We Saw The Handwriting On The Wall

Back last spring, when Trump's administration was rounding up the homeless in Washington, D.C., we all thought that this was just the first step in "Trump's Master Plan." Just like in Nazi Germany, where they rounded up the homeless, Trump's administration is now talking about doing the same thing!

Trump is pushing to institutionalize the homeless. That may include veterans

NPR News

June 25, 2026

Quil Lawrence

Pedro Jauregui, with the organization U.S. Vets in Long Beach, Calif., once spent a whole year getting one homeless veteran to come in from the cold.

[...]

More than 30,000 U.S. military veterans are homeless, according to the latest government data from an annual one night "point in time count." That number is down significantly in the past decade, which most experts credit to a straightforward combination of robust funding and a philosophy focused on offering housing without prerequisites, called housing first.

While the Trump administration has promised new housing for vets, President Trump also signed an executive order last year titled "Ending Crime and Disorder on America's Streets," which leans heavily toward institutionalizing homeless people against their will. This winter, NPR obtained slides describing a proposed VA plan called "Safe Harbor," which would include veterans in that shift to involuntary treatment. Then in March, the VA put out a memorandum of understanding with the Justice Department about state court guardianship for veterans.

Back in January I wrote:

That’s the goal of Trump & Company: homeless detention centers alongside immigrant detention centers.

Who will be next?

Us?

The trans community? It sure looks like they are setting us up as the next victims of Trump wrath! 

Among the allegations against the companies are medical neglect, unsafe or inhumane living conditions, physical abuse and excessive force, understaffing and poor oversight, and lack of transparency. Given the allegations that have been made against some detention-center operators, critics are asking whether similar problems could arise in large-scale facilities for homeless populations if oversight and accountability are insufficient.

"What the administration has said publicly on this proposal is at odds with the documentation on the project and its pilot program. That original documentation was directly linked to the president's executive order, calling for involuntary commitment of people experiencing homelessness. I think it's disingenuous for anybody from the VA to say that this was meant for a completely different population," she said.

Through my lens, what I am seeing is a repeat of the 1930s in Germany. The Nazis used the label "asocial" to classify people they believed did not fit their vision of a productive, orderly society. Does that sound familiar? We were also included in that group. If you want to know where the "Pink Triangle" came from, you only have to look at the Nazi concentration camps, where we were required to wear a pink triangle badge to identify us. So wear it proudly—many trans people, lesbians, and gays were killed wearing it.

In addition, the Nazis had their own "immigrant" problem with the Roma, whom they put into forced labor camps.

In states around the U.S., there are already "forced labor" camps reminiscent of the Jim Crow era. In federal prisons, inmates are forced to work for the shocking rate of around $0.12 to $1.15 per hour! When I had to be certified for military-spec soldering back in the '90s, there were a number of prison guards who were also getting certified. They joked all the time about how they had a "captive" workforce.

In Germany at the time, the concentration camps were run by millionaires—only now, it is billionaires.

The parallels are unbelievable.

---

What is instore for us? We will know a more this November... will Red win or Blue... it could be a matter of life or death for us.

Get Out Of Jail Free

Monopoly's "Get out of jail" card 

Did you know that Trump's DOJ settlement gave President Trump and his family special protection from IRS that blocked Trump's family from being investigate for tax fraud?

The addendum stated that the government was "forever barred and precluded" from pursuing audits, examinations, reviews, or related tax claims concerning Trump, members of his family, and affiliated businesses for tax matters that were pending or could have been raised before the settlement's effective date. (i.e. A Get Out Of Jail)

Watch this to see how far Trump's corruption has gone!

They Don't Even Try To Hide It Anymore!

Trump is getting embolden now the Congress is deadlocked! It is something in plain sight something everyone just winked and nodded.

The DOJ Just Admitted to Weaponizing a Prosecution Against Trump’s Foes

Slate

By Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern

May 22, 2026

A federal court threw out all charges against the Broadview Six—a group of protesters accused of obstructing a Chicago ICE facility—during a heated hearing on Thursday at which Justice Department officials apologized for egregious misconduct in securing the indictments. U.S. District Judge April Perry excoriated prosecutors for using illegal tactics to get the criminal charges past a skeptical grand jury, dressing down U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros and his colleagues for their “incredibly shock[ing]” malfeasance. The Broadview Six will now walk free, and may even apply for President Donald Trump’s fund for victims of government “weaponization.”

We saw this when Trump went after the Governor of Minnesota...

Federal judge halts Trump administration effort to subpoena Walz in immigration enforcement probe

AP News

By  ALANNA DURKIN RICHER, ERIC TUCKER and SCOTT BAUER

June 22, 2026

A federal judge has blocked an attempt by the Trump administration to subpoena Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and other state officials, accusing the Justice Department of using its investigatory powers to retaliate against state officials for not cooperating with federal efforts to crack down on illegal immigration.

In a ruling unsealed Monday, U.S. District Judge Patrick Schiltz found the “dominant purpose” of the subpoenas was to “coerce Minnesota officials into assisting the federal government with enforcing civil immigration law and to harass and retaliate against them for failing to do so.”

