Monday, June 30, 2025

The Death Knell

I can't believe that the Supreme Court just said this...


The Supreme Court on Monday tossed aside a handful of lower court rulings that sided with transgender Americans, requiring that judges in those cases revisit their decisions in the wake of a blockbuster ruling this month that upheld a ban on gender-affirming care for trans youth.

The justices upended rulings that blocked state policies excluding coverage for gender-affirming care in state-sponsored health insurance plans. The high court also tossed out an appeals court ruling that went against Oklahoma in a challenge to the state’s effort to ban transgender residents from changing the sex designation on their birth certificates. In a loss for the transgender Americans who sued, those decisions will now be reviewed again.

Lower courts must now review the cases again in light of the Supreme Court’s major decision on June 18 that upheld Tennessee’s ban on puberty blockers and hormone therapy for trans minors. The 6-3 ruling in US v. Skrmetti steered clear of discussion about other laws involving transgender Americans, but it also did little to protect them in other cases. The court ruled that Tennessee had not discriminated on the basis of sex, which gave the state far more room to regulate medical care.
WTF!!!!!
The court also held that the law did not discriminate on the basis of transgender status.

But three conservative justices – Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett – said that they would not require courts to more closely scrutinize other laws that discriminate on the basis of transgender status. While a majority of the court declined to adopt that approach, if those three justices can convince two of their colleagues to agree with that reasoning, it would give conservative states much more leeway to enact laws aimed at trans people, both minors and adults. An estimated 1.6 million Americans over the age of 13 identify as transgender, the court said.
Do you know what this is going to do?

Here is an example... a trans child family moves from Connecticut to Tennessee. Their birth certificate reflexes their true gender and their old one is sealed. What happens? Does the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution kick in? What happens when a trans child travels to a pro-trans state to get treatment and goes home with a prescription? What happens if I travel from Connecticut to California with a stop over in Nashville... where do I go the bathroom?

Mini-Post: They Always Blame Someone Else

There was a Pride parade that was against the law in Hungary and it set the dictator there into a tizzy!


Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban called Saturday's Pride "repulsive and shameful", accusing the EU of directing opposition politicians to organise the event, which turned into an anti-government protest, local media reported in Sunday.

The march in Budapest for LGBTQ+ swelled into one of the largest displays of opposition to Orban in recent years, as an estimated 100,000 participants defied a police ban and threats of fines to join the demonstration.
Have you noticed that Strongmen dictators always blame someone else. For example Trump blames the protester on paid protester with no evidence! The New York Times wrote...
“These people are agitators, they’re paid, they’re professionals, they’re insurrectionists, they’re troublemakers. They’re all of those things. But I believe they’re paid.”
— at a bill signing on Thursday

This lacks evidence. For years, Mr. Trump has accused those protesting his political candidacy and aims as “paid” and their demonstrations as inorganic. But he and his allies have provided scant evidence.

I Have Noticed...

That more and more churches are holding Pride celebrations. I hear some trans people complain that it should be run by only LGBT organizations and not by a church but I disagree. We need all the allies we can get.
Five churches organized the event out of a conviction of their faith, but as an invisible network.
by Religion News Service
June 12, 2025


In February 2024, the Rev. Carol Hill of Park Ridge Community Church got news that a group of LGBTQ teens who met at Hill’s church wanted to do something for Pride month in June.

Shelley Flener-O’Brien, who had created the group, called Connections, to give LGBTQ teens a safe space to gather and feel supported by adults in the community, reached out to Hill asking if the church could help put on a Pride event. Hill said yes, but added, “It needs to be bigger than just cookies on the lawn.”
I think it is fantastic that they are holding Pride celebration, we have seen it in churches like MCC, Unitarian, and Episcopal churches but we welcome all affirming churches!
The first year, in June of 2024, Flener-O’Brien figured that between the Connections teens, their families and friends and the people she invited, it was reasonable to hope 20 people would come. Instead, despite a torrential downpour, more than 200 people came to Park Ridge Community Church’s lawn, where food trucks were stationed, and the mayor and another local politician spoke. The festival’s organizers were thrilled.
Stop and think about for awhile. 200 people! That is 200 people who affirm us! Those are 200 people who could be voters in the next election.

Mini-Post: I've Been Flocked

No, no not that type of Flocked with with plastic pink flamingos but rather with traffic cameras!
Electronic Freedom Foundation
By Sarah Hamid and Rindala Alajaji
June 27, 2025


Two recent statements from the surveillance company—one addressing Illinois privacy violations and another defending the company's national surveillance network—reveal a troubling pattern: when confronted by evidence of widespread abuse, Flock Safety has blamed users, downplayed harms, and doubled down on the very systems that enabled the violations in the first place.

Flock's aggressive public relations campaign to salvage its reputation comes as no surprise. Last month, we described how investigative reporting from 404 Media revealed that a sheriff's office in Texas searched data from more than 83,000 automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras to track down a woman suspected of self-managing an abortion. (A scenario that may have been avoided, it's worth noting, had Flock taken action when they were first warned about this threat three years ago).

[...]

As if that weren't enough, the company has also come under fire for how its ALPR network data is being actively used to assist in mass deportation. Despite U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) having no formal agreement with Flock Safety, public records revealed "more than 4,000 nation and statewide lookups by local and state police done either at the behest of the federal government or as an 'informal' favor to federal law enforcement, or with a potential immigration focus." The network audit data analyzed by 404 exposed an informal data-sharing environment that creates an end-run around oversight and accountability measures: federal agencies can access the surveillance network through local partnerships without the transparency and legal constraints that would apply to direct federal contracts.
This is one of my concerns... Big Brother!

We cannot put the genie back in the bottle so we must control it! We must control where they are placed (Like license reader in front of abortion clinics), how long the images can be kept (A month? Six months, etc.), will they need a warrant to obtain license registrations and who can access the data (Police? Insurance companies? The general public?) Will they be used for over-policing of communities of Color and low‑income neighborhoods? Will they be used for political reasons?

We cannot not stop them but we can control them... but it all depends upon the regime in power at the time.


Sunday, June 29, 2025

Mini-Post: 201 Error!

Unable to Load...

Does not compute!
Military.com
By Steve Beynon
June 27, 2025


"They're not making acquisition decisions, they're not senior decision-makers," Steve Warren, an Army spokesperson, told reporters Wednesday when asked about what oversight mechanisms are in place over the new unit. "It's not in our interest to show any favoritism to a company -- that would be the exact opposite of what we're trying to do, right? What we want is competition. That's what we're looking for; these guys will help us think about that."

The four include Shyam Sankar, chief technology officer for Palantir; Andrew Bosworth, chief technology officer of Meta; Kevin Weil, chief product officer of OpenAI; and Bob McGrew, adviser at Thinking Machines Lab and former chief research officer for OpenAI.
Does anyone else see all types of red flags going up? And what is the need for this besides giving access to billionaires to classified technology?

