Wednesday, June 24, 2026

They Have No Guts

I was reading an article in the Christian Science Monitor about how Trump has warped the presidency.
By Caitlin Babcock 
May 28, 2026


Just about anything a president wants to do – such as go to war, start an infrastructure project, or strengthen law enforcement – requires financing from Congress.

But increasingly, the government’s money hasn’t been going where Congress says it should.

The Trump administration is using unprecedented tactics to test the boundaries of how it can control taxpayer money that Congress has budgeted, threatening one of Congress’ core functions under the Constitution – and one of its strongest checks on executive power.

The efforts are a direct assertion of presidential power, often wielded in the name of taming wasteful spending. But the actions also reach into Congress itself.

Under presidential pressure, Congress is slowly upending its own spending process, passing party-line bills that circumvent its normal, bipartisan procedure and give presidents broader leeway. For example, Republicans hope to soon pass a bill that will fund federal immigration enforcement for years in advance.
But this is the result of a Congress that has no backbone. What we need is to elect people who listen to the voters and not to Trump. I don't even call it the "Republican party" anymore because it is non-existent.

Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 of the U.S. Constitution states: "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law." This and the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 both make illegal what Trump is doing. But if the Republicans in Congress ignore the laws, Trump becomes a dictator... a King!
Still, the practice signals a profound shift in how money is spent, raising questions over how or whether taxpayers can hold the government accountable and whether more White House control over spending will become a “new normal” that permanently expands a president’s power.

In Congress, even some members of President Trump’s party aren’t entirely comfortable with the transfer of spending authority.

“Retaining our constitutional authority has always been something that I see as important, and hopefully my colleagues do, too. So I hope that we maintain a balance,” says Republican Rep. Dan Newhouse of Washington, who sits on the House Appropriations Committee. “Or else we become more and more irrelevant.”
Why can this happen? The Impoundment Control Act of 1974 was passed specifically because President Richard "Tricky Dick" Nixon kept refusing to spend money that Congress had allocated for programs he disliked. Congress stepped in to say, "No, if we pass it and appropriate the funds, you must spend it."

But this is happening because it takes a two-thirds majority to convict him. The House only needs a simple majority to impeach him, but the Senate needs a two-thirds vote to convict. As a result, Trump can get away with all the stuff he has been pushing.
Mr. Trump and his executive branch have asserted the power to spend as well as to cut, in ways that Congress hasn’t authorized. Emergency declarations over immigration and energy paved the way for sending military reservists to the Southern border and promoting fossil fuel development.
Trump knows that he has instilled a fear of losing their reelections that keeps them prostrating themselves to him. But he is losing his grip on them with his polling numbers in the 30s. Some of them smell blood in the polls and want to see who to hitch their wagon to: Trump or the voters?

Tuesday, June 23, 2026

A Racist Government!

We all know this. We saw it in the promotions in the military. We saw it in his cabinet picks. We see it in his staffing picks suck as Stephen Miller.
Recently the War Secretary found all qualified Black Americans and women eligible for a promotion to the rank of General “not fit” to receive the promotion
The Hartford Courant
By Gary Franks
June 17, 2026


President Donald Trump is definitely color blind, as he can only see white, and as far as gender, it is men in all key roles. Maybe it has something to do with how Trump amassed large vote totals. White men carried Trump into the White House.

Now, he’s still defending an Anti-Weaponization Fund of $1.776 billion that would have had nearly all, if not all, of their proposed reparations payout going to “white men.” (It should be noted that 400 years of Black slavery to get zero dollars in reparations, while a few hours of questionable and many illegal acts — i.e., attacking police officers — could have shared nearly $2 billion in reparations. Oh well).

Let us review the record of Trump 2.0 on race and gender.

Women and Black Americans have never fared well in Trump’s political orbit. The number of Black Republicans in the House of Representatives will go from the best ever to the worst since when I was the lone Black Republican in Congress — thanks, at least in part, to Trump. Leading Republican women voices in Congress will also be gone in January, thanks at least partially to Trump.
The Washington Post reported that Trump's cabinet current administration also is around 80–90% White overall.
Recently the War Secretary found all qualified Black Americans and women eligible for a promotion to the rank of General “not fit” to receive the promotion. Yet, all the white men eligible for a promotion to the rank of General were promoted.

