Thursday, December 04, 2025

A Set Up?

Was that what it was... a "Set Up?"

In Oklahoma students seems to have set their professor up for a lawsuit.
Although the student did not properly complete the assignment to academic standards, the university is investigating the teacher.
The Advocate
By Christopher Wiggins
December 02 2025 


The University of Oklahoma has placed a trans graduate instructor on administrative leave after a student received a zero on a psychology assignment that described transgender people as “demonic” and asserted that gender roles are “Biblically ordained.” The dispute has quickly escalated into a statewide political flashpoint.

The controversy began when junior Samantha Fulnecky submitted a 650-word reaction paper for a course on how social expectations shape gender. Instead of addressing the assignment’s questions using data, her essay claimed society is “pushing lies” about gender, warned that eliminating strict gender roles would be harmful, and described transgender identities as “demonic,” Them reports.
He wasn't the only one to review the paper...
A second instructor, Megan Waldron, independently reviewed the paper and agreed that it did not satisfy the assignment prompt or basic academic writing expectations.
Now tell does that sound like a set-up? The class is...
Course Name: PSY 2603 - Lifespan Development (A course in the Department of Psychology)
Course Description: A survey of psychological changes... changes in cognitive, social, emotional, and physiological development from conception to death will be included.
Assignment Type: Reaction essay to a scholarly article (on gender typicality, peer relations, and mental health).
"...scholarly article..." Did you catch that? A "...scholarly article..." but what the student turned in was a a diatribe a religious dogma.

The New York Post reported that,
The psychology course’s professor, graduate student Mel Curth, who uses “she/they” pronouns, failed Fulnecky on the grounds that she neglected to address the prompt and relied more on “personal ideology” than “empirical evidence,” according to a bombshell thread shared by the university’s Turning Point USA chapter.

In her essay, which was supposed to cover “how people are perceived based on societal expectations of gender,” University of Oklahoma student Samantha Fulnecky presented a biblically fueled tirade against the notion that there are multiple genders.

The psychology course’s professor, graduate student Mel Curth, who uses “she/they” pronouns, failed Fulnecky on the grounds that she neglected to address the prompt and relied more on “personal ideology” than “empirical evidence,” according to a bombshell thread shared by the university’s Turning Point USA chapter.

In the essay, Fulnecky repeats ad nauseam that she doesn’t take issue with gender stereotypes because “that is how God made us.” However, she neglected to cite the article she was responding to, save for a vague reference to “teasing as a way to enforce gender norms.”

The psychology course’s professor, graduate student Mel Curth, who uses “she/they” pronouns, failed Fulnecky on the grounds that she neglected to address the prompt and relied more on “personal ideology” than “empirical evidence,” according to a bombshell thread shared by the university’s Turning Point USA chapter.

In the essay, Fulnecky repeats ad nauseam that she doesn’t take issue with gender stereotypes because “that is how God made us.” However, she neglected to cite the article she was responding to, save for a vague reference to “teasing as a way to enforce gender norms.”
And here is the kicker... Them writes,
Turning Point’s posts about Fulnecky and Curth sparked a firestorm on social media over the weekend, as some conservatives — including Fulnecky’s mother — admitted they were targeting Curth because she is trans. Turning Point’s original post about Curth accused her of being “mentally ill.”

“Individuals who identify as trans should be automatically disqualified from holding any position as teacher or professor,” wrote Canadian anti-trans activist Chris Elston, aka “Billboard Chris,” on X last week; “Agreed! Proud of my daughter!” wrote Kristi Fulnecky, Samantha’s mother, in a reply. (Fulnecky is an attorney who previously represented January 6th rioter Christopher Joseph Quaglin.) Oklahoma state Rep. Gabe Woolley, a Republican who calls himself a “former member of the LGBTQ community,” similarly called for Curth to be barred from higher education and repeatedly misgendered her in a series of X posts last week.
Pink News reported...
Trans graduate assistant Mel Curth has been removed from her position at the University of Oklahoma after a Christian student complained a failing grade she received in a psychology essay – because she cited the Bible rather than empirical evidence – was a violation of her right to free speech.
By Sophie Perry
Dec. 2, 2025


As first reported by The Oklahoman in November, junior Samantha Fulnecky said she was asked to write a 650-word essay reacting to an article about how people are perceived based on societal expectations of gender.

