Thursday, December 04, 2025

A Set Up?

Was that what it was... a "Set Up?"

In Oklahoma students seems to have set their professor up for a lawsuit.
Although the student did not properly complete the assignment to academic standards, the university is investigating the teacher.
The Advocate
By Christopher Wiggins
December 02 2025 


The University of Oklahoma has placed a trans graduate instructor on administrative leave after a student received a zero on a psychology assignment that described transgender people as “demonic” and asserted that gender roles are “Biblically ordained.” The dispute has quickly escalated into a statewide political flashpoint.

The controversy began when junior Samantha Fulnecky submitted a 650-word reaction paper for a course on how social expectations shape gender. Instead of addressing the assignment’s questions using data, her essay claimed society is “pushing lies” about gender, warned that eliminating strict gender roles would be harmful, and described transgender identities as “demonic,” Them reports.
He wasn't the only one to review the paper...
A second instructor, Megan Waldron, independently reviewed the paper and agreed that it did not satisfy the assignment prompt or basic academic writing expectations.
Now tell does that sound like a set-up? The class is...
Course Name: PSY 2603 - Lifespan Development (A course in the Department of Psychology)
Course Description: A survey of psychological changes... changes in cognitive, social, emotional, and physiological development from conception to death will be included.
Assignment Type: Reaction essay to a scholarly article (on gender typicality, peer relations, and mental health).
"...scholarly article..." Did you catch that? A "...scholarly article..." but what the student turned in was a a diatribe a religious dogma.

The New York Post reported that,
The psychology course’s professor, graduate student Mel Curth, who uses “she/they” pronouns, failed Fulnecky on the grounds that she neglected to address the prompt and relied more on “personal ideology” than “empirical evidence,” according to a bombshell thread shared by the university’s Turning Point USA chapter.

In her essay, which was supposed to cover “how people are perceived based on societal expectations of gender,” University of Oklahoma student Samantha Fulnecky presented a biblically fueled tirade against the notion that there are multiple genders.

The psychology course’s professor, graduate student Mel Curth, who uses “she/they” pronouns, failed Fulnecky on the grounds that she neglected to address the prompt and relied more on “personal ideology” than “empirical evidence,” according to a bombshell thread shared by the university’s Turning Point USA chapter.

In the essay, Fulnecky repeats ad nauseam that she doesn’t take issue with gender stereotypes because “that is how God made us.” However, she neglected to cite the article she was responding to, save for a vague reference to “teasing as a way to enforce gender norms.”

The psychology course’s professor, graduate student Mel Curth, who uses “she/they” pronouns, failed Fulnecky on the grounds that she neglected to address the prompt and relied more on “personal ideology” than “empirical evidence,” according to a bombshell thread shared by the university’s Turning Point USA chapter.

In the essay, Fulnecky repeats ad nauseam that she doesn’t take issue with gender stereotypes because “that is how God made us.” However, she neglected to cite the article she was responding to, save for a vague reference to “teasing as a way to enforce gender norms.”
And here is the kicker... Them writes,
Turning Point’s posts about Fulnecky and Curth sparked a firestorm on social media over the weekend, as some conservatives — including Fulnecky’s mother — admitted they were targeting Curth because she is trans. Turning Point’s original post about Curth accused her of being “mentally ill.”

“Individuals who identify as trans should be automatically disqualified from holding any position as teacher or professor,” wrote Canadian anti-trans activist Chris Elston, aka “Billboard Chris,” on X last week; “Agreed! Proud of my daughter!” wrote Kristi Fulnecky, Samantha’s mother, in a reply. (Fulnecky is an attorney who previously represented January 6th rioter Christopher Joseph Quaglin.) Oklahoma state Rep. Gabe Woolley, a Republican who calls himself a “former member of the LGBTQ community,” similarly called for Curth to be barred from higher education and repeatedly misgendered her in a series of X posts last week.
Pink News reported...
Trans graduate assistant Mel Curth has been removed from her position at the University of Oklahoma after a Christian student complained a failing grade she received in a psychology essay – because she cited the Bible rather than empirical evidence – was a violation of her right to free speech.
By Sophie Perry
Dec. 2, 2025


As first reported by The Oklahoman in November, junior Samantha Fulnecky said she was asked to write a 650-word essay reacting to an article about how people are perceived based on societal expectations of gender.

Fulnecky said in her essay that traditional gender roles should not be seen as stereotypes and cited the Bible as evidence, stating that removing the concept of gender from society would be “detrimental” because it would put people “farther from God’s original plan for humans”.

[...]

In her feedback to the assignment – screenshots of which were shared by the university’s chapter of Turning Point USA on X in a post that derided Curth – the graduate assistant explicitly told Fulnecky she was “not deducting points because you have certain beliefs” but because her work “does not answer the questions for this assignment, contradicts itself, heavily uses personal ideology over empirical evidence in a scientific class, and is at times offensive”.
Once again... no references!
Fulnecky’s mother, Kristi Fulnecky – who has defended those involved in the 6 January Capitol riot in court – agreed, writing: “Agreed! Proud of my daughter!”
Her mother is a lawyer who has worked on anti-trans cases and other right-wing cases!

Does this seem like a set-up?

Mini-Post: Even With All The Laws...

They still discriminate!
ABC 10 News San Diego
By: Austin Grabish
Dec 03, 2025


The Grossmont Union High School District has agreed to pay $1.2 million to a former employee who filed a lawsuit last year alleging she was harassed for opposing the board's "anti-LGBTQ agenda."

Rose Tagnesi worked for the district for over 28 years and claims her boss told her to keep a "low profile" because if board members found out she was gay, they wouldn't approve a promotion for her.

In 2024, Team 10 reported the former special education director alleged in court documents that a board trustee referred to Tagnesi and another school employee as "witches" who were part of an "LGBTQ coven."

[...]

Collin McGlashen, a spokesperson for the Grossmont Union High School District, provided the following statement to ABC 10News:

 “The purpose of a settlement like this is to allow all parties to move forward in the most productive way possible. The agreement clearly states that it does not represent an admission of wrongdoing by the District or a validation of the claims made in the lawsuit.”
Yeah but... they paid out $1.2 million! But they didn't do nothing wrong... yeah right! They are as innocent as a new born baby!


Wednesday, December 03, 2025

Release The Files!

Notice the plural.

Not Trump want to block another release of files about him!
Trump’s request is a break from the Justice Department’s handling of all special counsel reports in recent decades.
Politico
By Kyle Cheney
12/02/2025


President Donald Trump argued Tuesday that former special counsel Jack Smith’s final report — chronicling the criminal case against him for hoarding classified documents at Mar-a-Lago — should never be made public.

Trump urged U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon in a new court filing to extend her 11-month-old order blocking the Justice Department from releasing the full report, which Smith submitted shortly before Trump’s second inauguration.

Anything less, his attorney Kendra Wharton wrote, would “perpetuate Jack Smith’s unlawful criminal investigations and proceedings.” 
What is he hiding?
Trump’s move is his first direct request of Cannon — a judge he appointed at the end of his first term — since taking office. And the filing came from his personal lawyer rather than Justice Department officials, who weighed in separately Monday. The filing is infused with the typical disdain Trump has expressed for his former prosecutors, labeling Smith a “so-called special counsel” and saying the case was “marred by numerous deficiencies and repeated abuses of office.”
Do you think that the judge might be biased?
 
