Thursday, February 05, 2026

Mixed Out Comes.

As you read this, keep one thing in mind... the Republicans think being trans a choice!
“They have no intention of actually using the data,” a Utah health provider treating transgender youth said.
The 19th News
By Emily Anderson Stern, The Salt Lake Tribune
February 4, 2026

Few Utahns have witnessed the effects of withdrawing transgender kids’ access to care as Collin Kuhn, a clinical child and adolescent psychologist who specializes in helping their clients navigate challenges and questions related to gender.

The difference between receiving care and not receiving care, they said, is “night and day.”

“All of a sudden, socially, their world opens up,” Kuhn said of transgender clients after they start hormone therapy — treatment that, Kuhn added, doesn’t start until the client has met with them or another mental health professional for a year or longer. “They’re not just isolating and sitting in their rooms behind a screen.”

[...]

But in 2023, Utah lawmakers passed what they referred to as a “moratorium” on gender-affirming care for transgender youth, then-state Sen. Mike Kennedy’s SB16. The bill’s GOP proponents, at the time, repeatedly insisted they were concerned for minors’ health and safety. So as part of the law, the Legislature commissioned an in-depth review of all research into the effects of hormone treatments.
And the results didn't come out the way they thought it would.
As the Republican supermajority now moves toward permanently banning such care in Utah, lawmakers continue to sidestep public dialogue about the results of that research — which concluded that gender-affirming care for minors with gender dysphoria is largely found to result in positive outcomes and reduce the likelihood of suicide.

Records obtained by The Salt Lake Tribune indicate legislative staff aiding the Health and Human Services Interim Committee initially planned on lawmakers discussing the review’s findings after the report’s delivery last May.
Hey wait a minute! We have to hide this... 
Gov. Spencer Cox said at a June news conference that he felt Utah’s limits on access to gender-affirming care are “probably in the right place right now,” adding, “There doesn’t seem to be an appetite to readdress it. I think things have shifted significantly over the past couple years.”
WTF! Trans kid will die! Trans kid will be effected for the rest of their lives with their deep voices all because the governor doesn't have the appetite to readdress it!



This is not good news!
A New York woman received $1.6M for pain and suffering and $400K for future medical expenses after suing doctors over teen transgender surgery
By Chloe Cole Fox News
February 5, 2026


Two million dollars.

That’s how much money a 22-year-old woman just won in a New York lawsuit against her doctors. She sued them for medical malpractice after they cut off her breasts when she was 16. They told her she could become a boy, even though that’s biologically impossible. Now she has won the first-ever lawsuit against doctors who try to give sex changes to kids.

That brave young woman isn’t alone.
This is the bull that the right-wing is pushing out!
The woman in New York has a heartbreaking story. She accused a psychologist and surgeon of pressuring her to get a sex-change surgery when she was a teenager. While her mother was opposed to the surgery, she felt like she had no choice but to allow it. That checks out: Doctors tell parents all the time that without a sex change, their child is going to commit suicide. How can a parent argue with that?
I don't know any therapist with forced or encouraged their patients to transition!
For that matter, every doctor who’s even remotely involved in providing sex changes should stop — immediately. People like me are coming for them. They pressured us and hurt us in profound ways. We demand justice. The $2 million that New York woman just won is a start. But this won’t end until the medical profession atones for its actions and stops giving sex changes to children once and for all.
The National Review writes,
By Brittany Bernstein
February 2, 2026


Welcome back to Forgotten Fact Checks. This week, we look at the lack of mainstream media coverage of a major verdict in a gender “detransitioner” medical-malpractice case, and cover more media misses.

As readers of National Review will know, a woman who received a double mastectomy at only 16 as an act of “gender-affirming” care was just awarded $2 million in the first successful medical-malpractice lawsuit brought by a detransitioner.

[...]

