Sunday, December 01, 2024

Strategy


Last time Trump ran into the law when he tried to stuff his cronies in federal agencies. So he now has a new strategy… move the agencies!
As part of his campaign to reclaim the White House, Donald Trump made clear that in a second term in office, he’d move tens of thousands of federal jobs outside the “Washington swamp” and into “places filled with patriots who love America.”

“This,” Trump said in one campaign video, “is how I will shatter the deep state.”

The relocation of federal jobs outside Washington, DC, was something Trump embarked on near the end of his first term — shifting the headquarters of the Bureau of Land Management about 2,000 miles west to Grand Junction, Colorado.
You will see more moves out of Washington, why?
But if that move is any indication of what’s to come, the massive push to relocate federal jobs outside the Beltway comes with the risk of kneecapping agencies through the loss of experienced workers and bogging them down in logistical minutia.
I believe that is how he plans on destroying federal agencies by moving them around to remove the “Deep State” employees (i.e. Federal employees) and put in his cronies.
The BLM move became an unproductive debacle marked by an exodus of experienced employees and a surge in vacancies that arguably undermined the then-Trump administration’s agenda, according to a half dozen current and former senior BLM staffers – including the agency’s current director — and a CNN review of government records.

That western relocation was “wildly disruptive” and should serve as a “cautionary tale” for the incoming Trump administration, said Tracy Stone-Manning, the Biden administration’s BLM director.
HA! That is the plan to destroy the federal agencies.
Relocating EPA headquarters blasted as ‘decapitation’
President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team is reportedly discussing the move, an effort described by a former agency employee as a “demolition plan.”
E&E News/Politico
By Kevin Bogardus
November 11, 2024
 
 
EPA’s supporters are warning that relocating its headquarters outside of the nation’s capital could be catastrophic for the agency.

On the campaign trail, President-elect Donald Trump pledged to shift parts of the federal government outside of Washington, an effort he began during his last administration. Now, those at EPA worry their agency could be up for relocation as Trump seeks to shatter the “Deep State” in his coming second term.

Nate James, president of American Federation of Government Employees Local 3331, which represents EPA headquarters employees, said many staff would leave the agency, choosing to stay with their families, rather than move to wherever the agency landed.
The oligarchs hate the federal agencies... they can't make the billions that they want. They want to dump their chemicals into the Love Canal and in the Cuyahoga River.
“This would be a devastating blow that would make it very difficult for what would be left of the agency, at least at the headquarters, to accomplish the mission,” James told POLITICO’s E&E News. “Because it could be advertised as a relocation, but really it would be decapitation.”
 
[...]
 
“This would be a devastating blow that would make it very difficult for what would be left of the agency, at least at the headquarters, to accomplish the mission,” James told POLITICO’s E&E News. “Because it could be advertised as a relocation, but really it would be decapitation.”
Yup, that is exactly what he wants. Keep this in mind... Trump is all about revenge.
 
Federal law prohibits the firing of federal employees without cause so this is Project 2025 way around the law, Trump swore on stack of Bible that he knew nothing about Project 2025 but... ProPublica writes;
The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, the 900-plus page blueprint for a potential second Trump term, recommends sending the BLM headquarters back to Colorado and relocating other agencies, ranging from the Environmental Protection Agency’s regional offices to the Air Traffic Organization and the American Indian Environmental Office.

[...]

But scores of people who worked in the Trump administration helped draft Project 2025. They include William Perry Pendley, his former pick to helm the BLM. Pendley oversaw the headquarters relocation to Grand Junction and authored the Project 2025 chapter on the Department of the Interior, which includes the recommendation to move the BLM’s headquarters back to the West.

Separate from Project 2025, Trump has doubled down on his plan to take aim at the federal bureaucracy as part of Agenda47, his campaign’s outline for a second term. “Just as I moved the Bureau of Land Management to Colorado,” he said in March 2023, “as many as 100,000 government positions can be moved out, and I mean immediately, of Washington to places filled with patriots who love America, and they really do love America.”
Translate: He will put his cronies who will answer to him and not the law.
 
You know that Trump found a soulmate in Musk who hates federal regulations as much as Trump does.

