are going to do the same thing over trumped up charges.
KDFW News
By FOX 4 Staff
December 21, 2023


On the heels of the Colorado Supreme Court ruling former President Donald Trump should be removed from the primary ballot, Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick suggested doing the same thing to President Joe Biden.

Patrick made the comments on Fox News' "The Ingraham Angle" on Tuesday night while criticizing the president's immigration policies.

"We're fed up. In fact, seeing what happened in Colorado tonight, Laura, makes me think, except we believe in democracy in Texas, maybe we should take Joe Biden off the ballot in Texas for allowing 8 million of people to cross the borders since he's been president, disrupting our state far more than anything anyone else has done in recent history," said the lieutenant governor.
They even admit that it is in retaliation for what Colorado did.

The scary part is...
Trump's revenge-driven campaign has far too many fans
Trump is ready to use the Justice Department as a weapon against former allies. His supporters are uncomfortably okay with the idea.
By Hayes Brown, MSNBC Opinion Writer/Editor
November 7, 2023


Former President Donald Trump is not a subtle man. He telegraphs his schemes, often in the middle of a tsunami of rapid-fire misinformation. It was true of his attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election, and it’s true of his plans to use a second term to make good on all the autocratic, dictatorial threats he has made since being voted out of office. Even more disturbing is how on board his supporters seem to be with the idea.
His cult followers are eating all of this up! They worship their orange haired leader and follow his every word.
Trump has taken particular umbrage at the multiple investigations into him and his company, framing any and every attempt to hold him accountable as a politically motivated attack. It’s a classic case of projection, given his numerous calls for his opponents to be prosecuted. But he suggests to his supporters that any revenge he’d take should he win in 2024 would simply be his playing by the rules his adversaries have set.

At an October campaign stop in New Hampshire, Trump went on a tear that said the left has “weaponized law enforcement” to “arrest their leading political opponent: me.” He said it was “third world country stuff” and then, chillingly, “that means I can do that, too.” Accordingly, his advisers are reportedly plotting how to use the Justice Department to follow through on that promise.
Around 50% of the voters back and support his vengeance plans! That is what's scary.

I fear to imagine what Trump would do to a jury that didn’t follow his plans… Would Trump do away with the juries and have a tribunal of his hand-picked judges?



I want to add, politics is an important part of the trans community lives. Whether we like it or not we have been thrown into the political pot. The attacks by the right-wing conservatives at our community affects us every time we walk out the door. Denying us healthcare, denying us the needed document changes, criminalizing us by just being ourselves, and stirring up animosity against us.

You never know what will set off a MAGA Republican and they are the ones walking around with assault weapons. They are the ones coming to protest drag queens armed.

You may not like it but we have been thrust into politics by those who want to eradicate us.



Since I wrote this Trump has made a number of statements... Updated December 29, 2023
The former president touted the word cloud on his Truth Social account weeks after saying that if elected to a second term, he wouldn't be a dictator, "except for day one."
NBC News
By Kyla Guilfoil
December 27, 2023


Former President Donald Trump posted a word cloud on his Truth Social account Tuesday showcasing words such as “revenge” and “dictatorship,” the result of a Daily Mail poll that asked likely voters what word they would use to describe what he wants from a second term. 

The poll, conducted by the firm J.L. Partners and released by the Daily Mail on Tuesday, asked 1,000 likely voters for one word to sum up President Joe Biden's and Trump's plans for new terms. According to the poll, the most popular word linked to what Biden planned to achieve was “nothing.” 

Trump cryptically posted the word cloud on his Truth Social account Tuesday afternoon without comment or context. The word “revenge” in crimson letters stands at the center of the word cloud, with “power” above it and “dictatorship” below it printed in orange.
Meanwhile the Independent wrote the other day,
Donald Trump has shared a graphic naming "revenge" and "dictatorship" as among his biggest goals if he wins the presidency in 2024.

In a poll published on Tuesday, The Daily Mail asked 1,000 American voters to sum up in one word what they thought Mr Trump and Joe Biden wanted from a second term in office.

