Tuesday, November 10, 2026

They Play Him Like a Fiddle!

They have his number… from Putin to Netanyahu to Rubio, they all know that flattery will get you everywhere with Trump. They all whisper praise in his ear.
WBUR 
By Tamara Keith Saige Miller 
August 02, 2025


There's a pattern in many of President Trump's interactions with other world leaders. You might call it "the art of the praise" — and they are serving heaping amounts of flattery.

When Prime Minister Keir Starmer of the U.K. paid a visit to the White House in February, he brought a letter tucked in his jacket pocket. It was a formal invitation from King Charles III for a rare second state visit, presented to Trump with rhetorical flourish in the Oval Office.

"This is really special. This has never happened before," Starmer said. "This is unprecedented, and I think that just symbolizes the strength of the relationship between us. So this is a very special letter."

[…]

There is another explanation. These leaders have "taken the measure of the man," said Ivo Daalder. He is a senior fellow at the Belfer Center at Harvard and served as U.S. ambassador to NATO during the Obama administration.

He says Trump clearly wants to be seen as a winner, as a singularly important figure who achieves things that others can't.

"So, flattery and saying he is the best, that he is the only person who could have achieved this outcome at this summit, is meant to first and foremost keep him on side," Daalder says.
So, all these "deals" — are they really deals? Yes, Trump walks out of meetings waving all these supposed victories, but are these deals actually in our favor?

That is the question. Did we go to war because Trump was manipulated by Netanyahu? Did Netanyahu know exactly which buttons to push? The Navy Times wrote:
Netanyahu in a news conference on Thursday dismissed as “fake news” claims that “Israel somehow dragged the U.S. into a conflict with Iran. Does anyone really think that someone can tell President Trump what to do? Come on.”

Trump has said publicly that the decision to strike was his alone.

Reuters reporting, with officials and others close to both leaders speaking mostly on condition of anonymity given the sensitivity of internal deliberations, does not suggest that Netanyahu forced Trump to go to war. But the reporting shows that the Israeli leader was an effective advocate and that his framing of the decision – including the opportunity to kill an Iranian leader who allegedly had overseen efforts to kill Trump – was persuasive to the president.

[…]

But during a December visit to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, Netanyahu told Trump that he was not fully satisfied with the outcome of the joint operation in June, said two people familiar with the relationship between the two leaders, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Trump indicated he was open to another bombing campaign, the people added, but he also wanted to try another round of diplomatic talks.
And like a little puppy dog, Trump agreed!

We don't know exactly why Trump agreed. We don't know whether Netanyahu played him like a fiddle. What we do know is that Trump has a strong dislike for Presidents Obama and Biden and seems to have a desire to outdo both of them.

But consider this: Was the deal good for both sides? Look back. The answer isn't so clear. Just look at what this is doing to our economy!
‘Thank you, thank you, thank you’: A diplomat’s guide to dealing with Trump Donald Trump’s tendency to change his mind and trust his instincts has led foreign leaders to try appealing to his personal feelings, not geopolitics. 
Christian Science Monitor 
By Ned Temko 
Aug. 21, 2025


Thank you, Mr. President. … Thank you. … Thank you, dear Donald!”

The gushing gratitude that leaders of Ukraine, NATO allies, and the European Commission showed at the White House this week was not a mere nervous tic. It was a core feature of their high-stakes mission to safeguard Kyiv from a potential U.S.-backed peace deal on Russia’s terms.

And it was the latest, most dramatic sign of a sea change in the way many leaders around the world are now approaching relations with the United States.

With each passing week since President Donald Trump’s inauguration, their focus has shifted more from traditional diplomacy to psychology – with the overriding aim of staying on the right side of the man in the Oval Office.

Partly, that’s because of Mr. Trump’s outsize personality, as well as his undisguised thirst for praise and for accolades such as the Nobel Peace Prize.