These are my red flags...
  • Privileged Access → Competitive Advantage
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • No Public Disclosure or Oversight
  • Ethical “Firewalls” Are Unclear
There are already agencies in place that do the exact same thing, DARPA which really can claim credit for the internet as well as GPS, stealth tech, autonomous systems! Then there is the Defense Innovation Board (DIB) that reports directly to the Secretary of Defense and one of their innovations was cloud storage and provide independent recommendations on how the DoD can become more agile, innovative, and tech-savvy.

So I see this as a payoff for their support and donations during the elections? Will this be another rampage through databases? 

Here We Go Again! Another Bathroom Bill

Once again the Republicans are on the war path... more anti-potty bills!
About 1 in 4 transgender people live in states with some form of bathroom restrictions.
Stateline
By: Anna Claire Vollers
June 26, 2025


Nineteen states now have a law or policy banning transgender people from using bathrooms that match their gender identity.

About 1 in 4 transgender people live in states with some form of bathroom restrictions, according to the Movement Advancement Project, a nonprofit research group that tracks LGBTQ+-related legislation.

So far this year, at least eight states have passed new transgender bathroom laws or expanded existing ones.

In March, Wyoming Republican Gov. Mark Gordon signed a pair of Republican-sponsored bills restricting the use of bathrooms and locker rooms in public buildings. The House bill requires public school students and anyone in a government building to use the bathroom or locker room corresponding with their sex assigned at birth, regardless of their gender identity, appearance or the gender on their legal documents. The Senate’s bill, which requires public school students to use facilities that align with their sex at birth, was introduced after a local school board called on lawmakers to restrict bathroom use.
Pretty soon Peeing in Peace will need monthly updates!

I searched for trans arrested in bathrooms... the only arrests that I could find was in protests of these laws... not one on morals charges. However, there were legislators on moral grounds!

I asked that question to ChatGPT and it replied,
More Politicians Arrested in Bathrooms Than Trans People: What the Data Really Shows

One of the most striking ironies in the ongoing debate over bathroom access laws is the fact that more politicians have been arrested in bathrooms for indecent acts than transgender people have been arrested for similar offenses. High-profile cases like Senator Larry Craig’s 2007 arrest for soliciting sex in a men’s restroom, or Representative Bob Allen’s arrest in a public restroom, are well documented and widely reported.

In contrast, arrests of transgender individuals in bathrooms are almost exclusively tied to laws restricting their access based on gender identity — not for committing indecent acts. Despite repeated claims that these laws are necessary to prevent safety risks or inappropriate behavior, there is little to no evidence that transgender people pose such threats.

This stark contrast exposes how bathroom bills targeting transgender people are less about actual incidents and more about politics, fear, and control. If the goal truly is public safety and decency, perhaps lawmakers should reflect on their own histories before imposing restrictive laws on vulnerable communities.
Maybe we should pass laws against Republicans legislators using public bathrooms!

Politico writes...
It’s not just North Carolina. Some of America’s great political struggles have pivoted around who uses which toilet.
By NEIL J. YOUNG
May 18, 2016


There seems to be no more controversial place in American life right now than the public restroom. It’s become the latest battlefield in the culture wars — an issue so electric that the most powerful politicians in the country have weighed in: President Barack Obama, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Ted Cruz, and Donald Trump.

In 2016, at least 15 states have considered “bathroom bills” similar to the legislation recently enacted in North Carolina, which blocks transgender people from using bathrooms that don’t correspond to the sex listed on their birth certificates. Opponents of these proposals have argued that the real impetus isn’t restroom protocol; it’s part of an ugly attempt by social conservatives to score a victory against a surging LGBT movement.

But it would be a mistake to see the bathroom bills as nothing more than a desperate last-minute counterpunch against an ascendant gay-rights movement. There’s a forgotten history at play: For as long as public restrooms have existed, they’ve been a political flash point.
The Republicans look back in history and found it worked once and now they tweaked but it is still about fear... 
In 1961’s Turner v. Randolph case, the City of Memphis, Tennessee, employed this exact rationale in opposing the desegregation of restrooms in its public library. “The public welfare” was at stake, the City argued, because venereal diseases were commonplace among blacks, and an integrated ladies’ room would put white women at risk of catching VD from black women. During this era, segregationist literature across the South told parents to keep their daughters home from integrated schools lest they catch VD from young black women now using the school restrooms. In Mississippi, one white second-grade teacher worried that if her school integrated, her white students would “contract syphilis” from toilet seats used by black children.
Fear of those different from them. They then moved their bathroom fear campaign to the gays!
At the same time, public fears about a “homosexual menace” overtaking the nation stoked alarm that young boys faced sexual danger in public restrooms. A police crackdown on same-sex sexual activity in men’s restrooms in the 1950s and 1960s — this at the time when many Americans equated homosexuality with pedophilia — deepened these worries.
They even handed out flyers warning of gay in the bathrooms!

And then we came along and they modified their "fear campaign" to use on us.

Mini-Post: Video Post.

 I have a song for you it is called... P*ssing the Right People Off!

He also has a video blog on this song and other topics, and is based in England.

"Toodle-pip"

What Does It Teach The Children?

It is my god given right to discriminate!

That is what the Supreme Court just ruled... yup they can op-out of anything LGBTQ+
Maryland parents have a religious right to withdraw their children from classes on days that stories with gay and transgender themes are discussed, the court ruled.
The New York Times
By Adam Liptak
June 27, 2025


Parents with religious objections to storybooks with L.G.B.T.Q. themes may withdraw their children from public schools when the books are discussed, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday.

Ruling in a case brought by Maryland parents who objected to books with gay and transgender characters, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. closely analyzed the messages the books conveyed, reproducing color images from them in an appendix to his opinion, and noted that they were written for young readers.

But the logic of Justice Alito’s majority opinion in the 6-to-3 decision seemed to sweep quite broadly, allowing parents with religious objections to demand that their children not be instructed about gay and transgender themes but also about many other topics.
Okay... here is my question. "When you allow student to op-out, what do it teach the children?"

This is what Perplexity AI wrote:
1. Reinforces Stigma and Exclusion

Permitting opt-outs from LGBT-related lessons can reinforce the idea that these topics are controversial or inappropriate, rather than a normal part of human diversity. This can contribute to a climate where LGBT students feel marginalized or singled out as different.