 
And Jack Smith’s final report!
 

The Fog Of War!

Bull! They knew what they were doing when they ordered the second strike!
AP News
By  KONSTANTIN TOROPIN
December 2, 2025


 Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday cited the “fog of war” in defending a follow-up strike on an alleged drug-carrying boat in the Caribbean Sea in early September.

During a Cabinet meeting at the White House, Hegseth said he did not see any survivors in the water, saying the vessel “exploded in fire, smoke, you can’t see anything. ... This is called the fog of war.”

Hegseth also said he “didn’t stick around” for the remainder of the Sept. 2 mission following the initial strike and the admiral in charge “made the right call” in ordering the second hit, which he “had complete authority to do.”

Lawmakers have opened investigations following a Washington Post report that Hegseth issued a verbal order to “kill everybody” on the boat, the first vessel hit in the Trump administration’s counterdrug campaign in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific Ocean that has grown to over 20 known strikes and more than 80 dead.
The "fog of war " had plenty of time to clear!
While several legal experts have told The Associated Press they believed the second strike violated peacetime laws and those governing armed conflict, the Pentagon’s own manual on the laws of armed conflict also specifically cites striking survivors of a sunken ship as being patently illegal.
The Guardian reported that from one to two hours were between the first strike and the second strike! There was no "fog of war" this was premeditated. 
He said that he “watched that first strike” but ultimately did not “stick around for the hour or two hours” after. “So I moved on to my next meeting,” the defense secretary said. “A couple of hours later, I learned that that commander had made the which he had the complete authority to do.” Hegseth went on to say that decorated US Navy admiral Frank Bradley made the “right call” as he described the unfolding events to reporters.
I see two courts-martial in the future. If the Democrats take control of Congress.

Mini-Post: I Would Add To That...

Researching my afternoon's posts I came across this on the Army webpage...
Warrior Ethos

I will always place the mission first.
I will never accept defeat.
I will never quit.
I will never leave a fallen comrade.

I would add first that something that Hegseth has forgotten... "I will always obey only lawful orders."
 

Maine Is Getting Tough

Maine is cracking down on discrimination against us... and it will lead right to the Supreme Court!
Bangor Daily News
by Daniel O'Connor
December 2, 2025


School boards that have bucked Maine’s legal protections for transgender students are making quick decisions after a Maine regulator filed a lawsuit against five of them last month.

After news of the suit from the state’s Human Rights Commission broke last month, at least two school boards are set to discuss their next steps. One could move as soon as this week to overturn its policy and adhere to state law. Other districts in conservative areas of the state could dig in for the battle ahead.

The scrambling school districts are responding to only one layer in a complex legal battle. President Donald Trump’s administration has sued Maine and other states with similar protections in their civil rights law, but a pair of cases in front of the U.S. Supreme Court are already in motion and could have large effects on the wrangling here.
Trump has embolden the conservative towns in Manie to buck the state law!
The debate centers on Title IX, which bars sex discrimination by schools receiving federal money. Trump, a Republican, says that law protects single-sex sports and spaces without regard to gender identity, and that transgender students ought to participate only alongside those sharing their birth sex or on co-ed teams.

Maine law considers such a ban illegal discrimination, which has led the federal government to sue the state. That court fight is not likely to render a decision until late in 2026. The Supreme Court cases out of Idaho and West Virginia could be decided sooner.

In January, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., a pair of cases dealing specifically with whether bans on allowing transgender athletes on sports teams that align with their gender identities violate Title IX and the Constitution.
The showdown is set. Our very existence will depend how nine people rule.
The state has weighed in on the Supreme Court cases alongside several other Democratic-led states. Attorney General Aaron Frey signed onto an amicus brief alongside 15 other attorneys general last month. Frey’s office declined to comment on the brief.


“Allowing transgender girls and women to participate in girls’ and women’s sports promotes inclusive school environments that benefit all, and does not compromise fairness or reduce opportunities for cisgender students,” the brief said.
The bottom line for the Republicans is that they think being LGBTQ+ is a choice, suggesting that one might deliberately choose discrimination, violence, and even death: "Gee, I think that I will be gay, so I can be discriminated against, beaten up, and killed—that sounds like so much fun!" Clearly, they do not believe that being LGBTQ+ is an inborn characteristic.

This perspective, which fuels the modern Republican party's stance on LGBTQ+ issues, seems to be an attempt to return to a past era—one characterized by stricter social codes, like those evoked by "Father Knows Best," and the existence of segregation and anti-gay laws. This is a common and accurate description of the current political dynamic.

Ultimately, this conflict is at the heart of the debate surrounding LGBTQ+ issues, especially transgender rights. The Republicans systematically reject the scientific and medical consensus in favor of a worldview rooted in traditional religious and conservative moral dogma.
All but one person spoke out in defense of transgender rights. The lone dissenter was not a town resident.
Midcoast Villager
By Stephen Betts
Nov 20, 2025


Parents, grandparents, and students turned out to speak up for the rights of transgender students during a School Board meeting Wednesday night, Nov. 19, amidst a controversy over a third-grade student whom some parents want to ban from sports.

All but one person spoke out in defense of transgender rights. The lone dissenter was a resident of South Thomaston, not St. George. 

The outpouring came after weeks of controversy in the small town of about 2,600 after several parents told the Select Board they do not want a student, who was identified as male at birth but now identifies as female, playing on a girls third and fourth grade basketball team. A petition to bar transgender students from youth sports has been circulating online as well. The petition also called for eliminating the school's civil rights team, banning books that deal with gender issues in ways deemed inappropriate and for restricting certain flags, such as the LGBT rainbow flags. No such petition has yet been presented to the school district.
The people are behind us!

The Supreme Court cases Little v. Hecox (challenging Idaho's "Fairness in Women's Sports Act") and West Virginia v. B.P.J. (challenging West Virginia's "Save Women's Sports Act") they will be decisive to our human rights. The conflict boils down to inclusive vs. exclusive.

The Republican view is that sex is only the external characteristics at birth. They don’t look at other factors… like chromosomes, Alpha-5-reductase deficiency, AIS or any other medical condition. And the Republican view totally ignores intersex people when they say that there are only two genders.

While the states look at Title IX as being inclusive. That being trans is an "innate characteristic" that is a quality or trait that is present from birth, meaning it is inborn, natural, and not learned. 



Tuesday, December 02, 2025

Have You Noticed That...

With Trump it is always someone else's fault, it is never his! So when a judge rules against him it must be a fault of the judge. So a lesbian judge on a trans case must be biased... you know the whole alphabet thing, you know LGBT. Don't they all stick together?

A court official has dismissed a Justice Department complaint that accused a federal judge of “hostile and egregious” misconduct during hearings for a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s ban on transgender troops serving in the military.

The complaint accused U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes in Washington, D.C., of inappropriately questioning a government lawyer about his religious beliefs and of trying to embarrass the attorney with a rhetorical exercise during a February hearing.

In a Sept 29 order that wasn’t made public until Monday, Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed the complaint. Srinivasan said a motion for Reyes’ recusal would have been the proper means for the Justice Department to contest her impartiality and seek her removal from the case.

Because she is a lesbian they don't think she should have the case. Hmm... I wonder if they feel the same way when a question on "religious freedom" comes up and not having a Christian hear the case?