But the main concern has been the real-world effects – the result of his unprecedented, almost uncontested, control of the levers of power and his penchant for policy swerves and U-turns.
Govern by praise! Whisper sweet nothings in his ear, and he'll follow you anywhere!

You have to wonder… is that how Putin got Trump to agree to the diesel fuel deal, by telling him he would become the hero of the Middle East if he overrode the trade embargo against Russia?

On the flip side, we know all too well how Trump handles criticism!
Trump's Inability To Take Criticism May Come Down To A Lack Of 'Ego Strength.' Here’s
What That Means. “Most people struggle with that, but most people do not struggle with it to the degree we’re talking about with [Trump],” one expert said. 
Huff Post 
By Jillian Wilson 
Nov 8, 2026


Anyone who has ever watched an interview of President Donald Trump or read his social media posts is likely familiar with his approach to criticism.

He’s verbally attacked journalists who have questioned his decisions and fired back at politicians who challenge his administration’s handling of any situation, from questions from a reporter regarding polling numbers among voters to an attack on Supreme Court justices after they ruled against his tariff policy.

According to Manahil Riaz, a psychotherapist in Houston and the owner of Riaz Counseling, people who respond to criticism in a similar way to Trump do so for several reasons. For Trump personally, it may be a way to protect himself, to show power and even create a distinct political strategy, Riaz said.

[…]

“He has this ego defensiveness that formed as a way to protect himself from ever having to look at himself and ever having to internalize someone else’s feedback,” Harris added.}
This is dangerous for a world leader. His adversaries know which buttons to push to get him to do something — or not do something. And that is a very dangerous trait for anyone in such a powerful position!

Monday, November 09, 2026

The Criteria!

It sounds like something out of a novel, but it is the criteria Hegseth is using to fire admirals and generals… and it is raising some eyebrows.
A senior official exclusively told MS NOW how decorated military officers with decades of experience were withheld from promotion after Pentagon staff printed out internet searches showing they had attended official events like promoting COVID-19 vaccinations or marking International Women’s Day.
MS Now
By Priya Sridhar
Nov. 9, 2026

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth short-circuited a merit-based process for  promoting senior officers and instead relied on newly invented criteria that disproportionately removed from advancement women and people of color who had already been approved for promotion, according to three military officials.

MS NOW spoke exclusively to a senior official with in-depth knowledge of flag and general officer selection and assignment who described in detail for the first time how, he says, the results of internet searches were used by Hegseth’s office to withhold promotions from women and people of color. He was granted anonymity for fear of retaliation.

The senior official also described how Hegseth intentionally scuttled the promotions of senior officers who were perceived to support DEI initiatives, played a role in implementing the Pentagon’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate, were involved in the evacuation from Afghanistan, or had a connection to former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Mark A. Milley, who served as President Trump’s senior military officer but after retirement publicly criticized Trump’s leadership.
Those criteria are racist and sexist, and they punish military officers for carrying out legitimate orders!

I would like to point out that we are losing Trump’s War: nearly two-thirds of Americans (around 60%–65%) feel the U.S. is not winning the conflict or is effectively losing ground/stalemated in the region! Those numbers are similar to those from the Vietnam War.
The senior official described to MS NOW how Hegseth’s executive office led a planned and deliberate process that involved creating paper-only files filled with printouts from internet searches that were inaccessible to the officers under consideration. Hegseth’s office gave instructions about the new criteria over the phone instead of in writing.
Why paper? Because there are no traceable records! They can’t be "Ctrl+C'd"! They knew it was wrong, so they tried to hide it and avoid leaving a paper trail. House and Senate committees rely on computer records to perform constitutional oversight; deliberate paper-only workarounds bypass congressional constitutional oversight entirely!

