Saturday, April 27, 2024

Saturday 9: Stay

Saturday 9: Stay (I Missed You) 1994

On Saturdays I take a break from the heavy stuff and have some fun…

Unfamiliar with this week's tune? Hear it here.

1) In this week's song, a woman is accused of only hearing what she wants to. "Selective listening" is when you choose to focus on what's important to you and ignore what isn't. Are you often, sometimes, or never guilty of selective listening?
Yes, especially when food is involved.

2) She turns the radio up when she hears her favorite song. What song have you recently sung along to?
Oh, that was a very long time ago.

3) This week's featured artist, Lisa Loeb, has always been a big reader. Her band was called Nine Stories as a tribute to her favorite author, JD Salinger. If you were to name a band to honor your favorite author, what would you call it, and why?
The Zimmer’s
It would be named after Marion Zimmer Bradley, the author of the Darkover series.

4) This week's song is her first and biggest hit. "Stay" was on the soundtrack of Reality Bites, a movie starring her friend and one-time neighbor Ethan Hawke. Ethan gave this song to the film's director, Ben Stiller, who agreed it was perfect for the film's closing credits. When you watch a movie, do you stick around for the closing credits?
Nope, never. But I do know those who do… boring!

5) In the 1990s, Lisa was popular for her style and appeared on many magazine covers, causing People magazine to comment, "Though she rose to fame as a singer, she's probably just as well known for her glasses." Do you wear glasses? If yes, do you consider your eyewear purely functional, there to improve your sight, or are your glasses an extension of your personal style?
If I don’t wear my glasses I’m blind as a bat! I lost my glasses in the house and I had to go out to the car and get my old pair so I could find my new pair.
Last week I forgot that I had them on and I went into the shower... Poof, instant fog!

6) Today Lisa does a show on Sirius Radio, and she enjoys broadcasting while her favorite collaborator, her cat, sits on her shoulder. Is there a pet in the room with you as you answer these questions?
Nope.

7) Lisa raises funds for SCOPE, a charity that helps children from low-income families attend summer camp. When you were a kid, did you go to camp?
Yes, scout camp. And also to day camp.

8) In 1994, when this song was popular, the nation's attention was riveted to a white Bronco driven by a man named Al Cowlings. Without looking it up, can you recall why this was newsworthy?
Oh yes and he just passed away.

9) Random question: Can you do a cartwheel?
Ha, you’re funny! Right now I’m hobbling around. I blew my back out Tuesday night and my back is slowly getting better, I figured another two or three week for it to get to the point where every move is not a stab in the back.

Friday, April 26, 2024

Have We Learned Anything Yet?


[Editorial]
 
On the radio as I was driving back from New Hampshire last weekend from the funeral of my cousin who was in the Air Force during Vietnam, I heard about the protests at Columbia University and that they shut down the university.

In 1970 I was driving to college and I heard on the radio about Kent State massacre and the college protests around the country shutting down campuses.
In 2024 I heard on the radio protesters are shutting down campuses.

Have we learned anything yet?

In 1970 we were sending our boys in to harms way.
In 2024 we are sending the war machines in the place of our boys.

Have we learned anything yet?

In 1967 there was "Blood in the streets in the town of New Haven"
in 2020 George Floyd was killed on the streets of Minneapolis.

Have we learned anything yet?

In 1972 Nixon broke in to the Watergate complex.
In 2020 rioters broke in to the Capitol.

Have we learned anything yet?

In 1985 the police bombed the headquarters of the Black Panthers in Philadelphia.
In 2024 we sell the bombs to other countries.

Have we learned anything yet?

In 1965 in Selma, Alabama there was a march for their civil rights.
In 2024 in states around the country there are marches for our rights for LGBTQ+ people.

Have we learned anything yet?

In 1970 Ohio Republican Governor Jim Rhodes called in the National Guard at Kent State.
On 2024 Republicans are calling for bring in the National Guard for Columbia University.

Have we learned anything yet?