The website Law Dork writes...
On Friday evening, Bloomberg News’s Erik Larson and Zoe Tillman reported that Chad Mizelle had filed a judicial complaint with the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit accusing U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes of “hostile and egregious misconduct“ during the two-day hearing over the constitutionality of President Donald Trump’s anti-transgender military executive order.

[...]

The extremely weak grounds for Mizelle’s complaint are discussed at length below, but, broadly speaking, this is a clear effort to “work the refs” that should be quickly shut down as unjustified and inappropriate. It is, first, an attempt to undermine the credibility and eventual ruling from the district court judge in the case. Second, it is an effort to begin arguing the merits of the case to the chief judge of the D.C. Circuit.

Beyond that, though, Mizelle’s complaint could send a significantly more chilling message about judicial independence to judges in more right-leaning circuits — making Srinivasan’s response here all the more important.

[...]

Another part that Mizelle ignored — and perhaps more central to this complaint — is that Reyes raised the email in reference to the outside animosity that has been sent her way due to her role as the judge on the case. These directed attacks on Reyes have included Fox News’s Laura Ingraham accusing Reyes of bias because she is a lesbian hearing a case over one of Trump’s anti-transgender orders.
You know the Republicans think of us as a one large monolithic block,
Another part that Mizelle ignored — and perhaps more central to this complaint — is that Reyes raised the email in reference to the outside animosity that has been sent her way due to her role as the judge on the case. These directed attacks on Reyes have included Fox News’s Laura Ingraham accusing Reyes of bias because she is a lesbian hearing a case over one of Trump’s anti-transgender orders.
The Republicans just think that we are all alike, hopping from one bed to another and bring hyper-masculine they can't even wrap their heads around us, why anyone would give up male privilege is beyond them. 

Meanwhile the Advocate writes,
Reyes, a lesbian and an immigrant from Uruguay, is hearing a case known as Talbott v. Trump, filed by six active-duty trans service members and two people who want to enlist. They are represented by GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders (GLAD Law) and the National Center for Lesbian Rights. The suit was filed January 28 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to challenge Donald Trump’s anti-trans executive order, now being implemented by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. A second lawsuit has been filed against the military policy as well.
The lawyer from GLAD also help us and the other New England states pass their non-discrimination laws.
“You and I both agree that the greatest fighting force that world history has ever seen is not going to be impacted in any way by less than 1 percent of the soldiers using a different pronoun than others might want to call them. Would you agree with that?” Reyes asked Lynch, who responded, “No, Your Honor, I’m not. I can’t agree with that.” She also challenged GLAD Law attorney Jennifer Levi about whether discharging this small number of troops would harm readiness.

[...]

She said of Trump’s “two genders” executive order, the basis for his other anti-trans actions, “There are people who are neither male nor female, and so the premise of the executive order is just incorrect.” These actions are motivated by “unadulterated animus,” she said.
They know that they are losing... so they are fighting dirty. Or rather dirtier than usual.

You never truly appreciate your rights until a judge has to rule on your existence!

This Is Bull!

We are not a matter of semantics.

It is a human right!

The Supreme Court settled it once and now the haters are trying to get some wiggle room to discriminate against us.
The Brookings Institution
Raquel Muñiz , Andrés Castro Samayoa, and Shane Dunn
December 1, 2025


Courts often issue decisions that, at first glance, might appear disconnected from education. Yet, these rulings frequently ripple through the educational landscape. The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Skrmetti (2025) is such a case. While the decision addressed Tennessee’s ban on certain medical treatments for transgender minors, its implications have broader reach.

In this piece, we consider what the Skrmetti decision could mean for students in America’s schools and institutions of higher education.

Skrmetti upheld SB1, a Tennessee law prohibiting certain gender-affirming care for transgender minors. The case hinged on whether SB1 prohibited the medical care for minors based on their “sex” or because they were transgender. If the Court found that SB1 prohibited access to care based on sex, then the Court would have applied a higher level of scrutiny and may have struck down the law. If the Court found that SB1 prohibited care based on transgender status, the Court would have to decide whether to apply heightened scrutiny. The Court held that SB1 did not prohibit the medical care based on sex or transgender status. Instead, the Court held that the law prohibited medical care based on “age” and “medical use.” Therefore, it applied the lowest level of scrutiny. This meant that Tennessee only had to show that it acted rationally in adopting SB1, and the Court held this much.
That is total BS... the Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins Supreme Court decision settled that question already!
The decision marks a departure from the Court’s recent trajectory on LGBTQ+ protections. For example, Skrmetti stands in tension with Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), where the Court held that “it is impossible to discriminate against a person for being transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex.” To be sure, that ruling was in the context of Title VII employment discrimination. But it remains unclear why the Court is willing to recognize sex-based discrimination protections for transgender individuals under Title VII but unwilling to entertain this logic under the Equal Protection Clause.
They are trying to unlink sex and gender. Back in 1989 the Supreme Court merged sex & gender. What the case was about a woman who didn't wear a skirt or high heels. Her boss at the accounting firm said to her that she would the job if she dressed, you know, a little more feminine, like wear a skirt and heels.
She sued.

The Supreme Court said that sex discrimination also includes stereotyping.
Discrimination against an employee on the basis of sex stereotyping--that is, a person's nonconformity to social or other expectations of that person's gender--constitutes impermissible sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Um... "a person's nonconformity to social or other expectations..." Um.. Us... the trans community!

The Republicans are trying to make us second-class citizens with no rights, to force us back into the closet!
School boards, superintendents, and principals now confront a legal landscape in which supportive practices—such as affirming names and pronouns, providing safe restroom access, and training staff—may be resisted by courts. Teachers, counselors, and social workers who are closest to students and most attuned to their needs face heightened risk for working to affirm transgender youth. Meanwhile, parents who love and affirm their children must now navigate a more hostile and confusing system that restricts their ability to secure care and support through schools.
Trump is using us the way other authoritarian leaders have targeted minority groups: antisemitic scapegoating in Nazi Germany, the targeting of Tutsis in Rwanda, the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, and Yugoslavia’s ethnic cleansing of Bosniaks, Croats, and Kosovar Albanians. He has learned from these examples.

Have we committed any crimes? No. Have we threatened anyone? No. Trump is attacking us over our identity. He is attempting to erase us by legally invalidating gender identity and restricting access to gender-affirming care. That mirrors tactics historically used by despots to marginalize and dehumanize vulnerable groups.

And now the Court may back up his campaign against us.

Monday, December 01, 2025

Birds of a Feather, Flock Together

The clouds of hanging over Trump and the Epstein Files of sexual escapades make you wonder about Trump's connection with Andrew Tate.

Who?


The controversial British-American influencer Andrew Tate has left Romania, where he was charged with rape, human trafficking and forming an organised crime group to sexually exploit women.

He and his brother are believed to be on a private jet heading to the US, sources told the BBC.

Tate was put under house arrest in Romania in August 2024 when prosecutors launched a second criminal investigation against himself and his brother Tristan, as well as four other suspects. They all deny wrongdoing.

Separately, the brothers are wanted in the UK to face allegations of sexual assault which they also deny.

The brothers have also been accused of tax evasion in the UK. A British court ruled in December 2024 that police could seize more than £2m ($2.4m) from them for failing to pay tax on £21m in revenue from their online businesses.