The top entry in Mr Biden's word cloud was "nothing", followed by "economy" and "peace". But for Mr Trump, it was "revenge" – alongside "power", "dictatorship", "America", and "economy" again.

Mr Trump quickly shared the graphic on his Truth Social page without any further comment, raising the question of whether he endorses such terms.
But that is not all, the Washington Post reported in November,
Donald Trump and his allies have begun mapping out specific plans for using the federal government to punish critics and opponents should he win a second term, with the former president naming individuals he wants to investigate or prosecute and his associates drafting plans to potentially invoke the Insurrection Act on his first day in office to allow him to deploy the military against civil demonstrations.
Also from last month the Guardians wrote that...
Donald Trump’s talk of punishing his critics and seeking to “weaponize” the US justice department against his political opponents has experts and former DoJ officials warning he poses a direct threat to the rule of law and democracy in the US.

Trump’s talk of seeking “retribution” against foes, including some he has branded “vermin”, has coincided with plans that Maga loyalists at rightwing thinktanks are assembling to expand the president’s power and curb the DoJ, the FBI and other federal agencies. All of it has fueled critics’ fears that in a second term Trump would govern as an unprecedentedly authoritarian American leader.

Trump is currently the overwhelming favorite to win the Republican nomination for 2024 and has long maintained hefty polling leads over his party rivals. At the same time a slew of recent polls has also shown him ahead of President Joe Biden, including in key battleground states.

But scholars and ex-justice officials see increasing evidence that if they achieved power again Trump and his Maga allies plan to tighten his control at key agencies and install trusted loyalists in top posts at the DoJ and the FBI, permitting Trump more leeway to exact revenge on foes, and shrinking agencies Trump sees as harboring “deep state” critics.

Ominously, Trump has threatened to tap a special prosecutor to “go after” Biden and his family.
His cult followers are eating this up!  His MAGA followers are sticking by him.


Monday, September 28, 2020

This Is What’s At Stake

For homeless trans people there are many laws here in Connecticut that protect us from discrimination and with Trump appointing a new Supreme Court justice it will tip the court on the side of the LGBTQ haters.
The National Law Review
September 24, 2020


Nearly one-third of transgender individuals experience homelessness at some point in their life, and 70% of those who have stayed in a homeless shelter have reported some form of mistreatment, including harassment and refusal of service, due to their gender identity.  Transgender individuals are significantly more likely to end up homeless than the general population because they often face rejection by their family members and discrimination in employment and housing.  The levels of discrimination and income inequality are even higher for transgender women of color, and the COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated the rates of unemployment, poverty, and homelessness among the transgender population.

On September 22, 2020, pro bono attorneys filed a public comment letter on behalf of The National LGBT Bar Association and Foundation urging the withdrawal of a Proposed Rule issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that would severely harm homeless transgender, intersex, and gender nonconforming individuals by allowing federally funded homeless shelters to discriminate against them on the basis of their gender identity.  The Proposed Rule would eliminate key non-discrimination protections previously afforded to transgender shelter-seekers under HUD’s 2016 Equal Access Rule and would permit single-sex shelters to turn away transgender, intersex, and gender nonconforming individuals if the shelter operator determines that the individual is not of the same “biological sex” as the other shelter residents.

The Proposed Rule is premised on the medically and legally indefensible presumption that an individual’s sex can be determined solely on the basis of their external physical characteristics.   In reality, an individual’s “biological sex” is complex, multi-faceted, and primarily determined not by external physical characteristics, but by an individual’s gender identity—which is sometimes referred to as one’s “brain sex.”  The Proposed Rule’s reduction of “biological sex” to physical sex stereotypes such as “height, the presence (but not the absence) of facial hair, the presence of an Adam’s apple, and other physical characteristics,” would not only result in discrimination on the basis of gender identity and transgender status, but would also enable single-sex shelters to arbitrarily provide or deny shelter based solely on a shelter worker’s assessment of whether an individual appears sufficiently “male” or “female” enough to enter.   Denying shelter to transgender, intersex, or gender nonconforming individuals on the basis of such physical sex stereotypes constitutes a type of gender discrimination that numerous courts have found unlawful.
We celebrated the Supreme Court ruling this spring were the court determined that “sex” is more than what is between your legs. But that court ruling is now being ignored by the Trump administration.
The Washington Blade
By Chris Johnson
September 16, 2020


