Friday, April 24, 2026

Discrimination!

Saint Patrick's Day parades?
Mardi Gras parades?
Cinco de Mayo parades?
Fiesta of Five Flags?
Chinese New Year parades?
Puerto Rican parades?
Pride parades?

Have they all been banned? Well, the governor just signed a bill banning Pride parades and other DEI events. So, are all these events banned? After all, cultural parades are DEI!
DEI and Pride discriminate against “white males,” DeSantis said. “It’s wrong.”
LGBTQ Nation
Molly Sprayregen (She/Her)
April 23, 2026


Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) signed a bill on Wednesday banning local governments from “funding or promoting or taking official action as it relates to diversity, equity, and inclusion.” The bill would also ban local governments from supporting Pride celebrations.

At a press conference after signing the bill, he reportedly described DEI as “an ideological construct that is designed to promote a particular political agenda, particularly to the detriment of disfavored groups.”

“I would think with DEI, ⁠the disfavored groups, number one obviously, would be white males,” he said, “and I think ​they’ve been discriminated against.”

“It’s not fine,” he added. “It’s wrong.”
Um... this is what throws me: "DEI and Pride discriminate against white males." How so? How is a Pride event discriminating against white males? I don't know about you, but at Pride events, I see a lot of white males walking around. So, how is it discrimination? The same holds true for the other events that he has banned—how is it discrimination? In their hatred of anything LGBTQ+, have they banned all cultural events?
 The bill defines DEI as any effort to “manipulate or otherwise influence the composition of employees with reference to race, color, sex, ethnicity, gender identity, or sexual orientation other than to ensure that hiring is conducted in accordance with state and federal antidiscrimination laws” as well as any effort to “Promote or provide preferential treatment or special benefits to” those groups or “promote or adopt training, programming, or activities designed or implemented with reference” to them.
You know, that just turned the definition of discrimination on its head! Think about it.

If an employer refuses to hire any Black employees, under this law, "manipulating or otherwise influencing the composition of employees" by forcing them to hire Black candidates would fall under that. The law has essentially made enforcing anti-discrimination measures illegal!

So, we shall see if any city, town, or county will have any Puerto Rican parades this year, or if they have determined that the law only affects us—the LGBTQ+ community. We are likely heading toward a massive legal battle over whether a city can recognize the heritage of its own citizens without it being labeled "illegal DEI."
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Of All The Things...

You would think that there are more important stuff to investigate!
The Justice Department ultimately decided not to pursue an investigation, according to the Times
The Wrap
Corbin Bolies
April 22, 2026


The FBI launched an initial investigation into New York Times reporter Elizabeth Williamson, who wrote about how FBI Director Kash Patel ordered the bureau to offer security and transportation to his girlfriend, according to the Times.

After the Feb. 28 story on Patel’s decision came out, FBI agents interviewed Alexis Wilkins and searched databases for information on Williamson, according to the Times. The bureau wanted to proceed with its investigation to determine whether Williamson broke federal stalking laws, a source told the outlet, but alarmed Justice Department officials ended the inquiry over concerns that it was rooted in retaliation and after establishing there was no legal basis for it.

[...]

Executive editor Joe Kahn told his paper it was “a blatant violation of Elizabeth’s First Amendment rights and another attempt by this administration to prevent journalists from scrutinizing its actions.”

“It’s alarming. It’s unconstitutional. And it’s wrong,” Kahn said.
Wow!

What a national security issue! The press learned a highly classified document... on the passenger list that is a matter of public record or should be!

This comes as the latest attack by the FBI on the press, you might remember that they didn't tell the judge that the warrant they wanted was for a reporters.
Agents searched Hannah Natanson’s Virginia home and seized devices in inquiry tied to a classified materials case
The Guardian
Richard Luscombe and Jeremy Barr
14 Jan 2026


The FBI raided the home of a Washington Post reporter early on Wednesday in what the newspaper called a “highly unusual and aggressive” move by law enforcement, and press freedom groups condemned as a “tremendous intrusion” by the Trump administration.

Agents descended on the Virginia home of Hannah Natanson as part of an investigation into a government contractor accused of illegally retaining classified government materials.

