Friday, June 12, 2026

The Best Government Money Can Buy: The Continuing Sage!

The the Gordie Howe International Bridge is just sitting there, all finished but still closed?
June 11, 2026
BBC News
Madeline Halpert


The long-awaited opening of a new bridge connecting the US and Canada has been delayed, according to the Canadian organisation in charge of construction.

A ribbon-cutting ceremony had been scheduled for Friday to honour the new Gordie Howe International Bridge, named for the Canadian hockey legend who played for the Detroit Red Wings in the NHL.

"Canada and the United States have agreed to delay the opening of the bridge, taking the necessary time to resolve any outstanding issues," said Chuck Andary of the Windsor-Detroit Bridge Authority (WDBA).

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said a delay of "a few weeks is time well spent" and referred to the issues as a series of "technical aspects".

Carney, who earlier this week conceded the bridge might not open at the scheduled time, asserted on Thursday that there is "no great drama" around the delay, which he said Canada agreed to at the request of the US.
So what is the holdup? Oh, you will loving this... a large campaign donor to Trump could be holding it up!


Summary
  • Opening delayed to resolve issues, officials stress benefits and ongoing talks
  • Trump cited trade disputes as reason to block bridge
  • Rival bridge owner linked to lobbying
  • Bridge aims to ease truck traffic, save time and costs for cross-border trade
The U.S. and Canada have decided to delay the ‌opening of a new $4.7 billion bridge connecting Detroit and Windsor, Ontario, that was set to open in the coming days after U.S. President Donald Trump earlier this year threatened to block the crossing.

[...]

Trump in February cited Canada's refusal to stock some U.S. alcoholic beverages on ‌Canadian store ⁠shelves, Canada's tariffs on dairy products and its trade talks with China as grounds for why he might not allow the bridge to open.

Matthew Moroun, owner of the rival Ambassador Bridge that connects Detroit and Windsor, in February met with Lutnick and weeks earlier had donated $1 million to a Trump-aligned political action committee. House Democrats have suggested that Moroun used his influence to "jeopardize American commerce" to protect his company’s bottom ​line.

The Detroit International Bridge Company, which ​runs the Ambassador Bridge, did ⁠not respond to an emailed request for comment.
Do I need to say anything more than "had donated $1 million to a Trump-aligned political action committee."

Oh, Really?


There is a new study out that looked at the worst business states for the LGBTQ+ community.
A new business climate index found lower-ranked states falling further behind while top-performing states continue strengthening LGBTQ+ protections.
The Advocate
Jack Walker
Jun 05, 2026


An index that measures state-level LGBTQ+ inclusion for business leaders has measured a national decline in support for the LGBTQ+ community for the fourth consecutive year.

Released this month, the eighth annual State LGBTQ+ Business Climate Index examines states across five main categories: legal protections, family support, political and religious attitudes, health care and employment. The index is published by OutLeadership, an LGBTQ+ business network.

This year’s report found that states that rank low in the index are performing worse year over year, and that fewer states are placing toward the middle of the 100-point index scale. The states with the lowest rankings were Arkansas, Tennessee, Idaho, South Carolina and Florida in that order.
What?
No Kentucky?
No Texas?
No Montana?

All of those states have passed a massive amount of anti-trans legislation, yet they don’t make the list.

Methinks there is bias in the selection of the states. It seems that all those laws are considered okay because they don’t affect the LGB community.

Just saying.

He Has This Image...

Of Crusaders going off to war... and women don't have a part in his weak male ego where he can't stand women in combat wrecking. It doesn't fit Hegseth's Walter Mitty dream of into vivid, heroic fantasies to escape a mundane reality.
Navy Times
By Hope Hodge Seck
Jun 11, 2026
 
 
 A 28th annual wreath-laying ceremony honoring women troops at a memorial outside Arlington National Cemetery was canceled earlier this month after organizers got word that multiple military services would not participate, with one citing Pentagon and White House guidance prohibiting “events related to cultural awareness months” and DEI programs.

The cancellation, first reported by Task and Purpose, was announced Wednesday by leaders of the Bipartisan Women’s Caucus in a press conference outside the U.S. Capitol.
Did you see that, they have been doing it for twenty-eight years and now!
A staffer for the Democratic Women’s Caucus told Military Times that the wreath-laying had been canceled June 10 after officials with the Department of the Air Force said they could not attend due to anti-DEI mandates published in January 2025, immediately after President Donald Trump took office.
 
 An Air Force spokeswoman, Ann Stefanek, confirmed to Military Times via email that “The Department of the Air Force declined participation in compliance with Executive Orders … and DoW guidance.”
This is idiotic! This is demeaning to women! This is misogynist! Congresswoman Emilia Sykes wrote;
WASHINGTON, D.C. — On Wednesday, the Democratic Women’s Caucus (DWC) led by DWC Vice Chair Emilia Sykes (OH-13) hosted a press conference to honor fallen servicewomen, servicewomen, and women veterans. The event replaced the Bipartisan Women’s Caucus’ 28th Annual Women In Military Service Wreath Laying Ceremony, historically held at Arlington National Cemetery. The wreath laying ceremony was canceled this year because several military branches declined to participate, citing an Executive Order from President Trump and guidance from the Department of Defense that they say barred the military from attending an event that honors women.

Our servicewomen risk everything to serve our country. To be met with anything other than respect and honor is a disgrace. At the press conference, Members spoke on the importance of recognizing women veterans and servicemembers for their dedication and sacrifice. Rep. Sykes paid tribute to fallen servicewomen and called out the importance of honoring and supporting servicewomen and women veterans.

"For nearly 30 years, this bipartisan wreath-laying ceremony has honored the service and sacrifice of America's women veterans. This year, military branches told us they could not participate because of President Trump's executive order and guidance issued by Secretary Hegseth's Department of Defense. The result was the cancellation of a ceremony dedicated to recognizing women who answered the call to serve. At a time when women veterans should be celebrated, the Trump-Hegseth Pentagon is sidelining them. We will continue to honor their service and speak out against efforts to diminish their contributions to our nation," said Rep. Sykes.
 My worry? Is that Hegseth is turning the military into a White Christian Nationalist military with allegiance not to the Constitution but to a cause.
 

Thursday, June 11, 2026

Fair Weather Friends!

Some say you can't blame them; I say you can.