This is the War Secretary (Pete Hegseth) that denied Black Engineers the opportunity to interview and compete for jobs in the Defense Department and followed by doubling down on his attack to deny opportunities to Black Americans. He “strongly suggested” that corporations doing business with the Pentagon also should not even interview Black engineering prospects at the job fair.
My concerns is that Hegseth is making the military into a White Christian male army. That he takes his crusader's persona to heart... Christian White males warriors.
Any objective political scientists, academics, sociologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, statisticians, or “seventh graders” would be able to figure out that our president has serious issues with strong women leaders and Black Americans who are not former athletes.
Then we have the Secretary of Defense, Hegseth... George Public Broadcasting reported that,
 Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth intervened to stop the promotions of several high-ranking service members including four Army officers, two Black men and two female soldiers, on track to become one-star generals, NPR has confirmed.

According to a U.S. official not authorized to speak publicly, Hegseth made the highly unusual move of interfering in the regular promotion process, as first reported in the New York Times. A second U.S. official also not authorized to speak publicly confirmed that Hegseth has been weeding out senior officers who are deemed ideologically incompatible.

NPR has also learned that a Black colonel and a female colonel from another branch of the military were taken off the promotion list, according to a U.S. official not authorized to speak publicly. This would bring the total to at least six promotions blocked by Hegseth.
They say that racism runs in families... Trump's father was arrested in Queens, New York in 1927 during a violent Memorial Day clash between the police and members of the Ku Klux Klan.

Hun?

So I have been getting 3 or 4 calls a day from something that the caller ID said "PCH" so after a week of getting "PCH" the only thing that I could thing of was "Publisher Clearing House... but I thought that they went under. So my curiosity got the better of me.

Well it turns out that they say it is an organization that collecting money for police that are victims of assault. But Guide Star didn't have any non-profit by PCH name.

When I searched on the internet, I got:

That opening line is a very common script used in fundraising pitches, especially ones tied to law-enforcement-themed charities—and also by a fair number of questionable or outright scam operations.

A pitch starting with something like “the growing number of assaults on police officers…” is designed to:

  • create urgency
  • trigger sympathy for officers
  • reduce skepticism before asking for money

What it could be

In Connecticut and elsewhere, that wording is often used by groups claiming to support things like:

  • local “police support funds”
  • officer injury/benefit funds
  • police union–adjacent charities (sometimes loosely connected to groups like the Fraternal Order of Police or similar associations)
  • “fallen officer” or “public safety” foundations

Why it raises suspicion

That exact style of pitch is also heavily used by bogus telemarketers and door-to-door fundraisers, because:

  • it sounds official without naming a specific organization
  • it avoids verifiable details early in the conversation
  • it leans on a real-world concern (attacks on officers) to build credibility

Quick way to judge what you were dealing with

If you remember anything else, these details matter a lot:

More likely legitimate if:

  • they gave a specific organization name (not just “police fund”)
  • they provided a mailing address in Connecticut
  • they offered a website ending in a known org domain (.org tied to a real group)
  • they didn’t pressure you for immediate payment

More likely a scam if:

  • it was vague (“support our officers fund”)
  • they pushed urgency or guilt
  • they asked for gift cards, cash apps, or instant payment
  • they refused to clearly identify the department or charity registration
Bottom line
That opening line alone doesn’t confirm legitimacy—it’s a standard emotional hook used by both real fundraisers and scams. In practice, most complaints about “police fund” solicitations come from unaffiliated telemarketing outfits using law-enforcement themes, not actual police departments.

So what out! It maybe a scam!

Monday, June 22, 2026

Cuckoo Award!

Today's Cuckoo Award is going out to the states with straight Pride!

Yeah... the majority gets to gloat over all the discrimination they heap on the minorites!
Fernando Cervantes Jr.
USA TODAY
June 3, 2026


Several Republican-led states have moved to designate June “Nuclear Family Month” or similar observances, creating an overlapping contrast with Pride Month.

Tennessee was the first to adopt the label this year, followed by proclamations in Indiana and Alabama emphasizing households with a mother, father and children. Supporters frame the observance as recognition of traditional family structures, while opponents say the timing and language amount to political counterprogramming that excludes LGBTQ+ families.

