I cannot understand why, but there are conservative trans people and they still are trans even though they are conservatives.
So far this legislation section something like over 20 bills have been introduced by state Republicans legislators that makes it illegal for us to pee, or to make it legal to discriminate against us.
Some say that they are conservatives because they want less government intrusion in their lives, but the Republicans are creating a major intrusion in our lives by trying to ban where we pee, by allowing people to refuse to service us in restaurants and other public accommodations, they want to deny housing for us or employment. To me this seems like government intrusion in my life.
So the only reason that I can think of why trans people ignore the bigotry and hate of the Republican Party is financial… they care more about their pocketbooks than their freedom.
The bottom line; there is no requirement for trans people to be liberal, but at the same time we do not have to like them.
The Republican Party of the 50s is no longer, it has been replaced by a radical right-wing that wants to tear the U.S.. It is a party of hate and bigotry. It is a party happier backing Russia than the Constitution.
A Brief Conversation With a Transgender Conservative at CPACI can’t understand how they can support an organization that wants to deny our existence. I can’t understand how they can support an organization that wants to criminalize us.
Slate
By Ostia Nwanevu
February 24, 2018
What has the conference been like for you?
We did something similar last year where we had only two of us. This year, we had four people here who are openly transgender, trying to advocate for the greater LGBTQ community. This year is different because the support we got last year was kind of like, “Oh my God, this is amazing. I’ve never seen a trans person before.” So this year, it’s been more thoughtful. People coming up to hug us, whereas last year, it was more like fist bumps, that type of thing. Questions, but also more people coming to express support. “I’m glad you’re here, because I’m not homophobic.” Or: “I’m not a transphobic person.” We’ve gotten a few more of the older generation give us dirty looks, more than that. But people argued with us. I had one woman, a lawyer from England, try to convince me that the threat of medical care discrimination doesn’t exist, which is totally bogus, of course. So you end up in some intellectual discussions. But overall, the response has been great. And the fact that CPAC hasn’t come down on us for doing this. What we’re trying to do is start a conversation with people and dispel the myths.
Ben Shapiro was a very well-received speaker yesterday—
Yeah, unfortunately.
—and one of his applause lines is always “Men are men and women are women,” or something to that effect. I was downstairs at the CPAC Hub yesterday and they were giving out coloring books making fun of liberals and the trans bathroom issue. But you think people have been pretty positive nevertheless.
Oh, absolutely. Ben Shapiro is going to say what he says in his speech. Moreso guys than women are going to hoot and holler and think it’s funny. But if we’re not out here doing this, we can’t refute what he’s saying with the truth—our authenticity and existence. But the reaction’s been great. I mean, I literally had a veteran who was in a wheelchair come over to us and essentially thank us for exhibiting our free speech that he fought for. And said, “I may not understand y’all, but I’m so glad you’re doing this.” It was hard not to start tearing up, I’ve got to tell you. It was really cool.
So far this legislation section something like over 20 bills have been introduced by state Republicans legislators that makes it illegal for us to pee, or to make it legal to discriminate against us.
The people who are among those doing the most to push trans rights have been politically correct college students on the left who have gotten a lot of flak from the main stage. What do you think about campus politics and political correctness, broadly speaking?There is a difference between “free speech” and “hate speech” and the Supreme Court has recognized the difference… the First Amendment is not absolute!
I think we lose when we confine free speech and when we shut people down. Because when we do that, we show that we can’t take criticism, even if it’s not based on anything, or if it’s wrong. But also, when we do that, we shut down our own voices. Rather than scream at someone on the stage, if they take questions, politely, correctly, succinctly, eloquently ask that question that they can’t answer, which is, “Prove it. Prove that I am not real, prove that my love for someone of the same sex or gender isn’t the same as your love.” And they can’t. But we inhibit ourselves when we shut down anybody else’s free speech.
