Wednesday, April 29, 2026

Figures Don’t Lie But...

Desisters

If you listen to Republicans or conservative you would think that it is around 80 or 90 percent of the trans children detransition. That lie goes back to studies in Netherlands and our friend Ken Zucker [That is sarcasm], in those studies they counted anyone who dropped out of the study (Because they moved or they just didn’t want to take part in it anymore.) as de-transitioning. The studies reported desistance rates as high as 60–90%!

It is those studies that get quoted in legislatures, not these.
The argument that studies show transgender youth desist from that identity on average has been used to support anti-gender-affirming care legislation nationwide.
Virginia Commonwealth University
By Madeline Reinsel
April 27, 2026


The frequently cited claim that 60% to 90% of transgender and gender-diverse children and young adults ultimately identify as cisgender – or their gender assigned at birth – is not supported by statistical analyses of published scientific research, according to a new study from Virginia Commonwealth University. The study, which analyzed 11 studies compiled in a commonly referenced 2016 blog post as well as five more recent publications, instead found that almost any stance on gender-affirming care for minors could be supported by different statistical analyses of the same data.

“We should rely on accuracy with our science, and we should rely on accurate science to guide legislation,” said Catherine Wall, Ph.D., an assistant professor of psychology in the College of Humanities and Sciences and the study’s lead author. Wall and her coauthors published their study in the journal APA PsycNet.

The quantitative meta-analysis found that “desistance” – or renouncement – of transgender identity by youth could be estimated to be as low as zero percent to as high as 100%, depending on how the studies’ data were interpreted. Meanwhile, rates of persistence of transgender identity could also range from zero percent to 100%, depending on how the studies – many of which were conducted pre-1990 on small sample sizes – were analyzed.
But many politicians don't care about the facts; they have an agenda to push.

When the first major longitudinal results from the Trans Youth Project came out in 2022, NBC News reported that transgender children are actually highly unlikely to "detransition" or return to identifying with their birth sex five years after a social transition.
The findings, published Wednesday in the journal Pediatrics, come from a larger project called the Trans Youth Project. Researchers at Princeton University began in 2013 to track 317 kids between ages 3 and 12 who socially transitioned — the first and largest sample of its kind, according to Kristina Olsen, the study’s lead author and a professor of psychology at Princeton.

The results showed that five years after their initial social transition, 94 percent of the study participants were living as either trans girls or trans boys. The remaining youth had "retransitioned," as the study called it, and no longer identified as binary transgender. Of that group, 2.5 percent came to identify with their birth sex. 

The findings come as Republican lawmakers in more than two dozen states have tried, over the last two years, to restrict access to gender-affirming care for transgender minors.
That last paragraph says it all: these lawmakers aren't acting in the best interest of children. They are willing to ignore scientific facts to push an agenda at the detriment of trans youth. They even go so far as to drag the same handful of individuals from state to state to testify, pretending a tiny minority represents the whole reality.

Bait & Switch

Carnival carnies are know for their bait and switch... they have all these fancy prizes and you get is a Kewpie doll.

Well you might have remembered that Trump said it will be paid for by his billionaire friends and companies... the White House released a list of 37 high-profile donors, including tech giants (Amazon, Meta, Google), crypto billionaires (Winklevoss twins), and finance titans like Stephen Schwarzman.

First it was 100 million, then 200 million, and now 400 million!

Well guess what? Republicans have introduced a bill to pay for the ballroom! Senator Lindsey Graham released this press release today!
U.S. Senators Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), Katie Britt (R-Alabama) and Eric Schmitt (R-Missouri) this week introduced the White House Safety and Security Act of 2026, which provides funding for the construction of the presidential ballroom in the East Wing of the White House.

In light of the shooting at the White House Correspondents Dinner and multiple assassination attempts against President Trump, this legislation sets aside the necessary resources to upgrade the presidential ballroom and strengthen the White House’s security infrastructure. Upon completion, President Trump and future presidents will be able to host large events without having to leave the White House grounds.

“This weekend’s shooting at the White House Correspondents Dinner is, tragically, just the latest example of an unhinged radical attempting to take the life of President Trump. These repeated instances of political violence underscore the need to adequately bolster the White House security apparatus,” said Senator Graham. “Our legislation is much bigger than simply renovating a venue for large gatherings. Rather, it represents a necessary measure to keep our Commander in Chief – whoever that may be – safe and protected.”
STOP RIGHT THERE!