“Homes led by stable parents, a father and a mother, provide children with the structure and discipline necessary to succeed,” Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey, a Republican, said in a statement. “In Alabama, we celebrate these hardworking parents that strive for an even better future for their children.”
Yup, like the guy with three wives and five children from them. And he was having an affair with while married to one of them.

Before I came out as trans, I never knew anyone LGBTQ+ and I believe that the lie that they hopped form one bed to another. The first couple that I met were together for 40 years!

Turning Discrimination Laws On Their Heads!

This is so bigoted, and vindictive. It is a perversions of the non-discrimination laws!


An investigation into Major League Baseball by the United States Department of Justice into possible discrimination against four San Francisco Giants players has been opened after they wrote Bible verses on their hats during the team's Pride Night.

On June 12, three Giants pitchers, Landen Roupp, JT Brubaker and Ryan Walker, broke MLB protocol by altering their uniforms with Bible verses on their Pride Night caps, which featured a rainbow Giants logo. And another pitcher, Sam Hentges, did not even wear his Pride Night hat. The players received a warning from MLB for violating the uniform policy. 

The DOJ said it was referring Major League Baseball to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in a letter written to Commissioner Rob Manfred.
So let me get this straight! They say it is their religious right to discriminate against others... just like they did with in the Jim Crows are. They believed that the Bible said it is okay to hate their neighbors but on 
"The three players expressed their opposition to MLB's pro-Pride orthodoxy," Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said in the letter. "The Civil Rights Act prohibits MLB and its franchises from unreasonably burdening the rights of players with religious objections to serving as the League's vehicle for pro-Pride messages.
So they are hiding the bigoty behind their religion! "Oh it's against my religion to treat everyone equal!"

How many times have you been to a game when it was some "night or other" for Oracle Park some of the other notable ones include:
  • Mexican Heritage Night – June 23
  • Irish Heritage Night – June 24
  • Italian Heritage Night – July 28
  • Native American Heritage Night – August 28
  • Filipino Heritage Night – September 8
  • Fiesta Gigantes (Latino-themed celebration) – multiple dates during the season
So the real question is: Is the DOJ going after all the other "special nights" or are they just going after Pride night, if so isn't that discriminatory? Just about all sports teams have "special nights" even the Hartford Yard Goats have a Pride night!

This is nothing more then an attempt to intimidates sports teams into not holding Pride events.

I am reminded the lyrics from the song "One Tin Soldier (The Legend of Billy Jack)"
Go ahead and hate your neighbor
Go ahead and cheat a friend
Do it in the name of Heaven
You can justify it in the end
There won't be any trumpets blowin'
Come the Judgment Day
On the bloody morning after
One tin soldier rides away
It seems all these religious people forget this...
“He answered: ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’; and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’” – Luke 10:27
It seems to me, all these super Christians have failed that command. 

The Department Of Dirty Tricks

Remember Nixon’s bag of dirty tricks? We Trump makes him look like amateur night!

Gerrymandering! Voter purges! Banning mail-in ballots! Voter IDs! They are all designed to rig the elections.
Two shadowy groups, Lead Left and Real Change, received all their funds from a super PAC that also supports Republicans.
Politico
By Jessica Piper
06/21/2026


A Republican-linked group was the sole funded of two pop-up super PACs that spent more than $4.3 million across a swath of Democratic congressional primaries to support candidates seen as less electable.

Democrats had speculated that the two groups, Real Change PAC and Lead Left, were Republican meddling as they spent heavily across Democratic primary races in Texas, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Nebraska and Maine in recent months.

New filings submitted to the Federal Election Commission late Saturday night show both groups got all of their money so far from Conservative Americans PAC, a super PAC founded in 2023 that this cycle has also sent money to the Senate Leadership Fund — Senate Republicans’ super PAC arm — and a host of other Republican groups.
This is why I am against open primaries, they allow voters to vote for the weaker other party’s candidates!
The meddling super PACs, which have spent entirely in open Democratic primaries, have a mixed record so far. In Maine’s 2nd District, state auditor Matt Dunlap — who benefited from a bit over $500,000 in spending from Real Change PAC boosting him and attacking one of his primary rivals — was declared the winner in recent days and will be Democrats’ nominee in a light red seat they are hoping to keep in November.
The Republican’s have made rigging elections an art form!

I Don't Like This!

Big Brother is coming!