Hegseth’s staff used the internet for the searches!
But those same officers had findings from the internet searches that disqualified them based on Hegseth’s criteria. The senior official described to MS NOW what was in the paper files for more than a dozen of the senior officers whose promotions were withheld. Some of the findings put into the paper-only files included officers who allowed a celebration that included rainbow flags, a Pride Month event and stood up a diversity committee and task force on the USS Kearsarge to combat discrimination.
In an NBC News article…
Two of the officials said there are concerns in the military and the White House specifically that Hegseth is blocking or stalling some qualified officers from receiving promotions through the ranks of general and admiral because of their race or gender as he targets diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives at the Pentagon. There is also concern that Hegseth could be singling out military officers whom he views as aligned with officials or policies of the Biden administration, the officials said.

On Thursday Hegseth fired the Army chief of staff, Gen. Randy George, whose term was expected to be four years ending in September 2027. George, the Army’s top officer, was senior military assistant to Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin during the Biden administration.
Hold it right there! This was in the spring of this year while we were fighting a war! Do you see his title? Army Chief of Staff… um, we are fighting a war. Hello?

That has been mentioned in The New Republic:
The extent to which Trump’s “secretary of war” has damaged America’s military capability is even worse than previously thought.
Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling
August 25, 2026

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s decision to fire numerous top generals has put America’s military between a rock and a hard place in its war against Iran.

The Army has been without a chief of staff since Hegseth fired General Randy George in April; he has forced out at least three senior officers who were believed to be in the running to be George’s replacement, according to current and former officials that spoke with The New York Times.

All in all, Hegseth has forced out at least half a dozen senior officers, according to inside sources that spoke with the Times, who say this purge has damaged the service’s expertise and has eroded its top ranks.
Hegseth put political ideology before the good of the country! He is...
“Hollowing out the most battle-tested and most lethal, proven leaders in a time of war means troops are less safe and we’re less likely to win,” Representative Pat Ryan, Democrat of New York and a former Army intelligence officer, told the daily newspaper. “We’re doing generational damage to the sense that the military is an apolitical trusted organization that swears an oath to the Constitution, not to a president.”
Other people have started to question this.
Jeffries predicted "incredibly strong support" among Democrats for it.
ABC News
ByQuinn Scanlan
November 8, 2026


House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) came out in support of impeaching Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on Sunday, telling ABC News he's a "hard yes."

"I'm a hard yes on the Hegseth resolution. The so-called secretary of defense has abused his power, undermined our national security, and engineered this reckless and costly war of choice in Iran, which has skyrocketed prices on the American people and made the country less safe," Jeffries said on ABC's "This Week." "Pete Hegseth has got to go."

Asked by "This Week" co-anchor Jonathan Karl if he's confident all House Democrats will join him in supporting the potential resolution, Jeffries said his conference will "have that conversation" on Tuesday morning, when members convene in Washington for the first time since the midterm election.
I also want to point out that a Navy Vice Admiral was elected to Congress after being fired by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth!

Gampel

[Editorial]

Anyone from Connecticut knows what I am writing about: the sports pavilion on the University of Connecticut campus.

But it is no longer just the Harry A. Gampel Pavilion—it's now the M&T Bank Center at Harry A. Gampel Pavilion! That is what you will hear when the next game is broadcast from there.

Why the change?

College sports are no longer amateur... the players get paid! Now they get paid through a combination of direct revenue-sharing from universities and Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) brand deals!

College sports have become the farm teams for the NBA, NFL, MLB, and other sports associations!

College sports foundations are nothing more than ticket franchises—donate $5,000 to the college alumni foundation, and you will receive season tickets!

You are not going to see sports disappear... they are the colleges' cash cows... or money pits. They also draw students To go to a big name school is a career decision on job applicants... "Oh I see you went to UConn!" Or maybe they dream of eating next to the next NBA star in the cafeteria or on the same dorm floor. 

[/Editorial]

Are We Heading Down This Path.

NO! But we are heading that way!

There was a post on Facebook featuring a New York Times article about facial recognition in Russia... this puts Flock back in the Middle Ages. They track you everywhere and use it for payments!



