Saturday, September 26, 2026

Saturday 9: Don't Take Your Love from Me

Saturday 9: Don't Take Your Love from Me (1956)
On Saturdays I take a break from the heavy stuff and have some fun… 


 Unfamiliar with this week's tune? Hear it here.
 
1) In this song, Doris Day sings about what happens when you take a petal from a rose. When did you last get or give flowers as a gift? 
Um… never.

2) This song is about a woman who fears losing her love. What's the most recent thing you lost? (Hopefully it's not as consequential as a great love. It could be as small or unimportant as the back of one of your pierced earrings.) 
A crown.
Yep, a crown.
I’m just waiting for it to come back.

3) Doris was known as The All-American Girl Next Door. Who lives next door to you? 
I’m in a good neighborhood. But it is a graying neighborhood, the two neighbors on either side, their children just went off to college. And the neighbors across the street had their grandchildren over.
 
4) As a young girl, Doris Day was passionate about dance. She recalled that concentrating on her lessons helped distract her from the pain and embarrassment of her parents' divorce. When you want to escape from what's troubling you, what do you do?
Photography.

5) The maitre d' at one of Doris' favorite restaurants wanted to ask her out. Knowing how she loved her dogs, he impressed her by handing her a bag of meat scraps and bones to take home. They began dating and, in 1976, he became her last husband. What's the best way to your heart? 
Lobster.

6) Over her long career, Doris received Golden Globe and Grammy Awards and the Presidential Medal of Freedom. She was also inducted into the Ohio Women's Hall of Fame, honored for being one of the most celebrated women to have been born there. Name a famous person born in your home state.
Katharine Hepburn
Gary Burghoff
Peter Tork
 
7) She was frank about her financial difficulties, yet some people are uncomfortable discussing money. Are you one of those people?
Kind of.

8) In 1956, when Doris released this song, The Wizard of Oz was shown on network TV for the first time. What movie have you seen multiple times?

9) Random question: Would you rather have a chef or a chauffeur?
Since I hate driving through the Tappan Zee area in New York and going through Providence so right now I’ll go with the chauffeur.


So, what’s new in the Diana household? Well, as stated above, a crown recovery! Otherwise, it's thousands of dollars for a new one. If I find the old one, it will only be a couple of hundred bucks to glue it back in.

Right now, we are in a state of PANIC, we are in the grip of a Nor’easter! I was going to go grocery shopping for just some odds and ends and then I thought: “Diana are you crazy? Everyone and his brother will be to get some odds and ends. I can live without for now.

Where I live, we are on the fringe, but it's in the low fifties with a 20 to 30 mph wind. However, Cape Cod is set to get tropical-force winds of 50 to 60 mph, along with heavy rain. And of course, I’m worried… I still have my patio furniture outside, and I can only wonder where it's going to end up. Outages are piling up on the Cape and here... here is the outage map.

So if everything comes out right as planned I should be back up to the Cape around mid-week.

Friday, September 25, 2026

Hate Comes To Connecticut

Another Pride flag is torn down from a church in Windsor.
 Pride Flag Torn Down From Historic Windsor Church
The church's senior minister called it an act of intimidation and said the flag would be replaced.
Jay Kenney,
Patch
Sep 9, 2026
 
 
 A Pride flag was torn down from the front of First Church in Windsor last week, prompting the church’s senior minister to condemn the act and promise that the flag will be replaced.

The Rev. Dr. Ned Allyn Parker discussed the incident in an open letter posted Tuesday. Parker said he believes the flag was removed to intimidate the church or silence its message of support for LGBTQ+ people.

“When a symbol of welcome is torn down, the message sent to LGBTQIA+ people is that their dignity is negotiable,” Parker wrote.
No other news source in Connecticut has carrying this, I guess bias crimes are becoming common here.
 

 

Another Invasion?

Is the military getting ready for another invasion? There are reports that Trump is getting ready to invade Cuba!
CBS News
By James LaPorta
September 25, 2026


The U.S. Army Reserve is examining whether it can provide the military's Southern Command with police forces, medical personnel and other support units within the next four months, according to an internal Army message reviewed by CBS News.