The bill reads in part...
In addition to amounts other wise available, including monetary or in-kind donations in the White House Repair and Restoration account as of the date of enactment of this Act, there is appropriated to the President for fiscal year 2026, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $400,000,000, to remain available until January 20, 2029, for design, construction, and other appropriate expenses to complete the East Wing Modernization Project, including a secure State Ballroom and visitor screening facility and any other related national security facility, pursuant to section 105(d) of title 3, United States Code.
Did you see that $400,000,000 price tag? This not just security upgrades that is the price tag of the whole frigging ballroom!

If it’s a security upgrade, why does it need Italian marble? And if it’s "America First," why are the quarries in Vermont and Connecticut being ignored while we import stone from Europe on the taxpayer's dime? Why are they using European steel?

This whole thing is a sham, we the tax payers are really payers for Trump's monstrosity.


Tuesday, April 28, 2026

Just Another Case Of Trump & Company Ignoring Laws

Once again the Trump adminstration ignoring laws they don't like!
Reuters
By David Hood-Nuño and Bianca Flowers
April 23, 2026


Summary
  • Complaint alleges EEOC head halted LGBTQ and disparate impact discrimination cases
  • Lucas sent DEI data requests to law firms without pending investigations, complaint claims
  • Former EEOC general counsel David Lopez stresses lawyers' independent ethical obligations regardless of directives
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Chair Andrea Lucas allegedly violated professional conduct rules of the ​Virginia State Bar by refusing to enforce key provisions of federal civil rights laws, according to a complaint submitted to the bar Thursday, shared ‌with Reuters.

The Legal Accountability Center, which focuses on filing complaints against individuals and institutions alleged to have violated professional conduct standards, asked the state agency to investigate whether Lucas breached her ethical obligations by directing EEOC investigators to stop processing certain categories of discrimination claims and by sending unauthorized information demands to 20 major law firms.

Those letters, sent on official EEOC letterhead in March 2025, sought extensive data on ​firms’ diversity, equity and inclusion practices, including demographic information related to race, sex, hiring, promotions and compensation, the complaint alleges. Since returning to the White House in ​January 2025, Donald Trump's administration has cracked down on diversity efforts nationwide, targeting universities, major corporations and non-profits.
So they stopped enforcing laws Trump doesn't like!
Field staff at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission say they are being pressured to bring politically charged cases, even with little evidence.
The New York Times
By Rebecca Davis O’Brien
April 27, 2026


Field staff at the federal agency that enforces civil rights laws in the workplace say they are under intense pressure from leadership to bring in cases that fit the Trump administration’s priorities, including charges of discrimination against white men and charges of antisemitism on college campuses.

That pressure has led investigators and lawyers at the agency, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, to focus its thin resources on pursuing and fast-tracking cases that have little evidence and tenuous legal bases, according to more than a dozen current and former employees, both Republicans and Democrats.

They described a deeply demoralized and fearful work force, diminished by years of attrition and a surge of resignations and retirements during the second Trump administration. Current and recently departed employees, who requested anonymity because they feared professional repercussions, said the commission’s Republican chair, Andrea Lucas, had recast the agency to carry out President Trump’s executive orders. They said they felt compelled to speak because they were concerned about the future of the agency, where many saw their work enforcing the nation’s civil rights laws as a moral calling that has now been abandoned.
She was under order to drop discrimination cases against us!
Ms. Lucas, whom Mr. Trump appointed to run the agency in 2025, has conveyed to staff that she is under pressure from the White House to produce cases the administration favors. Employees said they had been led to believe that bringing these cases was necessary to ensure the agency’s funding. This month, the White House released a budget recommending a $20 million funding increase for the commission — returning it to its 2025 level of $455 million, after a cut last year.
This is all to appease his MAGA people who think that they are being discriminated against because they are white!
Now, facing pressure to bring more cases for white men — as well as claims of discrimination against American-born workers and cases of systemic antisemitism — staff in several districts said they were struggling to find complaints with merit. And they said they were pressed by their superiors to look for reasons to keep those cases alive, even when evidence was weak.
And now the EEOC is being sued for discrimination in not going after discrimination against us!

Another Nail

Trump & Company are trying once again to put a nail in our coffin. And the 2nd Amendment be damned!
The controversy comes amid reports that trans Americans have been increasingly arming themselves as protection against the Trump administration.
LGBTQ Nation
Molly Sprayregen (She/Her)
April 27, 2026


The Trump administration is reportedly continuing to engage in efforts to prevent trans people from owning guns, or at least intimidate them into changing their minds.

The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) confirmed to the Independent that it is still working to update its policies in conjunction with the president’s executive order declaring there are only two innate sexes – male and female.

[...]

Most concerning for many trans advocates is the plan to alter ATF Form 4473, the Firearms Transaction Record that all applicants must fill out, so that folks must list their sex assigned at birth.