Faced with having to enforce the law to prohibit anti-transgender discrimination in the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision for LGBTQ rights this summer, the Trump administration has sought to minimize the breadth of the ruling in ways that could still lead to transgender people being denied access to public spaces and activities.

Although the Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, which found anti-transgender discrimination is a form of sex discrimination, thus illegal in the workplace under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, would in theory apply to all statutes and laws against sex discrimination — the Trump administration is promulgating rules allowing anti-transgender discrimination to persist with respect to sex-segregated facilities, such as homeless shelters and school sports.

It boils down to this legal theory: Denying transgender people access consistently to sex-segregated spaces with their gender identity is not tantamount to discrimination, so long as they’re so afforded entry according to their gender assigned at birth. Forcing transgender people into these spaces inconsistent with their gender identity, however, would be something few would be willing to accept, and may make them more vulnerable to harassment and violence.
[…]
“The administration is arguing that, while bans on sex discrimination encompass gender identity discrimination, they do not, in the administration’s view, require that transgender individuals be treated as the sex with which they identify,” Davidson said.
So we are going to see this back in the Supreme Court and with Justice Ginsberg not longer there to defend us what do we have to look forward to when the case reaches the court… Hint: it is not good.
She once questioned the court’s landmark ruling on marriage equality.
VOX
By Katelyn Burns
September 26, 2020


President Donald Trump nominated federal Judge Amy Coney Barrett to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court Saturday, a choice LGBTQ rights groups are concerned could lead to a reduction in the rights of LGBTQ Americans.

The Supreme Court has historically been important for the advancement of LGBTQ rights, with its rulings giving gay and lesbian people marriage equality and recently, protecting queer and trans people from employment discrimination under federal law.

And there are a number of important cases soon to come before the court; for example, Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is set to be heard the day after Election Day. That case, in which a religious adoption agency is seeking the right to turn away LGBTQ couples, will determine whether taxpayer-funded organizations are allowed to discriminate against LGBTQ people.
[…]
As Vox’s Ian Millhiser has explained, while Barrett has not served long as a federal judge, and thus does not have as long a judicial record as many Supreme Court nominees. However, as a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, “she frequently weighed in on many of the cultural fights that animate religious conservatism.”

One of these is the issue of LGBTQ rights, which has been a long and evolving debate for conservatives, many of whom have fought against policies such as trans people using the bathrooms that align with their gender identity and transition care for trans teens.
Past presidents appointed Supreme Court justices who had a life long who had a long history of rulings from the bench, while judge Barrett has only been on the bench for two years and now she has been nominated to the highest court in the land and she is only 48 years old,one of the youngest justices who have been appointed to the court for life..
Of concern to activists like David is that Bostock isn’t the only trans rights case that will hit the Supreme Court under the next justice’s tenure. The court will be called upon to rule on several big legal battles brewing for years, over issues such as transgender student bathroom rights, or trans women participating in women’s sports.
This is going to be horrible in the coming years.

You know that the court case here in Connecticut on trans athletes is going to the Supreme Court, there are no ifs ands or buts about it. And the way it stands now we will lose the case with a Trump court.



I had dinner with a couple at Max on the Pier in Wellfleet last night at sunset sitting out on the beach. They have picnic table where you can eat out on the beach.

It was a great end for the weekend with friends



 

Tuesday, September 15, 2020

It is Happening Again

Do you remember about ten years ago the ad that the Republicans used against us, the one with the creepy guy following a little girl in to the public bathroom?