Though the message makes no reference to Cuba, the request is for continued military planning aimed at Cuba, according to multiple U.S. officials who spoke to CBS News under condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

There is no indication in the document that any units have received deployment orders. But the planning comes as the Trump administration puts intense economic pressure on Cuba and urges the island nation to make political reforms.
CNN reported...
He made the promise even more directly during an August 2024 rally speech in the swing state of Pennsylvania, saying: “Under Trump, we will have no more wars, no more disruptions, and we will have prosperity and peace for all.”




Pro-Life... Bull!

In pro-life states, mother and baby deaths are increasing! Because of these laws that men are passing so they can get more votes.
 

They are not pro-life, but pro-votes.
ProPublica
by Andrea Suozzo and Agnel Philip
September 9, 2026
 
 
Reporting Highlights
  •     Increase in Deaths: ProPublica’s analysis of CDC data found that almost 200 women died after an ectopic pregnancy from 2020 to 2025, compared with about 100 in the previous six years. 
  •     Delays in Care: Abortion bans make exceptions for ectopic pregnancies, but getting a definitive diagnosis can mean waiting days or even weeks, while the risk of rupture and death rises.
  •     Federal Inaction: There’s been no public response to the increase in deaths. The Department of Health and Human Services has drastically cut maternal health staffers and grant funding.
The number of women who died after an ectopic pregnancy has spiked in recent years, a ProPublica analysis found. The mounting deaths in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data have drawn little scrutiny or response.
Of course, there has been no response from the HHS & CDC; that would be admitting to the deaths.
To treat an ectopic pregnancy, which is almost never viable, doctors must terminate it. But lawsuits and federal complaints have alleged that some medical providers are hesitating or flat-out refusing to do that in states where they face criminal penalties for performing an abortion. Patients described their terror. 

“I genuinely thought I was going to die,” said Kyleigh Thurman, whose right fallopian tube ruptured after she struggled to get ectopic care in Texas in 2023.

“There were a few times I asked my husband if I was going to die,” Leitaea Lowrimore of Oklahoma said in a lawsuit after being denied treatment for an ectopic pregnancy at multiple hospitals in February. “I kept thinking about our kids.”
At times like those, doctors shouldn't have to consult lawyers! The American Journal of Managed Care (AJMC) wrote:
 
 
Mississippi, Texas, Nevada, and Oklahoma are among the poorest-performing states overall for women’s health care access, quality, and outcomes, while Massachusetts, Vermont, and Rhode Island rank at the top, according to a new state-by-state scorecard. The scorecard examining women's health was released today by the Commonwealth Fund and revealed disparities in women’s health and reproductive care across the United States.1

The findings raise concerns over the state of women’s health care in the US and the ripple effects of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to overturn Roe v Wade, which has significantly altered access to critical reproductive health care services.

“The US Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v Wade in June 2022 has significantly altered both access to reproductive health care services and how providers are able to treat pregnancy complications in the 21 states that ban or restrict abortion access," the report stated.
 
[...]
 
 Using the latest available data, the results demonstrate significant disparities between states in reproductive care and women’s health, as well as deepening racial and ethnic gaps in health outcomes, with stark inequities in avoidable deaths and access to essential health services. The findings suggest these gaps could widen further, especially for women of color and those with low incomes in states with restricted access to comprehensive reproductive health care.
Doctors are afraid! When they need to make life-or-death decisions, they don't need the state second-guessing them! When politicians make medical decisions, people die.
 
 
 The increased number of state-level abortion restrictions in the U.S. was associated with a parallel increase in maternal deaths between 2005 and 2023, according to new research presented today at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) 2026 Pregnancy Meeting™. Researchers found that states with five or more different abortion restrictions had higher rates of maternal deaths from any cause, cardiovascular disease, and violence than those states with fewer restrictions. 

“Abortion is a medically safe procedure, and restricting access to it has real consequences,” said Marie C. Anderson, MD, a resident in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons in New York City, who led the study.  
 