When students are allowed to skip these classes, it signals that learning about LGBT people and issues is optional, which can undermine efforts to foster acceptance and reduce bullying.
And they referenced this article... LGBTQ-Inclusive Curriculum as a Path to Better Public Health on the ABA website.
Adolescence is a critical period in a young person’s cognitive, emotional, and identity development. Research shows that a young person’s experiences in school can have a particularly important influence on their academic and social-emotional growth, physical health, and mental well-being. Providing students with a quality education includes facilitating a positive school climate and implementing social and emotional supports that foster healthy developmental outcomes. For LGBTQ youth, these supports can be particularly important to make certain that they achieve their full potential. Lack of such support can adversely affect their academic motivation and can lead to sadness, feelings of disconnectedness, and even suicidal ideation. When LGBTQ students perceived their schools to be as safe as did straight cisgender students, the disparities in outcomes were reduced, though not eliminated. Although these relationships are correlational and not necessarily causal, they do suggest that improved feelings of safety at school would improve outcomes for LGBTQ students. Several studies report that an LGBTQ-inclusive curriculum promotes a positive school environment and student well-being. For example, students in California who learned about LGBTQ issues at school reported less teasing and bullying of LGBTQ students.
What does it teach the students that being gay, or trans is somehow dirty... unclean... must be discussed behind closed doors away from children. The AFT on their website writes...
Public schools have always been meant to provide all children with the skills and knowledge to become successful participants in the economy. But in the age of Donald Trump, a second important purpose of public education has become more salient: to promote social cohesion in a diverse and fractured democracy. As ugly and naked racism in America is further unveiled, how can schools be a tool for combating racism and promoting unity?

[...]

Less discussed, both in the court opinion and in public discourse, is the body of research that outlines the educational and moral damage that segregation inflicts on white children. In the Appendix to the Appellants’ Briefs submitted by the NAACP, psychologists and social scientists warned that segregation teaches white children to “gain personal status in an unrealistic and nonadaptive way,” preventing them from developing the skill of self-evaluation based on their own merits and abilities. The researchers noted that white children, in an effort to square the racial caste system they witness with the messaging of a meritocratic “American dream,” often internalize false narratives and develop unhealthy coping mechanisms “in an attempt to protect themselves from recognizing the essential injustice of their unrealistic fears and hatreds of minority groups.”
And that my dear is what the Republicans is exactly what the Republicans love, for white straight, cis-children to feel superior, that "other" are lesser beings. Perplexity AI writes...
Integrated schools promote social cohesion, cross-cultural dialogue, and civic engagement. These settings help students build the skills needed to navigate and contribute to a pluralistic society, reducing social discord and animosity
And that is what they hate!

But the Republicans know all this. They know that they are causing harm but they really don't care as long as it gets them votes!

Saturday, June 28, 2025

Trump's Mentor

Ever wonder who Trump is copying? Well it could very well be Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.


Tens of thousands have gathered for the Budapest Pride march, defying Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban's legal threats against LGBTQ rights activists.

Organisers estimated that a record 200,000 people may have taken part despite mounting pressure from nationalist conservative politicians and police to stop any display of pro-LGBTQ material.

The police issued a ban in line with a new "child protection" law restricting gatherings considered to be promoting homosexuality.

Orban downplayed the possibility of violent clashes between police and participants, but warned of potential legal repercussions for attendees.
All strong arm men use us for their boogeyman! 
Luca, 34, who is planning to attend with her mother Enikö, said they want a country of "diversity" which she said they don't currently have.

"We have a law that bans people who are different from others to gather. This is why we are here. Because it's hurting our rights. That's why we came."

She told the BBC she is worried about her four-year-old daughter's future living "in a country where she can't love anyone she wants to".

Barnabás said he was attending to "express my solidarity with the LGBTQ community... because I know what it feels like not being seen and to be treated like an outcast, which obviously everyone here is not".

Not part of the community himself, the 22-year-old said he comes from the countryside, where people "are more likely to be xenophobic and homophobic".
Dictators around the world find us easy pickings. NPR News writes,
The march began at Budapest City hall and wound through the city center before crossing the capital's Erzsébet Bridge over the Danube River. Police diverted the crowd from its planned route to keep it separated from a small group of far-right counterprotesters, while members of Hungary's LGBTQ+ community and large numbers of supporters danced to music and waved rainbow and anti-government flags.

The massive size of the march, which the government for months had insisted would no longer be permitted in Hungary, was seen as a major blow to Orbán's prestige, as the European Union's longest-serving leader's popularity slumps in the polls where a new opposition force has taken the lead.
Does this sound familiar?
Some participants said that the march wasn't only about defending the fundamental rights of sexual minorities, but also addressed what they see as an accelerating crackdown on democratic processes under Orbán's rule.
Donald Trump idols are Viktor Orbán, Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un, and, Nicolás Maduro, they do seem to represent traits and leadership styles he respects, even if their ideologies or policies differ from his.

In October 2007, Trump praised Putin on Larry King Live:
“Look at Putin … he’s doing a great job in rebuilding the image of Russia and also rebuilding Russia period.”
In January 2022, Trump endorsed Orbán’s reelection:
“truly loves his Country and wants safety for his people,” praising his hard‑line immigration stance 
At a 2018 rally in West Virginia, Trump said about the North Korean dictator:
“He wrote me beautiful letters…We fell in love.” 

On This Day...

From the 2019 NYC Pride Parade

In 1969 an uprising took place that shook the world... even till today we are seeing the repercussions.

The day we stood up and said; enough is enough! We did it before but it was buried away inside the newspapers. We did it at the Black Cat Tavern, we did it at Compton's, and we did it at Dewey's but they never gained traction like Stonewall.

One of the best narrative for that night I think was written by Leslie Feinberg in an article in Worker's World, 'I'm glad I was in the Stonewall riot' in July 2011,
Sylvia Rivera and African American drag queen Marsha P. Johnson co-founded STAR: Street Transvestites Action Revolutionaries in New York City in 1970. In this interview, which is included in Feinberg's upcoming non-fiction book "Trans Liberation: Beyond Pink or Blue" (Beacon, Oct. 1998), Rivera describes memories of life on the streets of New York as a drag queen, the uprising in Greenwich Village, and the era that followed:

[...]

In 1969, the night of the Stonewall riot, was a very hot, muggy night. We were in the Stonewall [bar] and the lights came on. We all stopped dancing. The police came in.

They had gotten their payoff earlier in the week. But Inspector Pine came in-him and his morals squad-to spend more of the government's money.

We were led out of the bar and they cattled us all up against the police vans. The cops pushed us up against the grates and the fences. People started throwing pennies, nickels, and quarters at the cops. And then the bottles started. And then we finally had the morals squad barricaded in the Stonewall building, because they were actually afraid of us at that time. They didn't know we were going to react that way.

We were not taking any more of this shit. We had done so much for other movements. It was time.
Okay notice how he ze describes the encounter,,,
It was street gay people from the Village out front-homeless people who lived in the park in
Sheridan Square outside the bar-and then drag queens behind them and everybody behind us. The Stonewall Inn telephone lines were cut and they were left in the dark.
"Street gay people" well there were a lot of trans and lesbians also in that uprising! When you call them out on it they well we are all under the "Gay" umbrella. Um... did you ask if the trans lesbian communities about this?