Fulnecky said in her essay that traditional gender roles should not be seen as stereotypes and cited the Bible as evidence, stating that removing the concept of gender from society would be “detrimental” because it would put people “farther from God’s original plan for humans”.

[...]

In her feedback to the assignment – screenshots of which were shared by the university’s chapter of Turning Point USA on X in a post that derided Curth – the graduate assistant explicitly told Fulnecky she was “not deducting points because you have certain beliefs” but because her work “does not answer the questions for this assignment, contradicts itself, heavily uses personal ideology over empirical evidence in a scientific class, and is at times offensive”.
Once again... no references!
Fulnecky’s mother, Kristi Fulnecky – who has defended those involved in the 6 January Capitol riot in court – agreed, writing: “Agreed! Proud of my daughter!”
Her mother is a lawyer who has worked on anti-trans cases and other right-wing cases!

Does this seem like a set-up?

Mini-Post: Even With All The Laws...

They still discriminate!
ABC 10 News San Diego
By: Austin Grabish
Dec 03, 2025


The Grossmont Union High School District has agreed to pay $1.2 million to a former employee who filed a lawsuit last year alleging she was harassed for opposing the board's "anti-LGBTQ agenda."

Rose Tagnesi worked for the district for over 28 years and claims her boss told her to keep a "low profile" because if board members found out she was gay, they wouldn't approve a promotion for her.

In 2024, Team 10 reported the former special education director alleged in court documents that a board trustee referred to Tagnesi and another school employee as "witches" who were part of an "LGBTQ coven."

[...]

Collin McGlashen, a spokesperson for the Grossmont Union High School District, provided the following statement to ABC 10News:

 “The purpose of a settlement like this is to allow all parties to move forward in the most productive way possible. The agreement clearly states that it does not represent an admission of wrongdoing by the District or a validation of the claims made in the lawsuit.”
Yeah but... they paid out $1.2 million! But they didn't do nothing wrong... yeah right! They are as innocent as a new born baby!


Wednesday, December 03, 2025

Release The Files!

Notice the plural.

Not Trump want to block another release of files about him!
Trump’s request is a break from the Justice Department’s handling of all special counsel reports in recent decades.
Politico
By Kyle Cheney
12/02/2025


President Donald Trump argued Tuesday that former special counsel Jack Smith’s final report — chronicling the criminal case against him for hoarding classified documents at Mar-a-Lago — should never be made public.

Trump urged U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon in a new court filing to extend her 11-month-old order blocking the Justice Department from releasing the full report, which Smith submitted shortly before Trump’s second inauguration.

Anything less, his attorney Kendra Wharton wrote, would “perpetuate Jack Smith’s unlawful criminal investigations and proceedings.” 
What is he hiding?
Trump’s move is his first direct request of Cannon — a judge he appointed at the end of his first term — since taking office. And the filing came from his personal lawyer rather than Justice Department officials, who weighed in separately Monday. The filing is infused with the typical disdain Trump has expressed for his former prosecutors, labeling Smith a “so-called special counsel” and saying the case was “marred by numerous deficiencies and repeated abuses of office.”
Do you think that the judge might be biased?
 
 
And Jack Smith’s final report!
 

The Fog Of War!

Bull! They knew what they were doing when they ordered the second strike!
AP News
By  KONSTANTIN TOROPIN
December 2, 2025


 Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday cited the “fog of war” in defending a follow-up strike on an alleged drug-carrying boat in the Caribbean Sea in early September.

During a Cabinet meeting at the White House, Hegseth said he did not see any survivors in the water, saying the vessel “exploded in fire, smoke, you can’t see anything. ... This is called the fog of war.”

Hegseth also said he “didn’t stick around” for the remainder of the Sept. 2 mission following the initial strike and the admiral in charge “made the right call” in ordering the second hit, which he “had complete authority to do.”