“Our research adds to a growing body of literature confirming the profound negative impact these restrictions are having on maternal health in this country,” said co-researcher Lisa M. Nathan, MD, Chief of Obstetrics at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. 
But death doesn't mean anything to Republicans as they kowtow to Christian nationalists! A report by the American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) said:
 Results. Among the 14 states with abortion bans, there was some evidence of a potential 9.2% (95% credible interval [CI] = −1.6, 20.7) increase in the number of pregnancy-associated deaths above expectation, equivalent to 68 (95% CI = −13, 147) excess deaths; the rate was also higher than expected, with 3.3 (95% CI = −2.6, 9.0) additional deaths per 100 000 live births. Relative changes in pregnancy-related mortality were similar in magnitude but had greater uncertainty. There was no detectable increase in maternal mortality.

Conclusions. Abortion bans may be associated with an increase in pregnancy-associated and pregnancy-related mortality, although data limitations and chance variation in these rare outcomes constrain the certainty of these and other findings. (Am J Public Health. 2026;116(6):819–828. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2026.308465)
And even if these anti-abortion laws are repealed, the damage they have done will take years to repair. Clinician.com writes;
Abortion Bans Lead Physicians, Nurses to Avoid Certain States
August 1, 2023

Medical students, residents, and practicing OB/GYNs are saying they do not want to train and practice in states with extreme abortion bans, including Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Tennessee, Oklahoma, and others. The authors of a recent study found that four in five physicians and trainees preferred to avoid working in states with abortion bans.1

“Our main findings were that among a very large sample of physicians and trainees on social media — over 2,000 — more than 80% preferred to avoid training and practicing in a state with an abortion ban,” says Vineet Arora, MD, MAPP, study co-author and a professor of medicine and dean for medical education in the department of medicine at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine.

The preference was consistent regardless of specialty. Physicians said they wanted to improve access to care for patients but also cited personal family health reasons for their preference for states with safe and legal abortion care, Arora notes.
They are creating OB/GYN deserts that will take years to heal, and they know it. They read the same reports, they know what is happening, but they just don't care... period. They want the votes from their evangelical Christian base.

Stop and think for a moment. Now you are a medical student who is looking for a place of residency—are you going to go to a hospital in a state that bans abortions and fail to get a complete education?

The same is true after graduation... would you want to practice in a state where you can get arrested because of treatment for an ectopic pregnancy?

Don't you think that Republicans know all this? They put votes above women's lives.

If they were really "pro-life," they wouldn't reduce spending for WIC, SNAP, school meals, and Head Start. If they were really "pro-life," they would support programs like those instead of reducing their funding! 

Thursday, September 24, 2026

Is Washington Becoming the New Versailles or Peterhof?

Picking the brain of Trump.

Oooo… do we want to go there.
  •    The ballroom
  •    The Arch
  •    The Kennedy Center
  •    The golf course
  •    The banners of Trump all over DC
 What does it remind you of? Versailles and Louis XIV, or Peterhof and Peter the Great?

Is Trump trying to make a legacy like Versailles or Peterhof?

Trump has this dream of going down in history as a great president who designs Washington, D.C., in the image of St. Petersburg or Versailles.

$200M Trump Ballroom Proposal Looks a Lot Like Versailles
Social media users couldn’t help but notice similarities between the lavish project, led by architect James McCrery, and the palace of a certain ill-fated French monarch.
Maya Pontone
August 3, 2025


President Trump has proposed a $200 million state ballroom off the White House’s East Wing, the newest addition to his growing list of inane design priorities for the presidential headquarters, which includes ornate gilded décor in the Oval Office, a propagandist painting of his assassination attempt, and a Mar-a-Lago-inspired pave-over of the historic Rose Garden.

[…]

The NCAS is a conservative Washington, DC-based nonprofit that advocates “to end the hegemony of Modernism in federal architecture by advancing the classical and humanistic tradition.” The organization is responsible for partially writing Trump’s 2020 executive order recommending that federal buildings be constructed in the so-called “classical” (referring to Neoclassical, Georgian, Federal, Greek Revival, Beaux-Arts, and Art Deco) and traditional styles. The order was echoed in a memorandum issued by Trump earlier this year that drew widespread criticism.