Well they are doing it again.
Transgender scare tactics are back on the Republican agenda. Here's why they won't work.
Making a 2020 wedge issue out of transgender lives ignores the real lesson of 2004: Republicans can’t stop human empathy, no matter how hard they try.
USA Today
By Leigh Finke Opinion contributor
September 14, 2020


At this very moment, there is a man sitting in a room deploying a strategy to re-elect the current president based on the belief that it is unacceptable for me, a transgender woman in middle America, to exist. According to this man, the extension of basic human rights to transgender people — specifically transgender children and youth — is so self-evidently repugnant, that posing the question of our humanity will swing voters away from Joe Biden and towards Donald Trump.

This isn’t hyperbole or conjecture. This man’s name is Terry Schilling. He runs the American Principles Project in Virginia. He’s already been profiled in a Politico feature that centers on this very strategy. Schilling, the piece reports, is in the process of rolling out a campaign, starting in Michigan, targeting Biden and Democrats for supporting transgender youth.

Schilling and his supporters want to make transgender rights a “kitchen table issue” in this election. He believes that opposition to transgender rights for young people “should define the Republican Party going forward.”
[…]
Schilling and his supporters want to make transgender rights a “kitchen table issue” in this election. He believes that opposition to transgender rights for young people “should define the Republican Party going forward.”
[…]
This is very scary, I’ll admit. As Schilling moves forward with his national strategy, voters are going to hear a lot of anti-transgender messages that are harmful, cruel, and just factually inaccurate.

The author believes that this will backfire but I don’t, I think that this year is different from when voters defeated Question 3 in Massachusetts in 2018.
In 2004, President George W. Bush narrowly defeated Sen. John Kerry in part by embracing a strategy of fear-mongering about the dire consequences of marriage equality. Bush called for a constitutional amendment to ban same sex marriage, and conservatives in 13 states put such bans on their November ballots. 

The idea was to help boost turnout by so-called family values voters. And it worked. Sort of.
[…]
Making a wedge issue out of our lives ignores the real lesson of 2004, which is that the Republican Party can’t stop human empathy, no matter how hard they try. In 2004, 31% of Americans supported marriage equality, and their culture war campaign worked. Today, only 31% of Americans oppose marriage equality. It is the majority opinion in the United States that the Republican Party was wrong in 2004. Transgender rights are following in the wake of the marriage equality fight. No matter how hard you wedge us into your campaign, you’re wrong, and whether it’s this year, or next, Americans will realize it.

Okay here is my reason that I worry about the hate ads.

This is a very tight race and they will not need many votes to sway the election toward Trump. Biden is ahead in the polls but… the margin for error in the polls put them almost neck-to-neck. Even if only one percent of the people believe the ads that one percent might be enough to make Trump the winner.

The other thing, it plays to Trump evangelical Christian base and it might energize them to go out and vote while the opposite is not true for Biden.

Lastly there are many avenues of attack… student athletes, bathrooms, and public accommodations. You remember Masterpiece Cakeshop Supreme Court case? I think that is going to be a rallying cry for the haters. Yes, Question 3 in Massachusetts was defeated by a wide margin but that was a liberal state, how do you think it will play out in Tennessee or North Dakota or Kentucky or in another of the swing states? 

Fear is a very hard thing to overcome and this is a wedge issue that divides “Them vs. Us.”

Friday, August 14, 2020

We Will Be The Republican Wedge For The November Elections

The Republicans are looking for a wedge issue to take the focus off of Trump’s handling of the COVID-19 virus and his corrupt administration and we are it!
The Wedge Issue That’s Dividing Trumpworld
A group of social conservatives wants the president to embrace anti-transgender issues to reverse his sagging poll numbers. Some Trump advisers think it’s political suicide.
Politico
By Gabby Orr
August 7, 2020


In late September, during the final tense weeks of the Kentucky governor’s race, a few hundred thousand voters started seeing ads in their Facebook feeds, YouTube channels and text messages. One spot showed a teenage boy dominating a high school girls wrestling competition. The other showed a boy easily winning a girls track race. Both ads posed the same question: Is this fair?