Twenty-eight detransitioner lawsuits are now in different stages of legal proceedings across the U.S., according to the New York Post. But Varian’s is the first known successful lawsuit. The case could open the floodgates for lawsuits of its kind.
This is horrible! This will not only affect minors but also those over 21... the hospitals and healthcare providers are going to backing off surgeries!



Then we have discrimination in the health care industry!


In summary
The Unruh Civil Rights Act provides the fundamental protection for equal access to health care regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity, experts say. The state has not acted to uphold those protections, transgender rights groups claim.
On Friday evening, California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit against the state’s largest children’s health provider. The complaint accused Rady Children’s Health in San Diego of taking steps to illegally terminate gender-affirming care for transgender youth.

News of the lawsuit spread quickly through chat groups of parents of transgender kids, LGBTQ organizations and the broader transgender community. It was the first major action the state has taken against a hospital that had severely limited or ended transgender health services.

Many in the community see this move as a major step towards protecting transgender health, but some still question why the state’s legal claims don’t rest on broader civil rights questions. Instead, the key argument relies on the state’s corporations code — a provision governing business transactions — to try to compel Rady into continuing gender-affirming care.
The hospitals are between a rock and a hard place with the fed saying that they will cutoff Medicare and Medicaid funding and the state saying not so fast!
California’s civil rights law — the Unruh Civil Rights Act — is the backbone of the state’s guarantee of equal access to transgender health services, which can include puberty blockers, hormones, surgery and therapy, said Megan Noor, a staff attorney at the Transgender Law Center. The law prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. 

Noor said that means, for example, if a hospital offers puberty blockers to a cisgender child who is starting puberty too young, they cannot deny access to that same treatment to a transgender child even if it is for a different purpose, such as giving the child more time to explore their gender identity. 
But the hard fact is the feds will bankrupt the hospital by cuttings the funding!
Hospitals say their hands were forced by an unfriendly federal government that does not recognize the existence of transgender people. 

On his first day in office, President Donald Trump issued an executive order characterizing transgender health procedures as “chemical and surgical mutilation” and directing agencies to defund any supportive programs. 

Since then his administration has intensified the pressure against health care organizations. Over the summer, federal investigators issued subpoenas to clinics and hospitals around the country, alleging fraud and seeking medical records. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in November published a self-described peer reviewed report “on the medical dangers posed to children” of gender-affirming care.
And as usual we get caught in the middle!

They Just Made A Big Mistake

[Editorial]

The Republicans just made a big, big mistake! Huge.

The Hour reported that,
“As the 102 Democratic majority stood up and cheered, Republicans including Sen. Rob Sampson of Wolcott, Rep. Ben McGorty of Shelton, Rep. Kurt Vail of Stafford walked out. State Rep. Cara Pavalock-D'Amato of Bristol wore a sweater with the words "ICE IN," on the back. The walkout and ICE criticism comes at a time of heightened tension and scrutiny nationwide.”
While Republicans continue to harp on crime and undocumented immigrants, residents are starting to look around and ask: Where? Most of us don’t see it. Yes, crime exists, but we don’t need federal "surge" tactics in our neighborhoods. As the GOP tries to force national rhetoric into local politics, voters are seeing through the facade.

We see the videos on Facebook and the reports on TV. We see the violence and realize: That isn’t us. We aren’t like that. So why are there ICE raids here?

As the polls show, the people don’t like what they are seeing,  Quinnipiac University reported that,
“61% Of Voters Think The Trump Administration Has Not Given An Honest Account Of The Fatal Shooting Of Alex Pretti, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; 58% Of Voters Think DHS Secretary Kristi Noem Should Be Removed”
So I hope that the Connecticut Republicans continue supporting Trump. Because the voters are saying enough! Enough!


Wow six! It is a regular crime wave! This is the bull that the CT Republicans are pushing! Six undocumented arrested by ICE and they want to call in ICE thugs! 