Evocative of the NCAS’s architectural renderings for the renovation of New York City’s Penn Station, the project envisions a ballroom of lavish grandeur and scale, consisting of high-arched windows, massive chandeliers, fluted columns, and ceilings with symmetrical crown moldings.
In Trump's mind gold = power! And Versailles and Peterhof drip of power and wealth!
Many social media users responded to the White House’s announcement by drawing comparisons between Trump and the last French monarchs, Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, whose reign is infamous for lavish personal expenditures and royal extravagance at Versailles amid food scarcity, fueling the masses to revolt. (Trump’s own Mar-a-Lago beach club and New York City apartment bear several architectural similarities to the grandiose Parisian palace.) Some also criticized the project by pointing out the administration’s recent gutting of expanded healthcare coverage and soaring grocery costs being escalated by Trump’s trade war, which he finalized this week.
Let them eat cake!

The British across the pond they write in the Guardian writes...
When you have a developer as US president, you might expect some zhooshing up of the capital. A few buildings renovated, maybe some parks replanted. But when you have a megalomaniac builder in charge, things can get out of hand. A decade ago, when Donald Trump was first elected, I asked what it might mean for the US to be led by a real estate tycoon whose career had left a trail of broken promises, angry buyers and endless lawsuits, with rules flouted, heritage trampled and the world pockmarked by a fleet of aspirational towers clad with a flimsy veneer of luxury. The answer is worse than I could have imagined.

With the air of a nightmarish Hollywood sequel, Trump 2 has seen the president’s true architectural ambitions unleashed: The Blingpire Strikes Back. As America’s self-styled decorator-in-chief, Trump has not only overseen the gilded mutilation of the White House, but embarked on the Mar-a-Lagofication of Washington DC itself, applying his gold paintbrush to statuary, daubing ponds with flaking pool liner, and brewing plans for a colossal triumphal arch – all procured in a blizzard of no-bid contracts. And, in true dodgy salesman style, this programme of bauble-building is turning out to be a high-profile decoy for deeper damage being wrought elsewhere.

[...]

Trump boasted that his ballroom will be “more beautiful” than Versailles, but it looks like something thrown together from the classical off-cuts bin, without any regard to how the pieces fit. “It has all the kneejerk gestures of classicism,” a former Commission of Fine Arts (CFA) official told me, “but they are not integrated in a way that makes any sense.”

A sweeping ceremonial staircase leads to nowhere. A grand pedimented entrance is shunted to one end of the east facade. The portico columns run four rows deep (“The supreme court is three deep,” Trump noted. “No other building has it, and I did it because it’s incredible.”) The ballroom’s proportions are so out of whack, it will make the White House look like a lopsided fiddler crab, the swollen appendage vastly dwarfing the original building.
His construction it is completely over-the-top!
The inflated scale was too much to bear for its architect, the bowtie-wearing James McCrery II, who protested at the increasingly Frankenstein nature of the classical details being applied. Enter Shalom Baranes, whose DC firm has handled multibillion dollar federal contracts, including the renovation of the Pentagon after the 9/11 attacks.
But Trump controlled every aspect of the construction overturning the architects! So much so it has been questioned if the building now meets building codes!

Then we have his golf course!
AP News
By  MATTHEW DALY
September 16, 2026


The Trump administration has awarded contracts to begin work on President Donald Trump’s planned takeover of the East Potomac Golf Links in Washington, Democrats on the House Natural Resources Committee said Wednesday.

Rep. Jared Huffman of California, the panel’s top Democrat, revealed during a committee hearing that the National Park Service hired a civil engineering firm to begin work on the historic public golf course, without any public announcement or heads-up to Congress. A lawsuit challenging Trump’s plan to revamp the golf course argues that the administration’s redevelopment would violate the congressional act that created the park more than a century ago.

“Now, this is not just any old golf course. This is a beloved public space with huge historic significance,” Huffman said.

Trump is “systematically moving to take this historic, publicly accessible resource and turn it into another gilded private golf club for the mega-rich,” Huffman said, calling the project “a methodical, deliberate effort to take a public park away from the people,” with American taxpayers footing the bill.
Trump is the "Me" president everything is about him!

However, not everyone likes what they are seeing!
PBS News Hour
By Jeffrey Brown, Anne Azzi Davenport, & Azhar Mercha
Mar 24, 2026


Leading cultural and architectural preservation organizations asked a federal court to stop the Trump administration from proceeding with its Kennedy Center reconstruction project. It's the latest development in a fight over the look and architecture of the nation's capital, and the power of the presidency. Jeffrey Brown reports for our series, Art in Action, as part of our CANVAS coverage.

