Wednesday, February 25, 2026

He Is Not Happy Until...

The economy, healthcare, and crime are the top concerns for most voters, while trans rights tend to fall low down the list. Yet we are often treated as “low-hanging fruit.” Politicians like Trump and his cohorts exploit ignorance about trans people to redirect attention away from more pressing issues, such as government corruption, violence, and the erosion of civil liberties. By stoking fear and misunderstanding about trans people, they create a convenient distraction from the real challenges facing citizens.
Opinion: The president's demonization of trans youth in his State of the Union requires a concerted pushback in school boards, family conversations, workplaces, and everyday speech, writes contributor Josh Ackley.
The Advocate
Josh Ackley
Feb 25, 2026


There is a comforting story many of us tell about progress. We imagine rights arrive because the world improves, knowledge spreads, time passes, and people naturally become kinder. We picture history as a staircase that society slowly climbs together.

Anyone paying attention now understands that is not how this works. Rights survive only when someone decides to hold them in place.
Oh... that is so true. Our rights are only skin deep! One judge, one legislator, and one governor away from loosing them!
Political speeches often elevate individual stories to humanize public policy, but this was something different. Here the young person’s life was enlisted as proof of a broader cultural crisis. Family dynamics, medical realities, and ongoing legal proceedings were flattened into a narrative of urgency and threat. The audience was invited to feel alarm rather than curiosity and certainty rather than compassion. Anecdote became mandate in a matter of seconds, and a child’s vulnerability was transformed into justification for federal intervention.
We can do the same! Our stories are powerful! Our families are powerful!

I have been out in this community for a quarter of a century. I have seen children transition, and I have detransition and get on with their lives. But these children who are poster children for the conservatives who are parading them around the country to go and tell their stories before legislators, I have to wonder what is that doing to them?
LGBT+ groups say ‘forced outing’ endangers vulnerable gender nonconfirming teens in unsupportive families
The Independent 
Alex Woodward
25 February 2026


President Donald Trump used a teenage girl’s story to call for a ban on states and schools allowing transgender and nonbinary students to socially transition without parental consent, in what civil rights groups have called “forced outing” that endangers vulnerable children.

Trump singled out the story of a Virginia teenager during his State of the Union address Tuesday to call on Congress to further restrict transgender and nonbinary youth after his administration imposed sweeping bans targeting trans Americans over the last year.

Sage Blair’s mother, Michele, sued the Appomattox County School Board in 2023 over allegations that the district did not disclose information that Sage was identifying as male.
As I said, the harm that they are doing to these children is criminal! They are creating lifelong angst for them. They will always have a deep voice because Trump and his religious cohorts! 

I have seen so many trans people detransition only to retransition. They were under so much family and/or religious pressure that they had to detransition. But in their souls they knew the truth.

Oh... Ohio!

The Republicans in Ohio are trying so hard to be the biggest a*s in passing anti-trans laws!


Ohio ranked fourth in the nation in 2025 for the highest number of anti-LGBTQ+ incidents, with 51 reported cases, according to a new report from GLAAD.

California ranked first with 198, then New Hampshire with 72 and Texas with 66, the organization said in its 2025 Alert Desk report released in late January. Nationwide, GLAAD tracked 1,042 anti-LGBTQ+ incidents in 47 states and the District of Columbia between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2025. The marks a 5% increase from the 984 incidents recorded in 2024, according to the report.

In Ohio, the 51 incidents included 20 protests, 19 instances of propaganda distribution, five acts of vandalism or damage, two acts of harassment, two bomb threats and three arson attempts.

The report found that 268 incidents occurred last June, making it one of the most dangerous Pride months since GLAAD began collecting data in 2022. That figure represents nearly a 400% increase from the 54 incidents tracked in June 2022.

