Misogyny ? Racism?

What do you call this... The removal of all women in combat rolls?

I call it religious  misogyny... a women's place is in the home... barefoot pregnant and in the kitchen. In Hegseth's book he writes according to the Guardian...

He went on to acknowledge that while women serve important roles in support operations, he opposes their placement in direct combat units. “Dads push us to take risks. Moms put the training wheels on our bikes. We need moms. But not in the military, especially in combat units,” he said in his book.

He is a total Christian Nationalist whose views are from the "Father Knows Best" era! He is purging the military of women in combat and Blacks in leadership roles!

Pete Hegseth replaces first woman to lead US naval academy with Marine Corps general

Yvette Davids, who took the role in January 2004, will be succeeded by Michael Borgschulte

The Guardian

By Marina Dunbar

Fri 18 Jul 2025

The first woman to lead the US naval academy is being reassigned, with the defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, moving to replace her with a Marine Corps general, defense officials confirmed on Friday.

The decision marks the first time in the nearly 180-year history of the academy that a Marine Corps officer has been nominated to take charge.

[...]

A Pentagon official, speaking anonymously to the Washington Post, said that the move was not a dismissal. Davids has been nominated for a senior position on the staff of the chief of naval operations following her roughly 18 months as head of the academy. The defense department confirmed the nomination in a statement on Friday afternoon.

Yeah but... it is a non-combat! I think of Senator Duckworth who was wounded in combat... what would her fellow wounded soldiers would think about her bravery? Were they glad to see her helicopter come to take them to safety? Or were they mad because she is a woman?

I want you to read this and stop and think for a moment.

The Trump administration has removed several high-ranking military officials, many of them women or people of color, as part of an effort to eliminate what officials describe as “wokeness” in the ranks.

What exactly are they saying.

1. They are removing non-Whites from leadership roles... that sure does sound like racial discrimination to me.
2. They are removing women from leadership roles... that sure does sound misogynistic to me.
3. They are removing high ranking officers from leadership roles... and replaced with Trump's loyalists.

This makes my hair stand... somehow that doesn't seem right to me (ChatGPT)...

• Why it's alarming: It suggests race may be a proxy for ideological or political targeting, which is not only unethical—it could be unlawful under equal opportunity policies, even within the military.
• Why it matters: Even in the military, gender discrimination is illegal under DoD policy and federal law. Patterns like this suggest women are being marginalized, not for performance but for who they are or what they represent.
• Why this is dangerous: When military leadership is chosen for ideological conformity over competence, the military risks becoming a politicized tool, not a professional institution.

What they are doing with all this "Anti-Woke" is reintroducing racism and discrimination into the military. What is their end game?

I want you to set your Way Back Machine to the year 2021, the place the Capitol building, Military.com wrote...

In Unprecedented Joint Letter, Top Military Brass Denounces US Capitol Riot

By Gina Harkins

January 12, 2021

The country's top military leaders have taken the unprecedented step of calling out last week's storming of the U.S. Capitol as inconsistent with the U.S. rule of law and a direct assault on the American way of life.

In a one-page memo to all U.S. troops, the eight members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff told the entire military force that President-elect Joe Biden will be their next commander in chief. All service members, they added, "must embody the values and ideals of the nation."

There is one thing that you can say about Trump & Company... they learn from their mistakes. Those who are filling the open positions have one thing in common; they're political loyalists!

The letter is noteworthy for an institution that remains vehemently apolitical, serving commanders in chief and civilian defense secretaries from both parties -- and putting the U.S. Constitution above any loyalties.

What would of have been the outcome with troops loyal to Trump and not the Constitution?