[...]

Yesterday, a coalition of leading cultural and architectural preservation organizations asked the Washington, D.C., federal court to stop the Trump administration from carrying through with its quarter-billion-dollar Kennedy Center reconstruction project.

It's the latest development in an ongoing fight over the very look and architecture of the nation's capital and a referendum on the power of the Trump presidency.

Senior arts correspondent Jeffrey Brown reports for our Art in Action series, exploring the intersection of art and democracy as part of our Canvas coverage.
He wants to remake Washington, D.C.; he wants it to be his legacy! He wants it to become the new St. Petersburg or Versailles. What could surpass the greatest thing for a narcissist to do, but to leave a city made in his golden image?

Racial Profiling -- OK

At least one Supreme Court justice thinks it is okay to arrest U.S. citizens because they look foreign!
Newsweekl
By Dan Gooding and Joshua Rhett Miller
Sep 23, 2026


The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on Wednesday cited a U.S. Supreme Court opinion, written last year by conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, to defend immigration agents who stopped and questioned an American citizen in Illinois because he looked like their target.

In its reasoning, the department said it had been "vindicated" for its practices through the Supreme Court opinion, which said U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents could stop an individual based on reasonable suspicion. Critics have argued that this allows agents to racially profile individuals as potential undocumented immigrants, leading to conflicts between federal agents and U.S. citizens.

[...]

"To be clear, apparent ethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion; under this Court's case law regarding immigration stops, however, it can be a 'relevant factor' when considered along with other salient factors," Kavanaugh wrote.
Welcome to Trump's world... a mixture of The Handmaid's Tale, 1984, and Brave New World! We are moving toward a society where citizens are eyed with automatic suspicion and forced to justify their presence evokes the exact kind of dystopian surveillance and erosion of rights as in those novels. "Your papers please!"

Code Breaker

No, not that kind of code breaker, but rather building code. It seems like there is a big question: Does the new ballroom meet code, and has it been inspected by the National Park Service for electrical, plumbing, and structure?
James McCrery II resigned in October after warning that the president was insisting on designs that violated fire and safety codes.
The Washington Post
By Sarah Blaskey and Jonathan O'Connell
Sept 23, 2026


James McCrery II resigned in October after warning that the president was insisting on designs that violated fire and safety codes.

In the weeks leading up to his resignation last year, the first architect on the White House ballroom clashed with President Donald Trump over design features that the architect believed violated building safety codes, according to two people with knowledge of the discussions and corroborating documents reviewed by The Washington Post.

Trump brushed off McCrery’s concerns, they said, and the president countered that no building codes apply to White House construction. “I am the code,” Trump said. That episode, as described by the people familiar with the matter, offers new insight into Trump’s priorities for the ballroom at a time when he is flexing executive power to fast-track construction projects across the nation’s capital.

The interviews and documents obtained by The Post — including early ballroom designs and images Trump appeared to have marked up with his trademark black-ink Sharpie — also show how deeply involved the president has been in the details of the project.
According to ChatGPT there are questions about:
According to the Post’s documents and interviews:
  • Main emergency egress: The early design did not allow the majority of occupants to exit quickly enough through the principal entrance, which the architect said conflicted with fire-safety requirements.
  • Secondary exits: The alternative emergency escape routes were considered inadequate.
  • Kitchen/fire separation: The design provided insufficient protection against a fire in the kitchen spreading rapidly to the ballroom above.
  • Restrooms/plumbing: The proposed number of toilets was inadequate for the building's maximum occupancy. One early plan had only seven women's stalls. The Post says there was little room to add additional facilities because the ballroom consumed most of the footprint. (The Washington Post)
  • Overall “life safety”: White House meeting notes from September 2025 specifically recorded “Life safety — big concern.” A November note said, “Life safety — needs POTUS buy in.” The Post reports that discussions about code and life-safety issues continued for months after the original architect left. (Nvdium)
Is this another of Trump's follies?

Nydium goes on to report that:
White House renovations and construction are typically handled by federal agencies required by law to comply with nationally recognized building safety standards to the “maximum extent feasible,” unless doing so would present a national security risk.