The ads were the brainchild of Terry Schilling, a conservative activist, who runs a think tank called the American Principles Project and thinks ads like these are precisely what Republicans need to win this fall’s elections. Schilling, 34, who works out of an office in the Washington suburbs, has a simple and slightly contrarian philosophy that social issues—not economics—win elections. In the fall, Schilling had watched from a distance as Matt Bevin, a Trump ally seeking to become Kentucky’s first two-term Republican governor, struggled to pull ahead of Democrat Andy Beshear despite flogging economic development records as part of his closing pitch to voters. Beltway Republicans were beginning to brace for a defeat that would not only cost the party a precious governorship, but potentially further weaken the president’s shaky hold on suburban voters.
[…]
“What we found was the sports issue got the most powerful response from people, specifically conservative Democrats and independents,” Schilling would explain to me later.

I believe we are going to see nation wide more of these ads and others about bathrooms reminiscent of the ad of a grubby old man following a girl in to a public restroom as the Republicans try to do the Wizard of Oz thing… don’t look at the corruption look over here at “men” on girls team.
To prove that thesis, Schilling is about to test his message on the biggest electoral stage of all—the 2020 presidential race.

Next week, APP will debut two ads in battleground Michigan that accuse former Vice President Joe Biden, who has generally used his platform to promote protections for LGBTQ youth, of endorsing “gender change treatments for minors,” including surgery and hormone therapies for transgender youth. One of the ads, featuring former drag queen Kevin Whitt, warns that children “need time” to develop a stable sense of their gender. “As a young teen, I felt I should be a woman,” Whitt says. “Seventeen years later, I felt I should be a man again. Treatments to change the gender of a minor are very dangerous and irreversible.”
What can we do to neutralize these ads?

Look to Massachusetts.

In 2018 for ballot Question 3 that wanted to strip public accommodation protections from us was defeated with 67% of the voters voting in favor of keeping our protections. Their strategy as reported by WBUR,
As WBUR's Steve Brown previously reported, proponents repeatedly stressed the civil rights law "keeps Massachusetts welcoming and fair, protects transgender youths and adults and lets transgender people go about their daily lives, including the use of restrooms."
I think will work nation wide; frame the Republican attack as a mean spirited on trans children. I think it could be tired in with the Republican attack on minorities. 

Thursday, August 13, 2020

So You Say You Are Not Going To Vote In November

Yes, say you don’t like the candidates from either major party to so are A. Not Voting, B. Voting for a third party candidate, or C. Voting for a write-in candidate.

Well there are differences between the parties… major differences!

And you well know it!

I see your Facebook post and they are all anti-Trump and anti-Republican but still you won’t vote for the Democrats.

Consider this news article this morning…
Doctors concerned about complex legal landscape for transgender patients: ANALYSIS
A revision removing references to gender identity goes into effect mid-August.
ABC News
By Dr. Danielle Weitzer andSony Salzman
August 10, 2020


Discrimination can be an everyday occurrence for transgender people – even at the doctor's office.

Enacted a decade ago, the Affordable Care Act forbid discrimination among health programs that receive federal funding. Then, in 2016, the Department of Health and Human Services determined that the basis of sex discrimination as outlined in the Affordable Care Act also included reference to gender identity -- a win for the transgender community.

But in June 2020, HHS announced a new final rule excluding specific protections for transgender people. That rule is set to go into effect in mid-August.

Now, doctors are sounding the alarm in a editorial [sic] published in the New England Journal of Medicine, saying that under the new rule it once again will be legal for doctors to turn away transgender patients seeking care, effectively stripping them of protections that have been in place for four years.

It is a matter of life or death to us, sure we are in a blue bubble where we have protections (I like to remind you that only one party was against the Connecticut, you know the one, I don’t have to tell you.) but imagine you are driving to visit your nephew in North Carolina and you get into a car accident and the hospital that they rush you to, the only one for miles around, the doctors refuse to treat  you because your trans.