And this also is why they are losing...
In the weeks since ICE agents began conducting operations across the city, Westminster Presbyterian has given its members a place to protest on their own terms.
The New York Times
By Claire Fahy
Feb. 3, 2026


On Sunday morning, as some people packed the diners in downtown Minneapolis in search of warm breakfast and coffee, others filed into the pews at Westminster Presbyterian.

One detail, however, hinted that this wasn’t a typical weekly service — a woman with knitting needles was making a red hat worn by many of those who have poured into the streets to deplore the presence of immigration agents.

The church offered a quieter but, for many, an equally powerful form of protest: prayer. Absent were the animal onesies and profanity-laden chants of the crowds outside the B.H. Whipple Federal Building. In their place were hymns, scripture and a full-throated sermon.

“The main reason why Operation Metro Surge has not gone according to the Department of Homeland Security’s plan is because the architects assumed that Minnesotans would turn on one another, or decide that it’s too costly to show solidarity to people who are suffering or who are gripped by fear,” the Rev. Matthew Skinner declared from the pulpit. “So far, we haven’t done that.”

Places of worship have played pivotal roles in protests throughout history. The Presbyterian Church has urged members into action in the Revolutionary War and supported the civil rights movement. Since Immigration and Customs Enforcement began operations in Minnesota in December, leaders of many faiths have provided support for the people resisting.
ICE’s presence isn't driving wedges between us; it’s uniting us. We see the violence and hear the rhetoric, and we respond: That this is not us. That is not the U.S. The Republicans seem to have forgotten the lessons of Selma, Montgomery, Birmingham, and Little Rock. They’ve forgotten that there comes a point where the American people simply say, "Enough." In the 1960s, that message was delivered on the evening news; today, it’s being delivered via social media.

These aren't "radical leftists" protesting in the streets or praying in the pews—they are our neighbors. And that is exactly why the GOP is losing the room.

[Editorial]

Wednesday, February 04, 2026

It Is Getting Worst!

It used to be we only got arrested, now they sicced bounty hunters on us!
A new Kansas law lets those “aggrieved” by the presence of a trans person in a bathroom to file a civil suit for monetary damages.
The Intercept
Natasha Lennard
February 3 2026


With masked paramilitary forces grabbing nonwhite people from the streets and shooting civilians with impunity, it can be difficult to keep focus on all the other ways Republicans are entrenching a fascist status quo nationwide. For trans people, however, the legislative and policy assaults, which have been escalating red states for nearly a decade, are only getting worse — and, as ever, drawing all too little concern from Democratic leaders.

Just last week, the Kansas legislature passed some of the most far-reaching measures to push trans and gender-nonconforming people out of public life to date. Bathroom bans that bar trans people from restrooms aligned with their gender identity have become grimly common; over 20 states have such a law on the books. But Kansas’s new anti-trans bathroom bill adds a dangerous twist: a bounty hunter provision.

The law would permit private citizens to sue and seek monetary reward based on claiming to encounter a trans person in the bathroom. That’s on top of some of the harshest punishments of any existing bathroom bans, such as criminal charges, steep fines and even jail time.
This is sick!

How can we fight this? We need our trans men friends to start obeying the law and use women's bathrooms! We need our women friend s to dress up looking as masculine to get arrested! We need to tie them up in court with wrongful arrests!

First Amendment!

The Constitution doesn't mean anything; the Law doesn't mean anything. Court orders? They’re treated the same way. The Trump administration does whatever it wants!
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Those forty-five words lay the foundation for our freedoms!

Those forty-five words lay the foundation for our freedoms! Yet, those using their First Amendment rights are being punished with court hearings without even being arrested—targeted simply for following a vehicle while a woman was denied the right to travel here in the United States!
By Ashley Grams
Updated on: February 3, 2026
CBS Minnesota


As the immigration crackdown continues in Minnesota, Nicole Cleland, a resident of Richfield, Minnesota, believes federal agents identified her through facial recognition software. 