Cutting-edge technologies have reshaped the Russian capital, making it safer, more convenient — and more closely watched.
By Ivan Nechepurenko
Sept. 14, 2026


On the surface, today’s Moscow is a technological wonderland. You can use your face to pay for almost anything, like subway fares, or even to finalize the purchase of an apartment. Robots scurry across sidewalks making 15-minute grocery deliveries, and driverless taxis are set to begin commercial service this year.

Underpinning many of the modern amenities is a robust digital infrastructure developed by the city government that has made life not only easier, but also safer. Policing aided by digital tools has helped cement Moscow’s transformation from the raw, unforgiving place it was 25 years ago, plagued by home burglaries, street muggings and murders.

But there is a cost to the convenience and security: an expanding surveillance state.
This is Flock on steroids!
Moscow’s roughly 300,000 CCTV cameras make it one of the most heavily watched cities in the world. It is impossible to avoid a lens while simply walking through the city. The same cameras that whisk subway passengers through turnstiles are also used to monitor and flag people.

In April, a Russian rock musician was detained by the police at a railway terminal in St. Petersburg after surveillance cameras mistook him for a similar-looking Ukrainian public figure wanted by the state. After checking his face and pulling at his hair to ensure it was not a wig, they let him go.
Gee where have we heard that before? Flock maybe?

All around the world people are turning over their freedom for convenience. You walk up to a vending machine in the US and hold up your phone to pay. In Russia and many other countries you just walk and get what you want... it recognizes your face!


Facial recognition-based payments are becoming a popular method to pay public transit tickets, while biometric payment solutions are also rising in retail.

Smile to Pay, a biometric payment method offered by Russia’s largest bank, Sberbank, has expanded its network of biometric payment terminals at public transportation systems.

On Tuesday, the Yekaterinburg metro announced it has equipped all of its turnstiles with Smile to Pay terminals, which allow passengers to purchase tickets through facial recognition. Expansion is also underway at Nizhny Novgorod, Samara and Novosibirsk.

The service was launched in late 2024 and now covers six cities. Sberbank says that over 1.2 million rides have been paid with Smile to Pay since the launch.

[...]

Japanese trains trial facial recognition payments
One of Japan’s major passenger railway companies, the East Japan Railway (JREast), is also following global trends by testing facial recognition ticketing on one of its shinkansen lines.

JREast plans to pilot the technology between Niigata and Nagaoka stations in central Japan until next March. About 500 regular commuters are expected to join the test.

Biometric cameras have been installed in tunnel-like gates to match the faces of passengers against a pre-registered facial image database. A passenger receives a green light when the face has been correctly matched and a red light in the case of a mismatch.

JR East plans to introduce facial recognition-based ticketless gates on all of its lines within the next 10 years, according to Japan’s public broadcaster NHK.
But a computer never forgets. In the movie The Graduate (1967), the famous one-word line is "plastics"; today it is Data Centers.

Why is Trump so set on data centers besides pushing his investments... big brother. Where do you think they are storing all those ALPR, toll data, facial recognition camera... everything is now being all linked.

You leave home, drive to work... your drive is recorded by every video doorbell or a smart doorbell on the street records your drive. You stop at the stop light and click. You stop at a coffee shop for your morning coffee... click. You get on the highway to work... click! The toll camera just snapped your plate.
You started your new job and you pull into the factory... click the gate goes up as it reads your license plate. And somewhere deep down in some data center it is all added to your file.

A month after you start your new job you get a letter from the state... "To Whom It May Concern" here are 20 speeding tickets for that road in front of work in the 30 mph zone where everyone does 40! You owe us a thousand dollars in speeding tickets! But I was only keeping up with traffic... yeah, but it is the town's cash cow, they rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars off the camera!