In 1968 Democratic National Convention was held in Chicago and was protested for the United States' involvement in the Vietnam War.
In 2024 the Democratic National Committee will be held in Chicago.

Have we learned anything yet?
 
"Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it."
 
[/Editorial]
 
 
And this one is dedicated to Trump.



Louisiana Title IX

How many times have I said that the Republicans think that laws don’t apply to them?
The rights of LGBTQ+ students will be protected by federal law and victims of campus sexual assault will gain new safeguards under rules finalized Friday by the Biden administration.

The new provisions are part of a revised Title IX regulation issued by the Education Department, fulfilling a campaign pledge by President Joe Biden. He had promised to dismantle rules created by former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, who added new protections for students accused of sexual misconduct.

Notably absent from Biden’s policy, however, is any mention of transgender athletes.

The administration originally planned to include a new policy forbidding schools from enacting outright bans on transgender athletes, but that provision was put on hold. The delay is widely seen as a political maneuver during an election year in which Republicans have rallied around bans on transgender athletes in girls’ sports.
Yeah he didn’t go far enough, but it is a compromise. I much rather have a Democratic landslide in November than Trump in the White House. Because the majority of courts have been in our favor because of the Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board case. Once President Biden wins in November we will hold his feet to the fire then.
Instead, Biden is officially undoing sexual assault rules put in place by his predecessor and current election-year opponent, former President Donald Trump. The final policy drew praise from victims’ advocates, while Republicans said it erodes the rights of accused students.

The new rule makes “crystal clear that everyone can access schools that are safe, welcoming and that respect their rights,” Education Secretary Miguel Cardona said.
Yeah, he added that from Trump deleting it, do we want Trump again?
Louisiana’s top education official on Monday instructed schools to ignore new Title IX rules unveiled by the Biden administration, warning that extending the civil rights law’s protections to transgender students may violate existing state and federal law.

The Education Department last week issued a final set of sweeping changes to Title IX — which prohibits sex-based discrimination at federally funded schools — including an expanded definition of sex discrimination that includes sexual orientation and gender identity.

[…]

The new rules, which are set to take effect Aug. 1, drew immediate criticism from Republicans, who slammed the proposal’s transgender student protections as an attack on women’s rights.

In a letter sent Monday to school system leaders and board members, Cade Brumley, Louisiana’s superintendent of education, said the new Title IX rules likely conflict with Louisiana law, and schools “should not alter policies or procedures at this time.”
Then DeSantis felt left behind so he...
The Hill
BY TARA SUTER
April 25, 2024


Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) said Thursday his state “will not comply” with recently unveiled changes to Title IX by the Biden administration.

“Florida rejects [President Biden’s] attempt to rewrite Title IX,” DeSantis said in a video posted to the social platform X. “We will not comply, and we will fight back.”

“We are not gonna let Joe Biden try to inject men into women’s activities,” DeSantis continued. “We are not gonna let Joe Biden undermine the rights of parents, and we are not gonna let Joe Biden abuse his constitutional authority to try to impose these policies on us here in Florida.”

The Biden administration on Friday unveiled a final set of changes to Title IX that add protections for transgender students to the federal civil rights law on sex-based discrimination. The changes will take effect in early August.

“These final regulations build on the legacy of Title IX by clarifying that all our nation’s students can access schools that are safe, welcoming, and respect their rights,” Education Secretary Miguel Cardona said in a statement.
You know this is something like… what do the call it today? Fear of missing out (FoMO)? Well Louisianan has has a law so Florida should also have a law like that! It is like a game to them, One-upmanship! Who can come up with the most draconian laws.

These officials know that federal law supersedes state and local laws, but they are Republicans and they can do what they want.

It Covers Everyone!

The gender inclusive non-discrimination law covers everyone… even non-trans people!
A Connecticut woman, planning medical leave from her job in order to undergo a hysterectomy, was allegedly harassed by her supervisor and co-workers, who taunted her about whether she was having a sex-change operation, according to a lawsuit.

The woman was ultimately terminated from her job at Chase Family Movement Disorder Center in Vernon, according to her lawsuit against Hartford HealthCare, which owns the center.