Lawmakers have opened investigations following a Washington Post report that Hegseth issued a verbal order to “kill everybody” on the boat, the first vessel hit in the Trump administration’s counterdrug campaign in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific Ocean that has grown to over 20 known strikes and more than 80 dead.
The "fog of war " had plenty of time to clear!
While several legal experts have told The Associated Press they believed the second strike violated peacetime laws and those governing armed conflict, the Pentagon’s own manual on the laws of armed conflict also specifically cites striking survivors of a sunken ship as being patently illegal.
The Guardian reported that from one to two hours were between the first strike and the second strike! There was no "fog of war" this was premeditated. 
He said that he “watched that first strike” but ultimately did not “stick around for the hour or two hours” after. “So I moved on to my next meeting,” the defense secretary said. “A couple of hours later, I learned that that commander had made the which he had the complete authority to do.” Hegseth went on to say that decorated US Navy admiral Frank Bradley made the “right call” as he described the unfolding events to reporters.
I see two courts-martial in the future. If the Democrats take control of Congress.

Mini-Post: I Would Add To That...

Researching my afternoon's posts I came across this on the Army webpage...
Warrior Ethos

I will always place the mission first.
I will never accept defeat.
I will never quit.
I will never leave a fallen comrade.

I would add first that something that Hegseth has forgotten... "I will always obey only lawful orders."
 

Maine Is Getting Tough

Maine is cracking down on discrimination against us... and it will lead right to the Supreme Court!
Bangor Daily News
by Daniel O'Connor
December 2, 2025


School boards that have bucked Maine’s legal protections for transgender students are making quick decisions after a Maine regulator filed a lawsuit against five of them last month.

After news of the suit from the state’s Human Rights Commission broke last month, at least two school boards are set to discuss their next steps. One could move as soon as this week to overturn its policy and adhere to state law. Other districts in conservative areas of the state could dig in for the battle ahead.

The scrambling school districts are responding to only one layer in a complex legal battle. President Donald Trump’s administration has sued Maine and other states with similar protections in their civil rights law, but a pair of cases in front of the U.S. Supreme Court are already in motion and could have large effects on the wrangling here.
Trump has embolden the conservative towns in Manie to buck the state law!
The debate centers on Title IX, which bars sex discrimination by schools receiving federal money. Trump, a Republican, says that law protects single-sex sports and spaces without regard to gender identity, and that transgender students ought to participate only alongside those sharing their birth sex or on co-ed teams.

Maine law considers such a ban illegal discrimination, which has led the federal government to sue the state. That court fight is not likely to render a decision until late in 2026. The Supreme Court cases out of Idaho and West Virginia could be decided sooner.

In January, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., a pair of cases dealing specifically with whether bans on allowing transgender athletes on sports teams that align with their gender identities violate Title IX and the Constitution.
The showdown is set. Our very existence will depend how nine people rule.
The state has weighed in on the Supreme Court cases alongside several other Democratic-led states. Attorney General Aaron Frey signed onto an amicus brief alongside 15 other attorneys general last month. Frey’s office declined to comment on the brief.


“Allowing transgender girls and women to participate in girls’ and women’s sports promotes inclusive school environments that benefit all, and does not compromise fairness or reduce opportunities for cisgender students,” the brief said.
The bottom line for the Republicans is that they think being LGBTQ+ is a choice, suggesting that one might deliberately choose discrimination, violence, and even death: "Gee, I think that I will be gay, so I can be discriminated against, beaten up, and killed—that sounds like so much fun!" Clearly, they do not believe that being LGBTQ+ is an inborn characteristic.

This perspective, which fuels the modern Republican party's stance on LGBTQ+ issues, seems to be an attempt to return to a past era—one characterized by stricter social codes, like those evoked by "Father Knows Best," and the existence of segregation and anti-gay laws. This is a common and accurate description of the current political dynamic.