That is how we get written out of history. When you put us under one big umbrella the minorities lose their identities.

One last thing, Trump & Company wrote us out of history! Executive Order 14168, issued by Donald Trump on January 20, 2025 was what lead to our removal.
 
A little about Leslie Feinberg, ze was a socialist and one of the editors of Worker's World

Friday, June 27, 2025

If You Don't Like The Message. Shoot The Messenger!

She has been on the job for over 30 years, she held her current position since 2012, she worked for both the Republicans and the Democrats leaderships. But now she has ruled against the Republican pet bill and the Republicans are ready to can her.
Kansas senator cites 2001 precedent when Trent Lott fired parliamentarian during reconciliation process
Fox News
By Alex Miller
June 26, 2025


A Senate Republican wants to see the Senate parliamentarian fired and plans to introduce a resolution that would require the position to be term-limited.

Fury erupted among conservatives Thursday morning following the news that Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled several key reforms and tweaks to Medicaid in the Senate GOP’s version of President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" did not pass muster with Senate rules.
Bear with me for a minute, this gets a little bit technical. You see when one chamber passes a bill and the other chamber amends the bill, they can only amend what in the bill and not add other things. For example if the bill is on the budget the other chamber can only add financial amendments... they add an amendment to strip us from healthcare. That would not be allowed. Yahoo News put it this way...
Over the course of the past week, the parliamentarian has decided that a long list of key provisions that have been part of the "big, beautiful bill" cannot be included in their current forms.
Danger Will Roberson, Danger! You are going against the Lord Master!
Here’s a list of just some of the items that have been vetoed:
  • A plan to sell off millions of acres of public lands.
  • Defunding the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
  • Blocking federal grants for “sanctuary cities.”
  • Cuts to federal food assistance.
  • Barring undocumented immigrants from receiving Medicaid.
  • Rollbacks of green energy funding and emissions standards.
  • New Medicaid tax rules that would have brought in hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue.
Republicans will now have to either rewrite each of these sections of the bill in a way that satisfies the parliamentarian or be forced to abandon them completely so they don’t prevent the entire package from becoming law.
You are going against the Master's plan! So heads will roll!

Fox News goes to report,
However, Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., wants immediate action taken against the parliamentarian.
Off with her head!
He argued that, based upon early reports, the parliamentarian's rulings against myriad provisions in the bill may erase up to $500 billion in spending cuts, which could hamper the bill's survival among fiscal hawks and miss the goal of hitting up to $2 trillion in spending cuts over the next decade. 

Marshall, like other congressional Republicans, was particularly incensed over the parliamentarian’s rulings that gutted numerous changes Senate Republicans made to the widely-used Medicaid program that triggered conservatives.

Among the axed provisions was the Senate GOP’s harsher crackdown on the Medicaid provider rate, or the amount that state Medicaid programs pay to providers on behalf of Medicaid beneficiaries, which proved a divisive policy among some in the conference.
Yahoo New writes this about the parliamentarian...
The current parliamentarian is named Elizabeth MacDonough. She’s a 59-year-old Washington, D.C., native who has worked for the federal government in some capacity for most of the past 35 years. She was appointed as parliamentarian in 2012, becoming the first woman — and just the sixth person in history — to hold the position. At the time, she was described as “down-to-earth,” “diligent” and “a pistol” by figures in Congress who knew her well.

Since assuming the role, she has largely stayed out of the public eye. She purportedly only makes one public speech a year and does not speak directly to the media. During her tenure, control of the Senate has flipped three separate times — first to Republicans in 2015, then to Democrats in 2021 and back to the GOP this year. In addition to advising leaders from both parties through several reconciliation bills over the years, she also guided the Senate through two separate impeachment trials and was responsible for protecting Electoral College certificates from the mob attacking the Capitol during the Jan. 6 attack.
Now now she is a piranha, she had the audacity to go against the king's wishes... so it is "Off with her head the traitor!"

She has found that the changes proposed to Medicaid are not budgetary but rather regulatory. The Hill writes,
Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough has rejected key Medicaid provisions in the Senate GOP megabill, a ruling that appears to strike a major blow to Republicans’ strategy for cutting federal spending.

The Senate’s referee rejected a plan to cap states’ use of health care provider taxes to collect more federal Medicaid funding, a proposal that would have generated hundreds of billions of dollars in savings to offset the cost of making President Trump’s corporate tax cuts permanent, according to a Democratic summary of the parliamentarian’s ruling.
I am just an interested bystander, but even I can tell that they way the Republicans want to cuts is by changing the rules... it is right in there in black and white. What they want is to change the rules for the state portion of Medicaid funding... That is a regulatory change.

So it all boils down to will they fire her and appoint a crony to the position who will always answer kneeling "Yes Master, as you wish!"

Mini-Post: I Don't Know About You...

But I just don't see it.
The Trump administration wants to end automatic birthright citizenship as enshrined in the Constitution’s 14th Amendment.
NBC News
By Lawrence Hurley
June 27, 2025


The Supreme Court on Friday handed a major win to the Trump administration by allowing it to take steps to implement its proposal to end automatic birthright citizenship.

In a 6-3 vote, the court granted a request by the Trump administration to narrow the scope of nationwide injunctions imposed by judges so that they apply only to states, groups and individuals that sued. That means the birthright citizenship proposal can likely move forward at least in part in the states that challenged it as well as those that did not.
I don't even see wiggle room in this...
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
The only exception is for children born of diplomats!

Here is there twisted logic; ChatGPT when asked about the reason that the Republicans see the amendment differently...
Conservative legal commentaries argue that “jurisdiction” should reflect political allegiance, not mere obedience to U.S. law:

“Critics argue that ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ must refer to those who bear allegiance to the United States… No allegiance… is given by a parent… remaining here in violation of law” 
They referenced articles in the SCOTUS Blog and The Federalist Society.

To me that makes no sense because immigrants are subject to our laws, since we are tying them in courts of law... I think is a DUH. If they were not subject to the laws of the Untied States and the laws of the states. If they were not subject to the laws then if murder someone they couldn't be tried in court of law. It is a stupid argument!

Connecticut Leads The Way

While the feds do everything can to discriminate, Connecticut is fighting back on hate crimes.
CT Mirror
by Hon Douglas S. Lavine
June 25, 2025


Source: CT gov

It is an unfortunate reality that the number of hate crimes in the nation and in our state have been steadily rising in recent years.

Statistics gathered by the F.B.I indicate that there were 6,121 reported hate crimes in 2016; 8,263 in 2020, and 11,862 in 2023.  Some 5,900 of the incidents in the 2023 report were anti-Black, three times higher than the next highest racial or ethnic category. Religion-based incidents in the 2023 report totaled 2,699, more than half driven by anti-Jewish bias; incidents involving anti-Muslim bias also rose.