The woman, an East Hartford resident, is claiming sexual orientation discrimination and hostile work environment against Hartford HealthCare.

[…]

Her supervisor responded by asking her whether she was a lesbian, the suit states. Later, the supervisor asked the woman, “Are you sure you won’t be out for a sex change?” it states.

According to the suit, other employees asked the woman about a sex change or said the supervisor had told them the woman was getting a sex change.
The law protects everyone, even cis-gender people!
Comments allegedly included, “How does it feel to be a dude?,” “We thought you were the girl in the marriage, not the guy,” and asking the woman whether she “was manly” because of her rumored sex change, according to the complaint.

The woman “became very upset and responded, ‘I am not a man,’ again asking for the harassment to stop,” the suit states.

Her supervisor told her that co-workers “felt they were ‘walking on eggshells’ and ‘felt weird’ around her” because of the alleged sex change and because she was a lesbian, according to the complaint.
Now Hartford Hospital has a gender clinic! They are pro trans but it goes to show you that a business can be supportive of us but when you get down to supervisors and employees the message might not get filtered down. But…
Tina Varona, senior director of media relations for Hartford HealthCare, said in an email, “While we do not comment on pending litigation by our current or former employees, we are committed to providing a workplace that promotes fair treatment, opportunity and advancement for all, and maintains robust workplace policies and reporting mechanisms to protect colleagues.

“We value the uniqueness of each person and embrace diverse backgrounds, sexual preferences, opinions and experiences,” Varona said. “We are proud of the dedication of our colleagues to create the DEIB —Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging — Council to increase diverse representation and retention in our workforce, and our CRG (Colleague Resource Groups) to bring colleagues together in support of an inclusive workforce.”
However, the message hasn’t gotten out to the employees. [That is one of my peeves with the HRC Corporate Equality Index, they company might have a great policy on paper but if it is not enforced it is worthless!]
 
When the non-discrimination law was passed, there were no limits on who was covered by the law, it covered everyone! Including non-trans people if they were being discriminated by trans people and as in the case here it protects non-trans people who are being harassed because people think that they are trans.

Thursday, April 25, 2024

I Don't Know

[Opinion]

I can't understand why someone who is trans would join an anti-LGBTQ+ organization.

It is beyond my imagination! So I asked Perplexity.AI and it is beyond the AI understanding also.
Question: "Why would a person who is transgender join a political organization that is anti-transgender?"

Answer:
Based on the search results provided, it is highly unlikely that a transgender person would willingly join a political organization that is anti-transgender. The search results indicate that the anti-transgender movement is actively working to eliminate the rights, protections, and legal recognition of transgender and gender diverse people. [1 & 4]

This movement is described as coordinating efforts to ban gender-affirming healthcare, institutionalize anti-trans conversion practices, and bar transgender people's participation in public life. [4]

The search results make it clear that the agenda of the anti-transgender movement poses a serious threat not just to transgender individuals, but to the broader LGBTQ+ community, reproductive rights, and democracy as a whole. [4]  Transgender people would have no incentive to join such an organization that is fundamentally opposed to their very existence and rights.

The search results also highlight how the anti-transgender movement has sought to co-opt and weaponize certain feminist groups, like the Women's Liberation Front, in order to divide the LGBTQ+ movement. [1]

This suggests the anti-transgender movement is acting in bad faith and using deceptive tactics, rather than genuinely representing the interests of transgender individuals.

In summary, the search results indicate there is no plausible reason why a transgender person would willingly join a political organization that is actively working to restrict their rights and freedoms. [1, 2, & 4]

Such an action would be completely antithetical to the transgender person's own interests and wellbeing
[1, 4, & 5]
****




So I asked ChatGPT...

There could be several reasons why a transgender person might join a political organization that is anti-transgender:

    1. Belief in Other Policies: They might agree with the organization on other political issues. People are complex, and someone might prioritize certain political stances over others, even if they directly contradict their own identity or interests.
       