Tell me, just what do you think all those data centers are for... to track your every move. Your every purchase. You see, you opt for paying with your face... you get loaded into a shared searchable database. A cashless society is the dream of every authoritarian fascist leader everywhere!

It is called Data Fusion! Where all the databases on us are searchable from one desk.

That a single camera at an intersection is just a traffic monitor is not the worry. That a database of toll booth reads is just accounting, neither is that just the toll reader. That a license plate reader (ALPR) at a gate is just building security is not the problem. But the problem is when you link those databases together and cross-reference them with facial recognition, credit card records, and smartphone location data, they cease to be separate tools. They merge into a continuous, real-time map of human behavior... they become "1984" Big Brother.

They Don't Want To Learn

Face it the liars have won. Their millions have proven that Joseph Gerber was correct... you tell a lie often enough and it becomes the true..


Someone posted this on Facebook... it is not this I want to talk about but rather all those who thought it a lie. The Republicans have brainwashed the people so much with their lies... that many of them think this is a lie, that they think that this little pill is all we need to transition. They believe what is written on the right and not the left.

None of them even bothered to research it. People who pointed to links showing it is wrong... people commented, Fake News! Lies! 

That is why I am writing this... the people are brain dead.

Sunday, November 08, 2026

Close To Home

Is this political cartoon too close to the truth?


What do you think that they have him wrapped around their little fingers?
What do you think?

It Amazes Me!

[Essay]

It amazes me all the people who voted Republican last week. There must be millions!

Yeah, I can discount MAGA people because they would have voted for him anyway. But the others… there is no excuse.
They put themselves ahead of morality.

When the kneeling American citizen was killed by a shot to the back of the head by an ICE agent, they didn’t care.
When they saw all the corruption in the government, they didn’t care.
When he was convicted of 34 counts of cooking the books, they didn’t care.
When accusations of pedophilia, they didn’t care.
When he slept around with other women, they didn’t care.
When they voted to take away the civil rights of people, they didn’t care.
When they took away food stamps, they didn’t care.
When they took away healthcare from the indigent, they didn’t care.
When they gerrymandered districts to cheat, they didn’t care.

There is a word for that kind of people… bigots.

If you voted Republican you are a bigot, you are the type of people who didn’t mind the Jim Crow laws because it didn’t affect them.

The Republican party is a party of racist, xenophobic, Islamophobic, misogynistic, homophobic, transphobic people! They are complicit to discrimination.

If you voted Republican so are you!

[/Essay]

Cuckoo Award!

How many times has the Trump administration sicced the DOJ on them in retaliation for some Trump-imagined affront? The hypocrisy deserves the coveted Cuckoo Award for such gall.
The Hill
by Suryatapa Chakraborty
11/07/26

President Trump raised concerns Saturday about some Democrats calling for the impeachment of Republican officials, referring to the threats as “extortion at the highest level” and asking the Justice Department to “look into this.”

“The Democrats are going around threatening a lot of people … with Impeachment and many other forms of punishment, even though they admit they have no reason to do so, and there have been no impeachable acts committed, or even thought of, by the victims of this illegal process,” the president wrote in a Truth Social post Saturday.
And he wants them investigated for doing, with cause, what he does out of malice?

This deserves no other award than the one being handed out here… for having the cojones to do this!



This award is handed out to politicians and notables who perform an undeniable act of stupidity, hypocrisy, idiocy, "Do As I Say, Not As I Do," Political lunacy, Monumental stupidity, double standards, or other forms of craziness.

Lies! Lies, and More Lies!

[Editorial]

They have torn down the old and rebuilt… slowly. They cheated and refused to hold hearings on President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, claiming it was too close to the election. When Justice Antonin Scalia died on February 13, 2016, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell immediately stated that the vacancy should not be filled until after the upcoming presidential election.
Politico 
By Burgess Everett and Glenn Thrush 
02/13/2016


Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said the Senate should not confirm a replacement for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia until after the 2016 election — an historic rebuke of President Obama’s authority and an extraordinary challenge to the practice of considering each nominee on his or her individual merits.