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) reports that the number of hate incidents reported in Connecticut jumped from 91 in 2020 to 682 in 2024 —an increase of 650 percent.  Antisemitic incidents in Connecticut, according to the ADL, spiked from 24 in 2020 to 184, dropping slightly to 159 in 2024. Connecticut hate crime statistics compiled by the state police also show an upward trend. In 2021, there were 75 hate crime incidents; in 2024 there were 103. Hate crimes in Connecticut went from 87 in 2021 to 130 in 2024.
I want to point out three things; first, there is a difference between a "hate incidence" and a "hate crime." A hate incident is someone calling with transphobic slurs and a hate crime is when a treat of violence or damage to property. Second... I rather call them bias crimes rather than hate crimes because not all bias crimes involve hate (I didn't sell him cake because I hate him but because I don't like Blacks doesn't involve hate just discrimination.). And third, I am on the Council that the judge is writing about.
Concerned about what was happening, the Connecticut legislature passed a law creating the Hate Crimes Advisory Council (HCAC). Pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes Section 51-279f, the council is responsible for encouraging and coordinating programs that increase community awareness and reporting of hate crimes. It also is charged with making recommendations for legislation concerning hate crimes, including recommendations on restitution for victims, and alternative sentencing programs for juveniles and first-time offenders.

The committee members, appointed by the governor, represent a diverse group of people from the private sector, police authorities, and state government. Consistent with its charge, the HCAC has been busily engaged in a wide variety of initiatives. Here are some of the most significant.
The article goes on to describe the council's duties and responsibilities.
Regular meetings: Meetings of the HCAC are held every other month. They typically involve discussions of what is being done by the HCAC’s many subcommittees, what initiatives are being undertaken, and invited speakers who are experts in the hate crimes area, or who represent various of the communities affected by hate crimes.

The communities include but are not limited to the Black, Jewish, trans, Asian, handicapped and Sikh communities. Hybrid meetings, held in person at the Office of the Chief States Attorney, 300 Corporate Place, Rocky Hill, are open to the public.
Guess who the trans person is?

I am proud of this part...
Third party reporting portal: It is an article of faith that hate crimes are radically underreported for a number of reasons, including the reluctance of victims to contact police authorities due to distrust or concern about immigration status.

While we encourage individuals to report hate incidents to local law enforcement, we concluded that an alternative public reporting tool would encourage people who prefer not to deal with police authorities to report their victimization. Working with community stakeholders an online portal is being created to permit victims to report hate crimes and hate incidents without contacting police authorities.
i.e. A Tip Line

Some of the other topics covered are:
  • Investigative form [All the police departments now have the same forms] 
  • Third party reporting portal
  • Outreach
  • Filing of annual reports
  • Public awareness advertisement [There will be a 30 sec ad coming out next moth.]
  • Legislative efforts and proposals [The bill that we sponsored never made it to the floor.]
The article end with...
Hate crimes and hateful incidents not only harm individuals but also spread fear through the community of which a victim is a part and corrode our civic sensibilities. They also tear at the social fabric of our multi-ethnic democracy which, for all its challenges, is still a miraculous achievement.
When a member of the trans gets attack, the whole community knows about it and is affected. It is an attack on the whole community.

Mini-Post: What Are They Thinking?

As the truth comes out on Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill and it is not beautiful! It is down right deadly!
AP News
By  MARY CLARE JALONICK
June 23, 2025


The massive tax and spending cuts package that President Donald Trump wants on his desk by July 4 would loosen regulations on gun silencers and certain types of rifles and shotguns, advancing a longtime priority of the gun industry as Republican leaders in the House and Senate try to win enough votes to pass the bill.

The guns provision was first requested in the House by Georgia Rep. Andrew Clyde, a Republican gun store owner who had initially opposed the larger tax package. The House bill would remove silencers — called “suppressors” by the gun industry — from a 1930s law that regulates firearms that are considered the most dangerous, eliminating a $200 tax while removing a layer of background checks.
Do you believe this S--t!

ChatGPT found that...

The U.S. has by far the highest number and rate of mass shootings among developed nations. For example, between 1998 and 2019, 73% of mass shootings in developed countries occurred in the U.S., resulting in 816 deaths (N-IUSSP)

While there is no standardized global definition for "mass shooting," U.S. rates per capita are much higher than in other developed countries. For example, Louisiana had about 4.3 mass shootings per 100,000 people from 2014–2022, and Washington, D.C. had 10.4 per 100,000, but these are city/state rates, not global. No other developed country comes close to these figures. (NBC News)

And don't forget that the U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6–3 decision in Garland v. Cargill, struck down the federal ban on bump stocks. Bump stock was used in the mowing down of concert goes in Las Vegas.

This is all about the Republicans playing to their MAGA base and not the voters. They don't care who gets killed as long as they get the votes.

Thursday, June 26, 2025

Carabiners and Subaru

These are myths... right? Stereotypes?

But sometimes they do have so basses in facts...
Why are carabiners the unofficial accessory for every lesbian night out – and what is their meaning for LGBT people?
Pink News
By Sophie Perry
June 26, 2026


Today, for many queer women, wearing a carabiner isn’t just about holding keys: it’s a nod to history, a statement of identity and a way to connect with others in the know. But what is the carabiner code and what’s the history behind this sapphic symbol?

A carabiner is a small metal clip, usually made of aluminium or steel, with a spring-loaded gate, and is commonly used in activities such as rock climbing. However, the accessory also has a history entangled with LGBTQ+ culture.


One of the first public nods to its history came from cartoonist Alison Bechdel, famous for Dykes to Watch Out For, who immortalised it through the “Ring of Keys” moment in her memoir Fun Home, where a young Bechdel recognises another queer woman – not by what she says but by what she’s wearing: a carabiner.
So do you have a carabiner? I do. Um, actually 3.
As women’s job opportunities expanded, the carabiner remained, becoming a quiet symbol of queer resilience, butch style, and community within the wider WLW world. In some lesbian circles, carabiners have worked like the gay men’s hanky code, where placement matters.

Clipped on the left, they can signal someone being a “bottom”, on the right, you’re a “top”. It’s a low-key way to signal preferences, often flying under the radar of straight onlookers.

So, the next time you spot a carabiner at the club, on the street, or in a café, remember: it’s not just an accessory. It’s a nod to the past, a wink to the present and a silent pledge to the future of lesbian culture.
Whoa, I never knew that! But I have mine in my pocketbook.

When I volunteered at the health collective they had a jar of them by the door. They are really handy and not just for keys, they are great in tying a knot. Need something to hold your dog to your beach chair bingo.