Cleland has actively protested against the deployment of federal agents in the Twin Cities. She says she's a trained observer, following officers of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as well as Customs and Border Protection. Her account is detailed in a lawsuit filed alongside other observers against the Department of Homeland Security 

On Jan. 10, Cleland says she was following a truck with federal agents inside.

[...]

Cleland described the unmasked Border Patrol agent as stern while warning that he was using facial recognition and his body camera was rolling. 

"He said, 'I'm giving you a warning. This is the only verbal warning that you're going to get,'" Cleland recounted. 

One source briefed on DHS tactics confirmed to CBS News that Border Patrol uses facial recognition software, including Mobile Fortify, to scan the faces of demonstrators.
Then they denied her right to travel like some communist country!
Cleland said three days after that interaction with Border Patrol, she received an email notice that said her Global Entry was revoked. 

"You can click on a link and there is a letter that just says, 'Your status has been changed. We're not obligated to give you any reason for that change,'" Cleland said after showing WCCO the revocation notice. 

Cleland says she's used Global Entry since 2014 and was reapproved in 2024. Global Entry status typically lasts for five years. 

While CBP did not share a reason, Cleland describes the timing as "pretty coincidental," noting she had no issues with the traveler program in the past.
No hearing, no court, nothing but some bureaucrat red-lining her because she exercised her 1st Amendment rights for a redress of grievances. The other thing is that the government now has a database of those who are legally using their 1st Amendment rights!

Attack on the freedom of the press...
Agents searched Hannah Natanson’s Virginia home and seized devices in inquiry tied to a classified materials case
The Guardian
Richard Luscombe and Jeremy Barr
Wed 14 Jan 2026


The FBI raided the home of a Washington Post reporter early on Wednesday in what the newspaper called a “highly unusual and aggressive” move by law enforcement, and press freedom groups condemned as a “tremendous intrusion” by the Trump administration.

Agents descended on the Virginia home of Hannah Natanson as part of an investigation into a government contractor accused of illegally retaining classified government materials.

An email sent on Wednesday afternoon to Post staff from the executive editor, Matt Murray, obtained by the Guardian, said agents turned up “unannounced”, searched her home and seized electronic devices.

[...]

“It’s a clear and appalling sign that this administration will set no limits on its acts of aggression against an independent press,” Marty Baron, the Post’s former executive editor, told the Guardian.
Hey, the Constitution is only for losers!

Oh, and they forgot one little detail when they got the warrant... they forgot to tell the judge it was for a reporter... Ops. Sorry about that boss.

The website Reporters Committee reports that,
“In its affidavit, the government did not reference the federal law that prohibits, with few exceptions, raids targeting journalists or newsrooms to seize unpublished work. The government appears to have ignored a crucial press freedom guardrail in searching a journalist’s home and did not alert the magistrate judge to the law’s application in this case, let alone show how or if it had complied with the statute’s considerable protections.”

That federal law is the Privacy Protection Act of 1980, which created essential protections for journalists and newsrooms from government searches and seizures. Congress passed it out of concern that such raids could stanch the free flow of information to the public.
The Trump & Company seems to have a little problem with reading — they keep adding thing like "freedom of the press only if it is good news..."

Then we have the Department of Justice banning gun possession in Washington DC!
February 2, 2026


U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro on Monday threatened jail time for people who bring firearms into Washington.

“I don’t care if you have a license in another district, and I don’t care if you’re a law-abiding gun owner somewhere else,” Pirro said on Fox News. “You bring a gun into this district, count on going to jail.”

[...]

But the remarks prompted outrage from gun rights advocates and some Republicans, adding to mounting friction between the Trump administration and gun owners following the fatal shooting of Minneapolis intensive care nurse Alex Pretti.

The National Association for Gun Rights called Pirro’s assertion “unacceptable and intolerable,” suggesting it shows how “broken and out of touch” local gun laws are.
The 2nd Amendment... bah humbug!

