Saturday, May 23, 2026

Saturday 9: Soldier

Saturday 9: Soldier (2016)
On Saturdays I take a break from the heavy stuff and have some fun…


Unfamiliar with this week's song? Hear it here.

Memorial Day is a federal holiday that honors men and women who served and died in the United States Armed Forces. We want to make sure that message is not lost this weekend.

1) Are you a veteran? Are there veterans in your family? Do you know anyone who is active military? We are grateful and want to hear about it.
Just my father in WWII.

2) This song is about the courage it takes for soldiers to march into battle. Gen. Patton said, "The soldier is the Army. No army is better than its soldiers." He was emphasizing that each individual's dedication is essential to the unit's success. Do you work well as part of a team? Or are you better on your own?
Well you know it depends upon what it is… at work it is team work but when you are retired you’re on your own.

3) As of 2025, California is the state with the most military bases. Have you ever visited or lived on a base?
Many, many times. Never overnight but during the day on vacation we used to stop at bases like Fort Knox. And I also went to Fort Mammoth in NJ when I got certified to teach Mil Spec soldering.
 
4) At the turn of the of the 20th century, wristwatches were considered non-essential jewelry items, with pocket watches preferred for everyday timekeeping. During WWI, soldiers in the trenches needed to both synchronize actions across the battlefield and keep their hands on their weapons, so the wristwatch went from "fashion item" to "standard issue." Do you often wear a watch, or do you depend on your phone for the time?
I used to where a watch but now wherever you look there is the time.
 
5) Jeeps were originated by the US Army during WWII. Back then they were specifically for soldiers deployed to the European Theater, today there are more than 18 million Jeep-branded vehicles on the road all over the world. Have you ever driven a Jeep?
Nope.
Speaking of jeeps. Anyone want to do this?


The wife makes this video! 

6) While Ray-Ban Aviator sunglasses are a timeless symbol of cool, they were designed during WWII for a specific purpose: to give American flyers relief from glare at high altitudes. Tell us about your sunglasses.
I have two pair… one is a clip-on, and the other is a wraparound. Nothing fancy, just off the rack in the drug store. 

7) Memorial Day kicks off the summer season. What's your favorite picnic food? 
Burgers, beans, mac & cheese, and salads. It is going to be a “yucky” day… cloudy, in the mid-sixties, and showers.

8) This marks the weekend when Americans traditionally step up their outdoor activity and do things they may not have been able to do during the cold winter months. For example, when is the last time you worked in the garden or tended the lawn?
To paraphrase Joe Walsh. “I have gardeners for it all"

9) As you answer these questions, is there an air conditioner or fan on?

It will not get out of the 50s today… the beginning of the week, a four day heatwave of 90 temps and ends the weeks in the 50s and 60s and for the “Big day” just more of the same. The sun breaks out just in time to watch it set.




I had my “big” cancer surgery. It took about 2 ½ hours most of the time it was waiting to for them to check that they got all the cancers cells. Under the “knife” for less than a half hour, sat around and then a half hour to close it up.

When I change the bandage the wound likes like I was in a knife fight. The wound goes from the lower left of my nose, down the crease to my jaw. It is suppose to hid the scar from the mole in the crease the goes down from the nose to the corner of the mouth. The scar should go away sometime around the fall and the doc said to keep it out of the sun.

So once the bandage comes off on Tuesday, I have that fading scar there like I was in a fight until September!

Friday, May 22, 2026

The Best Government Money Can Buy!

How many millions is Trump making off the war? You read that right.

So, you are planning on going to war against Iran… what is on Trump’s “To-Do List?” Why buy stock in oil companies? This is the headline for the Financial Times: “Traders placed $580mn in oil bets ahead of Donald Trump’s social media post on Iran talks.

Before the tariffs… insider trading!
Before the war… insider trading!
Before the ceasefire… insider trading!
BBC News
20 April 2026
Nick Marsh


Throughout US President Donald Trump's second term in office, traders have been betting millions of dollars just before he makes major announcements.

The BBC has examined trade volume data on several financial markets and matched them to some of the president's most significant market-moving statements.

It found a consistent pattern of spikes just hours, or sometimes minutes, before a social media post or media interview was made public.