There is one party that is doing everything they can to strip us of health care, you know the party that I am talking about, but you are not worry because you live a blue bubble but our trans brothers and sisters in the Southern states are worried.

There was only one party that had to be taken to court to keep our coverage under Title VII and the same party will be dragged back to court over this deletion of our healthcare coverage.

Now consider this… two Supreme Court justices are ready for retirement which party do you want to see appoint the new judges?

For better or worst we live in a two party country… there is a difference between parties. One is trying to kill us.



I’ll say it again, we live in a blue bubble.
The teens say their rights — and those of other transgender Arizonans — are being violated by the state's Medicaid ban on “gender reassignment surgery.”
NBC News
By Tim Fitzsimons
August 7, 2020


Two transgender teens sued Arizona's Medicaid agency Thursday, alleging their civil rights are being violated by the state health insurance program's ban on gender-affirming surgeries.

The suit, filed Thursday in an Arizona federal courthouse, seeks to establish a class action on behalf of the teens — known only as John Doe, 15, and D.H., 17, and other transgender Arizonan Medicaid recipients under age 21 who seek chest reconstruction as treatment for a diagnosis of gender dysphoria. The complaint estimates there are at least 100 Arizonans who would be affected by the suit.

The suit defines the class as “individuals who have been unable and will be unable" to obtain coverage through the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System "for medically necessary male chest reconstruction surgery because of the [ban], and as a result, have faced or will face delayed or denied access to these medically necessary treatments.”

The claims say the state’s 1982 ban on “gender reassignment surgeries” violates the Affordable Care Act’s anti-discrimination provisions, the Medicaid Actand the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Guess which party is trying to remove us from the ACA (Obamacare)?

In our blue bubble our New England states and New York all include coverage for us in their Medicaid.

Vote in November! There is a difference in parties.

*** Additional thoughts***

When I first started out being an activist someone told me… start local. And that is so true, if you want to change the two party system start local. Get third party candidates on the town and city governments, ballots and then get them on the state ballots.

One of the things that you can do right away is get your state to do what Connecticut does with third party candidates.

If a candidate is on both the major party ballot and a third party ballot the votes are combined. In other words if John Doe is candidate on the Democratic ballot and the Green party ballot endorsed on their ballot then John Doe gets the total of the votes.

Suppose John Doe gets 10,000 vote from the Democrats and 5,000 votes from the Green party, he gets a total of 15,000 votes and wins if the Republican candidate only 12,000 votes.

We can't sit this election out! We need to vote Democratic. We need to stop these horrific attacks are killing us by the Republicans playing to the white supremacist and evangelical Christian base.

Friday, July 31, 2020

Back Story… Trump’s Grandfather

Trump family fortune… Booze and sex.

Trump’s niece just came out with her book about her uncle and she also came out as a lesbian and offers some insight in Trump’s hate of LGBTQ+ people.
In our digital cover story, the president's niece discusses her family's intolerance and questions why any LGBTQ+ person would support her uncle.
The Advocate
By John Casey
July 27 2020


Mary L. Trump — and there’s a reason that the “L” is in there — has lived a very quiet existence for most of her life, but not behind the scenes. As a member of the Trump family, she saw and endured a lot. Most of it not good, and in some ways, what she saw and experienced has made her who she is today. And, that’s how I arrived at thinking that Mary L. Trump was pretty normal. That’s saying a lot for someone with the last name of Trump.
[…]
When her book, Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World’s Most Dangerous Man, came out, I was surprised to learn that she is gay. I think most of us were, and that’s mainly because most of us probably had no idea who she was. When I Googled “Mary Trump,” her grandmother’s name popped up, so it took a second try to find the younger Mary.
[…]
What I wanted to hear about from Mary was her experience as a member of the LGBTQ+ community, which is something she rarely talks about. And that’s because like most of us, Mary has gone quietly about her way, living her life not as a gilded Trump, but as a suburban mom. Mary is not a firebrand, so I doubt we’ll see her on a gay Pride float. Which I’m sure is probably fine with Mary. She’s popped her head out to warn us all about her uncle, and once he is done, finished and finally gone — and we all hope soon — I suspect that Mary will feel that she has done her job, and go back to her discreet life. Or quietly help us all pick up the pieces.
In the article she talks about her homophobic grandfather…
In your book, you write that your grandmother said, “It was a disgrace they’re letting that little faggot Elton John sing at [Princess Diana’s] service,” and that kept you from coming out. How did that comment make you feel?
It made me feel awful, mainly because I loved Elton John. I thought it was disgraceful given the context. The man lost someone he deeply loved in a tragic way, and he thought it was best to honor Diana by singing a tribute to her publicly. 