Andrew Tate said the ruling was "not justice" and called it a "co-ordinated attack".
He is not a nice guy besides ProPublica reports that,
Federal authorities were chided for seizing electronic devices from Tate and his brother, and told to return them, records and interviews show. Experts said the intervention was highly inappropriate.
by Robert Faturechi and Avi Asher-Schapiro
November 18, 2025


Online influencer Andrew Tate, a self-described misogynist who has millions of young male followers, was facing allegations of sex trafficking women in three countries when he and his brother left their home in Romania to visit the United States.

“The Tates will be free, Trump is the president. The good old days are back,” Tate posted on X before the trip in February — one of many times he has sung the president’s praises to his fans.

But when the Tate brothers arrived by private plane in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, they immediately found themselves in the crosshairs of law enforcement once more, as Customs and Border Protection officials seized their electronic devices.

This time, they had a powerful ally come to their aid. Behind the scenes, the White House intervened on their behalf.
Why did Trump step in? Is it because Tate knows things about Trump?
The incident is the latest in a string of law enforcement matters where the Trump White House has inserted itself to help friends and target foes. Since entering office for a second term, Trump has urged the Justice Department to go after elected officials who investigated him and his businesses, and he pardoned a string of political allies. Andrew Tate is one of the most prominent members of the so-called manosphere, a collection of influencers, podcasters and content creators who helped deliver young male voters to Trump. And news of the White House intervention on behalf of the accused sex traffickers comes as Trump is under fire over his ties to notorious child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his administration’s recent efforts to stop the public release of the so-called Epstein files.
While Newsweek reported...
U.S. officials initially broached the subject during a phone call with the Romanian government, advocating for the return of the Tates' passports and permission for them to travel while awaiting court proceedings, the FT reported.

This diplomatic effort was further amplified when Richard Grenell, President Donald Trump's U.S. envoy for special missions, met with Romanian Foreign Minister Emil Hurezeanu at the Munich Security Conference last week.
It seems like they are all running in the same circles... those who are sexual predators. USA Today said...
Ingrassia, who at the time was working as a White House liaison to the Department of Homeland Security, is alleged to have "chided" investigators for seizing the Tates’ property when they entered the United States last year. That request, Ingrassia claimed, came directly from the White House, according to the report.
You have to wonder why is Trump coming to his defense?  And this is all happening while Trump's Secretary of Defense is under investigation for war crimes!

I've Noticed Something

[Editorial]

You know what I noticed... all dictators are racists.

During WWII, Hitler was a racists. Imperial Japan was racists.

Authoritarian regimes use, ethno-nationalist and anti-immigrant rhetoric to solidify majority support.

Trumpism is racist. Trump uses ethno-nationalist and anti-immigrant rhetoric to energize his racist base.

Regime/Movement Ideology of Exclusion Racist
Hitler / Nazi Germany Biological Racism (anti-Semitism, Aryan supremacy). Strongest Example: Race was the fundamental and official organizing principle of the state's authoritarian power and violence.
Imperial Japan Ethnic/Cultural Supremacy(ultranationalism). Strong Example: Power justified by the superiority of the Yamato people and the divine nature of the Emperor, leading to the subjugation of other Asian ethnicities.
Trumpism Nativism, Ethno-Nationalism, & Anti-Immigrant Rhetoric. Contemporary Example: This movement is widely categorized as using a political variant of the far-right that employs rhetoric centered on national identity, fear of demographic change, and anti-immigrant policies, which mobilizes a base with high levels of racial resentment.
(Table is from Gemini)

[/Editorial]

The Best Government Money Can Buy.

We all know this, it is nothing that we already didn't know already but now it is so bold that it is not even being hidden. The corruption is out in the open. Taking campaign donations to pardon criminals... money talks and everyone gets a "Get Out of Jail" card. But it is not free, there is a price tag that comes with it.

The House Democrats released a statement back in June on the pardons,
Since his second term began, Donald Trump has pardoned or granted clemency to nearly 1,600 criminal offenders. Using publicly available court documents and reviewing the Office of  the Pardon Attorney’s website, the House Judiciary Committee’s Democratic staff estimates that President Trump’s pardons could deprive the pardoned offenders’ victims (and other survivors) of approximately $1.3 billion in restitution and fines owed to them and American taxpayers.1 President Trump’s corrupt pardons also risk depleting funding for the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) grants through the Crime Victims Fund as well as other victims’ compensation programs. 

Not only has President Trump issued an unprecedented number of pardons in his second term, he has used his clemency powers to take an estimated $1.3 billion away from victims and survivors of crime, allowing perpetrators to keep profiting from their crimes—a sharp break with established practice. The traditional standards used by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in evaluating clemency petitions require that the individual seeking a pardon “has accepted responsibility for his or her criminal conduct and made restitution to its victims” (emphasis added). A 2021 statistical analysis of 287 clemency petitions submitted to the Office of the Pardon Attorney found that none of the petitioners who still had outstanding restitution obligations received a pardon. Furthermore, a president always has the option of issuing a conditional pardon that requires the pardon applicant to pay all restitution in order to receive the full benefits of the pardon.
Trump is using not only pardons as his piggy bank but also,
The Christian Science Monitor
By Linda Feldmann
Nov. 25, 2025


When President Donald Trump pardoned billionaire Changpeng Zhao on Oct. 21, controversy surrounding the cryptocurrency mogul’s ties with the Trump family had already been swirling for months.

Mr. Zhao, founder and former chief executive of Binance – the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange – had served four months in prison in 2024, after pleading guilty to violating U.S. regulations against money laundering. The Binance platform had “accommodated criminals across the world,” according to then-Attorney General Merrick Garland.

After serving his time, Mr. Zhao would still benefit from a pardon, because of ongoing legal constraints on his business activities.

“No felon would mind a pardon,” he said in a March post on X, while also saying, “I have had no discussions of a Binance US deal” for a pardon.

But that same month, a different deal did happen: A sovereign wealth fund from the United Arab Emirates invested $2 billion in Binance, transferring the invested money in the form of a digital coin called USD1. It’s a product created and sold by the Trump family’s cryptocurrency firm, World Liberty Financial.
Cha-Ching! $$$$
On May 5, after the $2 billion Emirati investment deal occurred, two Democratic U.S. senators posted a letter to the acting director of the Office of Government Ethics, Jamieson Greer, outlining what they called a matter with “urgent ethics and national security implications,” involving “a crypto firm whose founder needs a pardon.”
But it is falling on deaf ears.

Almost six months after receiving a pardon from President Trump, the 26-year-old rapper YoungBoy Never Broke Again is on track to gross $70 million on a sold-out, cross-country tour.
Kind of makes you wonder...

Meanwhile Trump's cash machine is cranking out the money;
Of the $1.1 million his hotels and country clubs have collected from Republican candidates and committees this year, 80% is from entities Trump controls.
HuffPost
By S.V. Date
Nov 29, 2025


 Even as he leverages his presidency to make himself millions, perhaps even billions of dollars, Donald Trump is also funneling Republican donor money into his own cash registers through the political committees he controls.

In the 10 months since he retook office, the Republican National Committee has spent at least $796,513 at Trump’s hotels and country clubs, while MAGA Inc., Trump’s super PAC, has spent $60,733, according to a HuffPost analysis of Federal Election Commission data.

The figures are based on filings to date, with some committees providing updates only twice a year. The total number for 2025 will not be disclosed until the end of January 2026.

