What Gets Me.

There is a man,

He sells Bibles!
He doesn’t attend mass… But that doesn’t matter!
He has had three wives… But that doesn’t matter!
He cheated on the three wives… But that doesn’t matter!
He has children from each of the wives… But that doesn’t matter!
He lies… But that doesn’t matter!
He steals… But that doesn’t matter!
He swears… But that doesn’t matter!
He is anti-gay and trans… He’s our man!

While there is a woman,

Goes to mass regularly… But that doesn’t matter!
She has been married to the same man for 10 years… But that doesn’t matter!
Her children are from the same husban… But that doesn’t matter!
She doesn’t lie… But that doesn’t matter!
She doesn’t steal… But that doesn’t matter!
She doesn’t swear… But that doesn’t matter!
She isn’t anti-gay and trans… But he is the anti-Christ, we’re not voting for him!

 

Vote Blue and end this insanity!

I’m voting for the woman with Integrity, Honor, & Character

---

It brought attention to them!

Newspaper non-endorsements at Washington Post, LA Times fit a trend, but their readers aren’t happy

AP News

By  DAVID BAUDER

October 29, 2024

The number of newspapers endorsing a candidate for president has dwindled with the industry’s financial troubles the past two decades, in part because owners reason that it makes no sense to alienate some subscribers by taking a clear stand in a politically polarizing time.

Yet in the past week, The Washington Post and Los Angeles Times have angered readers for precisely the opposite reason: by choosing not to select a favored candidate.

The fallout from both decisions continued Monday, with Post owner Jeff Bezos taking the unusual step of publicly defending the move in the columns of his own paper. Three members of the Post’s editorial board resigned their positions and some journalists pleaded with readers to not express their disapproval by canceling subscriptions. Many thousands have already done so.

You know that they shot themselves in the foot. No one paid any attention to news media endorsements but now everyone is focused on them.

By announcing their decisions within two weeks of Election Day, however, the newspapers left themselves vulnerable to criticism that their publishers were trying not to anger Republican Donald Trump if voters returned him to power. “It looked like they were not making a principled decision,” said John Woolley, co-director of the American Presidency Project at the University of California-Santa Barbara.