In years past, businesses would shower us with their support. Now? Nothing. The political climate has changed. For true friends, that shouldn't matter.
By Jessica Guynn
USA TODAY
June 10, 2026


Key points:
  • Levi Strauss released a Pride collection honoring queer motorcycle clubs, while REI featured a rainbow camping chair designed by nonbinary artist Alva Skog.
  • Apple offered a Pride‑themed sport loop watchband and iPhone/iPad wallpapers for the month.
  • Abercrombie & Fitch’s “Made with Pride” line included a $400,000 donation to The Trevor Project.
  • According to a Harris Poll of nearly 5,000 U.S. adults, 77% of LGBTQ+ shoppers and 86% of LGBTQ+ Gen Z respondents said they would pay more for brands that meaningfully support gay and trans people.
  • The same poll found that 42% of LGBTQ+ respondents would trust a brand less and 38% would look for another brand if it pulled back on Pride support.
Levi Strauss & Co.’s Pride collection celebrates queer motorcycle clubs as “the community protectors who became symbols of strength, safety and solidarity.” Nonbinary artist Alva Skog created a collection of rainbow clothing and gear, including a camping chair for REI. 

Apple has a Pride-themed sport loop watchband and Pride wallpaper for the iPhone and iPad. Abercrombie & Fitch's “Made with Pride”  lineup is accompanied by a $400,000 donation to youth crisis intervention organization, The Trevor Project. 

But this year’s Pride Month still has far less rainbow bling and fewer corporate sponsorships.

Pride Month has suffered corporate defections since gay and transgender rights emerged as a culture-war flashpoint and the Trump administration cracked down on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.
We see, we remember.
“LGBTQ+ consumers are telling us that they notice when brands pull back, they can tell when support feels performative and many change how they shop when support disappears,” he said. 
Do you know why they courted us? We have disposable income. You know they used to call us: DINKs (Double Income, No Kids).
NPR
By Hannah Frances Johansson
May 30, 2026


Pride celebrations across the country continue to lose out on large sponsorships as corporations, a key source of funding, shrink their affiliation with diversity causes and LGBTQ+ events.

Corporate sponsorships of celebrations in several cities, including New York City, Salt Lake City, Louisville, St. Louis, Orlando, and Pittsburgh are down from previous years, organizers said.

Jordan Braxton, co-president of the United States Association of Prides, which supports Pride celebrations nationwide, said that while some smaller Prides have seen a growth in sponsorships, a majority have seen a reduction.

She said the Trump administration's dismantling of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives, has scared corporations away from sponsoring Pride celebrations. "I think that's why some of the corporations have pulled back, because they don't want that government scrutiny," she said.
In a way, this is good! We can go back to our roots!

I guess you can say that the original Prides were Cooper's Donuts, the Black Cat Tavern, Dewey’s Lunch Counter, Compton's Cafeteria, and Stonewall. They were the original sites of Pride where we stood up and said... ENOUGH!

Then we started passing non-discrimination legislation... Marriage Equality! We grabbed the "brass ring" on the carousel, and the partying began!

Support for grassroots organizations like Love Makes a Family dried up, but then the corporate sponsors started coming—and a new phrase was coined: "Rainbow Capitalism."

Now we are in the third wave... the era of Trump.

Gay Inc. is still in full swing. But others who have to make their living off the streets are just scraping by, and the trans community has borne the brunt of Trump's attacks.

We remember our true friends, not the fair-weather friends.
We remember the politicians who stand beside us, not the ones who run away when a dark cloud passes by.
We remember the companies and businesses that stood by us in tough times.
And we have long memories.

What I have learned from history: is you don't want to be around us when we have a coffee in our hands.



Our struggles continues, this is from this month!


Republican Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee posted a message on X on Tuesday declaring that "homosexuality has no place in America" before deleting it amid criticism from Democrats, LGBTQ+ advocates, and fellow members of the GOP.

The Republican congressman published the message on Tuesday, the second day of Pride Month, adding, "Happy Nuclear Family Month." The post referred to a nonbinding resolution signed by Gov. Bill Lee in April that defines a nuclear family as "one husband, one wife" and their children.

Ogles later deleted the post and blamed a staff member, saying in a statement that he was working on his farm when his phone "began going crazy" over a post that he claimed was made by a member of his communications team.

"The post was stupid, hurtful and a complete distraction from my America First focus," Ogles wrote, adding that the employee had been reprimanded.

The explanation prompted skepticism from critics, who questioned how such a message could have been posted from the congressman's official account.

Congressman Mark Takano of California, who serves as the chair of the Congressional Equality Caucus and who is gay, sharply criticized Ogles.

“America is beautiful because every person, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity, is welcome here. Republicans turn to posting hateful garbage online because they have no real plans to solve problems for American families,” Takano told The Advocate. “I think Rep. Ogles’ explanation raises more questions, like what kind of people is he hiring that would have thought that tweet was a good idea in the first place? Whoever that staffer was clearly thought the tweet would fit Mr. Ogles’ voice because of his extreme anti-LGBTQI+ record.”

They Call Themselves Holy Men!

I was watching a a news show, and they had segment about Christian nationalism and events connected to America's upcoming 250th anniversary, it is called "Rededicate 250". What struck me were ministers standing on the pulpit and claiming that the founders intended the United States to be a Christian nation. That claim is not supported by the historical record. I just don’t understand how a pious person can knowingly tell such a lie.

Then they had a segment about Trump reading from a Bible. What a crock. He’s a grifter and a confidence man—he’ll promise you the moon and tell you whatever you want to hear. He has been convicted on 34 felony counts in a criminal case, and in a civil case, a jury found him liable for sexually abusing and battering E. Jean Carroll. Yet people still believe him when he says that we are a Christian Nation.

 Here are some of the statements our founding father said about religion.

George Washington to the Hebrew Congregation (Newport, Rhode Island – 1790)
"For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens…"

The Treaty of Tripoli (1797)
"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen [Muslims]... it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."

Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists (Connecticut – 1802)
"I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church & State."

The Founders left a substantial written record of their views on religion and government.

Founder What They Said / Did
Thomas Jefferson
  • Coined the phrase "wall of separation between church and state."
  • Literally cut up the New Testament to remove all miracles, creating the "Jefferson Bible."
James Madison
  • The "Father of the Constitution" argued that blending government and religion corrupts both.
  • He even opposed hiring chaplains for Congress and the military with public tax dollars.
John Adams
  • Signed the Treaty of Tripoli, which stated: "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
  • He also noted that the U.S. was founded on reason and human rights, not dogma.
Benjamin Franklin
  • Wrote that when a religion requires the help of the "civil power" to support itself, it is a sign of it being a bad one.
  • Explicitly stated in his autobiography that public preaching spaces should be open to all faiths, including Islam.