The combined $857,246 represents just under four-fifths of the $1.1 million that the Republican candidate and committees spent at his properties.

The RNC, for example, spent $193,145.70 on March 5 to hold an event at Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s country club and residence in Palm Beach, Florida. Two months later, on May 2, the committee spent $307,202.49 for an event at his golf resort in Doral, near Miami’s airport.
And it is all perfectly legal... even though he charges exorbitant rates to rent his properties!
In all, 73 different GOP candidates and committees sent money Trump’s way, from $45.20 from Wyoming congresswoman Harriett Hageman’s campaign to $1,461.13 by the Massachusetts Republican Party to the five- and six-figure sums spent by MAGA Inc. and the RNC.

Directing committees that he controlled, and encouraging Republican candidates he did not, to spend at his properties — thereby putting all profits into his own pockets — was a strategy he also used in his first term in office.
Trump is raking in the dough!

World's AIDS Day

On this World's AIDS day I asked ChatGPT AI to write about AIDS and the White House announcement...
When Disease Becomes Political: The Cost of Silence on HIV/AIDS

Diseases aren’t political, but the way governments respond to them is. When leaders ignore or minimize a public-health issue, the consequences go far beyond symbolism. The White House’s decision to no longer recognize World AIDS Day is a striking example of how political silence can fuel real harm.

HIV has long been tied to stigma, especially against LGBTQ+ communities. When the government pulls back from acknowledging the disease, it reinforces old myths — including the false idea that HIV is a “gay disease.” This feels especially painful given the history of neglect during the early AIDS crisis, when stigma cost thousands of lives.

Silence also reduces public awareness. Without official recognition of World AIDS Day, fewer people are reminded to get tested or learn the facts. Undiagnosed HIV spreads more easily, often because people don’t realize they’re at risk. Awareness isn’t symbolic; it’s a prevention tool.

Stigma grows, too. People who fear judgment are less likely to seek testing or treatment. People outside LGBTQ+ communities may falsely believe they’re immune. Both of these patterns help the virus spread.

The effects extend globally. U.S. leadership has long shaped international HIV treatment and prevention. When the government seems to withdraw from even symbolic recognition, it raises fears of weakening support, which could disrupt lifesaving programs worldwide.

HIV is a virus we have the tools to control. What threatens progress isn’t biology — it’s silence, stigma, and political choices. When the White House no longer recognizes World AIDS Day, the virus gains ground. Public-health neglect doesn’t stay symbolic; it becomes deadly
What I did was give the AI a little guideline World AIDs, the White House, and the effects of that action of not recognizing World's AIDS Day anymore, told it to write an essay on the two and this is what it came up with.

Sunday, November 30, 2025

Shoot The Bas***ds!

It has been reported that the Secretary of Defense ordered the troop to shoot a survivor of an attack on a "drug-boat"
National Review
By Jeffrey Blehar
November 29, 2025


The secretary of war’s alleged order that led to drug boat–strike survivors’ being killed appears to be a violation of the norms of warfare.

When the Democratic Party released a video — featuring Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona along with five other Democratic lawmakers — solemnly telling our enlisted men and women that they had the right and responsibility to “refuse illegal orders,” my first reaction was to roll my eyes at what I assumed was the cynical “Resistance” theater of it all. My second was to think it a bad idea to encourage low-level soldiers and sailors to start venturing uninformed opinions about what was or was not an illegal order.

[...]

But now you sort of have to wonder: Were Mark Kelly and others reacting to a rumor they might have heard? Marking their position in advance, waiting for another shoe to drop? Because it’s either that or they got stupidly, stupendously lucky in their timing. Right now they look eerily prescient, as we head into what by rights should be a huge scandal, one which would have serious consequences in any just world. (Note my hedge.)
But now you have to wonder what triggered Hegseth going off the deep end?  You know that was like calling in the nuclear option... courts marshal someone out the military for over who has been out of the military for about 14 years? Yes, it has been done before... for rapists and murderers, but never for political reasons!
But yesterday the Washington Post broke the news that back in September, when the Trump administration launched that first strike, Hegseth was apparently very concerned about theater himself: For this opening salvo, Hegseth wanted a show of brute force emphasizing “lethality” (his favorite buzzword). To that end he issued a bloodthirsty command: “Kill everybody.” I’ll let the Post pick it up from there:

A missile screamed off the Trinidad coast, striking the vessel and igniting a blaze from bow to stern. For minutes, commanders watched the boat burning on a live drone feed. As the smoke cleared, they got a jolt: Two survivors were clinging to the smoldering wreck.
That statement by Hegseth might have just earned him a trip to the  Hague and to the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court.
The Special Operations commander overseeing the Sept. 2 attack — the opening salvo in the Trump administration’s war on suspected drug traffickers in the Western Hemisphere — ordered a second strike to comply with Hegseth’s instructions, two people familiar with the matter said. The two men were blown apart in the water.

It is important to note that Hegseth has not denied the story, and instead all but conceded it last night on Twitter. He opened with a typical blanket declaration that “[a]s usual, the fake news is delivering more fabricated, inflammatory, and derogatory reporting to discredit our incredible warriors fighting to protect the homeland.” And then he went on to affirm his belief in “lethal, kinetic strikes” and make the farcical — and intentionally untestable — claim that “[e]very trafficker we kill is affiliated with a Designated Terrorist Organization.” This of course is impossible to prove, but even more to the point: Trump designated these organizations as terrorists only five days ago. (You cannot make something like this go away by passing a law to change a legal definition, and especially not ex post facto!)
That is in direct violation of military law! West Point's Lieber Institute writes;
 The U.S. Army Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School instructs on international protections for the wounded and sick, one of the many aspects of the Geneva Conventions emphasized to both seasoned and new military lawyers. One focus of instruction is to determine when a wounded soldier ought to be recognized as hors de combat (“out of the fight”) and therefore, can no longer be made the object of attack. To that end, we expose judge advocates to the First Geneva Convention (GC I), Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions (AP I), and the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) Law of War Manual. Within the Law of War Manual, judge advocates review a section on hors de combat which observes, “In order to receive protection as hors de combat, the person must be wholly disabled from fighting” (§ 5.9.4).
Clinging to a sinking boat I think would meet that definition!



But at the same time as this was happening the Secretary of Defense is going after Sen. Mark Kelly over saying that servicemembers should only obey lawful orders.

Now stop and think for a moment what Hegseth said. That soldiers should obey unlawful orders! And now he wants to courts marshal Sen. Kelly.
SF Gate
By KONSTANTIN TOROPIN and BEN FINLEY, Associated Press
Nov 24, 2025


The Pentagon announced Monday it is investigating Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona over possible breaches of military law after the former Navy pilot joined a handful of other lawmakers in a video that called for troops to defy “illegal orders.”

The Pentagon’s statement, posted on social media, cited a federal law that allows retired service members to be recalled to active duty on orders of the defense secretary for possible court martial or other measures.

It is extraordinary for the Pentagon, which until President Donald Trump's second term had usually gone out of its way to act and appear apolitical, to directly threaten a sitting member of Congress with investigation. It comes after Trump ramped up the rhetoric by accusing the lawmakers of sedition “punishable by DEATH” in a social media post days after the video was released last week.
You know that was like calling in the nuclear option... courts marshal someone out the military for over who has been out of the military for about 14 years? Yes, it has been done before... for rapists and murderers, but never for political reasons!