GLAAD said states at the center of political debates over LGBTQ+ rights led the country in total incidents. In Ohio, the report cited controversy after the City Club of Cleveland invited a lobbyist from the Center for Christian Virtue, designated as an “anti-LGBTQ+ hate group” by the Southern Poverty Law Center, to speak as part of its civic engagement programming.
The Ohio chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-Ohio), CAIR Action, the ACLU of Ohio, the Ohio Divest Coalition, and a diverse coalition of partners testified against Ohio Senate Bill 87 (SB 87), legislation that would codify the controversial IHRA definition of antisemitism into state law on Wednesday, Feb. 19.

The coalition included lawyers, doctors, educators, veterans, and faith leaders from Muslim, Jewish, Christian, and other communities. Together, the coalition members advocated for free speech and human rights for people of all backgrounds. More than 25 Ohioans from across the state testified against the bill in-person, in addition to more than 67 others submitting written testimony. A letter signed by more than 100 Jewish Ohioans opposing SB 87 was submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee, and more than 400 Ohioans signed an action alert urging lawmakers to vote no. 
The bill would violate the First Amendment!
If passed, SB87 would expand the net of criminalization for speech using the IHRA definition of antisemitism that has been widely criticized as overbroad. Even Kenneth Stern, the principal drafter of the definition, has opposed its use by government agencies.
But wait — there’s even more. Last summer, Ohio lawmakers wanted to make attacks on politicians hate crimes…
The Ohio Capital Journal
By: Morgan Trau
August 28, 2025


A bipartisan group of Ohio lawmakers has introduced a bill making hate crimes illegal, increasing penalties for assaulting or terrorizing someone based on their race, sex, and even political affiliation.

Over the past year, the Ohio Statehouse has had to increase security due to upticks in threats against lawmakers.

The FBI charged a New Albany man in May for sending white powder and a bullet to Attorney General Dave Yost. Along with the threats to the state’s top cop, the suspect sent powder and violent messages to dozens of other public officials, like Sec. of State Frank LaRose and Treasurer Robert Sprague.

A Dayton man was arrested in July for leaving a threatening voicemail to Congressman Jim Jordan.

Over the past two years, Congresswoman Shontel Brown, Yost, and several state lawmakers have been “swatted,” with individuals falsely reporting serious crimes occurring at their addresses. This hoax has the goal of sending a large police presence, or a SWAT team, to approach an unsuspecting victim.
I'm for increasing penalties on crimes. But I do not support redefining them as hate or bias crimes. Hate crimes are about immutable characteristics.

Now they want to make political affiliation a protected class. I don’t know about you, but I have changed political parties in the past, but my gender identity, however, is immutable.
H.B. 306 creates a new provision, protecting race, color, religion, sex, national origin, ancestry, age, familial status, military status, disability, the person’s position in a labor dispute, and political affiliation or position.

“One category that is not explicitly protected by this law, and it was kind of surprising to see that it was omitted given how broad this law is, is sexual orientation and sexual identity, gender identity,” Hill said.

This bill was a compromise, Jarrells said, but he believes that if someone commits a crime against a member of the LGBTQ+ community, it would fall under the “sex” protection.

“We were able to settle on ‘sex’ being kind of the umbrella term that covers all the gamut,” Jarrells said.

Hill acknowledged that in some cases, the U.S. Supreme Court has included sexual orientation under the sex category. Still, this provides an opening to interpret the law as not necessarily including sexuality or gender, she said.
But aren't!

Last Night!

Last night in the State of the Union speech, NPR reported...
Transgender youth

TRUMP: "No state can be allowed to rip children from their parents' arms and transition them to a new gender against the parents’ will. Who would believe that we’re even talking about this? We must ban it, and we must ban it immediately."

For the second year in a row, President Trump has brought as a guest a parent with a story about a child who began a gender transition in secret. The children mentioned in both speeches seem to have done some version of "social transition," which involves changing a name, pronouns, clothes, haircuts and the like. All of those things are reversible.

This is a topic he brought up frequently during his presidential campaign, in which he and Republicans spent millions on anti-trans ads.