But these holy men have they have no qualms to lying from the pulpit or their political agenda.



And "Men" is the key word,


Thousands of Southern Baptists overwhelmingly voted Wednesday to advance a formal ban on women pastors in the nation’s largest Protestant denomination, sending a clear message that men alone should preach to these conservative evangelical congregations.

The amendment would tighten existing restrictions in the Southern Baptist Convention, which already has a faith statement opposing women pastors.

The vote was 6,028 to 2,026 — a 3-to-1 margin — which easily exceeded the required two-thirds majority. It will require a similar two-thirds vote at next year’s meeting to become part of the constitution.

The two-day meeting concluded Wednesday after bringing more than 11,000 delegates, or messengers, to a cavernous convention center in Orlando, Florida.
It fits right in with Christian Nationalist and the Republican push to send us back to the 1950s.

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

Corruption "R" Us

The Daily Beast writes...
KA-CHING!
The Trumps made a killing from a partnership with a fintech company—but investors weren’t as lucky.
Julia Ornedo
Jun. 10 2026


Investors have seen steep losses since putting their money on a fintech firm that partnered with a Trump family-backed crypto venture—but the president’s family got the better end of the deal, according to a new report.

ALT5 Sigma, now known as AI Financial Corp., teamed up with the Trump family’s World Liberty Financial last August in a deal that the president’s sons, Donald Jr. and Eric, celebrated with cheery photos at the Nasdaq MarketSite in New York.
Since the 1970s, presidents generally took steps to separate themselves from assets that could create conflicts of interest, often through blind trusts or by holding only broadly diversified investments. Ethics experts have noted that every president from the post-Watergate era through Obama used some form of blind trust, divestment, or conflict-free investment arrangement.

However with Trump, retained ownership of the Trump Organization while president.
Management was transferred primarily to his sons rather than to an independent blind trustee.
Under the deal, ALT5 acquired $1.5 billion in crypto tokens from World Liberty Financial. In turn, President Donald Trump and undisclosed members of his family were entitled to a staggering $500 million in proceeds from the sale, according to WLF disclosures first reported by CNBC.
This has resulted in massive profits for the family!

Is The FIFA World Cup Coming Apart At The Seams?

There has been growing talk in FIFA about obtaining visas for many of the players and visitors for the World Cup! The Guardian wrote:
Fifa has found its tournament squarely caught up in the second Trump administration’s aggressive border restrictions
Martin Belam
Tue 9 Jun 2026


For successive men’s World Cup tournaments Fifa has managed to bulldoze its way through costly immigration and entry requirements. In 2014 Brazil passed a law granting free temporary visas to ticket holders, and for Russia and Qatar, the respective autocracies bypassed traditional border friction using Fan IDs and Hayya cards as makeshift visa entry documents that also provided free public transport. Not so in 2026, where Fifa has found its tournament squarely caught up in the second Trump administration’s aggressive border restrictions. Here are some of the people that have been affected.
But here in the U.S.,
Omar Artan, one of 52 referees appointed by Fifa for the tournament, has been refused entry to the US after arriving in Miami. Artan had been set to become the first person from Somalia to officiate at a World Cup.

Fifa confirmed he “will be unable to train and officiate” and washed its hands of the diplomatic consequences. In a statement, the governing body said: “Fifa is not involved in host country immigration processes, including visa adjudications … a host government ultimately determines who receives a visa and who is admitted into their country.”
And then there is...
Treatment of delegations from Iran, Iraq, Senegal, and Uzbekistan, all World Cup qualifiers, as well as FIFA’s silence over the incidents, sparks widespread criticism in sports community
AA
Yunus Kaymaz
09 June 2026


- US denies visas to 13 members of Iran’s national team delegation and detains Iraqi footballer Aymen Hussein for 7 hours at Chicago airport
- US also turns away Somali referee Omar Artan, invited by FIFA, and subjects Senegalese and Uzbek delegations to strict security screenings

Just days before the start of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, several countries have found themselves in the spotlight not for their preparations on the pitch, but for visa disputes, lengthy interrogations, and heightened security procedures.

The treatment of national team delegations from Iran, Iraq, Senegal, and Uzbekistan – all of which qualified for the tournament – as well as the US decision to deny entry to a Somali referee appointed by FIFA, has triggered widespread criticism across the sporting world.

FIFA has faced growing scrutiny for remaining silent as the incidents unfolded and for failing to respond to developments many critics say contradict the inclusive spirit of a global sporting event.
But as they say on those late-night infomercials, "But wait! There's more!"

For fans who clear the legal entry barriers to attend U.S. games, another hurdle is cost. Aside from this year’s games having the most expensive tickets of any cup so far, the Iran war caused airline prices to soar, and nonimmigrant visa holders from five participating countries—Algeria, Cape Verde, the Ivory Coast, Senegal, and Tunisia—expected to face a $15,000 bond requirement to attend matches on U.S. soil. In mid-May, the U.S. government waived the requirement for fans from those five countries who had purchased tournament tickets as of mid-April. 

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) could also ramp up screenings for visitors from countries not affected by current travel restrictions. One proposal would require applicants from forty-two countries—including close U.S. partners—to hand over troves of online data, though it remains unfinalized just a week before the tournament’s opening. U.S. Customs and Border Protection confirmed in May that the new rule likely would not be finalized until later this year, but the agency planned to conduct more targeted social media screenings of select travelers. 

High costs, intense application processes, and bans aside, Alden suggested another barrier could be psychological: “Are people going to be scared to enter the United States?” 
Ad Week reported that "Visa costs and travel warnings are keeping overseas fans home, raising questions about the cachet brands like Adidas and McDonald's pay billions for"

Donald "The Art of the Deal" Trump's touch turns gold into lead. It looks like his track record is catching up with him.

Good News!

The judges once again slapped Trump's nose saying... "NO! Bad Trump!"
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from transferring 14 transgender women in federal custody to men’s prisons, ruling that the women are likely to succeed in their legal challenge against the policy.
Pink News
by Siân Thompson
June 10, 2026


The Sunday (7 June) decision prevents the Federal Bureau of Prisons from enforcing part of President Donald Trump’s 2025 executive order requiring incarcerated people to be housed according to their sex assigned at birth.