[...]

Press freedom groups were united in their condemnation of the raid on Wednesday.

“Physical searches of reporters’ devices, homes and belongings are some of the most invasive investigative steps law enforcement can take,” Bruce D Brown, president of the Reporters’ Committee for Freedom of the Press, said in a statement.

“There are specific federal laws and policies at the Department of Justice that are meant to limit searches to the most extreme cases because they endanger confidential sources far beyond just one investigation and impair public interest reporting in general.

“While we won’t know the government’s arguments about overcoming these very steep hurdles until the affidavit is made public, this is a tremendous escalation in the administration’s intrusions into the independence of the press.”
Trump & Company have an irrational fear of the press and ignore the First Amendment!
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

What The...

This is totally... I don't know how to express it without swearing.

Okay do you know what the Pink Triangle came from? They were Germany Holocaust prisoner markings for LGBT people and now Trump & Company wants to have TV shows with a warning label.
Statement on TV ratings system says disclosure is needed for children’s programs that include ‘gender identity issues’
The Guardian
Adrian Horton
Wed 22 Apr 2026


The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is launching a new inquiry into the TV ratings system, including whether content related to gender identity is not adequately flagged for parents, in the latest warning shot to broadcasters from the agency headed by the Trump loyalist Brendan Carr.

The new proceeding, announced on Wednesday, asks for public comment on the transparency of the TV Oversight Management Board, which oversees the rating system and guidelines. That system was developed after Congress passed a law in 1996, leading to the creation of numerous ratings such as TV-Y, for programs deemed appropriate for all children, and TV-MA, for mature audiences.

The so-called “industry voluntary rating system” is used by broadcast networks overseen by the FCC, as well as cable, satellite and streaming services, which are not subject to the same guidelines.
Are you ready for this... a throw back to the 1930s!
In its public notice of the new inquiry, the FCC singled out non-binary and transgender topics as an issue of concern. According to the agency’s media bureau, “parents have raised concerns that controversial gender identity issues are being included or promoted in children’s programs without providing any disclosure or transparency to parents. Specifically, the industry guidelines that parents rely on are rating shows with transgender and gender non-binary programming as appropriate for children and young children, and doing so without providing this information to parents, thereby undermining the ability of parents to make informed choices for their families.”
Save the Children!!!! That is only a smokescreen.

What they are saying by labeling us is that we are dangerous, we are predictors! Can you imagine if they said programs with Black in has to be labeled? Well it is the same thing!

The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum wrote, "... Gay men and men accused of homosexuality were identified with pink triangles. ..." Now we are going to be identified as TV-TG?

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, April 23, 2026

I'm gonna wash that man right outa my hair!

I'm gonna wash that man right outa my hair,
I'm gonna wash that man right outa my hair,
I'm gonna wash that man right outa my hair,
And send him on his way.
I'm gonna wave that man right outa my arms,
I'm gonna wave that man right outa my arms,
I'm gonna wave that man right outa my arms,
And send him on his way.

Song by Oscar Hammerstein II and Richard Rodgers

Well that is what the voters are saying.


It was almost exactly this time 20 years ago that the bottom began to fall out on George W. Bush’s approval ratings. And as Bush’s numbers in most polls fell into the 30s for the first time in late winter and early spring, the culprit was clear: the Iraq war.

History could be repeating itself with President Donald Trump in 2026. Just swap Iraq with Iran.

Three new polls released Tuesday showed Trump’s approval rating in the mid-30s: 36% in a Reuters-Ipsos poll, 35% in a Strength in Numbers-Verasight poll and 33% in an AP-NORC poll. They follow an NBC News poll over the weekend that showed Trump hitting a new low of 37%.

Over the past month now, eight of nine quality polls tracked by CNN have shown Trump in the 30s.

The only exception was a Fox News poll pegging Trump at 41%, but even that showed Trump with his worst numbers in its polls since 2017.

[...]