Ultimately, this conflict is at the heart of the debate surrounding LGBTQ+ issues, especially transgender rights. The Republicans systematically reject the scientific and medical consensus in favor of a worldview rooted in traditional religious and conservative moral dogma.
All but one person spoke out in defense of transgender rights. The lone dissenter was not a town resident.
Midcoast Villager
By Stephen Betts
Nov 20, 2025


Parents, grandparents, and students turned out to speak up for the rights of transgender students during a School Board meeting Wednesday night, Nov. 19, amidst a controversy over a third-grade student whom some parents want to ban from sports.

All but one person spoke out in defense of transgender rights. The lone dissenter was a resident of South Thomaston, not St. George. 

The outpouring came after weeks of controversy in the small town of about 2,600 after several parents told the Select Board they do not want a student, who was identified as male at birth but now identifies as female, playing on a girls third and fourth grade basketball team. A petition to bar transgender students from youth sports has been circulating online as well. The petition also called for eliminating the school's civil rights team, banning books that deal with gender issues in ways deemed inappropriate and for restricting certain flags, such as the LGBT rainbow flags. No such petition has yet been presented to the school district.
The people are behind us!

The Supreme Court cases Little v. Hecox (challenging Idaho's "Fairness in Women's Sports Act") and West Virginia v. B.P.J. (challenging West Virginia's "Save Women's Sports Act") they will be decisive to our human rights. The conflict boils down to inclusive vs. exclusive.

The Republican view is that sex is only the external characteristics at birth. They don’t look at other factors… like chromosomes, Alpha-5-reductase deficiency, AIS or any other medical condition. And the Republican view totally ignores intersex people when they say that there are only two genders.

While the states look at Title IX as being inclusive. That being trans is an "innate characteristic" that is a quality or trait that is present from birth, meaning it is inborn, natural, and not learned. 



Tuesday, December 02, 2025

Have You Noticed That...

With Trump it is always someone else's fault, it is never his! So when a judge rules against him it must be a fault of the judge. So a lesbian judge on a trans case must be biased... you know the whole alphabet thing, you know LGBT. Don't they all stick together?

A court official has dismissed a Justice Department complaint that accused a federal judge of “hostile and egregious” misconduct during hearings for a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s ban on transgender troops serving in the military.

The complaint accused U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes in Washington, D.C., of inappropriately questioning a government lawyer about his religious beliefs and of trying to embarrass the attorney with a rhetorical exercise during a February hearing.

In a Sept 29 order that wasn’t made public until Monday, Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed the complaint. Srinivasan said a motion for Reyes’ recusal would have been the proper means for the Justice Department to contest her impartiality and seek her removal from the case.

Because she is a lesbian they don't think she should have the case. Hmm... I wonder if they feel the same way when a question on "religious freedom" comes up and not having a Christian hear the case?

The website Law Dork writes...
On Friday evening, Bloomberg News’s Erik Larson and Zoe Tillman reported that Chad Mizelle had filed a judicial complaint with the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit accusing U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes of “hostile and egregious misconduct“ during the two-day hearing over the constitutionality of President Donald Trump’s anti-transgender military executive order.

[...]

The extremely weak grounds for Mizelle’s complaint are discussed at length below, but, broadly speaking, this is a clear effort to “work the refs” that should be quickly shut down as unjustified and inappropriate. It is, first, an attempt to undermine the credibility and eventual ruling from the district court judge in the case. Second, it is an effort to begin arguing the merits of the case to the chief judge of the D.C. Circuit.

Beyond that, though, Mizelle’s complaint could send a significantly more chilling message about judicial independence to judges in more right-leaning circuits — making Srinivasan’s response here all the more important.

[...]

Another part that Mizelle ignored — and perhaps more central to this complaint — is that Reyes raised the email in reference to the outside animosity that has been sent her way due to her role as the judge on the case. These directed attacks on Reyes have included Fox News’s Laura Ingraham accusing Reyes of bias because she is a lesbian hearing a case over one of Trump’s anti-transgender orders.
You know the Republicans think of us as a one large monolithic block,
Another part that Mizelle ignored — and perhaps more central to this complaint — is that Reyes raised the email in reference to the outside animosity that has been sent her way due to her role as the judge on the case. These directed attacks on Reyes have included Fox News’s Laura Ingraham accusing Reyes of bias because she is a lesbian hearing a case over one of Trump’s anti-transgender orders.
The Republicans just think that we are all alike, hopping from one bed to another and bring hyper-masculine they can't even wrap their heads around us, why anyone would give up male privilege is beyond them. 