The comment by my grandmother was so mean and small. It was not a good moment. As usual, I just ignored it and went on my way, but I knew then that I couldn’t tell anyone I was gay.
[…]
What was it like with the family? Was there just an absurd amount of toxic masculinity where white, straight rich men had the final say?
Everyone in my family was misogynist and there was a clear double standard. But thinking back, I never saw it as toxic masculinity because the only two men that mattered in my family were Donald and my grandfather. So, there was a much bigger issue, and that was this toxic positivity that my grandfather pushed on so hard.
So what about her grandfather?

According to Wikipedia (yes I know the repetition of it)…
Before leaving Seattle, Trump bought 40 acres (16 ha) in the Pine Lake Plateau, twelve miles (19 km) east of the city, for $200, which was the first major real estate purchase of the Trump family. In Monte Cristo, Trump chose a plot of land near the later train station that he wanted to build a hotel on, but could not afford the $1,000-per-acre fee to purchase it. Instead, he filed a Gold placer claim on the land, which allowed him to claim exclusive mineral rights to the land without having to pay for it, even though the land had already been claimed by Everett resident Nicholas Rudebeck. At that time, the U.S. Land Office was known to be corrupt and frequently allowed such multiple claims. Despite the placer's claim providing Trump no right to build any structure on the land, he quickly bought lumber to build a new boarding house and operate it similarly to the Dairy Restaurant. He never tried to mine gold on the land. Blair described Trump as "mining the miners" since they needed a place to sleep at night while they were mining. In July 1894, Rudebeck filed to incorporate the land and sent an agent to collect rent; this was apparently unsuccessful since the people of Monte Cristo did not pay attention to legal titles. Trump finally bought the land in December 1894. While in Monte Cristo, Trump was elected in 1896 as justice of the peace by a 32-to-5 margin.
So Trump grandfather was a con artist and when gold was discovered in the Klondike off he went. 

I dug out an article from the Canadian CBC…
Friedrich Trump amassed 'substantial nest-egg' from Yukon hotel before heading to New York
The Canadian Press
By Alexander Panetta 
September 19, 2015


Canadians amused by the improbable presidential run of Donald Trump might be surprised to learn the role their own country played in shaping his story.

Trump's grandfather started the family fortune in an adventure that involved the Klondike gold rush, the Mounties, prostitution and twists of fate that pushed him to New York City.
[…]
The move to Canada spared him financial disaster. He not only sold off two Seattle eateries, but also land in nearby Monte Cristo, Wash. — right before floods and avalanches destroyed the nearby railroad and development plans for the town were scrapped.
He realized that there was money in supplying vices to the miners, through out the articles that I read a common theme kept popping up… “Mining the Miners.” 
'Liquor and sex'
In his three years in Canada, Trump opened the Arctic Restaurant and Hotel in two locations with a partner — first on Bennett Lake in northern B.C., and then moving it to Whitehorse, Yukon.

Their two-storey wood-framed establishment gained a reputation as the finest eatery in the area, Blair said — offering salmon, duck, caribou, and oysters.

It offered more than food.

"The bulk of the cash flow came from the sale of liquor and sex," Blair wrote. She cited newspaper ads referring obliquely to prostitution — mentioning private suites for ladies, and scales in the rooms so patrons could weigh gold if they preferred to pay for services that way.
[…]
The Mounties announced plans to banish prostitution, and curb gambling and liquor. Trump quarrelled with his partner. Gold strikes were getting scarcer.
It was time to pack up and move on.