Another symbol that I never believed in until one day, it the Subaru. On the website Marketing the Rainbow they write,
Subaru is the automotive division of the Japanese transportation conglomerate Subaru Corporation, formerly Fuji Heavy Industries (FHI). It is a small player, the twenty-second car manufacturer worldwide. Subaru is the Japanese name for the Pleiades star cluster "The Seven Sisters" (one of whom, according to tradition, is invisible - hence only six stars in the Subaru logo). The logo also refers to the six companies that merged to create FHI.

[...]

Subaru was one of the first car brands and even brands in general that focused on the LGBT customer, more specifically: the "L" – and that was also very special.

Lesbian affinity for Subaru is a popular joke: just like wearing Birkenstocks — it's the subject of Saturday Night Live sketches and self-mockery jokes about lesbian stereotypes.

International tennis legend Navratilova was embraced by Subaru of America after the company began courting the lesbian market in 1996. A TV campaign features Martina among other female athletes in the "What Do I Know?" theme. The spot includes golfers Juli Inkster, Meg Mallon and Olympic skier Diann Roffe-Steinrotter. Each asks, "What do I know" about performance, control, grip, etc. Martina gets the last word in, asking "What do we know? We're just girls." 
I never believed it. I thought it was some type of anti-marketing ploy by Subaru competitors.

But one day I got invited to a fund raiser by a lesbian friend and I was driving up and down the street trying to find the address. When I spied a whole gaggle of Subarus in front of a house. Hmmm... I look around for the house number and it was it!

Even through they are stereotypes, sometimes it does fit.



Showdown In North Caroline!

North Caroline has a split personality, Republican legislature and a Democrat governor, so that is leading to a showdown over us.
State Rep. Allison Dahle spoke out against the effort in an interview with the Blade
Washington Blade
By Christopher Kane
June 25, 2025


Anti-trans legislation passed this week by North Carolina’s Republican-controlled General Assembly will now head to the desk of Democratic Gov. Josh Stein, potentially setting up a showdown with just a few days before the legislature is set to break for the summer recess.

State Rep. Allison Dahle (D-Wake) told the Washington Blade during a phone interview Monday that she was “as confident as I can be” that Stein will reject the bills and also that her Democratic colleagues will line up behind him to block Republicans if they try to override the governor’s veto, which would require support from three-fifths of the House and Senate.

At the same time, there is a good chance one or two members will decide the outcome. Holding 30 of the 50 Senate seats and 71 of the 120 House seats, Republicans can clear the three-fifths threshold so long as there are no defections or abstentions and at least one House Democrat joins with the GOP caucus to override a veto.
The drama begins! This just like Congress where the Republicans only have a few vote lead. But you see the Republican did a bait and switch... from a bill that had strong bipartisan support to one with a poison pill.
Most NC Senate Democrats vote present rather than support anti-trans items that GOP added to once popular legislation on revenge porn.
Carolina Public Press
by Sarah Michels
June 25, 2025


Tuesday, the state Senate passed a bill protecting North Carolinians from revenge or coerced pornography. Early drafts of the bill had unanimous bipartisan support in the state House, but in the end only Senate Republicans voted for it, due to several anti-trans amendments added to the legislation. 

Originally, House Bill 805 would have required website operators to obtain written consent and age verification from every participant featured in pornographic content before posting it online. It also would create a process by which people could request removal of content including them within 72 hours. 

It was designed to protect victims of coerced consent, instances where a person consents to a sexual act or distribution of pornographic content against their will through fraud or under duress.
I know back in 2011 when Connecticut was passing the gender inclusive non-discrimination legislation, the trans community was asked by legislators if the Republicans passed a poison pill amendment should we scrap the bill... we said pill it!
But when the bill reached the Senate, legislators made several changes that “muddied the waters,” Senate Democratic Leader Sydney Batch said.

What began as a bill to protect children from being exploited online was “hijacked, gutted and replaced with language that’s not just unrelated, but dangerous,” Batch said, referencing the anti-trans measures.

The vote was accompanied by hours of partisan drama ending with nearly all Democrats losing their rights to future votes on the bill.
See that is how the Republicans work... guess who gets blamed for a bill to ban revenge porn? And if the governor veto's the bill it will be all front page news... Governor is in favor of kiddy porn.

They let the bill get this far because they knew that if it had that amendment in committee it would have not made it out of committee and would have gotten a lot less attention back then, now it is front page material.

NPR reported...
A controversial state Senate bill restricting transgender access to bathrooms and locker rooms is dead for now.

The bill filed in March by a group of Senate Republicans has drawn comparisons to House Bill 2, the 2016 anti-transgender legislation that led to boycotts.

The new bill would require people to use bathrooms and other facilities that match their gender at birth. And it would ban transgender people from changing their birth certificates.

Senate leader Phil Berger said the new bill won't get a hearing ahead of a legislative deadline this week; bills that don't pass either the House or Senate by Thursday are considered dead under the legislature's rules.
See how that works... all local news outlets have articles on the bill.

Cuckoo Award

Once again Robert F. Kennedy Jr lied to Congress I bet you his uncle and father rolled over in their graves. 

This is a video award...

So with great disgust, the Cuckoo Award is given to RFK Jr. and no way can you live up to your father and uncle.

Wednesday, June 25, 2025

Mini-Post: Now Let Me Get This Straight

The White House does not believe the intel on the damage done in the attack!
The Nation News
June 24, 2025


The White House pushed back on Tuesday after reports said an early intelligence assessment found that the US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites did not destroy them.

The attacks on the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan sites failed to destroy the core components of Iran's nuclear programme and probably only set it back by months, CNN, The New York Times and AP said on Tuesday, quoting sources.

The assessment was carried out by the Defence Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon’s intelligence arm, and is based on a battle-damage assessment conducted by US Central Command after the bombings.

President Donald Trump said the stories were "fake news" and accused CNN and the Times of teaming up to "demean one of the most successful military strikes in history".

Mr Trump's special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff went on Fox News to say that whoever had leaked the information to the media was "treasonous".
Okay, here is my questions. Didn't they use the Defense Intelligence Agency information to plan the attack and they trusted the data then... now it is "Fake News?" It seems to me that the one who is lying is (As usual) Trump & Company.

Afraid Of Their Own Shadows

The Democrats are afraid of anything... trans.

Many Democrats looking for scapegoats as to why they lost the election look at us to place the blame upon.
While some in the party denounced the Supreme Court’s decision, other top leaders remained quiet, underscoring the party’s discomfort on the issue.
The New York Times
By Kellen Browning
June 18, 2025


Leading Democrats offered a slow trickle of critical reaction on Wednesday to the Supreme Court’s decision upholding a state ban on some transgender care for youths, underscoring the new discomfort on the issue from a party that has long seen itself as a champion of L.G.B.T.Q. Americans.