In a sharply worded ruling, US District Judge Royce C. Lamberth found that each of the 14 plaintiffs had demonstrated a substantial risk of serious harm if transferred to men’s facilities.

The court cited evidence that the women, many of whom have undergone gender-affirming medical treatment and have histories of sexual assault, self-harm, or other vulnerabilities, could face heightened risks of violence, sexual assault, and psychological trauma if moved.
The judge lambasted the policies, saying that,
Lamberth also criticised the administration’s position that any resulting harm could simply be treated after the fact: “It is fundamentally unreasonable for prison officials to respond to serious risks such as mental health deterioration, self-harm, and suicide by intentionally creating those risks and offering to treat them after they predictably occur,” he wrote.

But, as usual, Trump's cronies don't care about us; they only care about the points they score with their MAGA base.

There Is No Such Thing As Discrimination!

That is what Trump & Company think. If you look at Trump's track record with discrimination, ten years ago Mother Jones wrote:
After signing a consent order with the feds, Trump’s family real estate firm was again accused of racial bias.
David Corn
October 25, 2016


At the first presidential debate, Hillary Clinton brought up a notable and much-covered chapter in Donald Trump’s business career: when the Justice Department in 1973 sued the Trump family real estate business founded by his father Fred for discriminating against African Americans seeking to rent apartments in its buildings in New York City and Norfolk, Virginia. Donald Trump, who was president of the firm at the time of the lawsuit, tried to downplay the matter, noting, “We along with many, many other companies throughout the country, it was a federal lawsuit, were sued. We settled the suit with zero—with no admission of guilt. It was very easy to do.” Trump didn’t acknowledge that federal investigators had gathered compelling evidence of bias (Trump employees had coded applications from minorities with a “C” for colored) and that his company had fiercely battled the suit for two years before signing a consent decree—hailed by equal housing advocates—that would guarantee the desegregation of Trump properties. In 1978, though, the Justice Department accused the Trumps of violating the agreement and charged they were still discriminating against African Americans, but that case fizzled out by 1982.

The result: In 1975, Donald Trump and his father signed a consent decree to settle the case. They didn't admit to any wrongdoing, but it required them to implement extensive changes.

Back in the sixties, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed with bipartisan support, but since then, support for the act has diminished to the point where they are now actively attacking the law and turning the definition of discrimination on its head! It was during the Goldwater campaign that we started to hear that it represents an unconstitutional overreach of federal power directed at private businesses, and Trump has run with that. Under Trump, even saying you don't discriminate can get you into hot water.

The Hill
by Rebecca Beitsch
June 9, 2026


The Justice Department on Tuesday found the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) hiring guidelines unconstitutional, finding they pressure employers to take race into consideration.

The opinion from the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) is not a court opinion but could nonetheless make it more difficult for employees to bring discrimination claims against their employers.

[...]

In an unusual move, the Justice Department announced the opinion alongside the EEOC. 

“The fundamental problem is that disparate-impact liability tends to incent—and even coerce—employers to make race-based decisions to avoid liability or the threat of liability,” T. Elliot Gaiser, assistant attorney general for OLC, wrote in the opinion.
In this ganged up attack on the Civil Rights Act of 1964 it turns everything on it's head!
Under Trump, the EEOC has launched a number of investigations into major companies and law firms to determine if their hiring practices disadvantaged white people. It also rescinded its harassment guidance, pointing to President Trump’s executive order declaring there to be two sexes.
But it is not just race or LGBTQ+ individuals under attack; it is also other parts of the law that Trump & Company are going after, including a case against the DOJ itself for failing to accommodate the disabled.
Many agencies have instituted policies to more strictly scrutinize telework as a reasonable accommodation for workers with disabilities since the Trump administration’s return-to-office mandate.
Government Executive
June 3, 2026


Anew lawsuit alleges that the Justice Department discriminated and retaliated against two of its employees with disabilities “as part of a systematic, agency-wide practice of refusing to grant requests for telework as a reasonable accommodation.”

Both employees teleworked for years in their roles as supervisory IT program managers in the Criminal Division’s Office of Administration without any adverse impacts to their work, according to the complaint. But President Donald Trump’s January 2025 return-to-office directive for the federal workforce upended that.
It even has spread to the military... The Atlantic writes in the article Being Black in Pete Hegseth’s Military that,
But last year, after Donald Trump signed executive orders gutting DEI programs across the federal government and the military, people in the Pentagon noticed that a painting of James had been taken down from its prominent location in the Air Force Art Gallery. Instead of putting a new painting in the spot where James’s portrait had been, the Pentagon kept the space empty, leaving employees with the impression that, in spite of his many achievements, the new administration viewed the general as a symbol of unearned advancement, unworthy of recognition.

James, who died in 1978, might not have been surprised. “One of the most insulting questions that gets asked to me sometimes is Did they give you your fourth star just because it’s the bicentennial year coming up and they wanted to say we got a Black general? ” he said in a 1975 interview. “They didn’t give me anything. And they don’t give away stars in my service. You got to earn them.”
Racism, sexism, transphobia, and ableism. Under Trump & Company, the message from the top is loud and clear: If it fits Trump & Company’s agenda, discrimination isn't just tolerated—it’s government policy.
And under Trump and Hegseth it is getting worst!

Racism, sexism, transphobia, and ableism. Under Trump & Company, the message from the top is loud and clear: If it fits Trump & Company’s agenda, discrimination isn't just tolerated—it’s government policy.


Tuesday, June 09, 2026

$$$ The Selling of America $$$

Point #1 (The Conflict):
Trump owns stock KO Group Holdings the parent company of the UFC the company holding the UFC Freedom 250 at the White House.

Point #2 (The Secrecy):
None of the contract appears to have been publicly released as of now.

Point #3 (The Cost):

Point#4 (The Merchandise):
A special commemorative gold or silver coin with Trump on the front and the White House on the back

Point#5 (The Gift Shop):
These and other items will be on sale at the White House gift store.

Point#6 (The Profits)
???? Where is the money going? We don't know—it is being kept a secret.



This situation is not sitting well with either side of Congress. Even some Republicans have privately
expressed frustration that "the People's House" is being treated like a commercial venue.
Yahoo Sports
Andrew Ravens
June 8, 2026


The UFC and The Trump Organization have collaborated on a set of commemorative coins to mark UFC Freedom 250 on June 14 at the White House in Washington. The coins go on sale June 9, with a waitlist available for interested buyers ahead of that date.