Mary L. Trump story continues,
What do you think about gay people who support your uncle?
I never understood something like the Log Cabin Republicans, but I think it’s just a broader issue. There is a significant minority of people in this country who are comfortable voting against their own self-interest, whether it’s their sexuality, race, or economic status. It’s really astonishing. 
[…]
I have to ask this question, because it was such a big deal. But what did you think about Caitlyn Jenner supporting your uncle? Was it wealth and taxes?
I thought her transition was amazing and brave. Then I heard her endorsement, and I put her in the category of people who are completely willing to vote against their own self-interest. She seems like a wealthy person, and wealthy people seem to do better — not sure that’s true — by voting for Republicans. 

When someone is that privileged they are protected in some ways, which goes against anyone else who might not be wealthy or a member of a minority. Wealth is the greatest divider.

Friday, January 20, 2017

When Will President Trump Get Impeached?

When do you think President Trump will be impeached?

Before the end of the month? Next month? Sometime during the summer? Next year?

Take the poll!

There has been some talk that the Republicans saw that Trump was going to win that as a fallback plan they would impeached president Trump and make Vice President Pence

Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Trans Rights

In this year’s political arena the candidates are speaking out on trans rights and some of their positions are head scratchers.

Bernie’s position according to Buzzfeed,
Bernie Sanders declared he was an ally to the transgender community and he vowed to expand transgender protections under existing federal civil rights laws if he’s elected — according to his answers to a presidential questionnaire sent in April by a transgender-rights advocacy group.
Hilary’s position according to her statement,
In her statement, Clinton pledged to fight for full federal equality for LGBT Americans. She advised she will work with congress to pass the Equality Act, an amendment to the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The Act would provide LGBT individuals explicit and comprehensive protection from discrimination in all facets of American life—employment, housing, schools, access to credit, public education, jury service, and public accommodations.
Now Trump’s position is hard to pin down because it is flapping all over the place. The latest that I could find was,
Last month, presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump broke with his party’s orthodoxy and came out against a North Carolina law that bans schools and public buildings from accommodating transgender individuals’ bathroom use.

“North Carolina did something that was very strong,” Trump told Today, “and they’re paying a big price. There’s a lot of problems.”

But Trump has steadily walked those comments back during the handful of weeks since. In fact, Trump’s recent comments suggest he doesn’t actually object to anti-trans state laws like North Carolina’s aforementioned HB2 after all.

Earlier this month, Trump said that while he thinks "transgender people should be protected under the law," the bathroom issue is one that should be left to the individual states to sort out. The problem with that position, however, is that states like North Carolina are passing laws that do the very opposite of protect trans people.

Then, during an appearance on The O'Reilly Factor this Monday, Trump rolled out another rationale for why states shouldn't be required to accommodate trans people -- it's allegedly too expensive.

"Frankly, it would be unbelievably expensive nationwide," Trump said, referring to gender neutral bathrooms. "It would be hundreds of billions of dollars."
So take your pick on whether he is for trans rights or against them, it seems to depend upon his mood and audience.

Personally  I feel that human rights, not just trans rights but women’s right to determine their own reproductive health, integration, and freedom from religious persecution are the important issues for me this election cycle.

I believe that the Republicans cry is to get government off our back overlook the fact that they want to put government into our doctor’s office and tell us what we can do with our bodies. What could be more invasive that what Republican legislators have proposed… vaginal ultrasounds before a woman can get an abortion?

They have passed legislation that gives special rights to people to disregard laws and discriminate against people that they don’t agree just by saying it is against their religion.

In parts of the south segregation is alive and growing.

They are disenfranchising hundreds of thousands of voters in states and claim it is to stop voter fraud which they have admitted in court doesn’t exisit.

I cannot in good conscious vote Republican , a party that as part of their party platform criminalizes me.