It almost feels like there’s a competition to see who can come up with the most draconian laws.
Down in Tennessee, if this bill passes, doctors will have to register child trans patients:
Republican lawmakers say it’s about health data. Critics say it’s about tracking trans people.The AdvocateChristopher WigginsMar 27, 2026Tennessee lawmakers on Thursday advanced a bill that critics say could lay the groundwork for something more sinister than its text alone suggests: a system that doesn’t just regulate transgender health care, but maps trans people.The Tennessee House passed House Bill 754 after a charged floor debate and protests inside and outside the Capitol in Nashville, advancing legislation that would require data collection on patients receiving gender-affirming care. Supporters of the bill describe the measure as a tool for understanding medical outcomes. Opponents say it is something else entirely. They say it is a mechanism for tracking a vulnerable population.
This is something out of 1930s Germany!
The legislation would require clinics to report detailed information about gender-affirming care to the state, part of a broader effort, lawmakers say, to study treatment trends. But similar proposals in Tennessee have already raised alarms about what happens when “data collection” begins to resemble identification.A related measure advancing through the legislature would compel providers to submit extensive details about care, including age, treatments, and geographic data, to the state, which would then publish aggregated reports. While the bill bars the release of directly identifying information, privacy experts warn that the level of detail could still make individuals identifiable, particularly in smaller communities.
Did you know that here in Connecticut, when a non-discrimination bill was being debated, Republicans introduced a proposal that would have required trans people to register with the Department of Motor Vehicles and they would keep a list of all trans people?
Back in 2011 I wrote about it here and when the bill was being debated in the Senate here, and I called it the Scarlet Letter! The amendment was...
["Sec. 501. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2011) Any person holding a motor vehicle operator's license whose gender-related identity is different from that traditionally associated with the person's physiology or assigned sex at birth shall notify the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of such identity and the commissioner shall indicate such identity in the electronic record maintained by the commissioner pertaining to such person's operator's license. "]
Connecticut isn’t that far from becoming a red state, we’re really more of a purple state.
Back in 2011, I wrote: “...Jerimarie and Jennifer were there from the beginning when the hate crime bill was first introduced, and we were there at the end.” But it wasn’t the end, just a waypoint in an ongoing fight for our human rights.
.jpg)