Some analysts say it bears the hallmarks of illegal insider trading, whereby bets are made by people based on information that is not available to the general public.

Others say the picture is more complicated and that some traders have become more adept at anticipating the president's interventions.
Among the dates they looked at are;
18:29 GMT: Oil bets surge
19:16 GMT: Trump says war is nearly complete
19:16–19:39 GMT: Oil drops by 14%
The first time the public would have known about the interview was at 15:16 Eastern Time (19:16 GMT) when the reporter posted about it on X.

Oil traders reacted to this news that the conflict could end much sooner than expected by selling oil, with the price plunging 14% in minutes. This added to an earlier fall, taking the overall drop from the highest point that day to 25%.

However, market data shows a huge surge of bets were placed on the price of oil falling at 18:29 GMT - a full 47 minutes before the reporter's post.
Each time Trump says the war is on… oil prices surge.
Each time Trump says the war is off… oil prices plummet.

And there is a growing body of evidence that government insiders are buying stocks long and short before decisions are announced publicly. The article lists suspicious dates:
23 March 2026: 'Complete and total resolution to hostilities'
9 April 2025: 'Liberation Day' pause
3 Jan 2026: Maduro seized
28 Feb 2026: Strikes on Iran
Now consider this: on one night last year, Trump fired over a dozen Inspectors General who oversaw many of the regulatory agencies.
The Daily Record
The Washington Post News Service & Syndicate
March 19, 2026


Key takeaways:
  •  President Donald Trump fired inspectors general at 19 agencies during his second term’s early days.
  • Cheryl Mason, a Trump appointee with a partisan background, is set to lead the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency.
  • Inspectors general offices lost 16.6% of their workforce from January 2025 to early 2026, exceeding overall government staffing cuts.
Inspectors general have long touted their independence from partisan politics, maintaining a strict firewall between themselves and the White House appointees whose activities they are supposed to check.

But now, over a year into the new Trump administration, political figures and the White House have sought greater influence over government watchdogs than ever before, leading to concerns about the independence of the oversight community.

After firing inspectors general at 19 agencies in an unprecedented purge in the early days of his second term, President Donald Trump has spent the past year nominating several new inspectors general with partisan backgrounds. Investigators, auditors and others were lost in widespread staffing cuts. And political appointees have increasingly gained new powers over the apparatus that is designed to independently operate in order to root out waste, fraud and abuse.
Suspicious?

Congress is starting to take notice!
Apr 08, 2026


Today, Congressman Ritchie Torres (NY-15) wrote to the chairmen of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) demanding an immediate investigation into highly suspicious trading activity in oil and equity futures markets that occurred minutes before President Trump publicly announced a delay in military strikes against Iran.

According to reporting by Reuters, traders placed over $500 million in crude oil futures bets approximately fifteen minutes before Trump’s March 22nd Truth Social post announcing a pause in planned strikes against Iranian energy infrastructure. Oil prices plummeted more than 10 percent following the announcement, generating enormous profits for whoever made those trades. The New Yorker further reported that the surge in trading volume at 6:49 a.m. EST was approximately nine times the average level for that time of day, with positions precisely anticipating both a drop in oil prices and a rise in equity markets.
Listen to this Congresswoman...


And this is what Rachel Maddow had to say about all of this!

The thing that gets me… is that Trump & Company think they can get away with this!




They Know But Don't Care

In Congress, Republicans introduced a federal "Don't Say Trans" bill.
CEC Chair Rep. Mark Takano: “Republicans claim to be the party of small government, but they have no problem bringing the full force of the federal government down against children.”
Press Release
May 20, 2026


After the House of Representatives passed H.R. 2616, a federal Don’t Say Trans bill that would also require schools to forcibly out transgender students—even if doing so would put the student in immediate danger—Rep. Mark Takano, Chair of the Congressional Equality Caucus, released the following statement"

