Unable to Load...
Does not compute!
Military.comBy Steve BeynonJune 27, 2025"They're not making acquisition decisions, they're not senior decision-makers," Steve Warren, an Army spokesperson, told reporters Wednesday when asked about what oversight mechanisms are in place over the new unit. "It's not in our interest to show any favoritism to a company -- that would be the exact opposite of what we're trying to do, right? What we want is competition. That's what we're looking for; these guys will help us think about that."The four include Shyam Sankar, chief technology officer for Palantir; Andrew Bosworth, chief technology officer of Meta; Kevin Weil, chief product officer of OpenAI; and Bob McGrew, adviser at Thinking Machines Lab and former chief research officer for OpenAI.
Does anyone else see all types of red flags going up? And what is the need for this besides giving access to billionaires to classified technology?
These are my red flags...
- Privileged Access → Competitive Advantage
- Conflicts of Interest
- No Public Disclosure or Oversight
- Ethical “Firewalls” Are Unclear
There are already agencies in place that do the exact same thing, DARPA which really can claim credit for the internet as well as GPS, stealth tech, autonomous systems! Then there is the Defense Innovation Board (DIB) that reports directly to the Secretary of Defense and one of their innovations was cloud storage and provide independent recommendations on how the DoD can become more agile, innovative, and tech-savvy.
So I see this as a payoff for their support and donations during the elections? Will this be another rampage through databases?
No comments:
Post a Comment