Hours after the ruling arrived, some top Democrats like Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the minority leader, had denounced the decision as part of a “cruel crusade against trans Americans.”
Thump, thump. That noise that you hear is the bus running over of us.
Even Democrats who condemned the ruling tried to turn the focus to other issues. Mr. Schumer suggested on X that Republicans were using the topic “to divert attention from ripping health care away from millions of Americans.”
BINGO!

We are the diversion from the ICE raids, we're the diversion from wrecking the government, we are the low hanging fruit where they can say "Oh... look at those trans people! If it was for them our ___fill-in the blank___ would be better!
The careful calculus reflected how the fraught topic of transgender issues has tormented Democrats for months, with Republicans putting them firmly on the back foot. Many party leaders now believe that liberal politicians took positions in recent years that deviated too far from the beliefs of the average voter.
But there is one thing that the Democrats gloss over in their blaming losing the election on us, one small thing... IT WAS THE ECONOMY! According to the Washington Post, two-thirds of voters rated the economy as “poor” or “not so good.” and voted for Trump! But we still get blamed.

The Democrats let the Republican dominate the election debate. Instead of calling them out trying to distract the voters from the real issues that the people we concerned about.

My prediction,,, on the national level they are going to back away from us. You will not see any non-discrimination bills. You will probably not see and bills nationally on trans healthcare. Hopefully we will not see any bills banning trans athlete. If the Democrats gain control of Congress you will probably see the Republicans introduce anti-trans athlete bills or anti-trans healthcare bills. The Democrats best strategy is to never let the bills see the light of day. Saying that there are more important things that need to be done.

In Connecticut the Republicans introduced dozens of anti-trans bills this session... not one of then were even heard in committee. Bills like:

HB  5125 AN ACT PROHIBITING STUDENTS WHO ARE BIOLOGICAL MALES FROM COMPETING ON FEMALE-ONLY ATHLETIC TEAMS AND
USING FEMALE-ONLY LOCKER ROOMS AND FACILITIES.

To protect women's rights by allowing only biological females to use
female locker rooms and facilities and participate on public female-
only athletic teams.

HB 5336 AN ACT CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF A PARENTS' RIGHT
TO RAISE THEIR CHILDREN CONSISTENT WITH THEIR
CHILDREN'S BIOLOGICAL SEX AND THE PROMOTION OF
FAIRNESS IN INTERSCHOLASTIC ATHLETIC COMPETITION.

To protect a parents' right to raise children consistent with their
biological sex and promote fairness in interscholastic athletic
competition.

HB 5898 AN ACT PROHIBITING THE AVAILABILITY OF SEXUALLY EXPLICIT
MATERIAL IN PUBLIC SCHOOL LIBRARIES.

To prevent student access to sexually explicit material in public
school libraries.

SB 136 AN ACT PROHIBITING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE USE OF
SPECIFIC PRONOUNS.

To prevent compelled speech by prohibiting the state or any political
subdivision of the state from requiring the use of specific pronouns
Not one of these bills made to the committees! The Democrats squashed the bills and that is what is needed in Congress and if the Republicans complain? Say that we need to pass important bills like improving our infrastructure.

And here is a thought... for every anti-trans bill that the Republicans introduce... raise the billionaire tax by 5%! 

Mini-Post: Gender Dysphoria

We all know what that is... but sometimes we forget that it never magically, that it is always with us!

I know of many trans people who say... I'm a woman now. But just by thinking that shows that it is not true, we are trans and we will always be trans. Whether we transition or not or detransition... that gender dysphoria bug bit us in the ass.

I am writing this to say gender is a spectrum and we (I include everyone) move back and forth on that spectrum, it is not a spot fixed in time... we are human, we are a product of Mother Nature. And Mother Nature is a trickster.


This is a slide from when I do diversity training to show that gender is a spectrum and we continuously move back and forth all the time... like the old TV ad said "Some times I feel like and nut and sometimes I do." For me I am pretty solid, I identified as female but for other they move up and down the spectrum. 

Each of us is unique.

The conservatives make a big thing out of detransitoning and I what's the big deal? So they detransitioned so what.

We each are on this planet and trying to do the best we can... life is hard enough without some a**hole telling us what to do. We might go down a road and realize that it is not for us. So? What's the big deal.

The Republicans like to parade their pet detransitioner saying how horrible it was, nobody forced you, you made the decision all by yourself. Get over it an move on!

I made a horrible mistake... but I got over it. My mistake was in not buy my brother's half of the New Hampshire cottage. But I still whack myself in the head once in a while when I think about it. So? 

People get married and get divorced while others it is "until death do us part" does that mean that we should ban marriages? How many tines have you been at a wedding and thought... that marriage is not going to work, but do we stand up and shout "Stop the marriage!"

So you transitioned and it wasn't right for you, but that doesn't mean that it is not right for others.

So the moral to this post is... We are unique and are only doing the best we can.

Sanctuary!

Anyone who has been to that part of Massachusetts knows that it is very... I mean very LGBT friendly.
Daily Hampshire Gazette
By EMILEE KLEIN
June 26, 2025


It’s not often that a City Council decision draws a standing ovation, but that’s exactly what happened last week when Easthampton’s legislative body approved a resolution to protect the transgender, nonbinary, gender-diverse and intersex community from any attempts to remove their access to health care or community services.

Following the unanimous vote on June 18 to declare itself a “sanctuary city” for transgender and gender-diverse individuals, the 50 people attending the meeting stood in unison and applauded the declaration.

[...]

“This resolution was written by the community and these words are you affirming you,” Councilor Koni Denham said.


This is shorten post. My AC went kaput! So I'm down in the basement and I'm 25th in line for the repair man!

Mini-Post: I Feel Sorry For Him

Blink...        Blink...     Blink...

He is all alone. Out there among the trees. Flashing his tail in the darkness, hoping to see a flash in return.

He is different, he hatched before the masses, he is there looking for love, but he is different. He hatched early before the rest of the fireflies. He out there hoping for a reply,

Blink...        Blink...     Blink...                    Flash...

Blink...        Blink... 

Blink...        Blink...    Blink...        Blink...       Flash...

 Flash...    Flash...

Sometimes there is someone out there listening. They will start a brood of fireflies that will buck the others. They are the ones who get the sweetest grass to eat before the heat of the summer dries out the grass.

Tuesday, June 24, 2025

I Remember

When I was growing up I always hear that gays just hop from one bed to another... all one-night-stands. No long-term relationships.

Then when I came out as trans and entered the world of LGBTQ+, one of the first person I met was in a 30 year relationship... POP! The lies bursts! Some laughed when marriage equality push started, the right wingers, said laughing that they don't want to have any long term so why marriage?

Since then I have met so many couples in long term relationships. On the tenth anniversary of marriage equality here in Connecticut there were an awful lot of 10 yo rug rats running around. So why did the conservatives portray as bed-hopping sleaze bag? 