There are four coins in the collection, split between two silver and two gold options. One side of each coin features “250” while the other displays Donald Trump, who is said to have designed them personally. The price range is considerable, starting at $249.99 and climbing to $11,999.99 for the top-tier option — the 1 OZ PF70 Trump Coins X UFC Gold Medallion.

[...]

The release arrives as the White House event continues to attract attention beyond the fights themselves. The card is currently facing a lawsuit seeking to shut it down, and fighter Bryce Mitchell has publicly criticized the event on the grounds that hosting sporting events is not something the government should be involved in. The commemorative coin collaboration is likely to generate its own share of mixed reactions given those circumstances.

This is not The Trump Organization’s first foray into branded merchandise, nor its first set of coins. The organization, run by Donald Trump’s sons Donald Jr. and Eric, has previously released a wide range of products under the Trump name, including high-end shoes, watches, and mobile phones.

Talk about the selling of America!
Oregon Live
By Maxine Bernstein
Jun. 03, 2026


A judge on Wednesday repeatedly pressed a government lawyer to explain the purpose of a law that bars the images of living people on U.S. currency during a hearing over a planned 24-karat gold coin bearing President Donald Trump’s likeness.

The case before U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut stems from a lawsuit filed by a retired Portland lawyer challenging the coin’s production to commemorate the nation’s 250th anniversary.

Immergut interrupted U.S. Justice Department lawyer Kathryn Barragan at least six times, asking the same question as Barragan instead ticked off the history of an 1866 amendment that became law after the first chief of the the Bureau of Engraving & Printing put his own portrait on a 5-cent paper note.

“What’s the purpose. … I don’t want the long-winded version,” the judge interjected.

James Rickher, who filed the lawsuit and argued before Immergut, later answered the judge: “The prohibition is designed to avoid political self-promotion.”
From what I have gathered, it looks like a private mint will manufacture these coins, meaning they will not be legal tender. While it is hard to be completely certain because of the typical back-and-forth from the Trump administration, a private mint seems to be the current plan.

Meanwhile, the legality of the entire fight week is being heavily challenged in court.
The “UFC Freedom 250” event is slated to take place on June 14.
Truthout
By Chris Walker 
Published June 8, 2026


A lawsuit filed in federal court this past weekend seeks to block the White House from hosting an Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) match on White House grounds next week, an event that would coincide with President Donald Trump’s 80th birthday.

The event, “UFC Freedom 250,” is set to occur on June 14. Although it is happening on Trump’s birthday, it is being billed as part of the administration’s planned celebrations for the country’s 250th birthday — despite the match not being authorized or approved by Congress. In preparation for the planned bout, a massive structure called “The Claw” has been erected on the South Lawn of the White House, where the event will take place. The structure surpasses the height of the White House.

The Public Integrity Project filed the lawsuit on behalf of two Virginia residents: Susan Douglas, a civic activist and self-identified Democrat; and Paul Romano, a Vietnam War veteran who has previously run for public office as a Republican.

[...]

Public Integrity Project also notes that Trump, as well as UFC CEO Dana White, will likely personally financially benefit from the event.

“Trump purchased up to $50,000 in UFC parent company TKO stock earlier this spring, while White’s company is selling VIP packages for $1.5 million each, and benefiting from what one TKO executive called ‘the greatest earned-marketing tool of all time,'” the organization wrote.

In addition to the fight, a weigh-in for the bouts is set to happen at the Lincoln Memorial the night before. Public Integrity Project is seeking to block that from happening, too.
You see one of the main problems is that Lincoln Memorial hasn't been rented out for commercial reasons before. It is "free" but for $One Million, Five Hundred Thousands corporate high-rollers get front-row seating. And that, my dear reader, is where the situation gets very, very iffy when it comes to crossing ethical lines.

The $1.5 million "Partner Investment" package bundles together elite, gated access across all the weekend's historic venues:
  • The Lincoln Memorial: Reserved premium placement for Friday's fighter face-offs.
  • The Ellipse: VIP access to Saturday's ceremonial weigh-ins, the Fan Fest, and the Zac Brown Band concert.
  • The White House South Lawn: Guaranteed entry into the highly restrictive, 4,300-seat temporary arena for Sunday's fights (where public tickets are completely unavailable).
"The President arranged to hand two of America's most cherished monuments to a private corporation so he and his allies could profit from them. That is corruption," said Susan Douglas. "These monuments belong to all of us Americans, not to Dana White, not to advertisers like Crypto.com, and not to Donald Trump. We're asking the court to enforce the law because the administration refuses to."

[...]

The complaint identifies three grounds on which the administration's authorization of the event is unlawful and asks the court to order the event halted:

Violation of NPS regulations. The White House South Lawn and Lincoln Memorial are federal parklands administered by the National Park Service, where sports events are flatly prohibited under longstanding regulations. The only regulatory exception, the "America250 Rule," applies solely to events "planned, organized, and executed by executive departments and agencies or the Semiquincentennial Commission." The UFC, whose CEO Dana White is a close personal ally of President Trump, is itself planning, organizing, and executing the event. Reporting published June 4 confirms that neither entity competing for the role of official semiquincentennial commission has any organizational responsibility for UFC Freedom 250.

No congressional authorization for "the Claw." Under 40 U.S.C. § 8106, no structure may be erected on federal parklands in the District of Columbia without express congressional authorization. No such authorization exists for the UFC's 92-foot, 600-ton steel structure, which the UFC calls "the Claw," that has been under construction on the South Lawn since May 26.

Cost to taxpayers. Dana White has estimated that repairing the South Lawn alone will cost $700,000. Under the National Environmental Policy Act, major federal actions with significant environmental effects require a public environmental assessment or impact statement before proceeding. No such review has been conducted or made public. The lawsuit comes as the administration is simultaneously overseeing the illegal demolition of the White House East Wing, leaving taxpayers to foot the bill for the damage to two of the nation's most iconic structures.

Romano and Douglas both live in Alexandria. Romano has run for office as a Republican; Douglas is a Democratic organizer. They are united by a shared conviction that Washington's national monuments belong to all Americans and may not be corruptly exploited for private commercial gain.
Back in July of last year, the UFC wrote that,
The official fight kit for UFC Freedom 250 has been released ahead of the fight card scheduled to happen on June 14.

According to the press release, the UFC Freedom 250 fight k
it, which was created in collaboration with popular sports brand Venum, is a “modern expression of the American fighting spirit, built for performance and designed for a moment of true historical significance.” 