Meanwhile the Advocate writes,
Reyes, a lesbian and an immigrant from Uruguay, is hearing a case known as Talbott v. Trump, filed by six active-duty trans service members and two people who want to enlist. They are represented by GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders (GLAD Law) and the National Center for Lesbian Rights. The suit was filed January 28 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to challenge Donald Trump’s anti-trans executive order, now being implemented by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. A second lawsuit has been filed against the military policy as well.
The lawyer from GLAD also help us and the other New England states pass their non-discrimination laws.
“You and I both agree that the greatest fighting force that world history has ever seen is not going to be impacted in any way by less than 1 percent of the soldiers using a different pronoun than others might want to call them. Would you agree with that?” Reyes asked Lynch, who responded, “No, Your Honor, I’m not. I can’t agree with that.” She also challenged GLAD Law attorney Jennifer Levi about whether discharging this small number of troops would harm readiness.

[...]

She said of Trump’s “two genders” executive order, the basis for his other anti-trans actions, “There are people who are neither male nor female, and so the premise of the executive order is just incorrect.” These actions are motivated by “unadulterated animus,” she said.
They know that they are losing... so they are fighting dirty. Or rather dirtier than usual.

You never truly appreciate your rights until a judge has to rule on your existence!

This Is Bull!

We are not a matter of semantics.

It is a human right!

The Supreme Court settled it once and now the haters are trying to get some wiggle room to discriminate against us.
The Brookings Institution
Raquel Muñiz , Andrés Castro Samayoa, and Shane Dunn
December 1, 2025


Courts often issue decisions that, at first glance, might appear disconnected from education. Yet, these rulings frequently ripple through the educational landscape. The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Skrmetti (2025) is such a case. While the decision addressed Tennessee’s ban on certain medical treatments for transgender minors, its implications have broader reach.

In this piece, we consider what the Skrmetti decision could mean for students in America’s schools and institutions of higher education.

Skrmetti upheld SB1, a Tennessee law prohibiting certain gender-affirming care for transgender minors. The case hinged on whether SB1 prohibited the medical care for minors based on their “sex” or because they were transgender. If the Court found that SB1 prohibited access to care based on sex, then the Court would have applied a higher level of scrutiny and may have struck down the law. If the Court found that SB1 prohibited care based on transgender status, the Court would have to decide whether to apply heightened scrutiny. The Court held that SB1 did not prohibit the medical care based on sex or transgender status. Instead, the Court held that the law prohibited medical care based on “age” and “medical use.” Therefore, it applied the lowest level of scrutiny. This meant that Tennessee only had to show that it acted rationally in adopting SB1, and the Court held this much.
That is total BS... the Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins Supreme Court decision settled that question already!
The decision marks a departure from the Court’s recent trajectory on LGBTQ+ protections. For example, Skrmetti stands in tension with Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), where the Court held that “it is impossible to discriminate against a person for being transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex.” To be sure, that ruling was in the context of Title VII employment discrimination. But it remains unclear why the Court is willing to recognize sex-based discrimination protections for transgender individuals under Title VII but unwilling to entertain this logic under the Equal Protection Clause.
They are trying to unlink sex and gender. Back in 1989 the Supreme Court merged sex & gender. What the case was about a woman who didn't wear a skirt or high heels. Her boss at the accounting firm said to her that she would the job if she dressed, you know, a little more feminine, like wear a skirt and heels.
She sued.

The Supreme Court said that sex discrimination also includes stereotyping.
Discrimination against an employee on the basis of sex stereotyping--that is, a person's nonconformity to social or other expectations of that person's gender--constitutes impermissible sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Um... "a person's nonconformity to social or other expectations..." Um.. Us... the trans community!