    2. Identity Complexity: Their transgender identity might not be the sole or primary aspect of their identity. They might prioritize other aspects of their identity, such as political ideology, religious beliefs, or community ties.
       
    3. Desire for Change from Within: Some individuals might join such organizations with the hope of influencing change from within. They might believe that by being a member, they can challenge and change the organization's anti-transgender stance over time.
       
    4. Lack of Awareness or Understanding: It's possible that the individual hasn't fully come to terms with their own transgender identity, or they may not fully understand the implications of the organization's anti-transgender stance. They might be joining the organization for reasons unrelated to transgender issues, without fully realizing the conflict.
       
    5. Social Pressure or Obligation: They might join due to familial, social, or professional pressures. They could feel compelled to align with the organization for fear of rejection, ostracization, or other negative consequences if they don't comply with the expectations of their social circle or community.
       
    6. Seeking Acceptance: In some cases, transgender individuals might join anti-transgender organizations in a misguided attempt to seek acceptance or validation from a group they perceive as powerful or influential, even if it means suppressing or denying their own identity.
       
    7. Misinformation or Manipulation: They might have been misled or manipulated by the organization's propaganda or messaging, leading them to believe that their interests align with the organization's goals, despite evidence to the contrary.

It's essential to recognize that each individual's motivations and circumstances are unique, and there's no single explanation that applies to all cases.



And I couldn't leave Google out of it, so I asked Gemini...
There are a few reasons why a transgender person might join a seemingly anti-trans organization:

    Misaligned Beliefs: The organization might have some policies the transgender person agrees with, even if they disagree with the anti-trans stances. For instance, they might prioritize economic policies and overlook social stances.
    Hope for Change: They might believe they can influence the organization from within, working to change its views on transgender rights.
    Internalized Transphobia: In some cases, a transgender person might have internalized negative messages about themselves and their identity. This could lead them to believe the anti-trans rhetoric of the organization.
    Lack of Awareness: It's possible the transgender person isn't fully aware of the organization's anti-trans positions.

However, it's important to consider that these reasons don't justify joining an anti-trans organization. There are many LGBTQ+ rights organizations that work towards positive change for transgender people.


I think that Gemini came the closet to what I thought... "Internalized Transphobia" and I also think that they are thinking with their pocketbook. "Its my money and I want to keep it! Sc**w everyone else!"

What are your thoughts on why a trans person or lesbians and gays join an anti-LGBTQ+ organization?

[/Opinion]

The Dumbing Down.

[Editorial]

I tell you that is their goal, they are always talking about “originalists” back in colonial times and that is what they want to bring us back to.
DeSantis said public schools were religious when U.S. began. Is he right?
Scholars say the Founding Fathers’ thoughts on public education are often misconstrued.
Tampa Bay Times
By Jeffrey S. Solochek
April 24, 2024


Before signing into law a measure allowing religious chaplains in public schools, Gov. Ron DeSantis said the initiative brought Florida closer to what the nation’s founders wanted for educating youth.

“When education in the United States first started, every school was a religious school. That was just part of it. Public schools were religious schools,” DeSantis said at an April 18 news conference.

“There’s been things that have been done over the years that veered away from that original intent,” he continued, “but the reality is I think what we are doing is really restoring the sense of purpose that our Founding Fathers wanted to see in education.”
The just want “Reading, ‘Riting, and ‘Rithmetic,” an uneducated population is easier to control. That only the ruling class gets the education.
Education historians said the notion that the founders intended for a religion-based public schooling system is an increasingly common misconception. It’s gained traction amid high profile incidents including a taxpayer-funded church-sponsored charter school in Oklahoma, a lawsuit over whether public high school coaches can pray at games in Washington, and now this provision for chaplains in Florida schools.
They want a Christian nation! They are our version of the Taliban in creating a nation in the image of the evangelicals.