And we saw it in the case the DOJ brought against the Federal Reserve:

Judge blocks DOJ's criminal probe of Federal Reserve, blasting it as political

KPBS
By Scott Horsley

March 13, 2026

A federal judge put the brakes on the Justice Department's criminal probe of the Federal Reserve, saying it was part of an improper campaign by the Trump administration to pressure the central bank into cutting interest rates more aggressively.

Judge James Boasberg quashed subpoenas that had been issued to the Fed in January, ostensibly seeking information about cost overruns on the renovation of the Fed's headquarters. At the time, Fed chairman Jerome Powell had called that a pretext. And Judge Boasberg agreed.

"The Government has offered no evidence whatsoever that Powell committed any crime other than displeasing the President," Boasberg writes in a newly-unsealed opinion. "There is abundant evidence that the subpoenas' dominant (if not sole) purpose is to harass and pressure Powell either to yield to the President or to resign and make way for a Fed Chair who will."

Like I wrote this morning, Trump knows that Congress is deadlocked and will not do anything! They are so emboldened that it is an open secret!

Here are just some of the people Trump's Justice Department has gone after:

• Letitia James
• Adam Schiff
• Tim Walz and other Minnesota Democratic officials 
• Jack Smith
• Liz Cheney 
• Anthony Fauci
• John Bolton
• Robert Garcia

There are also reports of the DOJ trying to investigate members of Congress for telling the military to obey the law. ABC News reported;

Several Democrats accused by President Donald Trump of "seditious behavior" defended their message to military members that they can refuse illegal order. The president and administration officials suggested the action could be punishable by law.

The video featuring six Democrats who served in the military or in the intelligence community set off more than a dozen social media posts by Trump, who called them "traitors" and said their action could be "punishable by death."

"I think it's important to say that there is nothing more American than standing up for the Constitution, that's what we were doing. President didn't like it, so now he calls for us to be hanged," Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly said on CNN's "The Source with Kaitlan Collins" on Thursday night.

Furthermore, Trump has appointed judges who put their beliefs before the Constitution. The Republicans refused Mitch McConnell/the Senate refused Obama's appointment to fill Justice Antonin Scalia's opening, saying mid-February was too close to the elections. Yet, that didn't stop them from putting Amy Coney Barrett on the bench just days before the 2020 election.

Trump, more than any other president, has weaponized the judiciary. He makes Nixon look like a saint.

They Have No Guts

I was reading an article in the Christian Science Monitor about how Trump has warped the presidency.

In Washington, a profound shift in how taxpayer money is spent. Will it last?

By Caitlin Babcock 

May 28, 2026

Just about anything a president wants to do – such as go to war, start an infrastructure project, or strengthen law enforcement – requires financing from Congress.

But increasingly, the government’s money hasn’t been going where Congress says it should.

The Trump administration is using unprecedented tactics to test the boundaries of how it can control taxpayer money that Congress has budgeted, threatening one of Congress’ core functions under the Constitution – and one of its strongest checks on executive power.

The efforts are a direct assertion of presidential power, often wielded in the name of taming wasteful spending. But the actions also reach into Congress itself.

Under presidential pressure, Congress is slowly upending its own spending process, passing party-line bills that circumvent its normal, bipartisan procedure and give presidents broader leeway. For example, Republicans hope to soon pass a bill that will fund federal immigration enforcement for years in advance.

But this is the result of a Congress that has no backbone. What we need is to elect people who listen to the voters and not to Trump. I don't even call it the "Republican party" anymore because it is non-existent.

Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 of the U.S. Constitution states: "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law." This and the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 both make illegal what Trump is doing. But if the Republicans in Congress ignore the laws, Trump becomes a dictator... a King!

Still, the practice signals a profound shift in how money is spent, raising questions over how or whether taxpayers can hold the government accountable and whether more White House control over spending will become a “new normal” that permanently expands a president’s power.

In Congress, even some members of President Trump’s party aren’t entirely comfortable with the transfer of spending authority.

“Retaining our constitutional authority has always been something that I see as important, and hopefully my colleagues do, too. So I hope that we maintain a balance,” says Republican Rep. Dan Newhouse of Washington, who sits on the House Appropriations Committee. “Or else we become more and more irrelevant.”

Why can this happen? The Impoundment Control Act of 1974 was passed specifically because President Richard "Tricky Dick" Nixon kept refusing to spend money that Congress had allocated for programs he disliked. Congress stepped in to say, "No, if we pass it and appropriate the funds, you must spend it."

But this is happening because it takes a two-thirds majority to convict him. The House only needs a simple majority to impeach him, but the Senate needs a two-thirds vote to convict. As a result, Trump can get away with all the stuff he has been pushing.

Mr. Trump and his executive branch have asserted the power to spend as well as to cut, in ways that Congress hasn’t authorized. Emergency declarations over immigration and energy paved the way for sending military reservists to the Southern border and promoting fossil fuel development.

Trump knows that he has instilled a fear of losing their reelections that keeps them prostrating themselves to him. But he is losing his grip on them with his polling numbers in the 30s. Some of them smell blood in the polls and want to see who to hitch their wagon to: Trump or the voters?