The swiftness of McConnell’s statement — coming about an hour after Scalia’s death in Texas had been confirmed — stunned White House officials who had expected the Kentucky Republican to block their nominee with every tool at his disposal, but didn’t imagine the combative GOP leader would issue an instant, categorical rejection of anyone Obama chose to nominate.

“The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president,” McConnell said, at a time when other elected officials, from Sen. Bernie Sanders to future Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer, were releasing statements offering condolences to the justice’s family, which includes 26 grandchildren.
Keep this in mind: All eleven Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee signed a letter to McConnell explicitly vowing to refuse to hold hearings or votes on any nominee put forward by President Obama.

But they sang a different tune in 2020. When Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died, they suddenly had a different story to tell.
“The historical precedent is overwhelming and it runs in one direction," he says. 
Politico 
By Marianne LeVine 
09/21/2020


Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell pushed back Monday against Democratic allegations of hypocrisy over holding a vote this year on Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s replacement, arguing that historical precedent is on his side.

Democrats are accusing McConnell and other Republicans of a double standard when it comes to the Supreme Court, citing McConnell’s 2016 decision to block President Barack Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, because it was an election year. But McConnell and Senate Republicans claim 2016 was different because the White House and Senate were controlled by different parties.

During the Obama administration, Republicans blocked or stalled around 200 of Obama's nominees. Judicial nominees usually came from the states where they would sit and would be backed by organizations like the American Bar Association (ABA). But all that changed with the Trump administration; he outsourced the selection process to conservative legal organizations, completely bypassed the American Bar Association, and focused on quickly filling vacancies with young, ideological originalists who put their ideology before the Constitution.
And now, in this election cycle… gerrymandering, threats to use troops, outrageous claims that undocumented immigrants are voting, and lawsuits against the states! The people saw through his lies and those of his party.

The voters said, “Enough of this bull!” But the message didn’t sink in… 
AP News 
By SEUNG MIN KIM, MARY CLARE JALONICK and LINDSAY WHITEHURST 
November 6, 2026


President Donald Trump led a transformation of the Supreme Court that ushered in a conservative supermajority but soon he will confront an emboldened Democratic-led Senate that is preparing to play hardball on his judicial nominations.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who is likely to return as majority leader next year, promised in an interview with The Associated Press that Democrats will prevent Trump from installing a “right-winger” on the Supreme Court and that they are “not going to allow any crappy nominees” elsewhere in the federal judiciary or in Trump’s Cabinet.

After years of being on the losing end of highly partisan confirmation fights against Republicans, especially on Supreme Court nominees, Democrats will be under considerable pressure to wield the same type of aggressive tactics.

We have until January 3 to worry that a justice might just decide to "retire" to allow Trump to appoint another far-right judge.




[/Editorial]

A Possible Scenario

Gazing into my crystal ball, I see a possible future. Trump is really, really looking his age… he wears diapers. He shuffles when he walks. Dozes in meetings. So I think that it is entirely possible that he steps down to count his billions and JD takes over.
That is who JD reminds me of: Charlie Brown. Because he is like a clown in everything he does.
So what will happen? Well, Congress gets to vote on the new president's pick. The new President nominates a Vice President and Congress votes! Before the election, I could see this possible scenario working, but now, I can’t see a Democratic Congress voting for a VP that Vance picks. Also, I doubt very much that JD isn’t involved with all the corruption in the White House. Then the Speaker will become President!

So how likely is this to happen? Well, for Trump to step down… I give the odds at 50/50, but with the administration being so myopic, I think that they will miss the big picture. I said the odds are 50/50, so what’s the other half?

Declining Health + an Ambitious Inner Circle → Behind-the-Scenes Control = A puppet. They just lead him around like an old, senile man, tell him to smile! Sign here! Wave! Just like with Reagan.