For trans people who have a different gender listed on other legal documents, the shift could both cause bureaucratic confusion and put their safety at risk, as the administration would more easily be able to identify trans gun owners by finding people whose sex on various legal forms contradict one another.
The Republicans are supposed to be pro-Second Amendment, but as usual, it is only lip service! The Trump administration has been stoking endless fear about the “dangers” the trans community poses to others, including false claims that trans people are more likely to commit mass shootings.

The British newspaper The Independent wrote that,
Such a rule would make it easier for ATF to gather lists of trans gun owners, simply by identifying where names appear to conflict with the listed sex, according to firearms policy experts.

It could also deter trans people from buying guns legally, since complying with paperwork would create a “Catch 22” situation — and a false statement comes with the threat of federal charges and prison time, the experts said.

"Just the announcement is going to have a chilling effect," Patrick G. Eddington, a senior fellow in homeland security and civil liberties at the Cato Institute, told The Independent.
The Second Amendment says "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" it sure does sound that our rights are being infringed upon!

Presidential Behavior?

Once again Trump crawls out of the swamp, Trump disregards respect for Congress members, this time he attacks one of our own Connecticut delegates, congresswoman Rosa DeLauro.
CHEAP SHOT
The People’s House fired off a high school bully-level insult.
The Daily Beast
Vic Verbalaitis 
Apr. 28 2026


The official White House social media page attacked a congresswoman for her looks in typical Trumpian fashion.

The White House X account insulted Connecticut Rep. Rosa DeLauro, 83, after President Donald Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency administrator, Lee Zeldin, posted a video of their heated exchange during a congressional hearing on Monday.

[...]

He has frequently insulted comedian Rosie O’Donnell by calling her “fat,” a “pig,” and a “slob,” and in November, he told White House reporter Catherine Lucey to “Quiet, piggy,” aboard Air Force One.

His insults of women extend past just looks, however, as he commonly berates female reporters as “stupid,” “aggressive,” “rotten,” or “the worst."
But the White House are says it is the Democrat rhetoric... the voters know the truth!

Monday, April 27, 2026

They Don't Care

[Editorial]

I’ve been listening to Jack Campbell’s "The Pillars of Reality." On Goodreads, the author's biography notes that he draws heavily on his "experience as a retired United States Navy officer."

One particular passage in the book struck me. After a brutal battle with heavy losses on both sides, a general remarks: "We won, but that doesn’t mean we liked it." He said this while mourning the dead from both factions.

That moment provided a sudden moment of clarity regarding figures like Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth: they seem to like it. Unlike the seasoned officer in Campbell’s world, they appear gleeful over the destruction they inflict.

This behavior is not normal. The language they use to demonize others... such as their rhetoric regarding Iranians, is not the language of a true leader. It is the language of a dictator.

[/Editorial]

Takes One To Know One

Score!

CBS News’ Norah O’Donnell got Trump to open his mouth and put his foot in!
Any detente between the president and the press after the shared horror of Saturday’s dinner appears to be short-lived.
Politico
By Eli Stokols
04/26/2026


President Donald Trump lashed out at CBS News’ Norah O’Donnell in an interview Sunday for quoting from the manifesto of the suspected gunman who tried to storm the White House Correspondents Dinner less than 24 hours earlier.

Trump had initially expressed a sense of camaraderie with members of the press corps who hosted him at their annual dinner and experienced the same initial panic when armed law enforcement agents stormed into the ballroom.

But when O’Donnell, during an interview recorded at the White House on Sunday, quoted from the accused gunman Cole Allen’s apparent manifesto — “I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes,” she read — Trump, who’d been relatively subdued in his responses, flashed a familiar anger.

“I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would, because you’re horrible people. Horrible people,” Trump said. “Yeah, he did write that. I’m not a rapist. I didn’t rape anybody.”

O’Donnell interjected, “Oh, do you think he was referring to you?”

But the president blew past her question, declaring, “I’m not a pedophile.”

Trump bristled at what he seemed to deem an insinuation about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, who was not mentioned by name in the manifesto or by O’Donnell. “You read that crap from some sick person,” the president said. “I got associated with stuff that has nothing to do with me. I was totally exonerated.”
Okay, here’s my take on this.

I’ve done it. You prepare for interviews by thinking through everything that might come up and practicing your responses. You practice a lot. Only once did I ever need to fall back on rehearsed answers, but the key is actually listening to the question; something Trump didn’t do here.

You plan it out: if they say this, you respond with that. If they bring up the manifesto, you’re ready with a clear reply. But she threw a curveball and followed up his answer with: “Oh, do you think he was referring to you?”

Gotcha!

Why? Why?