But Trump’s White House construction projects are being routed through the Executive Residence, a tiny office that is not a federal agency and is therefore exempt from rules governing agencies. The District of Columbia government has no jurisdiction to enforce local building codes on federal property.

The contractors hired to design and build the ballroom are responsible for adhering to safety standards as they work nearly round-the-clock to meet Trump’s ambitious deadlines, according to experts. Discussions about the life-safety deficiencies in the ballroom’s design continued for months after McCrery resigned, according to White House records.

It is not clear from the records reviewed by The Post whether the safety issues he identified have been resolved in more recent designs by Shalom Baranes Associates, the architecture firm that replaced McCrery’s firm late last year. Shalom Baranes Associates declined to comment. When Post reporters visited McCrery’s office this month, he asked them to leave and not contact him again.
Does this give you a warm, fuzzy feeling? How about this?
Trump’s growing vision for the ballroom triggered a cascade of design issues, including conflicts with building standards McCrery was trained to follow, according to the people familiar with their discussions.

McCrery informed the White House that Trump’s ballroom design did not meet fire safety codes, which require the majority of guests to be able to quickly exit through the main entrance during an emergency, according to the people and documents.

The architect also pointed out that alternative emergency exit routes out of the building were insufficient, and that there was little in the design to prevent a kitchen fire from rapidly spreading into the event space on the floor above.
This is all just a vanity project for Trump... he has a Walter Mitty dream of going down in history like Versailles and Peterhof.
Renderings show an ornate and gilded interior that departs from the simplicity of the original White House and echoes the look of the ballroom at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, a look he has said was inspired by the Palace of Versailles in France. A March budget for the new White House ballroom included nearly $6 million in gold leaf.

Well Now We Know

Earlier I wrote about candidate promises of pie-in-the-sky tax cuts. Now Fazio has said where he will cut... Medicaid!
Plan to save families $2,000-plus hinges on fiscal good fortune, healthcare cuts
CT Mirror
by Keith M. Phaneuf
September 22, 2026


Republican gubernatorial candidate Ryan Fazio swung big Tuesday, unveiling an plan to cut income taxes that he insists would return $2,000 to $2,500 annually to middle-class families by 2031.

But Fazio’s plan is based partly on outdated spending and revenue trends, leaving it unprepared to maintain hundreds of millions of dollars in new investments in municipal aid, affordable childcare and social services.

The relief plan, which he pitched during a midday stop in downtown Stratford, also would end state-sponsored healthcare for undocumented adults and children, impose a controversial “managed care” system to cap Medicaid assistance, and levy fees on private universities with major endowments. It also hinges on Connecticut winning a tax battle in court with neighboring states.
I don't know about you, but I don't like cutting healthcare for the undocumented. So where are they going to get their healthcare? The Emergency Room, the most expensive treatment. And how are they going to pay? They're not, so that will drive up the price for all of us.
“All of this is just based on a house of cards,” Afriyie said, adding the childcare investment is “something that’s going to pay big dividends in the future and shouldn’t be imperiled.”
So he wants to shift the burden onto lower-income people and off of the rich... a typical Republican... "Me" first. No thanks.

Remember When...

The Trump administrations was so upset over software from China being suspect of trojan bugs, well get a load of this... the Trump adminstration but software from a company that supplies software to Russian intelligence!
Russian devs alleged to have built tools for US agencies as software from same op was sold to Moscow's security services
The Register
Carly Page
24 Sept 2026


US defense and homeland security agencies bought digital forensics software developed by the same Russian operation that also sold its wares to the FSB, according to US prosecutors.

The Department of Justice says Oxygen Forensics CEO Lee Reiber and Russian national Oleg Sergeyevich Davydov have been arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud over an alleged scheme to hide the company's Russian ownership and where its software was actually being built.

Oxygen Forensics, based in Virginia, sold digital forensics tools to the US Department of War and several Department of Homeland Security components, including Homeland Security Investigations, the DHS Office of Inspector General, and the Secret Service's National Computer Forensics Institute (NCFI).

Prosecutors allege Oxygen presented itself to Uncle Sam as an independent US company, when it was actually owned and controlled by five Russian nationals through a Cyprus-based holding company.
Maybe if Trump and Company didn't fire all those people in the intelligence agencies they might have found that out!