The pieces, of course, featured a prominent red, white, and blue theme since it’s tied to celebrating the United States’ 250th birthday (as well as, at least by implication, Donald Trump’s birthday, which occurs on the day of the fight). The design also includes a White House logo that makes it more than performance wear, but also a way to commemorate history.

In addition to the White House logo, there’s an exclusive USA 250 patch and logo that’ll appear on the kit. The patch and logo were created in collaboration with Fanatics, the White House, and America250.
This entire operation is a direct slap in the face to the American public. As the plaintiffs brilliantly
argue, by bundling exclusive monument access into a million-dollar corporate marketing package, the UFC is effectively "renting out" and commercializing a sacred national landmark for private financial gain. This flagrantly violates long-standing federal park regulations and makes an absolute laughingstock out of the Constitution's Emoluments Clauses. 
 
Trump's deep lust for gold is dragging us right back to the corrupt excess of the Gilded Age and the era of the Robber Barons.

TDS

Did you see Trump's interview on Meet the Press?

Item #1:


Then we had Item #2:

Shoes for industry! Shoes for defense! Shoes for tomorrow! Shoes for advance! Yes, shoes for industry!*

Slate reported on Trump's obsession on buying and gifting $145 Florsheim dress shoes to his Cabinet members and close allies. 
“You guys have shitty shoes,” Trump allegedly told Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in the Oval Office last December, before retrieving a catalog and picking out four new pairs for each of them. The president’s footwear of choice is Florsheim, a 134-year-old brand he seems to have fallen in love with after searching for a more comfortable option for himself. In the world of men’s fashion, Florsheim is a widely available and decidedly midtier option; it typically retails for about $145. Trump, known for both gilded excess and cheapness, has apparently been paying for the shoes himself and gifting them to his (male) aides and allies. According to the Wall Street Journal, which first reported the haberdasher in chief’s podiatric largesse, recipients include Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Communications Director Steven Cheung, and Fox News host Sean Hannity. “Seems to work out pretty well,” Trump told Fox in March about his habit of resoling the men in his orbit. “And now they look all spiffy and nice.”

Those fortunate enough to get a presidential rebrand appear anxious to show their appreciation. “It’s hysterical because everybody’s afraid not to wear them,” one White House aide told the Journal. But to invert the old saw, the shoe doesn’t always fit. Earlier this year, Rubio was photographed on Capitol Hill wearing a new-looking pair of black Oxfords in which his feet were positively swimming.
They want to humor Trump by wearing his shoes. "Oh yes, my president, those are beautiful shoes... I love them!"

Item #3: 
But the erratic behavior doesn't stop at footwear. When it comes to actual policy His reply to the accusations regarding the $1.776 billion "Slush Fund." He tries to steer the questions away from the story by launching into a wandering soliloquy on other topics.

Item #4:
On the Iranian war... he wanders around with "The war is off!" "The war is on!"

But when President Biden misspoke, the media was all over him. With Trump, he gets a "pass" on all his ranting.


* Don't Crush That Dwarf, Hand Me the Pliers. Firesign Theatre

Monday, June 08, 2026

Voter Intimidation!

Pure and simple... it is nothing more than an attempt at voter intimidation! Trump is threatening to send federal agents to voting places. You want to bet that if he does, it will be to minority districts that tend to vote Democrat?
As Nevada’s secretary of state, I will not let this administration intimidate voters.
MS Now
By Cisco Aguilar
June 6, 2026


As the midterms approach, election officials across the country are preparing for a dangerous possibility: the deployment of immigration agents and other federal law enforcement officials to America’s polls.

Any stationing of federal law enforcement at polling sites is a heavy-handed attempt to intimidate voters. It runs counter to our founding principles, including that all of us are created equal, and that promise is fulfilled at the ballot box. When we cast our ballots, it doesn’t matter who you are, what you believe in or the amount of money  in your bank account. They all count the same — one person, one vote.
Trump is running scared, rigging voting districts by gerrymandering, and trying to make it hard to vote for low-income workers who work multiple jobs to make ends meet and can't take time off to vote.
The challenge we now face is anti-democratic forces running amok. President Trump and his anti-democracy allies seek to weaken our democracy to improve their chances of winning elections. They have repeatedly suggested deploying ICE agents to voting locations for that purpose — to sow discord and confusion. Whether or not these deployments occur, the mere suggestion is enough to create fear, chaos and doubt. This is particularly true in states like Nevada that were built by, and continue to grow because of, the contributions of immigrants.

Democracy only works when voters feel safe enough to participate. If voters are afraid to vote, many will stay home, and that is exactly what anti-democratic officials want. Rather than answer to the people, these extremists seek to pick and choose their voters.
He wants to scare voters away with the fear of violence!
Armed federal agents have absolutely no business near election sites.
The Brennan Center for Justice
Jasleen Singh, Kendall Verhovek
March 31, 2026


Ahead of the 2026 midterms, Trump administration allies have floated the possibility that federal immigration agents could interfere at polling sites this fall, a scenario that would violate federal and state laws.

Longtime Trump supporter Steve Bannon said last week that the deployment of ICE agents to airports is “perfect training for the fall of 2026.” Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin said during his confirmation hearing to lead the Department of Homeland Security that ICE could be sent to polling places in the event of a “specific threat.”

The White House and a top DHS official previously said there are no plans to deploy ICE agents to polling sites. Those assurances, however, do little to ease concerns over voter intimidation and chilling voter turnout because of these persistent calls.

Part of the push to deploy ICE agents to polling sites stems from the administration’s insistence, without evidence, that noncitizens are voting in droves. Noncitizen voting is already illegal and vanishingly rare, and states have multiple checks in place that ensure only American citizens vote.

[...]

Can the president send ICE agents to polling places?
No. Elections are special. There are specific federal and state laws that make this kind of action unlawful.

Sending ICE or any other armed federal agents to the polls is illegal because federal law bans federal officers from interfering in elections. It’s also illegal because federal law bans troops and armed federal agents from being deployed anywhere an “election is held.” While that law was passed in 1865, surely in today’s elections, that means wherever votes are cast and counted, including, polling places, vote-counting facilities, and drop boxes. And any kind of voter intimidation, including by federal agents, is illegal under both federal and state law regardless of where it happens.
You know that Trump and company know this... this is established law. I would imagine that this is covered in law school. So, the only reason Trump is saying this is to keep voters away from the polls.