The Republicans are trying to make us second-class citizens with no rights, to force us back into the closet!
School boards, superintendents, and principals now confront a legal landscape in which supportive practices—such as affirming names and pronouns, providing safe restroom access, and training staff—may be resisted by courts. Teachers, counselors, and social workers who are closest to students and most attuned to their needs face heightened risk for working to affirm transgender youth. Meanwhile, parents who love and affirm their children must now navigate a more hostile and confusing system that restricts their ability to secure care and support through schools.
Trump is using us the way other authoritarian leaders have targeted minority groups: antisemitic scapegoating in Nazi Germany, the targeting of Tutsis in Rwanda, the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, and Yugoslavia’s ethnic cleansing of Bosniaks, Croats, and Kosovar Albanians. He has learned from these examples.

Have we committed any crimes? No. Have we threatened anyone? No. Trump is attacking us over our identity. He is attempting to erase us by legally invalidating gender identity and restricting access to gender-affirming care. That mirrors tactics historically used by despots to marginalize and dehumanize vulnerable groups.

And now the Court may back up his campaign against us.

Monday, December 01, 2025

Birds of a Feather, Flock Together

The clouds of hanging over Trump and the Epstein Files of sexual escapades make you wonder about Trump's connection with Andrew Tate.

Who?


The controversial British-American influencer Andrew Tate has left Romania, where he was charged with rape, human trafficking and forming an organised crime group to sexually exploit women.

He and his brother are believed to be on a private jet heading to the US, sources told the BBC.

Tate was put under house arrest in Romania in August 2024 when prosecutors launched a second criminal investigation against himself and his brother Tristan, as well as four other suspects. They all deny wrongdoing.

Separately, the brothers are wanted in the UK to face allegations of sexual assault which they also deny.

The brothers have also been accused of tax evasion in the UK. A British court ruled in December 2024 that police could seize more than £2m ($2.4m) from them for failing to pay tax on £21m in revenue from their online businesses.

Andrew Tate said the ruling was "not justice" and called it a "co-ordinated attack".
He is not a nice guy besides ProPublica reports that,
Federal authorities were chided for seizing electronic devices from Tate and his brother, and told to return them, records and interviews show. Experts said the intervention was highly inappropriate.
by Robert Faturechi and Avi Asher-Schapiro
November 18, 2025


Online influencer Andrew Tate, a self-described misogynist who has millions of young male followers, was facing allegations of sex trafficking women in three countries when he and his brother left their home in Romania to visit the United States.

“The Tates will be free, Trump is the president. The good old days are back,” Tate posted on X before the trip in February — one of many times he has sung the president’s praises to his fans.

But when the Tate brothers arrived by private plane in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, they immediately found themselves in the crosshairs of law enforcement once more, as Customs and Border Protection officials seized their electronic devices.

This time, they had a powerful ally come to their aid. Behind the scenes, the White House intervened on their behalf.
Why did Trump step in? Is it because Tate knows things about Trump?
The incident is the latest in a string of law enforcement matters where the Trump White House has inserted itself to help friends and target foes. Since entering office for a second term, Trump has urged the Justice Department to go after elected officials who investigated him and his businesses, and he pardoned a string of political allies. Andrew Tate is one of the most prominent members of the so-called manosphere, a collection of influencers, podcasters and content creators who helped deliver young male voters to Trump. And news of the White House intervention on behalf of the accused sex traffickers comes as Trump is under fire over his ties to notorious child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his administration’s recent efforts to stop the public release of the so-called Epstein files.
While Newsweek reported...
U.S. officials initially broached the subject during a phone call with the Romanian government, advocating for the return of the Tates' passports and permission for them to travel while awaiting court proceedings, the FT reported.