And perhaps more troubling for Trump, the trendline in his second term has been remarkably consistent — consistently down.
Glub... Glub... Glub!
A big reason for that appears to be views of his handling of the economy, which the Iran war — and the rising gas prices that have accompanied it — has sent to new lows.
As the Iran war goes down the tubes, Trump lashes out for anything to save him.
Reuters-Ipsos, AP-NORC and NBC polls show approval in mid-30s, with economy, Iran and immigration concerns
The Guardian
Edward Helmore
22 Apr 2026


A trio of political polls indicate public approval of Donald Trump’s management of the US economy, immigration and the Iran conflict is slipping, flashing warning lights for Trump-aligned Republican candidates with six months to go until the US midterm elections.

[...]

A Reuters-IPSOS poll published on Wednesday also found that Trump’s signature migrant deportation policies could harm Republicans in November’s congressional elections: 52% of Americans said they were less likely to support a candidate who backs Trump’s approach to deportations, significantly more than the 42% who said they were more likely to support such a candidate.

[...]

But the challenges faced by Republican candidates to defend their twin majorities in Congress are stark. The poll found that one-third of Americans believe the country is on the right track while two-thirds believe it is on the wrong track.

The economy continues to be the top issue, with 29% saying it is the issue that matters most to them right now, while 24% said threats to democracy, 12% said healthcare and 10% said crime and safety, NBC polling found.

Meanwhile, two-thirds, or 67%, said they disapprove of Trump’s handling of the war with Iran, with one-third approving. Those figures grow more stark among Democrats and independents, showing almost all Democrats and 82% of independents disapproving, but 74% of Republicans approving.
His supporters for his immigration policies all turned south with images of US citizens being shot in the back of his head!
His supporters for his promised of no more wars walked away from him with the attack on Iran!
His supporters for his promised on the economy zipped their pocketbooks!
His women supporters dropped him over abortion bans!
His over-the-top attacks on us is turning away votes!

The voters are going to wash him right out White House!
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

DEI

Or is it DIE? “Die” feels more fitting with the way the Trump administration is attacking our community. When I used to do diversity training I used to use the case of Lynn Conway. I first found out about her back around 2005, when things were slow at work, I started looking up the old computers I’d worked on, IBM 1620, IBM 360, PDP-8, and so on. I came across an article about the IBM 360 and something called dynamic instruction scheduling. Huh. It described how one engineer helped develop the idea, but then work got in the way of my curiosity.

A couple of months later, I remembered the article and went back to it. This time I noticed it was about a woman. That caught my attention.

Being trans, my radar went off—beep, beep.

I found her university webpage; she was a Professor Emeritus. I learned that when she transitioned, she was asked to leave IBM... she didn’t fit the “flat-top haircut, thin blue tie, blue sports jacket with a white shirt and a pocket protector” mold.

IBM’s loss was significant. She went on to become a leader in integrated circuit design, worked with DARPA, and later received the IEEE Computer Society’s Computer Pioneer Award for her foundational contributions to computer architecture and VLSI design.

When I taught diversity, I used her story as an example: IBM let go of a highly talented engineer because she was trans—it was our gain and IBM loss.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

The Harm

You see all over the news how the Republicans are saying that they are saving the children, but the opposite is true, they are harming us, not saving us!
KFF
Authors: Lindsey Dawson and Jennifer Kates
Published: Apr 21, 2026


Starting on the first day of his second term, President Trump began to issue numerous executive actions, several of which directly address or affect health programs, efforts, or policies to meet the health needs of LGBTQ+ people. This guide provides an overview of these actions, in the order in which they were issued. The “date issued” is date the action was first taken; subsequent actions, such as litigation efforts, are listed under “What Happens/Implications.” It is not inclusive of administrative actions that impact LGBTQ+ people that are not directly related to health and health care access, such as efforts related to participation in sport even though those actions might have an impact on well-being. In addition, within the actions examined, only provisions directly related to health and health access are described in table.
Trump issued a number of anti-trans EOs!
Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions, January 20, 2025
Implications: This order could lead to less oversight, reduced health programing, and fewer policies protecting LGBTQ+ people, which could negatively impact access to care and well-being. Of particular note:
  • Rescinds orders that had called for LGBTQ+ people’s health equity, the national public health needs of LGBTQ+ people, LGBTQ+ data collection, and nondiscrimination protections, including in health care.
  • Rescinds orders that had called for nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ+ young people in school, which could contribute to stigma and worsened mental health.
Executive Order: Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to The Federal Government, January 20, 2025
Implications: This order is broad, directed to all federal agencies and programs. Because federal health programs reach LGBTQ+ people, and some are specifically designed to be inclusive of the LGBTQ+ community, or account for gender identities in addition to biological sex, this Order could widely affect program funding, guidance, and access. It has several possible implications:
The terms used in the Order include several biological and social inaccuracies which could perpetuate misinformation about LGBTQ+ people and transgender people’s health needs. It also takes steps towards ban gender care in certain area, most explicitly in prisons.