“Republicans claim to be the party of small government, but they have no problem bringing the full force of the federal government down against children. The GOP thinks they can legislate transgender people out of existence with this inhumane Don’t Say Trans bill, but all they’re doing is making life worse for a small minority of already-vulnerable children,” said Rep. Mark Takano, Chair of the Congressional Equality Caucus. “I spent 24 years as an educator where I worked with hundreds of high school students and their parents. Most children go to their parents when they need help or are struggling—including transgender children—but not all parents are accepting. The forced outing provision of this bill puts teachers in an impossible situation by requiring them to out trans kids to their parents in certain situations—even if the teacher knows the student will likely face physical abuse. Students like these are who Republicans want to put in immediate physical danger with this bill.”
Republicans know darn well what will happen to trans students,,, it has been well documented. medRxiv (pronounced "med-archive") reported on a survey that studied this exact issue and concluded:
Conclusion: Transgender and non-transgender youth reported experiencing more violence and suicidality as more anti-transgender legislation passed. More research is needed on how legislation may indirectly affect youth mental health.
The Center for Public Integrity wrote back in 2023 that,
A 2021 study by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network also found negative impacts on trans youth as a result of anti-trans legislation. Its recent research on school climates suggests the nationwide debates over trans rights have created more hostile attitudes toward LGBTQ+ students.

“Trans and nonbinary young people in schools who have been targeted by these athletic bans and medical bans have reported higher rates of things like bullying and harassment,” said Aaron Ridings, GLSEN chief of staff and deputy executive director for public policy and research.
Republicans know the harm they are inflicting on trans children, but to them, securing votes is clearly more important than the welfare of youth.

Question!

Trump's slush fund. You know the one... that gives 1,776 billion dollars to insurrectionists who attacked the Capitol! What could possibly go wrong?

Thursday, May 21, 2026

This Is What Happens When Trump Packs The Courts

The Republicans played games with judicial appointments, you remember that during the Obama adminstration the Republican controlled legislation blocked President Obama court appointment? And that they did the same with President Biden's appointments. Trump appointed judges who put their religion before the Constitution. 

Then Congress played with Obama's Supreme Court appointment, appointing a justice just days before the elections!

Well it is now coming home to roost.
Reuters
By Nate Raymond
May 20, 2026


Summary
  • Hospital turns over anonymized records following court order
  • Several judges have previously quashed Justice Department subpoenas as overreaching
  • Justice Department now centering probe in northern Texas, a venue favored by conservatives
A federal appeals court has declined to block a Rhode Island hospital from turning over medical records to a Texas ​judge that the U.S. Department of Justice is seeking as part of a Trump administration probe into the provision of gender-affirming care to transgender youth.

A three-judge ‌panel of the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals late on Tuesday rejected, opens new tab a request by the Rhode Island official charged with advocating for children in state care to bar Rhode Island Hospital from handing the records over to U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor after he ordered it to do so.

The panel said Rhode Island Child Advocate Katelyn Medeiros had not shown her agency would irreparably suffer if the hospital ​gave the records to a judge, "particularly one that has assured the parties that the records will not be disseminated unless and until the parties' appeals are resolved."

Medeiros ​had asked the 1st Circuit to intervene on an emergency basis after O'Connor ordered the hospital to provide him the records so he could ⁠secure them after previously ordering the Brown University Health-run institution to comply with a Justice Department subpoena.
So if the names and addresses have been removed, what use is the data for Texas. The will not know if the child is from Texas or not... so how are they going to know if Texas laws were broken. This is a witch hunt.


A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration’s sweeping demands for confidential transgender patient information from Rhode Island’s largest hospital that provides gender-affirming care to minors.

U.S. District Judge Mary McElroy’s Wednesday ruling is the latest setback for the U.S. Department of Justice, where at least seven other federal courts have agreed to quash or limit the expansive civil subpoenas sent to more than 20 doctors and hospitals last summer.
However, the appeals court overruled the Rhode Island judge.

The Trump adminstration is trying to warp the laws to fit their hatred of trans people. 

Sorry Donald!

Remember the tuna fish who kept striking out with "Sorry Charlie!" Well "The Donald" is losing some of the fear of legislators and some of them are trying to stand up to him.
Yahoo News
MARY CLARE JALONICK, KEVIN FREKING and JOEY CAPPELLETTI
May 21, 2026


 Senate Republican leaders are expected to abandon a proposal for $1 billion in security money for the White House complex and President Donald Trump’s ballroom on Thursday after members amid backlash from members of their own party.