His first term was a dress rehearsal, he has plans to strip the entire federal government. He will be putting the fox in charge of the hen house. Just look at Musk he is mad at California for forcing labor laws on him. For making him follow the environmental laws, for making him follow the non-discrimination laws… he is mad. Trump is mad for all the laws he had to follow in his businesses.

So for revenge they are going to cripple the bureaucracy. Mark my words.

*****

You know this has been tried before, one of Connecticut's governors moved the state agencies out of the capitol and it also didn't work. The commissioners all work with the governor and the legislature, so that meant if the commissioners needed to be in a meeting in Hartford they had to drive half way across the state and back. Now they are all back in the Hartford area. I had attended regular meetings at the Commission on Women, Children, Seniors, Equity & Opportunity office in Hartford. I don't think that I would have attended if it was down in Bridgeport or another long drive.

So for these federal employees it is either move to a far way city or quit which is what Trump wants them to do.

Ding, Ding, Ding!

That is the warning bell going off!
The bill that Rep. Mace (R South Carolina) introduced is not just for the Capitol building but all federal buildings!

That means…
  • Government buildings
  • Museums
  • National parks
  • Libraries
  • Recreation centers
  • Public schools in Washington D.C.
  • Post offices
  • Military facilities
So when I bring friends to the Salt Pond Visitor Center at the Cape Cod National Seashore use the bathroom of our “birth gender” (More on that latter)
The 19th Explains: How bathroom bans on federal property would impact trans Americans
A proposed bill in Congress would ban trans people from bathrooms in museums, national parks and other federal property. How would it be enforced, and what are the consequences?
By Orion Rummler, Grace Panetta
November 27, 2024


Congress has a long list of pressing priorities — including funding the federal government to prevent a shutdown — that it is likely to put off until 2025. One new item packed on that to-do list: legislation introduced by GOP Rep. Nancy Mace to ban transgender women from women’s restrooms, and transgender men from men’s restrooms, on any federal property.

The South Carolina lawmaker proposed this bill after launching a campaign to remove newly-elected Rep. Sarah McBride of Delaware from women’s restrooms on Capitol Hill. After House Speaker Mike Johnson announced a rule that effectively matched her initial proposal, Mace expanded her proposed bill to restrict the ability of all trans Americans to use restrooms, locker rooms or changing rooms on federal property across the country.
How long did it take? Two, three weeks to come after us?
If passed into law, how would such a bill be enforced, and what would be the consequences? And what is the atmosphere like right now for transgender lobbyists and advocates who work on the Hill? The 19th spoke with multiple experts to find out.
Believe it or not… there is a case before the Supreme Court: United States v. Skrmetti that is about our healthcare. But we need to be aware of how they rule on case, if they stick with the states we are screwed! But if they rule in favor of us we have to see why they voted that way and it could help us with bathroom.
Such a far-reaching law would mean widespread discrimination against all transgender people, experts say, although Mace’s rhetoric has singled out trans women. It would have the potential to expose trans and nonbinary people to harassment and discrimination at national parks, courthouses, IRS buildings like taxpayer assistance centers, Social Security Administration offices, and some post offices and Native American lands.
Now when they say “birth gender” how are they going to enforce it? Birth certificates? Driver licenses? Or DNA testing? What about intersex people?
 
ABC News reported,
When it comes to specific policies, about half of Americans in that poll (including 78 percent of Republicans and 29 percent of Democrats) seemed to agree with Mace on bathroom bans, telling YouGov they think transgender people should use bathrooms that correspond to their assigned sex at birth, while 34 percent thought they should use bathrooms that align with their current gender identity, or either option.
Okay guys! It is your turn to step up to the plate! You know when the Civil Rights protest began there were sitting at lunch counters. Guys if this bill passes we need your help! We need you to use the women's bathrooms, in other words... obey the law! we need to have a trans man in every women's bathroom in the U.S. Capitol when one trans man comes out we need another to go in.

The Republican myopic rush to pass anti-trans laws just don;t think about trans men.

When the news announced Rep. Mace the news media said that the bill was targeted at Rep. McBride but now the truth comes out... it is national wide!

This is a wake up bell!