Back then people got arrested for being gay... so it was two old spinsters living together that just happen to share a bedroom. Wink, wink, nod. For trans people we had to have on at least three items of male clothing and socks did not count as two.

Society was dominated by Christian religious... it was against the law for two unmarried people to live together, it wasn't against the law for an unmarried woman to have a baby but society treated unwed mothers with intense stigma and shame. It was against the law for a store to be open on Sunday.

When it came to us, the conservatives portrayed homosexuality as a danger to traditional family values and as promiscuous and incapable of commitment helped paint them as deviant or immoral. To fit their fit their dogmatic propaganda against the LGBTQ+ community.

So you will be able to get married but all legal protection is stripped out of the laws so everyone can discriminate against them!

Project 2025 want to strip all of our legal protections, PolitiFact writes that Project 2025...
The document refers to heterosexual families as "ideal" and calls for the protection of faith-based federal grant recipients who do not support same-sex marriage. 
Project 2025 also pushes the tried and true dogma of  bed hopping gays and lesbians...
The document also says, without a citation, that nonheterosexual, intact marriages involve higher instability, financial stress, and poorer outcomes for children.
Looking at divorce rates between heterosexual and same-sex couples are about identical.

And their lies continue!


A Little History On Iran.

I am old enough to remember a Republican president helped overthrow the Iranian democratically elected government. Then they made a fatal mistake… they nationalized the oil!!!!!

The British and the American oil companies went crying to their governments and the US obliged the oil companies the CIA staged a coup and put the Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi into power. The Republican president’s excuse was they are turning to the Soviets! He turned out to be a petty dictator… but that was okay because he was our tyrant.

We actually helped Iran to learn to enrich Uranium in the late 50s and early 60s!

The people said “We had enough of this crap and staged a revolution in 1979! And overthrew the Shah.

Then in 2015 the US along with Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) – 2015
After years of negotiations between Iran and the U.S., UK, France, Russia, China and Germany signed the  JCPOA in 2015. In the agreement Iran would limit uranium enrichment, reduce centrifuges, and allow strict IAEA inspections in return we and all the other countries unfroze their bank accounts which amounted to around tens of billions of dollars in Iranian assets that ws held in foreign banks. Contrary to the MAGA lies we did not give money to the Iranians! The treaty was working and Iran stopped making bomb grade uranium and allowed inspections.

But Trump torn up the treaty saying he could do better.

And now some 6 years after the treaty was voided by Trump we are at war!

Monday, June 23, 2025

Mini-Post: This Is What Gets Me Worried!

This post caught my attention on Facebook.


I am worried that they are packing the military with Christian Nationalist and those who are loyal to Trump and not the Constitution.

One Of My Pet Peeves Is...

LGBT.

Hun?

Well that this excellent article that was on PBS News Hour but...
LGBTQ Senior Care
Older LGBTQ adults face a number of challenges, especially when it comes to finding housing and care. SAGE, a national advocacy leader in this space, created a system of training programs for care providers. H.O.M.E. housing director Nikki Moustafa and SAGEcare trainer Britta Larson highlight how the training has improved their abilities to support residents.
But it has one major flaw! It is so major that even an AI spotted it when I asked the AI... Look at this article through trans lens.

It replied... there is nothing about transgender people in the article... BINGO!
Britta Larson, SAGECare Trainer: Sadly, approximately 70 percent of LGBTQ older adults go back in the closet when they enter a skilled nursing facility. And that statistic makes me so sad, because it’s no quality of life to be hiding who you are, to not be your authentic self, to basically be forced to live a lie.
Um... what about trans people? It is nice that they can go back into the closet, but that would mean we would have to detransition! Unacceptable! Of the 30% of those who don't go back in the closet, how many of them are trans?
They are SAGECare credentialed. That means that they put an emphasis on making sure all of their programs and services are inclusive and welcoming for LGBTQ older adults.
Um...how many trans people do you have teaching it!
Britta Larson: LGBTQ older adults really did pave the way for many of us today in terms of our rights in this country. But they shouldn’t have to feel like they need to continue to fight for their rights and be activists as they’re aging. And we are all aging, so we will all be there someday.
And who lead the way back then? Gee it was trans people, people of color, flaming gays and butch lesbians who couldn't assimilate in to society! We were the outcast who refused to fit in to the "norm"

We were the ones at Black Cat Tavern in '67! We were the ones in 66' at the Compton’s Cafeteria Uprising! And we were the ones who were at the Dewey’s Lunch Counter Sit-In in '65!

This gap points out the importance of having diversity to bring in all view points. Nothing against SAGE but how many of their trainers are trans. When I was at their headquarters a number of years ago they had a diverse crew there... but I didn't see any trans people in the office.

I'm a trouble maker... people who know me know that whenever I can bring up the facts that A: you should include trans people in the organization, and B: you should also have seniors on your board.

I don't know how many time I stuck with attending the meetings because I was the only trans person sitting there at the table. On the Governor's Advisory Council on Hate Crimes, I'm the only trans person on the committee.

If we we want to bring about change... we have to go and take our seat at the table to make sure our voice is being heard.

It was never about them... it was about us! The misfits of society!

Mini-Post: This is one of those DUH moments

The Republicans want to ban the law they prevents people from blocking women health center, they claim (Live Action is a far-right media outlet)...
Live Action
By Nancy Flanders
June 11, 2025


KEY TAKEAWAYS:
  • The FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025, advanced by the committee, now goes to the House for a full vote.
  • Though introduced under the Clinton Administration, prosecutions against pro-lifers under FACE ramped up in 2022 under the Biden-Harris DOJ when it appeared the Supreme Court would overturn Roe v. Wade.
  • Multiple pro-lifers were imprisoned for peaceful protests at abortion businesses, though some had occurred years before and were not prosecuted locally.
  • After President Trump pardoned 23 imprisoned pro-lifers, he said FACE Act prosecutions should only be brought in extreme cases.
  • The repeal of the FACE Act will guarantee that pro-lifers won’t “face felony convictions for peaceful acts such as sidewalk counseling or singing hymns,” says Rep. Chip Roy.
Okay, let us take a look at their Key Points...
  • The  prosecutions against pro-lifers... well let me ask you when was the last time you heard of a women's rights advocate blocking a Planned Parenthood clinic?
  • Their peaceful protests  is anything but! Yes, there is no physical violence but what do you call a bunch of screaming people inches from your face saying you're a murder! Baby killer! Sinner! and preventing you from going into the clinic? I know because it happened to me when I had a legislative planning meeting at Planned Parenthood's office and it was on the day where women with problem pregnancy come in. When they saw I was trans it was like the plague just hit them!
  • This is total bull... "peaceful acts such as sidewalk counseling or singing hymns"