Executive Order: Protecting Children From Chemical and Surgical Mutilation, January 28, 2025
Implications: If fully implemented, the Order would broadly and extensively limit access to gender affirming care for young people, across a range of payers and providers. Access to gender affirming care is associated with improved mental health outcomes for transgender people and limiting this care with negative ones, including poorer mental health outcomes. Additional impact includes:
  • The executive order includes details about sex, gender identity, gender affirming care, and transgender people that conflict with science and evidence. These inaccuracies include suggesting that large shares of youth are seeking gender affirming medical care, that regret rates among those seeking care are high, and conflating “female genital mutilation” and gender-affirming care. This has the potential to promote hostility, stigma, and discrimination, and can lead to care denials.
But judges are going "Wait a minute!" some judges are throwing out the EO based on junk science while other judges are saying that they are an overreach of the laws.
The ruling in the U.S. District Court for Maryland keeps protections in place for providers offering gender-affirming care to patients under 19 while the legal fight continues.
The Advocate
Christopher Wiggins
Apr 06, 2026


A federal judge has refused to lift a nationwide block on key portions of President Donald Trump’s effort to restrict gender-affirming care for minors, preserving access to treatment even as the case remains tied up in an appeals process.

On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Brendan A. Hurson denied the administration’s request to stay a preliminary injunction that bars federal officials from conditioning or terminating funding for health care providers based on their provision of gender-affirming care to patients under 19.

The ruling keeps in place a March 2025 injunction secured by PFLAG, families, and medical organizations challenging two executive orders directing federal agencies to limit funding tied to what the administration has described as “gender ideology” and certain medical treatments for transgender youth.
In another court this time in Oregon,
JD Supra
April 20, 2026


On April 18, 2026, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon issued a sweeping opinion vacating the “Kennedy Declaration,” a directive issued by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in December 2025 without notice-and-comment rulemaking. The Kennedy Declaration purported to establish that transgender healthcare for minors falls below professionally recognized standards of health care and threatened providers with exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid. Opinion and Order, State of Oregon, et al. v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., et al., No. 6:25-cv-02409-MTK (D. Oregon Apr. 18, 2026) (ECF 93).

The court granted summary judgment for the 22 Plaintiff States, vacated the Kennedy Declaration in its entirety, declared that HHS lacks authority to unilaterally establish standards of care superseding state-recognized standards, and permanently enjoined HHS and its Office of Inspector General (OIG) from implementing the Kennedy Declaration or any materially similar policy against any provider in the Plaintiff States.

This ruling delivers immediate, concrete protection to healthcare providers in Oregon, Washington, New York, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawai’i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin. The court’s opinion—notable for its extraordinarily pointed criticism of the administration’s conduct as causing “very real harm to very real people”—found the Kennedy Declaration unlawful on multiple grounds.
Even with these ruling hospitals are going to be gun-shy to take up any healthcare for us. The hospital are worried about losing funding for Medicare and Medicaid. I doubt very much that any trans healthcare programs will be restarted out of not legal fears but fear of Trump's vengeance.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Yes Men

Defense Secretary Hegisth has been firing naysayers to Trump's War.
April 23, 2026


Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has fired Navy Secretary John Phelan. The Pentagon framed it Wednesday as an immediate departure.

Why it matters: The ouster of the Navy's top civilian caught many off-guard and adds to the pile of military officials who have either abruptly exited or been pushed out of their posts under Trump 2.0.