A Racist Government!

We all know this. We saw it in the promotions in the military. We saw it in his cabinet picks. We see it in his staffing picks suck as Stephen Miller.

Gary Franks: For Trump, it’s a color-blind man’s world

Recently the War Secretary found all qualified Black Americans and women eligible for a promotion to the rank of General “not fit” to receive the promotion

The Hartford Courant

By Gary Franks

June 17, 2026

President Donald Trump is definitely color blind, as he can only see white, and as far as gender, it is men in all key roles. Maybe it has something to do with how Trump amassed large vote totals. White men carried Trump into the White House.

Now, he’s still defending an Anti-Weaponization Fund of $1.776 billion that would have had nearly all, if not all, of their proposed reparations payout going to “white men.” (It should be noted that 400 years of Black slavery to get zero dollars in reparations, while a few hours of questionable and many illegal acts — i.e., attacking police officers — could have shared nearly $2 billion in reparations. Oh well).

Let us review the record of Trump 2.0 on race and gender.

Women and Black Americans have never fared well in Trump’s political orbit. The number of Black Republicans in the House of Representatives will go from the best ever to the worst since when I was the lone Black Republican in Congress — thanks, at least in part, to Trump. Leading Republican women voices in Congress will also be gone in January, thanks at least partially to Trump.

The Washington Post reported that Trump's cabinet current administration also is around 80–90% White overall.

Recently the War Secretary found all qualified Black Americans and women eligible for a promotion to the rank of General “not fit” to receive the promotion. Yet, all the white men eligible for a promotion to the rank of General were promoted.

This is the War Secretary (Pete Hegseth) that denied Black Engineers the opportunity to interview and compete for jobs in the Defense Department and followed by doubling down on his attack to deny opportunities to Black Americans. He “strongly suggested” that corporations doing business with the Pentagon also should not even interview Black engineering prospects at the job fair.

My concerns is that Hegseth is making the military into a White Christian male army. That he takes his crusader's persona to heart... Christian White males warriors.

Any objective political scientists, academics, sociologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, statisticians, or “seventh graders” would be able to figure out that our president has serious issues with strong women leaders and Black Americans who are not former athletes.

Then we have the Secretary of Defense, Hegseth... George Public Broadcasting reported that,

 Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth intervened to stop the promotions of several high-ranking service members including four Army officers, two Black men and two female soldiers, on track to become one-star generals, NPR has confirmed.

According to a U.S. official not authorized to speak publicly, Hegseth made the highly unusual move of interfering in the regular promotion process, as first reported in the New York Times. A second U.S. official also not authorized to speak publicly confirmed that Hegseth has been weeding out senior officers who are deemed ideologically incompatible.

NPR has also learned that a Black colonel and a female colonel from another branch of the military were taken off the promotion list, according to a U.S. official not authorized to speak publicly. This would bring the total to at least six promotions blocked by Hegseth.

They say that racism runs in families... Trump's father was arrested in Queens, New York in 1927 during a violent Memorial Day clash between the police and members of the Ku Klux Klan.

Hun?

So I have been getting 3 or 4 calls a day from something that the caller ID said "PCH" so after a week of getting "PCH" the only thing that I could thing of was "Publisher Clearing House... but I thought that they went under. So my curiosity got the better of me.

Well it turns out that they say it is an organization that collecting money for police that are victims of assault. But Guide Star didn't have any non-profit by PCH name.

When I searched on the internet, I got:

That opening line is a very common script used in fundraising pitches, especially ones tied to law-enforcement-themed charities—and also by a fair number of questionable or outright scam operations.

A pitch starting with something like “the growing number of assaults on police officers…” is designed to:

• create urgency
• trigger sympathy for officers
• reduce skepticism before asking for money

What it could be

In Connecticut and elsewhere, that wording is often used by groups claiming to support things like:

• local “police support funds”
• officer injury/benefit funds
• police union–adjacent charities (sometimes loosely connected to groups like the Fraternal Order of Police or similar associations)
• “fallen officer” or “public safety” foundations

Why it raises suspicion

That exact style of pitch is also heavily used by bogus telemarketers and door-to-door fundraisers, because:

• it sounds official without naming a specific organization
• it avoids verifiable details early in the conversation
• it leans on a real-world concern (attacks on officers) to build credibility

Quick way to judge what you were dealing with

If you remember anything else, these details matter a lot:

More likely legitimate if:

• they gave a specific organization name (not just “police fund”)
• they provided a mailing address in Connecticut
• they offered a website ending in a known org domain (.org tied to a real group)
• they didn’t pressure you for immediate payment

More likely a scam if:

• it was vague (“support our officers fund”)
• they pushed urgency or guilt
• they asked for gift cards, cash apps, or instant payment
• they refused to clearly identify the department or charity registration

Bottom line
That opening line alone doesn’t confirm legitimacy—it’s a standard emotional hook used by both real fundraisers and scams. In practice, most complaints about “police fund” solicitations come from unaffiliated telemarketing outfits using law-enforcement themes, not actual police departments.

So what out! It maybe a scam!