So far, the Trump administration's efforts to ban trangender [sic] care has focused on medical interventions for youth. Using threats of withheld federal funding, investigations, proposed regulations, and subpoenas, the White House has succeeded in shutting down many gender clinics for youth at hospitals across the country. There are also many lawsuits challenging these actions.

— Selena Simmons-Duffin, Health Policy Correspondent

Tuesday, February 24, 2026

A Choice… Yeah Right!

[Editorial]

I was recently reading a comment on Yahoo regarding an article about how lesbians organized care for AIDS patients back in the ’80s. The article mentioned that one of the women attended a Seven Sisters college. A commenter wrote: “Those lesbian colleges are turning young women into lesbians!”

That single comment highlighted so many prejudices. First is the belief that being LGBTQ+ is a choice. Second is the assumption that all New England colleges are filled with gay and lesbian students.

If you look through their warped lens, it all fits together. But no matter how much science and research you show them, they reject it.

I don’t argue with them anymore. It is all circular logic that makes my head spin.

I learned a long time ago: thank your supporters, tell your detractors that you don’t agree with them, and then move on. Focus on the "movable middle."

[/Editorial]

Thumbing Their Nose

In Florida they banned rainbow crosswalks... in St. Petersburg they laughed in Ron DeSantis face. He banned rainbow crosswalks how about a 60 miles laser rainbow!
WMNF
February 20, 2026
Chris Gorman

Winter Pride Saint Pete had its grand pride laser light ceremony, sending rainbow lasers into the evening sky in a display that organizers say can be seen from as far as 60 miles away.

The show didn’t explode into full brightness right away. Instead, it started off subtle… a slow, gradual process as the lasers warmed up. At first, the colors were faint and easy to miss against the glow of the streets, but as the minutes passed, the beams sharpened, brightened, and became dramatically more vivid.

By the time the display reached its peak, the transformation was undeniable. What began as a low-key start built steadily into a striking, intensely colorful rainbow stretching above St. Pete.

Even though the ceremony took place in the heart of St. Petersburg, the lasers didn’t feel like a local-only moment. People throughout the area reported seeing the glow from a distance, turning the launch into something bigger than a single gathering and giving Winter Pride a skyline-sized presence.
LGBTQ Nation reports that,
This is not the first act of rebellion the city has taken since DeSantis removed its rainbow crosswalks.
Molly Sprayregen (She/Her)
February 23, 2026


The city of St. Petersburg, Florida, has continued to find ways to support its LGBTQ+ community amid Gov. Ron DeSantis‘s (R) crusade to eradicate rainbow crosswalks from the state.

Most recently, the organizers of Winter Pride St. Pete lit up the night sky with an impressive rainbow laser display visible from more than 60 miles away.

Winter Pride St. Pete executive director Rob Hall called the light show “a remarkable moment,” confirming it was a direct response to the LGBTQ+ erasure taking place in the state.

He told Fox 13 that he knew he should come to St. Petersburg after he came out as an adult. He said the rainbow crosswalk he saw when he got there, which has since been removed by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), was “life-changing.”

“When it was removed, it had a significant impact on my heart,” he said.

The light display was designed by laser artist Yvette Mattern, who said she was “so proud to be able to do this where that rainbow crosswalk was taken away.”
Two thumbs up!

Monday, February 23, 2026

Sorry Charlie

Remember the tuna fish commercial where the tuna keeps getting rejected... well the just turned down Trump's invitation!
President Donald Trump invited the men's and women's hockey teams after both won gold medals in overtime games against Canada.
NBC News
Feb. 23, 2026
By Monica Alba and Megan Lebowitz


The U.S. women's hockey team said it is declining President Donald Trump's invitation to attend his State of the Union address, a day after the president jokingly told the U.S. men's hockey team that he would be impeached if he didn't also invite the women's team.