And take a look at this plaque at West Point...


Two things... the first Hegseth was in the military and should know this! Second; what type of military is Hegseth building if he is promoting officers who put party loyalty ahead of the Constitution?

Lunacy! Or Crazy Like A Fox?

Trump's latest deranged rant is about Biden and "The Autopen Caper" with zero evidence Trump wants to go after former president Biden for perjury!
November 28, 2025


President Donald Trump has announced that all orders signed by former President Joe Biden via autopen are "null and void," and that if Biden tried to argue that he was involved, he would be charged with perjury.

The president posted on his social media platform Truth Social on Friday: "Any document signed by Sleepy Joe Biden with the Autopen, which was approximately 92% of them, is hereby terminated, and of no further force or effect. The Autopen is not allowed to be used if approval is not specifically given by the President of the United States. The Radical Left Lunatics circling Biden around the beautiful Resolute Desk in the Oval Office took the Presidency away from him. I am hereby cancelling all Executive Orders, and anything else that was not directly signed by Crooked Joe Biden, because the people who operated the Autopen did so illegally. Joe Biden was not involved in the Autopen process and, if he says he was, he will be brought up on charges of perjury. Thank you for your attention to this matter!"
I think Trump's use of the autopen should be looked into because of "Trump Derangement Syndrome" (TDS)... it is starting to mean that he sees and hears things that are not there.
The president seemed to be arguing that the autopen was used by his staff without the input of Biden. It's not clear who will validate the orders or under what legal authority he will cancel Biden's orders.

Using the autopen is legal, according to an investigation in 2005 by the Justice Department under former President George W. Bush, which found that "the President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill to sign it within the meaning of Article I, Section 7."
This is just typical Trump distraction, and it is recycled from this spring.
AP News
By  DARLENE SUPERVILLE
March 17, 2025


President Donald Trump claimed Monday that pardons recently issued by Joe Biden to lawmakers and staff on the congressional committee that investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot have no force because, Trump says, the-then president signed them with an autopen instead of by his own hand.

“In other words, Joe Biden did not sign them but, more importantly, he did not know anything about them!” Trump wrote on his social media site. Trump didn’t offer any evidence to support his claims. Nor did the White House.

Trump asserted in his all-caps post that the pardons are void and have no effect in his estimation. But presidents have broad authority to pardon or commute the sentences of whomever they please, the Constitution doesn’t specify that pardons must be in writing and autopen signatures have been used before for substantive actions by presidents.
Oh, look over there... not here! And of course, his cult followers believe him and not the facts.

And of course, the cult media got into line behind Trump with the lies!
The Oversight Project at the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank recently said its analysis of thousands of pages of documents bearing Biden’s signature found that most were by autopen, including pardons. Conservative media have amplified the claims, which have been picked up by Trump. He has commented for several days running about Biden’s autopen use.

Mike Howell, the project’s executive director, said in an interview that his team is scrutinizing Biden’s pardons because that power lies only with the president under the Constitution and can’t be delegated to another person or a machine. Howell said some of Biden’s pardon papers also specify they were signed in Washington on days when he was elsewhere.
That is one of those "Yeah, so? all the modern presidents have done that!
There is no law governing a president’s use of an autopen.

A 2005 opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel at the Justice Department said an autopen can be used to sign legislation. Barack Obama became the first president to do so in May 2011 when he signed an extension of the Patriot Act. Obama was in France on official business and, with time running out before the law expired, he authorized use of the autopen to sign it into law.

Much earlier guidance on pardons was sent in 1929 from the solicitor general — the attorney who argues for the United States before the Supreme Court — to the attorney general. It says “neither the Constitution nor any statute prescribes the method by which executive clemency shall be exercised or evidenced.”
So "Where's the beef?"

The UPI articles ends with...
Biden has denied that any decisions were made without him during his presidency.

"I made the decisions during my presidency," Biden said in a statement. "I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false."
Everyone knows that. What is Trump harping on this for? What is he trying to hide?

Saturday, November 29, 2025

Don't Go Out Of Your Way.

This doesn't fit the Cuckoo Award criteria but... It still deserves the award for the indifference. You know Donald it might be on a golf day, so you know you don't really have to go.
Army Specialist Sarah Beckstrom was shot and killed in the attack in Washington, D.C.
The Daily Beast
By Janna Brancolini
Nov. 28 2025


President Donald Trump responded to a question about whether he will attend the funeral of a National Guard member killed in Washington, D.C., by bragging about his electoral success in her home state.

[...]


Asked Thursday if he plans to attend Beckstrom’s funeral, Trump said he “hadn’t given it any thought, but it sounds like something I could do.”

“I love West Virginia,” he said from his Mar-a-Lago resort of Beckstrom’s home state. “You know, I won West Virginia by one of the biggest margins of any president anywhere. These are great people. I love the people of West Virginia.”
Um... Donald, I don't know how to tell you this, but this isn't about you. It is about a soldier who got killed because of your orders, you sent them there... you are their commanding officer! Don't you think it will be nice if you went.
Trump said Thursday he had learned Beckstrom had succumbed to her injuries. He called her a “highly respected, young, magnificent person” who was “outstanding in every way” before launching into an attack on his predecessor Joe Biden.
Ah... do you really think that this is the time for politic?

I know that in the past you called military personnel "Suckers and losers" but you know this person and another is in critical condition on your orders... you really should go.

Saturday 9: Thank You Girl

Saturday 9: Thank You Girl (1964)
On Saturdays I take a break from the heavy stuff and have some fun… 
Unfamiliar with this week's tune? Hear it here.

1) Who were you talking to the last time you said, "thank you?"
The clerk at the grocery store.

2) Paul McCartney recalls that "Thank You Girl" was inspired by all the female fans who had written them fan letters, pledging undying love. Have you ever written a fan letter? If yes, did you receive a response?
Nope, never did. I think that you need to be a fan first, and I’m not a fan of any celebratory, if I did write a “fan letter” it wouldn’t be to an actor or sports figure, it would probably to someone like Neil deGrasse Tyson.

3) Recording engineer Geoff Emerick remembered that John Lennon was easily winded while recording this song. John had a bad cold and went back to bed when they were done for the day. We're in cold/flu season right now. How are you feeling?
Backache from sitting so long in a chair at Thanksgiving.

4) "Thank You Girl" is this week's song because November 27 was Thanksgiving. What are you thankful for this year?
Well so far my New Year’s resolution is coming true which I am thankful for… since my New Year resolution was to make it to next year.

5) While the big meal is referred to as Thanksgiving dinner, most Americans enjoy it earlier than they usually serve dinner. 3:00 PM is the most popular time for the holiday feast. When did you have dinner on Thursday?
At around 2ish, 

6) Cranberry sauce has been a Thanksgiving staple since the late 1800s. Was it on your menu this year?
It was but they forgot to put it out and the table.

7) The Thanksgiving Turducken is said to have originated in New Orleans. Chef Paul Prudhomme is often cited as the first to stuff a deboned chicken into a deboned duck into a deboned turkey. Prudhomme's recipe has more than 85 individual steps and takes a full day to prepare. Did you face any challenges while cooking your Thursday dinner?
Nope, my contribution was Corn Pudding.