The Guardian writes that the Trump adminstration has ignored court orders;
Chief US district judge Patrick Schiltz demanded ICE lead Todd Lyons explain himself personally in a three-page order issued Monday evening, declaring that “the court’s patience is at an end”.

The rebuke follows weeks of tilting anger during the so-called “Operation Metro Surge”, the Trump administration’s large-scale, aggressive and now deadly immigration enforcement campaign in Minneapolis-St Paul. The operation has generated numerous emergency lawsuits from immigrants claiming unlawful arrest or detention, with judges consistently ruling in their favor.

Schiltz, appointed by George W Bush, accused the Trump administration of deliberately delaying or ignoring judicial directives across Minnesota’s federal courts. His order came in the case of a man he had ordered released on 15 January who remained in custody as of Monday night.
Ha, laws? They're just for Democrats!

Then they are politicizing the law by attacking opponents and going after judges whose rulings they don't like. The right-wing Washington Examiner reported that.
A federal appeals court judge quietly dismissed a judicial misconduct complaint the Justice Department filed against U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, dealing a setback to the Trump administration’s effort to challenge one of its most prominent judicial critics in the fight over deportations to El Salvador.

The complaint was rejected on Dec. 19, 2025, by Jeffrey Sutton, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, although the order did not become public until this weekend. Sutton concluded that the DOJ failed to back up its allegations with evidence and fell well short of the standard required for a misconduct finding, according to a seven-page decision.

The complaint centered on James Boasberg, the chief judge of the federal district court in Washington, D.C., who repeatedly clashed with President Donald Trump’s administration last year over its use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan migrants to a high-security prison in El Salvador.
Laws mean nothing to this administration. With the Supreme Court ruling that the President is above the law, a spineless Congress, and a base that loves the lawlessness, people are being denied their constitutional rights. The government has crossed the line from "serving the people" to "monitoring the subjects."

"Your papers, please!"

Tuesday, February 03, 2026

Tell Me That Trump & Company Are Not Racists!

They keep denying it, but their actions and words say otherwise.
USA Today
Anna Kaufman
Mon, February 2, 2026


The lineup for Turning Point USA's "All-American Halftime Show" is finally here.

The show, put on by the conservative organization to compete with Bad Bunny's Super Bowl halftime performance, will feature performances by Kid Rock, Brantley Gilbert and Lee Brice. Gabby Barrett, 2021 winner of new female artist of the year at the Academy of Country Music Awards, will also perform.

Kid Rock is a close ally of President Donald Trump, becoming more outspoken in his conservative beliefs in recent years. Both Gilbert and Brice are mid-level stars in the country music space; Gilbert is known for hits like "Dirt Road Anthem" and "Bottoms Up" while Brice is known for tracks like "One of Them Girls" and "Rumor." Barrett is the only female performer so far announced, breaking through with her hit single "I Hope."
I hope everyone knows that Kid Rock is a racist!
"We're approaching this show like David and Goliath. Competing with the pro football machine and a global pop superstar is almost impossible … or is it?" Kid Rock said in a release announcing the lineup.

Kid Rock continued, taking jabs at Bad Bunny: "He's said he's having a dance party, wearing a dress, and singing in Spanish? Cool. We plan to play great songs for folks who love America."
"...singing in Spanish

Heavy Sports wrote this about the other halftime show...
By Nathan Dougherty
Feb 2, 2026


Details have finally emerged on the alternative to Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show — and the show is already sparking some controversy online.

Turning Point USA had announced it would hold its own halftime show, responding to criticism when Puerto Rican artist Bad Bunny was announced as the official Super Bowl show. The organization released its lineup on Monday, including some digs at Bad Bunny and garnering some pushback.

[...]

“Funny that they could only get washed-up artists to perform,” one person wrote on X in response to the lineup announcement.
Um... he just won a Grammy! That makes six Grammys! Yup, "could only get washed-up artists to perform"  I think that it is Kid Rock who's a has been!
“Yikes. I’d rather throw my silverware into my garbage disposal and listen to that,” another wrote on X.