"We are sincerely grateful for the invitation extended to our gold medal–winning U.S. Women’s Hockey Team and deeply appreciate the recognition of their extraordinary achievement," a USA Hockey spokesperson said. "Due to the timing and previously scheduled academic and professional commitments following the Games, the athletes are unable to participate."
Sorry Donald. Maybe next time!
If he did not invite the women's team, "I do believe I probably would be impeached," he joked.
Ha, ha... That is Trump thinks of the women's teams... as an after thought.

The Constitution? What's That?

They are thugs, pure and simple. There're so many parallels in history with dictatorships throwing laws out the window. We are seeing that here.
A number of court challenges are tied to these constitutional amendments, with potentially significant consequences for immigration law.
NBC News
Feb. 22, 2026
By Allan Smith and Scott Wong


In and out of court, more than half of the amendments enshrined in the Bill of Rights are being fought over as a direct result of President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota.

In his second term, Trump and his administration have been aggressive in stretching the boundaries of political conventions, resulting in a number of court challenges. Trump’s push to eliminate birthright citizenship, freeze federal funds and bypass Congress through executive orders have tested the separation of powers.

The Twin Cities campaign, though, has been a flashpoint, with fights over at least six — the first, second, third, fourth, fifth and 10th — of the first 10 amendments. Conservative-leaning scholars see both lawyers and judges overstepping their bounds in fiery filings and opinions, while liberal-leaning counterparts see a notable disregard by the Trump administration for Bill of Rights provisions.

[...]

Yoo added that the contests over the Fourth Amendment might be the most significant as the space where individual liberties may most be at stake. That amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures and requires the federal government to obtain warrants based on probable cause to enter a person’s home. It has been tested under a Trump administration policy that allows Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to enter people’s homes with administrative warrants issued by the executive branch, instead of a judge.
I keep on having flashbacks to the Boston Tea Party, Writs of Assistance, and the Quartering Act!


When U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents wear masks and use unmarked vehicles to make arrests, a federal judge from West Virginia wrote, the tactics violate the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment by eliminating officer accountability and stripping people of due process.

“A mask does one thing: it hides the face of the officer wearing it. On a public highway, in a civil arrest of a person suspected of no crime, the only purpose served by hiding an officer’s face is to prevent his identification. And preventing identification serves only to eliminate accountability.”

The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable government searches and seizures of persons, houses, papers and effects. It requires that warrants be issued only upon probable cause, supported by oath and specifically describing the place to be searched and the items to be seized.
The judge had this to say...
Lawyers for the people in these cases contend that they have cooperated with the immigration system and that judges in that system should make final determinations of status. Instead, they have been caught up in sweeps, arrested and sent to jail without being charged with a criminal offense.

Just last week, such cases were before Judges Thomas Johnston, Irene Berger and Goodwin in the southern district. In each case, the judges agreed that the original basis for arrest was flimsy, that being held in jail without a hearing was improper and that the people who were arrested should be released.
This is just one of many cases around the country that judges are ruling that the Constitution is being ignored!

Last week, the top federal judge in Minnesota accused Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) of violating nearly a hundred court orders in the month of January. In a ruling that was part of a contempt case involving Todd Lyons, the acting director of ICE, the judge, Patrick J. Schiltz, wrote, “ICE has every right to challenge the orders of this Court, but, like any litigant, ICE must follow those orders unless and until they are overturned or vacated.” ICE, Schiltz added, “is not a law unto itself.” The ruling marks perhaps the most serious turn in an ongoing battle between federal courts and the White House, with the Trump Administration often appearing to blatantly ignore court orders, or to comply with them only after being repeatedly warned to do so.

[...]

I think judges are being very careful. If they hold the government in contempt, and the government still doesn’t abide by the court orders, we might very well be in a constitutional crisis. The judges appear to be hoping upon hope that if they threaten contempt, the government will come into line, either in the individual case before the judge or across the board.
The Trump adminstration is just thumping their noses at the Constitution and the laws!