This diplomatic effort was further amplified when Richard Grenell, President Donald Trump's U.S. envoy for special missions, met with Romanian Foreign Minister Emil Hurezeanu at the Munich Security Conference last week.
It seems like they are all running in the same circles... those who are sexual predators. USA Today said...
Ingrassia, who at the time was working as a White House liaison to the Department of Homeland Security, is alleged to have "chided" investigators for seizing the Tates’ property when they entered the United States last year. That request, Ingrassia claimed, came directly from the White House, according to the report.
You have to wonder why is Trump coming to his defense?  And this is all happening while Trump's Secretary of Defense is under investigation for war crimes!

I've Noticed Something

[Editorial]

You know what I noticed... all dictators are racists.

During WWII, Hitler was a racists. Imperial Japan was racists.

Authoritarian regimes use, ethno-nationalist and anti-immigrant rhetoric to solidify majority support.

Trumpism is racist. Trump uses ethno-nationalist and anti-immigrant rhetoric to energize his racist base.

Regime/Movement Ideology of Exclusion Racist
Hitler / Nazi Germany Biological Racism (anti-Semitism, Aryan supremacy). Strongest Example: Race was the fundamental and official organizing principle of the state's authoritarian power and violence.
Imperial Japan Ethnic/Cultural Supremacy(ultranationalism). Strong Example: Power justified by the superiority of the Yamato people and the divine nature of the Emperor, leading to the subjugation of other Asian ethnicities.
Trumpism Nativism, Ethno-Nationalism, & Anti-Immigrant Rhetoric. Contemporary Example: This movement is widely categorized as using a political variant of the far-right that employs rhetoric centered on national identity, fear of demographic change, and anti-immigrant policies, which mobilizes a base with high levels of racial resentment.
(Table is from Gemini)

[/Editorial]

The Best Government Money Can Buy.

We all know this, it is nothing that we already didn't know already but now it is so bold that it is not even being hidden. The corruption is out in the open. Taking campaign donations to pardon criminals... money talks and everyone gets a "Get Out of Jail" card. But it is not free, there is a price tag that comes with it.

The House Democrats released a statement back in June on the pardons,
Since his second term began, Donald Trump has pardoned or granted clemency to nearly 1,600 criminal offenders. Using publicly available court documents and reviewing the Office of  the Pardon Attorney’s website, the House Judiciary Committee’s Democratic staff estimates that President Trump’s pardons could deprive the pardoned offenders’ victims (and other survivors) of approximately $1.3 billion in restitution and fines owed to them and American taxpayers.1 President Trump’s corrupt pardons also risk depleting funding for the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) grants through the Crime Victims Fund as well as other victims’ compensation programs. 

Not only has President Trump issued an unprecedented number of pardons in his second term, he has used his clemency powers to take an estimated $1.3 billion away from victims and survivors of crime, allowing perpetrators to keep profiting from their crimes—a sharp break with established practice. The traditional standards used by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in evaluating clemency petitions require that the individual seeking a pardon “has accepted responsibility for his or her criminal conduct and made restitution to its victims” (emphasis added). A 2021 statistical analysis of 287 clemency petitions submitted to the Office of the Pardon Attorney found that none of the petitioners who still had outstanding restitution obligations received a pardon. Furthermore, a president always has the option of issuing a conditional pardon that requires the pardon applicant to pay all restitution in order to receive the full benefits of the pardon.
Trump is using not only pardons as his piggy bank but also,
The Christian Science Monitor
By Linda Feldmann
Nov. 25, 2025


When President Donald Trump pardoned billionaire Changpeng Zhao on Oct. 21, controversy surrounding the cryptocurrency mogul’s ties with the Trump family had already been swirling for months.

Mr. Zhao, founder and former chief executive of Binance – the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange – had served four months in prison in 2024, after pleading guilty to violating U.S. regulations against money laundering. The Binance platform had “accommodated criminals across the world,” according to then-Attorney General Merrick Garland.

After serving his time, Mr. Zhao would still benefit from a pardon, because of ongoing legal constraints on his business activities.

“No felon would mind a pardon,” he said in a March post on X, while also saying, “I have had no discussions of a Binance US deal” for a pardon.