8) Leftovers are popular after Thanksgiving, especially turkey sandwiches. Some cooks recommend serving cold, sliced turkey on wheat bread, but white bread, pitas and flatbread are also popular. When you head into the kitchen to make a sandwich, what's your go-to bread?
Artisan bread. I buy it at a local farm orchard store.

9) The day after Thanksgiving is known as Black Friday, the unofficial start of the holiday shopping season and sales. Black Friday got its name in Philadelphia back in the 1950s to describe the traffic clogging both highways and side streets as consumers raced out in search of bargains. When is the last time you were stuck in traffic?
 Um… you do know that I go to Cape Cod all the time. And that the entire Cape has only two bridges to get on or off the Cape. And if you didn’t guess… there is just about always a traffic jam around the bridges for the Cape,

Friday, November 28, 2025

How Deep Their Hatred Of Us Goes

You can tell how deep these “born again” Christians think a woman’s place is—in the kitchen and not in the military. They cling to an Ernest Hemingway–style, hyper-romanticized view of masculinity.

This is how pitiful the Secretary of Defense is. The Daily Mail writes;
Pete Hegseth is set to cut ties between the Pentagon and the Boy Scouts over their promotion of diversity, equity and inclusion and taking 'boy' out of its name.

The organization changed its name to Scouting America last year, which was criticized with Hegseth calling it a 'genderless' attack on 'boy-friendly spaces' in leaked documents. 

'The organization once endorsed by President Theodore Roosevelt no longer supports the future of American boys,' Hegseth said, according to NPR.
He sees this as a direct attack on masculinity! Never mind the fact that the Boy Scouts were going bankrupt and hope that this change will revive them.
Scouting America told The Advocate that its "values have not changed" even after the U.S. military threatened to sever ties.
The Advocate
By Ryan Adamczeski
November 25 2025


The U.S. military intends to sever ties with Scouting America, formerly the Boy Scouts of America, citing its decision to change its name in an effort to be more inclusive.

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth accused the group of trying to "attack boy-friendly spaces" when it made the decision to become "genderless" in a leaked memo to Congress obtained by NPR. The memo, which has not yet been sent, calls for the Department of Defense to withdraw medical and logistical assistance during the group's National Jamboree, an event with over 20,000 attendees, and to bar Scout troops from military installations.

The memo claims that the group has been promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion, with Hegseth writing, "The organization once endorsed by President Theodore Roosevelt no longer supports the future of American boys."

A spokesperson for Scouting America told The Advocate that it is "surprised and disappointed by today’s news about the potential policy change," especially given that "the Scouting movement has had a strong relationship with our nation’s military going back more than a century."
Imagine that! Opening their doors to everyone, Hegseth thinks, is discriminatory! He still thinks of the Scouts as being like the cover folder—a little miniature version of the army.

This is what set Hegseth off in a hissy fit:
The BSA formally banned gay and bisexual Scouts and leaders in 1978, and that would not change until 2014, when it lifted the ban against gay and bi youth members, and 2015, when it decided to allow gay and bi adult leaders. The group announced that it would accept girls and transgender boys in 2017.
The Hill writes that,
Republican Rep. Glenn Thompson (Pa.), the Congressional Scouting Caucus’s House co-chair, called Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s proposal to cut ties with Scouting America “nearsighted” in a statement to The Hill. 

“As co-chair of the bipartisan Congressional Scouting Caucus, I can think of no better recruitment tool for our military than the lessons acquired through Scouting,” he said. “It would be nearsighted to uproot this decades long partnership.”

[...]

Hegseth reportedly criticized the organization for being “genderless” and promoting diversity, equity and inclusion principles in the memo, which has not yet been sent to lawmakers.
And that is the cardinal sin: the new Scouts do not fit Hegseth’s romanticized, masculinized image of the Scouts.

The Rest Of The Story

Last week I wrote about the "Rest of the Story" in the aftermath of the raid on the Chicago apartment building, today it is the award Barney Franks got. My guess the trans community doesn't think so, our memories of being stabbed in the back long.
The former Massachusetts congressman praised California U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters for her decades of LGBTQ+ allyship at a recent PFLAG awards ceremony.
The Advocate
By Christopher Wiggins
November 20 2025


With LGBTQ+ people facing intensifying political hostility, PFLAG National gathered about 100 supporters Tuesday evening at the American Federation of Teachers headquarters in Washington, D.C., for its annual “Love Takes Justice” reception. Former Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank, a gay political icon, made a rare public appearance to celebrate a friend he knew from his time in Congress.

This year’s honoree was Congresswoman Maxine Waters, the California Democrat, who received the PFLAG National Champion of Justice Award. The honor places Waters in a lineage that includes the late Georgia Rep. John Lewis; Wisconsin Sen. Tammy Baldwin; then-Rep., now Colorado Gov. Jared Polis; former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi; and fellow Californian Rep. Barbara Lee, who received last year’s award during a gathering on Capitol Hill. That event, held in September, before the 2024 election, also honored AFT President Randi Weingarten with the PFLAG National Flag Bearer Award for her work on inclusive education and opposition to book bans.
But we remember! We don't forget getting stabbed in the back.
Frank, 85, took the stage with the mix of wit, political clarity, and historical memory that has made him one of the movement’s most enduring voices. Sitting in a wheelchair with an oxygen tank, he began by thanking PFLAG “for the enormous good work you do,” joking about aging, “losing a body part here for the last few years,” and quipping that he would likely outlive “two of the things that have sustained me for most of my life — newspapers and my spine.” But his humor was the prelude to a deeper assessment of the political alliances that have shaped LGBTQ+ rights for decades.
Frank drove the knife in and twisted it!

In 2007 I went down to Washington DC to lobby in favor of the gender inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA). Everyone was so lovey dovey, but one lone voice said... watch out for the HRC!


You see after that speech Frank withdrew us from the bill and the HRC changed their position on the non-inclusive bill to approving the bill without out is included. Frank twisted the knife by saying that we haven't earn the right to be on the bill! 

He said, "We’d make even more progress if the transgender community was willing to do the hard political work. And not, frankly, think they can just talk a few leaders into handing this to them.” 

However back in 1994 Phyllis Frye and Karen Kerin went to Washington, D.C., to attempt to speak before the Senate Hearings on ENDA.

We have a long memory.

Thursday, November 27, 2025

405 Years Ago (Part II)

They say history is written by the victors, but sometimes it is rewritten, and rewritten. The latest rewrite occurred in the 1950s.
Time
By OLIVIA B. WAXMAN 
November 21, 2019


On a recent Saturday morning in Washington, D.C., about two dozen secondary-and-elementary-school teachers experienced a role reversal. This time, it was their turn to take a quiz: answer “true” or “false” for 14 statements about the famous meal known as the “First Thanksgiving.”

Did the people many of us know as pilgrims call themselves Separatists? Did the famous meal last three days? True and true, they shouted loudly in unison. Were the pilgrims originally heading for New Jersey? False.

But some of the other statements drew long pauses, or the soft murmurs of people nervous about saying the wrong thing in front of a group. Renée Gokey, Teacher Services Coordinator at the National Museum of the American Indian and a member of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, waited patiently for them to respond. The teachers at this Nov. 9 workshop on “Rethinking Thanksgiving in Your Classroom” were there to learn a better way to teach the Thanksgiving story to their students, but first, they had some studying to do. When Gokey explained that early days of thanks celebrated the burning of a Pequot village in 1637, and the killing of Wampanoag leader Massasoit’s son, attendees gasped audibly.