Many others took issue with the insinuation that it was an “All-American” alternative to Bad Bunny, who is Puerto Rican and by extension an American citizen.

USA Today’s Kaufman pointed out that the Turning Point halftime show arose due in large part to the backlash of Bad Bunny’s selection, giving it an inherent tone of opposition to him.

“Bad Bunny, a Latin superstar who hails from Puerto Rico, sings primarily in Spanish and has been critical of Trump’s deportation efforts in the past,” Kaufman wrote. “When he was announced as the Super Bowl’s lead performer, several conservative pundits, and Trump himself, criticized the choice, alleging he wasn’t a popular enough artist and that he was a divisive pick. Bad Bunny was Spotify’s most-streamed artist globally in 2025.”
Not only is Kid Rock racist but so is all of Turning Point!

People, wake up — this is a racist government now.
In a Monday interview with Newsmax, Trump was asked by presenter Greg Kelly if he had any thoughts on the recent announcement that Bad Bunny, whose real name is Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio, would be the halftime performer at next year’s Super Bowl LX in Santa Clara, Calif.

“The NFL just chose the bad bunny rabbit or whatever his name is. This guy who hates ICE, he doesn’t like you. He accuses everything he doesn’t like on racism,” Kelly told Trump. “Do you think maybe we should just entertain blowing off the NFL, like a boycott or something along those lines?”

Trump replied, “I’ve never heard of him. I don’t know who he is.” He added, “I don’t know why they’re doing it. It’s crazy. And then they blame it on some promoter they hired to pick up entertainment. I think it’s absolutely ridiculous.”
And now they’re criticizing Bad Bunny as being racist simply because he opposes the brutal treatment carried out by ICE.

In Their Hate...

Of us Indiana just pasted a draconian bill defining gender as having either egg or sperm. And the just disenfranchised the who intersex community in order to punish us.
Opponents said that the bill will increase the bullying of trans youth while supporters of the bill complained about expressions like “birthing people.”
LGBTQ Nation
Alex Bollinger (He/Him)
February 2, 2026


A bill that is being called the “most extreme anti-LGBTQ+ bill” in Indiana was passed by the state’s Senate last week.

S.B. 182 contains several provisions. First, it defines sex and gender in terms of reproductive organs and applies that definition to all laws in the state. Second, it says that trans students can only use the restrooms associated with their sex assigned at birth. Moreover, it allows students to sue schools if a trans classmate breaks this rule. Third, it forces jails and prisons to house trans inmates with their sex assigned at birth.
These laws are designed for one thing... to forced us back into the closet!
S.B. 182 passed the state Senate in a 37-8 party-line vote last week. The bill’s author, state Sen. Liz Brown (R), said that the bill is necessary to protect “women” in “their private spaces.”
Lies, lies, lies there have never been a problem with trans women in bathrooms! But all the Republicans lies are having a toll on the people's perceptions. The Williams Institution at UCLA School of Law found...
While we have found no evidence of increased harms to people who are not transgender when transgender people are allowed to use restrooms and other gendered facilities according to their gender identity, it is a consistent finding across studies and over time that transgender people report being denied access to these spaces and experiencing verbal harassment and physical assault from others in these spaces.
But facts don't matter tot he Republicans in their fear campaign on us. While most American think that the Republican are going overboard on us. The 19th News reported that,
Many Americans across the political spectrum would prefer that politicians avoid focusing on trans issues at all. Four in ten Americans — with an even split between Democrats and Republicans — think politicians should not focus on transgender issues. This alignment marks a notable difference from 2024, when 33 percent of Democrats agreed with this hands-off stance compared with 53 percent of Republicans. 
Meanwhile behind the smoke screen of the fear of us, the Republicans shred the Constitution!

And as usual in their anger against us... the Republicans haven't thought about the trans men!