[Editorial]
Connecting the dots. How many times have you heard this?
Well a little history, the trial is in the discovery phase where both sides can dig into the other files. Something Trump didn’t want… but did happen anyway. You see BBC wanted the extensive financial records from Trump's business trust. His lawyers clearly did not want to provide that financial information.
Okay now we jump a head to now… there is a new judge to oversee the case. The case is now being transferred to Jeffrey Kuntz, a federal judge whom Trump himself nominated. Hmmm…
The judges nomination has been in the works for a while now, but all the paperwork just got completed, just in time to sit on Trump v. BBC. Wasn’t the timing nice?
Now consider this… Kuntz previously ruled in Trump's favor in the Pulitzer Prize Board litigation while he was a Florida appellate judge.
Connecting the dots…
Trump files a $10 billion lawsuit against the BBC. → The case enters discovery. → The BBC seeks extensive financial information about Trump's business interests. → Trump's lawyers fight that disclosure. → Altman temporarily halts the financial disclosure while Trump's effort to narrow his claims is considered. → Then a new federal judge arrives. → That judge was nominated by Trump. → And that same judge had previously ruled in Trump's favor in another Trump defamation case.
Nothing was illegal, but sure as hell rasies a lot of red flags
Connecting the dots. How many times have you heard this?
Well, a little history. The case is in the discovery phase, where both sides can dig into the other side’s files and records. Something Trump didn’t want, but it happened anyway. You see, the BBC wanted extensive financial records from Trump’s business trust. His lawyers clearly did not want to provide that financial information.
Okay, now let’s jump ahead to today…
There is a new judge overseeing the case and it hss is now being transferred to Jeffrey Kuntz, a federal judge whom Trump himself nominated.
Hmmm…
The judge’s nomination had been in the works for a while, but all the paperwork was finally completed, just in time for Kuntz to sit on Trump v. BBC.
Wasn’t the timing nice?
Now consider this…
Kuntz previously ruled in Trump’s favor in the Pulitzer Prize Board litigation while he was a Florida appellate judge.
Connecting the dots…
Trump files a $10 billion lawsuit against the BBC. → The case enters discovery. → The BBC seeks extensive financial information about Trump's business interests. → Trump's lawyers fight that disclosure. → Altman temporarily halts the financial disclosure while Trump's effort to narrow his claims is considered. → Then a new federal judge arrives. → That judge was nominated by Trump. → And that same judge had previously ruled in Trump's favor in another Trump defamation case.
Nothing about the transfer was necessarily illegal. But nothing about this sequence makes the questions go away, either.
However, it sure as hell raises a lot of red flags.
[/Editorial]
No comments:
Post a Comment