[…]

But some of the other statements drew long pauses, or the soft murmurs of people nervous about saying the wrong thing in front of a group. Renée Gokey, Teacher Services Coordinator at the National Museum of the American Indian and a member of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, waited patiently for them to respond. The teachers at this Nov. 9 workshop on “Rethinking Thanksgiving in Your Classroom” were there to learn a better way to teach the Thanksgiving story to their students, but first, they had some studying to do. When Gokey explained that early days of thanks celebrated the burning of a Pequot village in 1637, and the killing of Wampanoag leader Massasoit’s son, attendees gasped audibly.
But when you tread on history you have to walk lightly because some people hold on to tradition and don’t like the facts.
What really happened back in the fall of 1621 is documented in only two primary sources from colonists’ perspectives. Edward Winslow’s account of the bountiful harvest and the three-day feast with the Wampanoag people runs a measly six sentences, and Plymouth Colony Governor William Bradford’s later account is about the same length—evidence, argues historian Peter C. Mancall, that neither colonial leader considered the event worth more than a paragraph. As Plymouth became part of Massachusetts and Puritans gave way to the Founding Fathers, nobody thought much about that moment. When George Washington declared a national day of Thanksgiving in 1789, his proclamation of gratefulness made no mention of anything related to what happened in Plymouth. Then, around 1820, a Philadelphia antiquarian named Alexander Young found Winslow’s account. He republished it in his 1841 Chronicles of the Pilgrim Fathers, with a fateful footnote: “This was the first Thanksgiving, the harvest festival of New England.”
Let us wave the Red, White, and Blue… this is what makes us great! We have Thanksgiving! Lets have parades and marching bands dressed up like Yankee-doodle, pumpkin pie and turkey dinners with all the fixings!
But that’s not what was included in the classroom materials about Thanksgiving that began to be developed in the wake of Lincoln’s proclamation, especially between the 1890s and 1920s, according to former Plimoth Plantation historian James W. Baker’s Thanksgiving: The Biography of an American Holiday. The settlers were re-branded the “pilgrims.” An 1889 novel Standish of Standish: A Story of the Pilgrims by Jane G. Austin, which described “The First Thanksgiving of New England” as an outdoor feast, became a best-seller. In 1897, an illustration by W.L. Taylor of a meal like the one Austin described accompanied a piece in Ladies Home Journal that was presented as a factual article about the first Thanksgiving; thanks in part to the growth of the advertising industry at this time, variations of this image spread quickly.
In 1941 Thanksgiving was made a national holiday. Before then it was celebrated at different days in November. The National Archives writes;
To end the confusion, Congress decided to set a fixed-date for the Thanksgiving holiday. On October 6, 1941, the House passed a joint resolution declaring the last Thursday in November to be the legal Thanksgiving Day. 

The Senate amended the resolution establishing the holiday as the fourth Thursday, which would take into account those years when November has five Thursdays. The House agreed to the amendment, and President Roosevelt signed the resolution on December 26, 1941, establishing the fourth Thursday in November as the federal Thanksgiving Day holiday. The law went into effect the following year.
And so the Christmas shopping season was created!

*****

A heartwarming 1950s holiday film about the virtues of capitalism
The Atlantic
By Kathy Gilsinan
November 26, 2014


The Johnsons, a fictional Midwestern family, are in for a letdown one Thanksgiving in the 1950s. Expenses were high the previous month, and while the kids are getting stoked for turkey, it falls to their mom to tell them the truth: There will be no turkey this year. Little Tommy is incredulous: "No turkey for Thanksgiving?" Dick, the oldest, notes that everyone else on the block will have a turkey. "A fat lot we're gonna have to be thankful for," he sulks.

[…]

A Day of Thanksgiving came out in 1951, in the context of the early Cold War, with American troops battling communists in Korea and Senator Joseph McCarthy kicking his investigations of suspected American communists into high gear. As such, the film extolls the virtues of capitalist democracy—even, as in the Johnsons' case, when you can't afford turkey. After all, Thanksgiving, as O. Henry pointed out at the turn of the 20th century, "is the one day of the year that is purely American." And America, per Mr. Johnson, is a set of freedoms and privileges that, by the 1950s, has produced abundance beyond the pilgrims' imaginings. "Do you know," Johnson asks his kids, "that there are some places in the world today where you have to get along without just about everything else" besides life itself?
Without Thanksgiving what would Norman Rockwell have to paint? Without Thanksgiving what would Macy's do?

Of all magazines to write about Thanksgiving, Science News had an interesting take on it.
Memory often favors a tidy narrative over the messier reality of history
By Sujata Gupta
Social Sciences Writer
November 21, 2023


Ask someone in the United States to name five events important to the country’s foundation and there’s a good chance they’ll mention the Pilgrims.

That’s what researchers found a few years ago when they put that question to some 2,000 people. The Revolutionary War, Declaration of Independence, Christopher Columbus’ “discovery” of the Americas and the Civil War topped the list. But coming in seventh place were the Pilgrims, the team reported in 2022 in Memory Studies.

The “Thanksgiving myth” is part of that tale, says coauthor and cognitive psychologist Henry Roediger, also at Washington University. The shorthand for that story, he says, goes like this: In 1621, the Pilgrims and Native Americans “had this peaceful meal and powwow [while] singing kumbaya.”

The two groups did engage in a peaceful harvest celebration in the fall of 1621, history suggests. But historians are quick to point out that the tidy tale ignores context, particularly the deadly diseases and bloody wars that devastated Indigenous populations both before and after the occasion.

[…]

Origin stories like the Thanksgiving one are particularly sticky as they underpin a group’s raison d’être. Fixing or changing the story risks muddying the plot and tearing apart the group, says Van Engen. “The Pilgrims just become right for telling [the] stories … that we want to tell about ourselves.”

[...]

But scholars are starting to grapple with how nations should contend with difficult pasts. “How do you keep a strong national identity and patriotism while at the same time acknowledging the more negative aspects of your history?” Roediger asks. The answer, as evidenced by increasing calls for racial reckonings in the United States and elsewhere, is very much a work in progress.
We must learn from the past! Not only from our roots but from global history, especial from the events in Europe in the 1920s and 1930s.
For that 1621 Thanksgiving, the complex historic arc goes like this. Up to 90 percent of the Wampanoag population had died from an epidemic brought by a previous wave of European explorers by the time the Pilgrims arrived in December 1620 in what’s now Massachusetts. The weakened community faced threats from an encroaching neighboring tribe. Meanwhile, the Pilgrims, unaccustomed to the new environment and climate, were dying of starvation and disease.
That got the right-wingers howling and started this whole “Woke” business.

The right-wingers picture Thanksgiving as “over the river and through the woods to grandma’s house...” and anyone who tampers with their fantasies watch out.
My thoughts:
Thanksgiving is a rough holiday for some and we have to keep that in mind, for the “haves” it is family, a table overflowing with food, and laughter. For the “have-nots” it can be a lonely time, it can be a time famine and empty plates. We need to be aware of these two diametrical opposites.


Thanksgiving might have been created with an ulterior motive to unify the country and build patriotism but it has warped into something else a time to be with family. But the harvest celebrations are found throughout history and in all different cultures.

So enjoy your leftovers. (That is also part of the tradition)