"Phelan didn't understand he wasn't the boss. His job is to follow orders given, not follow the orders he thinks should be given," a person familiar with the situation told Axios.
The same person said Phelan and Hegseth did not "get along."
Yeah, former Secretary Caputo told Hegseth that the war was wrong!
Despite the turmoil, Hegseth remains in Trump's good graces because he has a solid relationship with the president, Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
The Axios article goes on to write Hegseth and Trump dream of a "Great Golden Fleet" to rival Roosevelt's "Great White Fleet"
Of note: Phelan sat down with a dozen reporters Tuesday afternoon to discuss the future of the Navy and its major investments, including the Golden Fleet and its battleship and frigate.

"We're going to really need to improve our ability to build ships," he said at the time.
Thump's pipe dream is the battleship "Trump" the first navy ship to be named after a living president!
Jan 7, 2026


America's newly promised warship, the Trump-class neo-battleship, is an oddity.

The big picture: The future vessels — should they actually be paid for and constructed — subvert years of precedent, just like the commander in chief.

Military thinkers have prioritized dispersion of firepower, people and supplies, especially in the Indo-Pacific. This is not that.
  • Outfitting surface ships with nukes, in this case promised to be nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missiles, bucks decades of post-Cold War practice.
  • Warships are named a certain way and after certain people. Here, naming conventions are also out the window.
What we're hearing: While supporters have been the loudest, critics appear to be more numerous.
  • "Dumb," one defense industry executive told Axios when asked about the design. "I like the overall energy and vision in Golden Fleet, though."
  • "I'm struggling to see the upside, other than lots of missile launchers and 'super lethal,'" another person familiar with the Navy's plans said. "But the downsides and complications are many."
Yup... it is really dumb. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

Wow!

A friend sent me this on Facebook, it is amazing!

So does that mean that AI is more ethical than the humans running the program?

What got me is the very last sentence. That the data to bomb the school was a decade out of date! WTF!
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

"Say It Ain’t So, Joe!”

Those famous lines were uttered by a kid about Shoeless Joe Jackson after the Black Sox Scandal, but that could very easily be said of the Trump's family latest sandal, no not the war, not the Epstein Files but rather it is insider trading!
 
Now with Trump is anyone surprised that insider trading has become out in the open! (Note: when they say betting, they mean selling short or long depending on how you think the market will move. so if they are selling short (thinking that the price will drop) or going long (thinking that the price it will rise)),
April 20, 2026
 
 
 Throughout US President Donald Trump's second term in office, traders have been betting millions of dollars just before he makes major announcements.

The BBC has examined trade volume data on several financial markets and matched them to some of the president's most significant market-moving statements.

It found a consistent pattern of spikes just hours, or sometimes minutes, before a social media post or media interview was made public.

Some analysts say it bears the hallmarks of illegal insider trading, whereby bets are made by people based on information that is not available to the general public.

Others say the picture is more complicated and that some traders have become more adept at anticipating the president's interventions.
This is the perfect war for insider trading! With the on again/off again opening of the Strait of Hormuz the commodities markets bouncing up and down with each iteration of the strait.
Nine days into the US-Israel war with Iran, Trump told CBS News in a phone interview that the conflict was "very complete, pretty much".
 
These photos are from newspapers from the 1890s,
the era of the Robber Barrons
    18:29 GMT: Oil bets surge
    19:16 GMT: Trump says war is nearly complete
    19:17 GMT: Oil drops by 25%

The first time the public would have known about the interview was at 15:16 Eastern Time (19:16 GMT) when the reporter posted about it on X.

Oil traders reacted to this news that the conflict could end much sooner than expected by selling oil, with the price plunging by around 25%.

However, market data shows a huge surge of bets were placed on the price of oil falling at 18:29 GMT - a full 47 minutes before the reporter's post.