But that same month, a different deal did happen: A sovereign wealth fund from the United Arab Emirates invested $2 billion in Binance, transferring the invested money in the form of a digital coin called USD1. It’s a product created and sold by the Trump family’s cryptocurrency firm, World Liberty Financial.
Cha-Ching! $$$$
On May 5, after the $2 billion Emirati investment deal occurred, two Democratic U.S. senators posted a letter to the acting director of the Office of Government Ethics, Jamieson Greer, outlining what they called a matter with “urgent ethics and national security implications,” involving “a crypto firm whose founder needs a pardon.”
But it is falling on deaf ears.

Almost six months after receiving a pardon from President Trump, the 26-year-old rapper YoungBoy Never Broke Again is on track to gross $70 million on a sold-out, cross-country tour.
Kind of makes you wonder...

Meanwhile Trump's cash machine is cranking out the money;
Of the $1.1 million his hotels and country clubs have collected from Republican candidates and committees this year, 80% is from entities Trump controls.
HuffPost
By S.V. Date
Nov 29, 2025


 Even as he leverages his presidency to make himself millions, perhaps even billions of dollars, Donald Trump is also funneling Republican donor money into his own cash registers through the political committees he controls.

In the 10 months since he retook office, the Republican National Committee has spent at least $796,513 at Trump’s hotels and country clubs, while MAGA Inc., Trump’s super PAC, has spent $60,733, according to a HuffPost analysis of Federal Election Commission data.

The figures are based on filings to date, with some committees providing updates only twice a year. The total number for 2025 will not be disclosed until the end of January 2026.

The combined $857,246 represents just under four-fifths of the $1.1 million that the Republican candidate and committees spent at his properties.

The RNC, for example, spent $193,145.70 on March 5 to hold an event at Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s country club and residence in Palm Beach, Florida. Two months later, on May 2, the committee spent $307,202.49 for an event at his golf resort in Doral, near Miami’s airport.
And it is all perfectly legal... even though he charges exorbitant rates to rent his properties!
In all, 73 different GOP candidates and committees sent money Trump’s way, from $45.20 from Wyoming congresswoman Harriett Hageman’s campaign to $1,461.13 by the Massachusetts Republican Party to the five- and six-figure sums spent by MAGA Inc. and the RNC.

Directing committees that he controlled, and encouraging Republican candidates he did not, to spend at his properties — thereby putting all profits into his own pockets — was a strategy he also used in his first term in office.
Trump is raking in the dough!

World's AIDS Day

On this World's AIDS day I asked ChatGPT AI to write about AIDS and the White House announcement...
When Disease Becomes Political: The Cost of Silence on HIV/AIDS

Diseases aren’t political, but the way governments respond to them is. When leaders ignore or minimize a public-health issue, the consequences go far beyond symbolism. The White House’s decision to no longer recognize World AIDS Day is a striking example of how political silence can fuel real harm.

HIV has long been tied to stigma, especially against LGBTQ+ communities. When the government pulls back from acknowledging the disease, it reinforces old myths — including the false idea that HIV is a “gay disease.” This feels especially painful given the history of neglect during the early AIDS crisis, when stigma cost thousands of lives.

Silence also reduces public awareness. Without official recognition of World AIDS Day, fewer people are reminded to get tested or learn the facts. Undiagnosed HIV spreads more easily, often because people don’t realize they’re at risk. Awareness isn’t symbolic; it’s a prevention tool.

Stigma grows, too. People who fear judgment are less likely to seek testing or treatment. People outside LGBTQ+ communities may falsely believe they’re immune. Both of these patterns help the virus spread.

The effects extend globally. U.S. leadership has long shaped international HIV treatment and prevention. When the government seems to withdraw from even symbolic recognition, it raises fears of weakening support, which could disrupt lifesaving programs worldwide.

HIV is a virus we have the tools to control. What threatens progress isn’t biology — it’s silence, stigma, and political choices. When the White House no longer recognizes World AIDS Day, the virus gains ground. Public-health neglect doesn’t stay symbolic; it becomes deadly
What I did was give the AI a little guideline World AIDs, the White House, and the effects of that action of not recognizing World's AIDS Day anymore, told it to write an essay on the two and this is what it came up with.