I Have A Lot Of Questions

My first question is"
  • Can a company get jury duty?
  • Can it get a passport?
  • Can they be jailed?
  • Then how can they vote? How can they show citizenship.
  • If a company is in multiple countries can they vote in each country?
  • Who votes for the company? Do they need a vote from the Board, or does just the ED vote?
  • What about is they have faculties in serval towns, do they get to vote in each town?
Reuters
By Tom Hals
May 26, 2026

  • Summary
  • Judge rules Fenwick Island's corporate voting does not dilute human votes
  • ACLU of Delaware argued corporate voting violates state constitution, sought to block practice
  • Judge found no evidence of discrimination or violation of 'free and equal' elections
A judge in Delaware, where many big U.S. companies are incorporated, ruled ‌on Tuesday that a small town that allows corporations to vote in municipal elections was not violating the state's constitution.
Delaware Superior Court Judge Craig Karsnitz said the beach town of Fenwick Island was not diluting human votes by allowing companies ​and other legal entities that own property to cast votes in municipal elections.

The American Civil Liberties Union ​of Delaware sued the town, arguing it violated the elections clause of the state ⁠constitution. The group sought a court order blocking Fenwick Island from counting votes by "non-human artificial entities" in future elections.

The ​group said entities make up about 12% of registered voters in the town.

A lawyer for the organization did ​not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The town's mayor, Natalie Magdeburger, did not immediately respond to a request for comment but told Reuters in March that the city believes "a property owner who pays taxes and is subject to our ordinances should ​have a say in who represents them on our Town Council."
Just another power grab by the billionaires!

Standing The Law On It's Head

You see the White Christian Nationalist think they are being discriminated against because they can't discriminant. Hun? Yeah they are saying that they are being discriminated against because they are white.
Claims of discrimination at UCLA and Yale show how laws meant to foster inclusion are being used for the opposite
The Guardian
ReNika Moore
Fri 5 Jun 2026


The Department of Justice’s civil rights division was once known as the crown jewel of the agency, but under Trump it has become just another tool of this administration’s politicized and racialized attacks targeting Black, Latino and other people of color. The latest examples are the sham findings of discrimination the division issued against the medical schools of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and Yale University for admitting high-achieving Black and Hispanic students. The administration is cynically wielding its anti-discrimination authority to tear down civil rights advances at the cost of equal educational opportunity.

In its findings, the justice department claimed the grades and test scores of Black and Hispanic admitted applicants were less competitive than those of white and Asian admits and said the schools intentionally discriminated against white and Asian applicants. But the justice department’s conclusions overstate the difference in scores between applicants and ignore other applicant data completely, including student transcripts, letters of recommendations and essays. The differences among GPAs and test scores – one standard deviation or less – were too small to be legally or statistically significant and may be explained by random factors unrelated to race. Comparatively, two standard deviations is the commonly accepted threshold that federal courts and social scientists consider statistically significant in racial discrimination cases.
Now this is on top of the Department of Defense reportedly blocked promotions to Black and women officers!
Hegseth has now intervened in both the Army and Navy’s most recent promotions.
ABC News
By Luis Martinez and Steve Beynon
June 2, 2026,


Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth blocked the promotions to one-star admirals of several senior Navy officers who had already been selected for promotion by a board of senior Navy admirals, three sources familiar with the move told ABC News. 

Secretaries of Defense have the authority to intervene in promotion lists for reasons of cause, but it is unusual to see Hegseth now having intervened in both the Army and Navy’s most recent promotions to the one-star rank.

The Navy officers removed from the Navy’s promotion list included African Americans, women, and white males who were removed for a variety of reasons, including their participation or involvement in military Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, sources said.
You know it sure does kind of like they government is racist. They keep tiptoeing right on the boarder of racism.

Saturday, June 06, 2026

dDeb/dt

You engineers out there are probably thinking what rate are we measuring? It is the rate at which the national debt is increasing. So I asked Gimini...

 I asked  Gemini to look at national deficit through an engineering lens”

 If we look at this strictly through calculus and economic modeling—treating the national debt $D$ as a function of time $t$, and evaluating the first derivative, (dD/dt) (the instantaneous velocity of debt accumulation)—the data reveals specific trends.
Currently, $\frac{dD}{dt}$ is running at a baseline rate of +$2.6 trillion to +$2.99 trillion per year. Broken down into a daily rate, the government is currently adding roughly $7.2 billion to $8.1 billion per day to the total gross national debt. 
When comparing this current derivative to the peak values of $\frac{dD}{dt}$ under recent presidents, the trajectory shows the following:
1. The Maximum Peak of (dD/dt) (2020)
The absolute highest value for (dD/dt) in modern U.S. history occurred during the spring and summer of 2020 (Trump’s first term). When the COVID-19 pandemic hit and the CARES Act was passed, the debt spiked by $3 trillion in roughly three months. During that specific window, the localized rate of change surged to an unprecedented annualized velocity of +$12 trillion per year.
The current rate of roughly $2.9 trillion per year does not match that localized peak acceleration.
2. High-Velocity Baselines (2021–2024)
During the Biden administration, the baseline velocity of(dD/dt) stabilized at a historically high level. Spurred by post-pandemic packages (like the American Rescue Plan) and structural deficits, the debt regularly grew by $2 trillion to $2.5 trillion per year.
The current velocity under the second Trump administration represents a slight acceleration of that trend line, nudging closer to $3 trillion annually. This increase is driven primarily by two forces adding velocity to the derivative:
    • The Revenue/Tariff Equation: New legislation, like the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025, altered tax codes and implemented new tariff structures, which shifted the baseline revenue projections. 
    • The Interest Component: Because the Federal Reserve kept interest rates elevated, the interest component of the deficit has compound velocity. The U.S. now pays over $1 trillion a year just in net interest, acting as an internal accelerator on (dD/dt) regardless of new legislation. 
3. Looking at the Second Derivative: (dD/dt) (Acceleration)
If you are tracking whether the debt growth is speeding up faster than before, you are looking at the second derivative, (dD2/dt). The most dramatic positive spikes in acceleration (dD/dt) occurred in 2009 (the onset of the Great Recession under Obama) and 2020 (the pandemic under Trump). In both of those periods, the deficit did not just grow—it multiplied rapidly from the previous year's baseline due to emergency injections

The Physics of the National Debt: Why Acceleration is the Real Danger

If you want to understand where the U.S. national debt is heading, stop looking at the total dollar amount. You need to look at the physics of the system.