The traders who placed those bets will have made millions of dollars from the movement in oil prices.
But remember, Trump stripped the agency in charge of policing Commodity market. He replace the chair with Michael Selig and many of the positions remain open on the Board. 
US probes suspicious oil trades made before Trump Iran pivots, source says
Reuters
By Anirban Sen, Chris Prentice and Anushadevan Shah
April 15, 2026
 
 
Summary
  • Lawmakers raise concerns over potential insider trading
  • Senator Warren urges deeper probe of administration officials
  • CME Group says it monitors trading and urges scrutiny 
 The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission is examining a series ‌of trades in oil futures placed shortly before major shifts in President Donald Trump's Iran war policy, a person familiar with the matter said on Wednesday.

CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said in remarks prepared for delivery to Congress on Thursday that the agency ​will go after wrongdoers, but nothing in the testimony addressed any specific investigation and an agency spokesperson ​declined to comment.
 
 The CFTC probe is focused on trading ​of oil futures contracts on platforms belonging to CME Group (CME.O), opens new tab and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE.N), opens new tab, with investigators examining at least two instances of oil trades made on March 23 and April 7, the source said.
 
Well‑timed trades may have generated millions of dollars in profits, ​drawing concern from lawmakers and legal experts that decisions around war and diplomacy can create opportunities for abuse ​in volatile and opaque derivatives markets.
It is not just these trades that have raised eyebrows but also Congress.
The Christian Science Monitor
 By Linda Feldmann
April 01, 2026
 
 
 Reports of big payouts from market trades that appeared to foresee major actions by the Trump administration – potentially with insider information – are becoming increasingly common.

Last week, the oil futures market saw a spike in trades about 15 minutes before President Donald Trump announced a pause in plans to attack Iranian power plants. The unidentified trader or traders had placed more than $500 million in trades, according to calculations by the Financial Times.

Similarly, the prediction market Polymarket saw a sharp increase in bets that proved lucrative right before the United States went to war against Iran and, earlier, invaded Venezuela.
 
[...]
 
 “This is just astounding corruption,” Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut said in a social media video. “There are a bunch of millionaires and billionaires in this country who are making money off of their inside information, their access to what President Trump is going to do or what he is going to say.”

The White House denies any wrongdoing by administration officials.
 
[...]
 
 Suspicions of impropriety have sparked a wave of legislation, some of it bipartisan, in both houses of Congress. Senator Murphy, along with Rep. Greg Casar of Texas, another Democrat, has introduced a bill aimed at banning prediction markets from “wagering on government actions, terrorism, war, assassination, and events where an individual knows or controls the outcome.”
There are investigations being opened in Congress... 
In Letter, Raskin Warns Kushner’s Dual Role as U.S. Negotiator in the Middle East and Financier Funded by Middle Eastern Governments Poses Grave National Security Risks and Likely Violates Federal Law

Washington, D.C. (April 17, 2026)—Rep. Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, opened a sweeping investigation into Jared Kushner’s financial conflicts of interest, demanding documents and communications related to his foreign-funded private investment firm and his simultaneous government service as the so-called “Special Envoy for Peace.” The inquiry comes amid mounting reports that Mr. Kushner is wielding diplomatic powers in the Middle East while fundraising billions of dollars in capital from foreign powers, whose interests diverge sharply from those of the American people.

“From the standpoint of the American people, your decision to act in these two roles—one public for the government and one private for personal profit—creates a glaring and incurable conflict of interest. Your clients Saudi Arabia and the Royal Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman have unique and significant strategic, economic and political interests that are certain to diverge sharply from the strategic, economic and political interests of the American people,” wrote Ranking Member Raskin.

Mr. Kushner’s investment firm, Affinity Partners, has amassed approximately $6.16 billion in assets under management—including $1.2 billion in the past year alone—with an extraordinary 99 percent of its funding derived from foreign nationals. These include sovereign wealth funds operated by the governments of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar. At the same time, Mr. Kushner has assumed a central role in sensitive geopolitical negotiations across the Middle East and beyond.
With Trump we have the best government money can buy! Will the Trump administration end up rivaling "Boss Tweed and Tammany Hall" or the "Teapot Dome Scandal"? Trump likes to keep it in the family, so to him the family that steals together, stays together in prison!

So tune in next week when Diana’s Little Corner in the Nutmeg State brings you another exciting episode in the adventures of the wheelings and dealings Trump family!
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)