They live in their little own fantasy world, where Blacks know their place, gays and trans people do not exist. They forget that the Pilgrims fled England because of the English state religion.
“An act passed in Massachusetts in 1647, ‘Old Deluder Satan Act,’ is often cited as the first public education in what would become the US,” Curran wrote. “Requiring communities across the state to hire teachers, the general purpose of the act was to ensure a level of literacy sufficient for reading the Bible and preventing individuals from falling prey to ‘the old deluder, Satan.’”
Back to that level of education is where they want to take us.

Just look at the Republican attacks on schools… Book bannings, “Don’t Say Gay,” “Parental Rights,” the removal of Black history, vouchers, and their attacks on liberal colleges are all weakening the public education system.

The Daily Kos writes,
Not long ago, everyone agreed that public education was a value in this nation, much like the notion of a democracy. Yet just like with Republicans shifting attitudes toward democracy, more prominent Republicans are now openly disparaging the entire concept of public schools. Laura Ingraham claimed that “a lot of people are saying it's time to defund government education or at least defund it by giving vouchers to parents.” Fox’s Greg Gutfeld similarly declared that private school vouchers are needed because public schools are “a destructive system” and described teachers as “KKK with summers off.”

Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida has called public schools “a cesspool of Marxist indoctrination.” Donald Trump declared, “public schools have been taken over by the radical left maniacs.” And Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia called them taxpayer-funded indoctrination centers that need to end, which is a bit ironic since she is the poster child for the necessity of funding public education.

Although Republicans have long held a disdain for public schools, only recently have they openly advocated for ending them. Like libraries, they are arguing that giving taxpayer money to educate people is a socialist concept. Thankfully, we have had a public school system for centuries, which makes it hard to destroy. However, the GOP has opened up a new front by starving public schools for funds while diverting the resources to charter schools, private institutions, and homeschooling without any of the standards that public schools must adhere to. After all, the biggest threat to their party is critical thinking and an educated populace.
Just look at the Voucher system where middle and upper class family can afford to send their children to private schools while at the same time cut the funding to public schools where lower class families have to send their children. They also know that private schools can turn away the undesirables like Blacks, gays, trans children, and non-Christians.
Right now, red state legislatures are trying to do this through "school choice" reforms. Conservative states, like Florida, are burdening public schools with expensive requirements and taking money to give to unregulated charter schools. They defund schools while supporting a fast-growing sector of charter schools funded by right-wing billionaires to deliver indoctrination of their ideology. The money they take away from public schools cuts not just educational programs, but mental health funding to prevent violence, suicide, and drug abuse.
And now they are putting religious chaplains in schools, how much do you want to bet that they will all be Christian chaplains? Do you think that there will be any Jewish chaplains? Or Muslim chaplains? And I’ll even bet that there would be no affirming Christian chaplains.

[/Editorial]



Sticking it to them!

When it comes to Girl Scout cookies, I love them but they don’t love me since I’m a diabetic, but did you know that the Girl Scouts allows trans Girl Scouts which has set the holier than thou groups in a tizzy.
Book Riot
By Kelly Jensen
April 24, 2024


The Hanover County Supervisors has censored the honor they are giving to one of their young community members. Why? Because that student’s Girl Scout project is related to banned books — something that the local school board is actively engaged with and something that Commissioners themselves are currently engaged with at the public library.

Hanover County School Book Bans Lead to A Teen Girl Scout Service Project
Hanover County, Virginia, has become a familiar name in the book censorship world. In June 2023, the district adopted a policy to combat so-called “explicit” books in school libraries. The policy allows any resident to file a complaint over a book, and the decision over the book’s fate lies solely in the hands of the school board — not a review committee, not the school or district administration, and not the actual professional librarians or educators in the schools. Just months after the policy was approved 5-2 by the board. Nineteen books were banned at that same meeting with unanimous yes votes by the board, and by the end of 2023, over 75 books were banned from the district. The bulk of those books were by or about LGBTQ+ people.