Why does the Trump administration hate us so much? They are constantly finding new ways to attack us—and now they are going after doctors for, of all things, false advertising!!!!
A series of new hires and investigations at the agency appear to focus on penalizing gender-affirming care for minors—and those who speak in favor of it.
Wired
Vittoria Elliott
Apr 24, 2026


The Federal Trade Commission appears to be targeting transgender rights, going beyond its usual ways of operating to do so, according to experts and federal employees who spoke to WIRED.

Since July 2025, the agency has been gearing up to frame gender-affirming care for minors as a consumer-protection issue, in a move that a former FTC employee, who spoke to WIRED on the condition of anonymity due to fear of retaliation, described as “very strange.”

“I think their end goal here is to be on the front page, being warriors for the Trump anti-trans agenda,” they claim.
Why? This is pure hatred.
“The FTC has brought lots of cases around phony cures, phony health products,” the former employee says. But those cases were targeted around issues like businesses peddling fake Covid cures. In cases where the FTC has gone after nonprofits, the former employee says, it has involved the nonprofit misappropriating donations.
Who will be the focus of all this? Doctors? Hospitals? The AMA and APA? This is a targeted attack on the trans community, and the official response from the agency to a news organization proves it:
 The former FTC employee described the agency’s move to target nonprofits as “really weird” and said it was “very unusual” to hire lawyers for a specific project or case as opposed to recruiting people based on skill sets, like data protection.

In response to questions from WIRED, FTC spokesperson Joseph Simonson said, “Virtually everything you asked is based off a complete misunderstanding of the law, this agency, and the issue of whether children are potentially suffering from unnecessary mutilation. Stick to computers.”
Contrast this rhetoric with the actual medical data. On the National Institutes of Health (NIH) website, specifically in the article "Mental Health Outcomes in Transgender and Nonbinary Youths Receiving Gender-Affirming Care," published in JAMA, the evidence is clear:
Conclusions and relevance: This study found that gender-affirming medical interventions were associated with lower odds of depression and suicidality over 12 months. These data add to existing evidence suggesting that gender-affirming care may be associated with improved well-being among TNB youths over a short period, which is important given mental health disparities experienced by this population, particularly the high levels of self-harm and suicide.
All the medical evidence shows that this treatment helps us, yet it is being ignored. Instead, the administration is relying on "evidence" from far-right medical organizations. The Wired article concludes by showing this is a coordinated effort across multiple departments:
Other agencies have also targeted trans rights. In July 2025, the Department of Justice subpoenaed doctors and clinics providing gender-related care for minors. “Medical professionals and organizations that mutilated children in the service of a warped ideology will be held accountable by this Department of Justice,” then-attorney general Pam Bondi said in a statement at the time. In December 2025, the Department of Health and Human Services announced that it would bar hospitals that accept Medicare and Medicaid from performing gender-affirming care. Earlier this month, a federal judge overturned the HHS ban, writing, “This case highlights a leader’s unserious regard for the rule of law.”
Naw... tell me again how there’s "no bias" here.

The Courthouse News reports that judges are seeing through this sham.
The Justice Department issued over 20 subpoenas to clinics providing gender-affirming care after Trump called for the end of such services.
Monique Merrill 
March 6, 2026


A battle over a subpoena targeting a Washington clinic that provides gender-affirming care to minors reached the Ninth Circuit on Friday, with the Trump administration arguing a judge wrongly blocked its investigation into drug manufacturers.

“It just can’t be right that the administration must choose between advocating for a policy outcome and using tools like regulatory actions and proposing legislation to achieve that outcome on the one hand, and enforcing existing laws to protect consumers within the same space where it’s engaging in policy advocacy,” said Sarah Welch, attorney with the Department of Justice.

The Justice Department issued a subpoena in June to QueerDoc, a telehealth clinic that provides gender-affirming care to adolescents and adults.

The department sought records as part of an investigation into possible violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act by manufacturers of drugs used in gender-affirming care, including puberty blockers and hormone therapies.

[...]

In October, U.S. District Judge Jamal Whitehead quashed the subpoena, agreeing with QueerDoc that the Justice Department had weaponized its investigative authority to advance Trump’s policy goal of eliminating gender-affirming care.

[...]

But U.S. Circuit Judge Daniel Bress, a Donald Trump appointee, questioned why the Justice Department would need patient records.

The Trump administration argued that it needed complete records to verify whether the medications QueerDoc prescribed matched the insurance billing and the patient’s diagnosis.

QueerDoc contended that the Justice Department issued the subpoena under the guise of conducting an investigation but really issued it to advance Trump’s goal of ending gender-affirming care.
No way would Trump be trying to end our healthcare! (This is sarcasm.)