In engineering, we don’t just track velocity (how fast an object is moving); we track acceleration (the rate of change of that velocity). If we treat the national debt (D) as a function of time (t), the first derivative (dD/dt) is the velocity—how many billions of dollars we pour into the deficit per day.

Right now, that velocity is staggeringly high. But the truly dangerous metric is the second derivative:

d2D
dt2
>> 0
Translation: The rate of debt growth is actively speeding up.

In plain terms, this math means we aren’t just cruising down a highway at a steady 100 mph. Our foot is actively stomped on the gas pedal, and the speedometer is climbing.

When you pair massive revenue cuts (like restricting the system's intake valves) with skyrocketing interest rates (an internal, compounding feedback loop), the system enters a phase of thermal runaway. The machine is now generating its own velocity, regardless of what we do next.

SYSTEM DIAGNOSTIC:
  • Mass in the Tank (D): ~$39 Trillion and climbing.
  • Flow Velocity (dD/dt): ~$2.5M to $3M added per minute.
  • The Friction Link: Net interest alone now consumes over $1 Trillion annually, acting as a permanent internal accelerator.

Even In Connecticut!

Yes, it is even here in Connecticut we have right-wing agitator...
Man Accused Of Disrupting Pride Month Flag Raising Ceremony In Trumbull Arrested: Police
Police said a man is accused of repeatedly disrupting an LGBTQ+ Pride Month flag raising ceremony at Town Hall while using a megaphone.
RJ Scofield,
Patch 
Posted Fri, Jun 5, 2026
 
 
  A man accused of repeatedly disrupting an LGBTQ+ Pride Month flag raising ceremony at Town Hall was arrested Thursday, according to police.

In a news release posted to Facebook, police said Albert Mastri is accused of repeatedly disrupting the ceremony while using a megaphone.

"Despite multiple warnings from officers to stop yelling at attendees, including children, the individual continued to direct disruptive and profane remarks toward the crowd," police said in a news release.

Mastri was charged with breach of peace, according to police
He was charged with breach of peace.
 
 
 
 

Dad's Story

June 6th: D-Day and Dad’s Day

Thanks to history, I could never forget my dad’s birthday.

As I look back on his life and mine, I see the stages we went through as I grew up. Like most boys, it was a bit of a "love/hate" relationship—the teenage years were rather rebellious. I think that was also partly due to his own youth.

Being Italian back in the 20s, 30s, 40s, and even into the 50s carried a heavy burden. For summer jobs, they dug ditches (more on that later). Before WWII, my father, being the oldest, went to college. He was the first in the family! He attended RPI and earned a degree in Civil Engineering. Afterward, his brothers and cousins went into home construction. While in college, my father was also in ROTC.

Then came the Great Depression. He and his brother used to joke about how my father talked them into joining the National Guard during the Depression just for some extra cash. But then WWII happened, and guess who got called up first?

At the beginning of the war, he was stationed in Coastal Defense to guard against German submarines, before being sent to Key West to defend the harbor. After V-E Day, he went to the Pacific theater with an anti-aircraft unit. Then the Army made a discovery: he had a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering! They promoted him and put him in charge of rebuilding the Manila water and sewer systems.

(An aside for one of my pet peeves: What military units landed on Iwo Jima? A: The Marines. B: The Army. C: Both. The correct answer is “C,” both! But you never hear about the Army landing on Iwo Jima; it is always "John Wayne!" Toward the end of the campaign, the 147th Infantry Regiment—an independent unit from the Ohio National Guard—was assigned to the "mopping up" operations. Thousands of Japanese soldiers were still hidden in the island’s massive 11-mile tunnel network. The 147th spent months in intense, small-unit underground combat, using flamethrowers and satchel charges to clear the caves.)

After the war, he returned to Connecticut and climbed the ranks in education: teacher, then assistant principal, then principal. Eventually, he became the head of the state technical colleges.

I later attended Waterbury State Technical College. Only one person there knew who I was: the president of the college. I was the son of the boss of bosses! Then one day, just before my graduation, there was a knock on my classroom door. The professor turned and saw my father, immediately assuming he was there to see him in his capacity as the head of the professors' union.

Instead, my father said, “No, I’m here to see my son. My car broke down and I need a ride home.”

The professor looked at me, then back at my father, and I could practically see the gears turning as he put two and two together.

After I graduated, I went on to RIT for my four-year degree. My father retired the exact year I graduated from college—but just like me, he didn't truly retire. He worked as a consultant, advising other states on how to create two-year technical colleges, and wrote articles for trade magazines. He even became the head of the American Vocational Technical Association and stayed active in the Kiwanis. And, of course, there was travel!

I lived with my parents until I was in my forties, but there was a catch. The year my father retired and I graduated from RIT, they bought a summer cottage on a lake in New Hampshire. During the summers they were at the cottage, and in the winter they went to Florida. They were only home during November, December, March, and April. The rest of the time, I had the house to myself.

It was when I was building my own house that we truly bonded. I had the "great idea" of acting as my own general contractor—after all, I came from a home-building family! Yeah, right... but they didn't have a regular 40-hour-a-week job to balance at the same time!

When I was building the retaining wall, my father was right there giving me instructions. When I was laying brick and floor tiles in the basement, he was there too—sitting in a lawn chair, drinking his Bourbon Manhattan, calling out, “No, no, that tile is out of line,” or “that brick is low.” Those are the fondest memories I have of him.

(I actually got into a very heated argument with my brother over laying tile once! It was so heated that I left the cottage in the boat just to drive around and cool down. The argument was over whether to “butter” each tile one at a time, or put the thin-set mortar on the floor and do a whole section at once. After I did it my way, he admitted it was faster. I replied, "Of course it is—that’s how Dad taught me!")

I also remember getting a phone call at 7:00 AM right before rushing off to work. My mother said, “Your father is having chest pains.” I told her to call an ambulance, but she replied, "No, he wants you to take him. What would the neighbors think?"

Then there was the Saturday morning I got a call from my mother saying, "Come over and tell your father to stop chopping wood! He is 90 and he’s going to have another heart attack!" I told her, "Mom, he is doing what he wants to do. It makes him happy." I ended up chopping the wood that Saturday while we sat and talked.

A few years passed, my mother passed away, and the spark went out in my father. He passed away a few years later from an old folks' disease: aspiration pneumonia.

I carried an extra burden that he never knew about, something that cried me to sleep at night. He never knew I was trans, and I always wondered how he would have felt if he had known. Everyone tells me he would have been very accepting.