In response to the policy and removal of books, one local Girl Scout named Kate Lindley decided she knew how she could get engaged locally and work on a project that would impact her community and help her earn her Gold Award from the Scouts — the highest honor given. Kate created an app called the “Free to Read” app, which offered information about the bans and books impacted.
Now here is the quandary the Hanover County Supervisors is in; every year they give an award to Girl Scout who earn a Gold Award. But this years Gold Award Girl Scouts received her award by creating a work around for banned books! Oh what a supervisor to do?

Well they did what any good Republican does… lie!
On April 10, Kate was to be recognized by the Hanover County Board of Supervisors alongside her fellow Girl Scouts, who earned their Gold Award. But instead of being commended, one of the board members, Cold Harbor Supervisor Michael Herzberg, changed the language around Kate’s project for her honor. No longer was the school board and its book ban policy and practice mentioned — the very things that spurred the project itself. Upon censoring the language around the honor, the rest of the Board of Supervisors approved the changes.

Kate’s work has been removed from its context, meaning that not only is her work being undermined by the adults who are supposed to be honoring it, but her work will enter the historical record without noting that it was done in response to the school board’s book banning.
So Kate got banned because of banned books!

But there craziness doesn't end there!
But It Gets Darker & Fishier
Unfortunately for Hanover County, it isn’t just the school district that earned a name for its book banning. The Hanover Public Library also found itself at the center of right-wing censorship in early March 2024, and it is impossible not to connect the censoring of this proclamation with the ongoing battle between County Supervisors and the public libraries.

During a toddler story time at the Atlee Branch Library, one person was offended by the inclusion of Todd Parr’s The Family Book, which showcases all of the ways a family can look. The idea of two same-sex parents “normalized homosexuality,” and the person took their concerns to the library’s board director. The book was deemed perfectly appropriate, but the individual wasn’t satisfied.
The book police got on the case!
Floyd attended the following library board meeting and spoke during public comment, parroting the same language about the book being inappropriate and demanding that the situation be handled (minutes for that library board meeting are not yet available).

Per the library board minutes, she stated, “Personal agendas do not need to be pushed on children and we do not find that acceptable in Hanover County.” Immediately after Floyd’s public comments — the final comments after a series of pro-book banning and anti-book banning sentiments during that time — the Goodrich County Library Board representative Barb Young introduced Floyd and fellow County administrative members to the new point of contact for the county attorney’s office.

[...]

The same day that Kate’s commendation was edited, the April 10 County Supervisors Meeting, Hanover County resident Peggy Lavinder noted that something was fishy at the public library. Per the County Supervisor Board Packet:
Ms. Lavinder spoke regarding the Pamunkey Regional Library Board of Trustees meeting held on Tuesday, the 9th of April. Ms. Lavinder explained that documents were not provided to individuals prior to or at the meeting. When she questioned that, she was told that the Board did not want to release that information because they felt the public would be confused. She continued, saying a Board member did confirm that those documents need to be shared with the public in the interest of transparency. She noted that towards the end of the discussion, a proposal was put forth to revise the collection policy, and that is going to involve changing the way the library is in general. The proposal is to have an adult section, and that any book, even if it’s written for a child, a teenager, a 17-year-old, if it has any sexual content in it, it’s going to be put in the adult section. She added that there was no consideration whether it was a sex education book that was written for a young teenager or how this restriction was going to be enforced if a teenager picked up a book from the adult section. Ms. Lavinder spoke regarding book titles that received complaints which she added was 50 maximum and suggested, instead of trying to determine what the public does not want to read, the Board should spend time finding out what the public does want to read. If the library does not have a title, it can be requested. She added that it is the same thing that happened with the school division, and she suggested that the Board use the process developed for the school division and spend time learning what people want. She closed by asking for the Board’s help.
You want to guess who the next Board members are going to be?
But let’s go back to the Hanover County Schools for a second. Supervisor Floyd and fellow County Supervisor Faye Prichard — who was absent from the meeting where the proclamation for Kate’s project was censored — are currently involved in the process of selecting two new members of the Hanover County School Board as well. Floyd is aligned with a local right-wing group, the Hanover Patriots, who’ve had a hand in the policy-making that led to banning dozens of books in the school district.