6 Surprising Exceptions to Freedom of SpeechYou got that? “…Finally, you can’t knowingly say things that cause severe emotional distress…” so those speakers who come to campuses that talk hate and still up unrest on campuses cannot claim “First Amendment rights.”
Saturday Evening Post
By: Jeff Nilsson
Published: March 21, 2017
Although the First Amendment to the Constitution states, “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech,” Americans don’t have the luxury of always saying whatever they want. Your right to free speech is limited by where you are, what you say, and how you say it.
Here are six areas where your talk can make you liable in criminal or civil court.
[…]
3. Violence
You can’t make offensive remarks or personal insults that would immediately lead to a fight. You also can’t threaten violence to a specific person unless you’re making an obvious exaggeration (for instance, “I’m going to kill my opponent at the polls”). Finally, you can’t knowingly say things that cause severe emotional distress or incite others to “immediate lawless action.”
In 1951, the Supreme Court concluded in Dennis v. United States that the First Amendment doesn’t protect the speech of people plotting to overthrow the government.
Some say that they are conservatives because they want less government intrusion in their lives, but the Republicans are creating a major intrusion in our lives by trying to ban where we pee, by allowing people to refuse to service us in restaurants and other public accommodations, they want to deny housing for us or employment. To me this seems like government intrusion in my life.
So the only reason that I can think of why trans people ignore the bigotry and hate of the Republican Party is financial… they care more about their pocketbooks than their freedom.
The bottom line; there is no requirement for trans people to be liberal, but at the same time we do not have to like them.
The Republican Party of the 50s is no longer, it has been replaced by a radical right-wing that wants to tear the U.S.. It is a party of hate and bigotry. It is a party happier backing Russia than the Constitution.
OpinionsIf this is what conservatism has become, count me outThose who still believe in the Republican Party of the 50s are living a in a dream.
Washington Post
By Max Boot
February 25, 2018
I’m used to being vilified by the far left as a bloodthirsty neocon warmonger for the Original Sin of having supported the invasion of Iraq along with 72 percent of the American public. It has been a little more surprising to be simultaneously vilified by the far right as a dangerous left-winger.
David Horowitz’s FrontPage magazine accused me of going “full leftist” for acknowledging that racism and sexism remain pervasive problems. Breitbart called me, with ironic quotation marks, the “Washington Post’s ostensibly new ‘conservative’ columnist,” because, among other sins, I support gun control and immigration. American Greatness wrote that I am a “soulless, craven opportunist” whose “brain is broken,” because I compared President Trump’s indifference to the 2016 Russian election assault to a president ignoring 9/11. For the same offense, Jack Posobiec — an Internet troll notorious for pushing the theory that Hillary Clinton was running a child-sex ring out of a Washington pizza parlor — said I was “sick” and a “Russian propagandist.” In the Orwellian language of the far right, someone who wants to combat Russian aggression is a “Russian propagandist,” whereas someone who echoes Russian propaganda is putting “America first.”
In the past I would have been indignant at such attacks and eager to assert my conservative credentials. I spent years writing for conservative publications such as the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Commentary magazine and working as a foreign policy adviser for three Republican presidential campaigns. Being conservative used to be central to my identity. But now, frankly, I don’t give a damn. I prefer to think of myself as a classical liberal, because “conservative” has become practically synonymous with “Trump lackey.”
[…]
Principled conservativism continues to exist, primarily at small journals of opinion, but it is increasingly disconnected from the stuff that thrills the masses. I remember as a high school student in the 1980s attending a lecture at UCLA by William F. Buckley Jr. I was dazzled by his erudition, wit and oratorical skill. Today, young conservatives flock to the boorish and racist performance art of Milo Yiannopoulos and Ann Coulter. The Conservative Political Action Conference couldn’t find room for critics of Trump, save for the brave and booed Mona Charen, but it did showcase French fascist scion Marion MarĂ©chal-Le Pen.
No comments:
Post a Comment