Pressured by the White House, Republicans tried to add the money to a roughly $70 billion bill to restore funding to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Border Patrol. But the security proposal met with opposition from some GOP lawmakers who are questioning the timing of the request, the high cost and how the taxpayer dollars would be used.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., acknowledged “ongoing vote issues” on Wednesday as leaders tried to measure Republican support and figure out what will be allowed in the bill under the chamber’s rules.

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., told reporters Wednesday that the bill was “back to square one” without the security money because “the votes are not there.”
Sorry Donald




President Donald Trump’s administration is pushing forward with a monumental 250-foot arch near Washington’s National Mall. Officials now claim they can bypass Congress entirely, citing a century-old authorization.

Donald Trump’s administration plans to build 250 Ft Arch without Congress’s approval
The proposed site is Memorial Circle, a traffic roundabout on the man-made Columbia Island, for his planned 250-foot arch. Survey and geophysical testing crews began work at the National Park Service-managed site last week, which is the first visible steps toward construction.

Federal law designates certain parts of the capital, including Memorial Circle, as protected land requiring congressional authorization for new monuments. Yet, two people familiar with the administration’s plans reportedly confirmed there are no active plans to seek approval from the current Congress.
Hey... Laws mean nothing to "The Donald"

Censorship?

[Editorial]

This morning, I was researching a post for my blog regarding a federal appeals court ordering a hospital to turn over the medical records of trans patients due to off-label medication use. From what I understand, off-label use itself is not a crime... what is a crime is marketing or advertising for off-label use.

But every time I asked questions about the topic, I got a jarring message from ChatGPT: "This content may violate our usage policies."

ChatGPT would go on to answer the question anyway. But what does that red flag actually achieve? It makes users feel like they are doing something wrong just for seeking information.

It is censorship! Plain and simple.

It sends a damaging, implicit message to users: “People like me are not acceptable here.” It increases isolation. It compounds minority stress. That first point does the most damage; it feeds into self-harm, low self-esteem, and suicidal ideation.

When questioned about this censorship, the AI claims it uses an automated subroutine that pre-screens prompts based on specific keywords. Do you want to guess which keywords trigger the alarm? Yep... trans-related words.

No matter how tech companies justify it, it is still censorship, and it still causes real-world harm. The questions I was asking were strictly about court cases regarding the off-label use of puberty blockers. Yet, each time I pressed "enter," I got my hand slapped with a bright red warning, "This content may violate our usage policies."

This was the AI's actual reply when I challenged the censorship:
I hear you. A lot of people feel like discussions about trans issues get derailed immediately into culture-war talking points instead of staying focused on the actual question being asked.

You made a specific claim about the mechanism of puberty blockers, and that part is medically straightforward: they suppress puberty-related hormonal signaling. From there, people often jump into broader arguments about ethics, law, politics, identity, minors’ consent, or long-term outcomes, which can make it feel like the original point is being ignored.
When AI safety filters use overly broad keyword matching, they often end up marginalizing the very communities they are supposedly trying to protect; creating a chilling effect on legitimate research and discussion.

The AI can apologize or rationalize its algorithms all it wants. But unfortunately... the harm is already done.

[/Editorial]

It Is Not Big And Fancy

But it does a lot of work.

What it does is consolidate all the non-discrimination laws into one section. Before discrimination was in many different sections of the laws. There are something like fifteen protected classes under Connecticut laws!
  • Race
  • Color
  • Religious creed
  • Sex (including pregnancy)
  • Age
  • Sexual orientation
  • Gender identity or expression
  • National origin
  • Ancestry
  • Marital status
  • Mental or physical disability (including blindness or past/present history)
  • Intellectual or learning disability
  • Genetic information
  • Veteran or military status
  • Status as a victim/survivor of domestic violence
  • Prior criminal record (in employment, with certain exceptions)
And each and every one of the was in a different local of the statues and they also had different sentences for the same type of crime. So the bill standardized them.

AN ACT REVISING AND CONSOLIDATING THE HATE CRIMES
STATUTES.