They just put speed cameras around town. In the past, I wrote about them, but this time I want to write about the data. Who gets to see it? How do they get to see the data—do they need a subpoena or just cash? How long do they keep it? And most importantly... how many errors does it make? In other words, what is its accuracy? Those are all questions that need answers. We are already seeing ICE and CBP agents getting unfettered access to data in states that supposedly require a subpoena.

But now they have taken it a step further..
Facial recognition tech is coming to a queer bar near you — if it’s not already there
Local media and a digital rights organization are sounding the alarm in San Francisco.
LGBT Nation
Greg Owen
June 19, 2026


A digital rights advocacy group is reupping its call to ban biometric facial recognition technology in bars and other venues serving the LGBTQ+ community after new reporting revealed widespread use of the technology in San Francisco’s Castro District.

This week, Gazetteer SF put a spotlight on the face-scanning technology that’s been hiding in plain sight in multiple Castro venues for over a year.
 
Hart Owen, a guest at Mix bar on 18th Street in the iconic gayborhood, said she was taken aback when she saw the tech stationed at the bar’s front entrance.   

She’d just handed her ID to the bouncer when she was directed to turn and face a small camera before being allowed into the bar.
I don't know if I would want to go to a place that does that.
Why are San Francisco gay bars scanning patrons’ faces?
Guests say the use of facial recognition technology at Castro bars undermines the sense of anonymity and safety that LGBTQ+ spaces have historically provided.
 The Advocate
Jacob Ogles
Jun 12, 2026

 
The use of facial-scanning technology at several San Francisco gay bars has angered many in the LGBTQ+ community. At locations often frequented by people who are not publicly out, the notion of tracking patrons' whereabouts in the very havens sought for privacy raises many alarms.

At least three gay bars in the Castro District have started using Patronscan Guard+, a technology intended to flag fake IDs, according to the San Francisco Gazetteer. But the experience of having a camera turned on every person entering the venues, often without warning, has left many outraged.
Yeah, I would be alarmed too! As a member of a highly persecuted minority, I can't help but wonder: what happens to the data?
Hart Owen told the outlet that she considers the surveillance technology a serious risk to privacy. “It’s really not great to have lists of gay people,” they said.
I can see the pros of it, like spotting a troublemaker. Suppose some "gay-bashers" are making the rounds harassing patrons. Yeah, I can see the benefit there, but only if I have answers to my questions. I would even like to see a sign posted stating their policies, if only to avoid things like this:
New York City’s main sports arena allegedly used facial recognition to stalk & ban a trans woman
She became an obsession for Madison Square Garden’s head of security.
LGBTQ Nation
Greg Owen 
April 22, 2026
 
 
 A transgender fan of the New York Knicks basketball team was tracked over a two-year period using sophisticated face recognition technology at Madison Square Garden (MSG), according to a lawsuit by a fired former security official who worked there. The woman was later banned from the venue.

The suit alleges that Nina Richards (not her real name) became a fixation for the head of security working for James Dolan, the owner of MSG, Radio City Music Hall, and the Sphere, among other venues that use the same surveillance technology. Dolan, scion of former cable TV titan Charles Dolan, also owns the Knicks and the New York Rangers hockey team.
See, this is where having answers to my questions is important:
The lawsuit’s allegation follows news in 2024 that Dolan added the faces of up to 1,500 lawyers involved in litigation against his companies to his facial recognition system at MSG, banning them from the property.
 
[...]
 
 Described by another security staffer as “a very large transgender woman, being a fan,” Eversole determined that Richards was a threat to players and the team’s image. He ordered her to be added MSG’s facial-recognition database and instructed staffers to perform an open source “work-up” on her, based on the images captured by their cameras and other intelligence gathered by security.

Eversole allegedly wanted to keep Richards “away from the players.”

Richards was targeted “because of her gender identity,” according to the suit filed by former MSG security staffer Donnie Ingrasselino.

We need rules with teeth, not just a slap on the wrist. Law enforcement should be required to obtain a search warrant that does not blindly allow database searches. Instead, they should need a specific warrant tied to a particular investigation, not a general warrant allowing them to sift through entire facial-recognition databases looking for matches.

Ownership of the data should rest with the towns, not with a private company that can sell access to the database.

This could lead us down the road to 1984.

So, what do you think?